Topic: The ban was a mistake. I need admin’s attention - page 5. (Read 3606 times)

As long as the new ban bot is concerned that is the one which is responsible for the current bans, I think a small modification in the code should satisfy that condition. Like the bot creator can check if the copied posts are written in 2017 or less and the count of copy-pasted posts is > 2.

      Unfortunately, Hero+ accounts sell for a premium, so people can get in good sig campaigns and sling their sig all over the place. Also, I'm not sure that we can expect a moderator to sift through an account's post history to see what the extent of the plagiarism truly is. I suspect that tvplus may have other copy paste posts, since suchmoon exposed that he was prone to copy/paste a quick answer. Also, I believe suchmoon revealed that with the tools that she uses, searching through a post history is much more difficult than just going through a shitty megathread and finding hits.

I'm not really in support for the ban for users who are above Hero+ and have 1 or maximum 2 posts copy-pasted. Like in terms of signature gains, how much they would have made copying the two posts? If the posts are from 2017 and less then they should be given another chance instead of a perma-ban. It's sad to see a legendary member getting banned for copying one post in 2016.

Could be, but it's also not uncommon for plagiarists to try to stay on topic by copying something from earlier in the thread.

All the more reason for this user to be given a temporary posting ban and a signature ban for 2 years. Recently they have become a net positive for the forum and I don't think we should banish this user to the dog house forever.

Meh, tvplus just was answering a noob's question and parroted what the OP had answered to another user. I think the intent was to be useful rather than upping their post count for financial gain.

Better now?

Since it appears that the results are inconclusive

Spreadsheet is under updation and will be public once the stake calculation will be completed.
Signature stakes have already been updated so participants may remove their signature.
Please be patient and try not to ask for access in the meantime.

[...]
Spreadsheet is under updation and will be public once the stake calculation will be completed.
Signature stakes have already been updated so participants may remove their signature.
Please be patient and try not to ask for access in the meantime.

If not for plagiarism, your account may be banned for low-quality posts as most of your old posts are just bounty-related stuff. You started finding scams and other detective work very recently for which you got most of the merits. I could be wrong though.

Moderators are not bound to reply to such threads, they do it out of their choice. If you're that curious, maybe you should open OP's profile and look for plagiarised posts?

I don't know what it's for as there's no handled reports in the queue but I'm guessing it was probably for plagiarism.

Moderators replied on almost all of ban appeal thread and reply the reason of ban. But wondering why moderators are silent on "tvplus006" case. At least we could see the plagiarism post that OP got ban for. We can't judge before know the mistakes. So we want to know what was the post/mistake ?

OP should edit title with, "Ban by mistake" and mention admin. So other moderators and admin will check your account.

In my opinion @ tvplus006, is prohibited because the Post is 100% identical. Plagiarism
I'm sure the @ tvplus006 account was blocked based on this report:

I don't know what it's for as there's no handled reports in the queue but I'm guessing it was probably for plagiarism.

Moderators replied on almost all of ban appeal thread and reply the reason of ban. But wondering why moderators are silent on "tvplus006" case. At least we could see the plagiarism post that OP got ban for. We can't judge before know the mistakes. So we want to know what was the post/mistake ?

Harris Pay.
Dear, colleagues

I want to introduce you to a table with the new AirDrop and Bounty programs, which are on bitcointalk.
This is not the first table which is posted on a forum, but definitely not least. But I want to believe that it will find its admirers, which will help with finding new bounty.
It’s not a secret, that new Bounty programs need to be taken from thread:
Bitcoin Forum > Alternate cryptocurrencies > Marketplace (Altcoins) > Bounties (Altcoins)
Of course they are not posted in the same order in my table. Before getting something similar, you will have to filter through some rubbish and only then you will find the new program itself. The ones who have done it, will understand what I mean.
So, I have created this draft work, filtering through the rubbish. Everything that I have found, I have put in the table according to days of the week. The only thing that you will have to do is choose program, which suits you best.
In this table, not only programs which are led by famous managers are gathered, but also those who lead bounty for the first time. And if everyone understands about the first ones, I will talk about the second.
There are many campaigns, which do not hire local managers, but lead them by themselves. As a rule, they have the rank Cooper Member, and their name corresponds to the name of their bounty program. That is why I included them in the table.
The following ICO Bench rating in the table is set at the start of a bounty campaign. To get more accurate value, you should follow a link, which will get you to the page of a campaign in the rating, since the value is re-counted every couple of hours.
P.S. please, do not take the following table as a recommendation, but as a helping hand with choosing bounty.
I will be glad to receive your comments and critical remarks.

THE TABLE OF NEW BOUNTIES, which will make you happy.
*you can stimulate regular updating of the table with the help of +Merit or any kind wor

Why don't you just continue this unban appeal here https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/unban-appeal-tvplus006-5143666 created by your friend? Someone already posted the reason why you've been banned.

Nah, it would not. Another thread generated by community,  not by banned user. Forum allow you to create a thread by supporting a person if you think that any person deserve unban or temp ban.

I’m pretty sure that would be considered “ban evading”; banned users can create ONE appeal thread and only post on that thread. Having a discussion somewhere else isn’t allowed.

If you think that a ban should be ended, make your case in a new topic from a "good for the forum as a whole" perspective.