OK - looks like miners colluded (intention) down to about 90% and choose SW2x - question: what have nodes to do now ?
Wait until SegWit is locked in.
Topic: The Barry Silbert segwit2x agreement with >80% miner support. - page 13. (Read 120014 times)
OK - looks like miners colluded (intention) down to about 90% and choose SW2x - question: what have nodes to do now ?
Wait until SegWit is locked in.
OK - looks like miners colluded (intention) down to about 90% and choose SW2x - question: what have nodes to do now ?
there's is now so much going on with all the different BIPS and UAHFs cam someone simply state what I am now supporting with bitcoincore 14.2?
I have tried to keep up reading but the developments are now that many getting close to July 31st that I don't half e the feeling I am still in charge about all the different news occurring.
I have tried to keep up reading but the developments are now that many getting close to July 31st that I don't half e the feeling I am still in charge about all the different news occurring.
so this what will happen, it's really becoming a mess https://image.ibb.co/gh1wxv/Bitcoin_flowchart_2017.png
is it true that some miners are already mining the new fork or something?
No. The only evidence of mining activity is everyone switching to a BIP91 compatible client.is it true that some miners are already mining the new fork or something?
Does anyone have links or information concerning the supposed large number of BIP91 renditions? Is there really a possibility that some might be more inclusive of the 2x portion of segwit 2x and others do not have that 2x portion in their code?
so this what will happen, it's really becoming a mess https://image.ibb.co/gh1wxv/Bitcoin_flowchart_2017.png
is it true that some miners are already mining the new fork or something?
No. The only evidence of mining activity is everyone switching to a BIP91 compatible client.is it true that some miners are already mining the new fork or something?
Does anyone have links or information concerning the supposed large number of BIP91 renditions? Is there really a possibility that some might be more inclusive of the 2x portion of segwit 2x and others do not have that 2x portion in their code?
"476325 BU 20000000 Bitcoin.com �D /pool.bitcoin.com/BIP100/B8/NYA/ /EB1/AD6/��,��� C,�k�"
HA!
Oh Roger Ver, you funny guy!
HA!
Oh Roger Ver, you funny guy! BIP91 blocks are at 52.1% now. I lol so hard at the BU blocks. Why? Why oh why! -edit- looks like the BU blocks are slowly dying so whoever was running BU nodes is slowly migrating.
.... what's about the 2x later this year. Do you care? Do core care?
I don't know if Core cares, but I for sure don't. I don't necessarily want the block size increase for now, just segwit. However I do realize that all the signatory parties to the NYC agreement promised they will hard fork later. I would assume they will keep their word, but we shall see. Just please not the Bitcoin ABC monstrosity!
Would there be a UAHF on August 1?
1. UAHF on August 1.
2. Segwit2x hard fork by November.
This UAHF wouldn't fork the complete network, right? Miners could opt to mine on BCC (altcoin) chain.
This is a bit confusing, why go through the whole Segwit2x drama when they still want to deploy UAHF? Maybe because they know there wouldn't be a majority for the hard fork on November?
https://medium.com/@ViaBTC/statement-on-bitcoin-user-activated-hard-fork-6e7aebb67e67
There won't be a UAHF because segwit will get activated before then. 1. UAHF on August 1.
2. Segwit2x hard fork by November.
This UAHF wouldn't fork the complete network, right? Miners could opt to mine on BCC (altcoin) chain.
This is a bit confusing, why go through the whole Segwit2x drama when they still want to deploy UAHF? Maybe because they know there wouldn't be a majority for the hard fork on November?
https://medium.com/@ViaBTC/statement-on-bitcoin-user-activated-hard-fork-6e7aebb67e67
I lol so hard at the BU blocks. Why? Why oh why! -edit- looks like the BU blocks are slowly dying so whoever was running BU nodes is slowly migrating.
Never fear, the big blockers will be back with their next hard fork coup attempt in the guise of bitcoinABC.Quote
On 22nd July 2017, we will be launching a brand new BCC mining pool and lock the activation time of UAHF at 12:20 1st August 2017 (UTC Time).
If you decide to switch and mine on the BCC chain, you will still be mining BTC before UAHF activates at 12:20 1st August 2017 (UTC time) and switch to mine BCC after UAHF is activated.
If you decide to switch and mine on the BCC chain, you will still be mining BTC before UAHF activates at 12:20 1st August 2017 (UTC time) and switch to mine BCC after UAHF is activated.
Would there be a UAHF on August 1?
1. UAHF on August 1.
2. Segwit2x hard fork by November.
This UAHF wouldn't fork the complete network, right? Miners could opt to mine on BCC (altcoin) chain.
This is a bit confusing, why go through the whole Segwit2x drama when they still want to deploy UAHF? Maybe because they know there wouldn't be a majority for the hard fork on November?
https://medium.com/@ViaBTC/statement-on-bitcoin-user-activated-hard-fork-6e7aebb67e67
so this what will happen, it's really becoming a mess https://image.ibb.co/gh1wxv/Bitcoin_flowchart_2017.png
is it true that some miners are already mining the new fork or something?
is it true that some miners are already mining the new fork or something?
No
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/about-the-unknown-block-versions-being-mined-warning-2027513
so this what will happen, it's really becoming a mess https://image.ibb.co/gh1wxv/Bitcoin_flowchart_2017.png
is it true that some miners are already mining the new fork or something?
No. The only evidence of mining activity is everyone switching to a BIP91 compatible client. is it true that some miners are already mining the new fork or something?
I lol so hard at the BU blocks. Why? Why oh why! -edit- looks like the BU blocks are slowly dying so whoever was running BU nodes is slowly migrating.
Never fear, the big blockers will be back with their next hard fork coup attempt in the guise of bitcoinABC.And Band of UASF Brothers will be waiting for them again. We till throw them into the sea just like the last time.
I see - you are fully prepared for the mass adoption - here you go and get Bitcoins' reputation up to its' limits....
so this what will happen, it's really becoming a mess https://image.ibb.co/gh1wxv/Bitcoin_flowchart_2017.png
is it true that some miners are already mining the new fork or something?
is it true that some miners are already mining the new fork or something?
I lol so hard at the BU blocks. Why? Why oh why! -edit- looks like the BU blocks are slowly dying so whoever was running BU nodes is slowly migrating.
Never fear, the big blockers will be back with their next hard fork coup attempt in the guise of bitcoinABC.And Band of UASF Brothers will be waiting for them again. We till throw them into the sea just like the last time.
I lol so hard at the BU blocks. Why? Why oh why! -edit- looks like the BU blocks are slowly dying so whoever was running BU nodes is slowly migrating.
Never fear, the big blockers will be back with their next hard fork coup attempt in the guise of bitcoinABC. BIP91 blocks are at 52.1% now. I lol so hard at the BU blocks. Why? Why oh why! -edit- looks like the BU blocks are slowly dying so whoever was running BU nodes is slowly migrating.
.... what's about the 2x later this year. Do you care? Do core care?
BIP91 blocks are at 52.1% now. I lol so hard at the BU blocks. Why? Why oh why! -edit- looks like the BU blocks are slowly dying so whoever was running BU nodes is slowly migrating.
Segwit is the best possible update Bitcoin can have, followed later by a hf. After that sidechains, that will make Bitcoin mainstream.
Lawl, noob. You've got a few talking points and terms memorized, but that's it. Keep on chugging that Kore Koolaid, and see where it gets you... but from your post history it looks like you don't even own any BTC... bwar har.
He is right, you clearly dont understand what Blockchain is. Blockchain can do a lot more things than just Bitcoin
Bitcoin cannot go mainstream with just bigger blocks. As for the HF part, i rather see Core handles that HF because they can deliver a save landing HF.
There is a difference between signaling an intention to signal and actually signaling the thingie-ma-jiggie that you had stated that you had intended to signal.
Much like there's a difference between seeing that people want the thingie-ma-jiggie and giving them the thingie-ma-jiggie or seeing that people want the thingie-ma-jiggie and saying that them wanting the thingie-ma-jiggie is just to delay themselves from getting the thingie-ma-jiggie. In short, I'm saying that I want a million dollars and you're saying that I'm only saying that I want a million dollars to delay you giving me a million dollars.
Something like that, but NOT.
Jump to: