News URL : http://www.newsbtc.com/2015/10/06/black-october-campaign-of-hacktivist-group-anonymous-to-spur-bitcoin-demand/
Topic: The Bullish Bitcoin Media Center (The ONLY Bullish Bitcoin News Thread) - page 257. (Read 259659 times)
October 07, 2015, 06:24:26 PM
October 07, 2015, 06:18:10 PM
October 07, 2015, 05:57:43 PM
Very inspiring talk by Johann Gevers (Monetas.net CEO) presenting "The Age Of Cryptofinance" on stage in Zurich -- FULL VIDEO
News URL : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kKFTwZ3-dQ8&feature=youtu.be
October 07, 2015, 05:47:33 PM
October 07, 2015, 05:43:47 PM
October 07, 2015, 05:41:57 PM
October 07, 2015, 05:39:46 PM
Banks Are Obsolete & Will Not Exist As We Know Them In 10 Years
News URL : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4m53DvLKmTU&feature=youtu.be
October 07, 2015, 05:31:14 PM
October 07, 2015, 05:22:32 PM
October 07, 2015, 03:16:29 PM
I don't think that this is a bullish news. Promoting gambling is always wrong, I think. I understand that the aim of the post is to tell that peer to peer is used for the online gambling sites but this is not new. I know that since two years ago this technology was adopted from such sites. I have no proof or link to put it here but even my news may not be true, this kind of news which promote gambling in some way, according to me, is wrong.
It's bullish dear because there are a lot of money in the gambling scene, A LOT !!
Latest poker sites were using online banks like Neteller, Skrill and such. But Bitcoin would be a killer here
I don't agree with you about the gambling and you reasons to consider bullish those. But everyone has its ideas and the world is beauty because is different.
The key is volume in this area, and I have to say I see a ton of BTC thrown around.
But I think that not every ton of bitcoins can be important. I cannot say that the bitcoins of Silk Road are important. The bitcoin without the moral is nothing according to me. In this case we are not in the same situation because the regulated gambling is legit but near of that, I think, yes. I'm sure that most people play to earn and lose the money of the everyday bread hoping that one time will have jackpot only trying without stopping themselves. Maybe the problem is the person itself but i see that the gambling has the power to convert to many people like the above person. And this is wrong. As for me gambling is wrong and must have very severe rules for this kind of "entertainment".
This not a very freedom and liberty based mindset. Which is what Bitcoin was born from.
Look man we all have personal beliefs. But requiring strict punishment for gambling fits right into a dictatorship of regulation. Bitcoin is freedom from everything, (in theory). People come to this space to free themselves of the over reaching hands of regulation.
You might not agree with gambling. But people are adults who make their own decisions. Those decisions my be horrably but that is not our place or the governments place to stop it. All that BTC going into gambling is pumped back into the ecosystem to pay labor, services, licensing, advertising, ect. So gambling sites actualy make a ton of volume in the space (good or bad not the issue). What we see is transaction and as long as that continues to go up we are growing.
October 07, 2015, 07:20:17 AM
The first step of the creation of the wish of the author of this bullish thread. When it will be the beginning of its materialization? Let's wait a little Fakhoury....
October 07, 2015, 07:15:41 AM
I don't think that this is a bullish news. Promoting gambling is always wrong, I think. I understand that the aim of the post is to tell that peer to peer is used for the online gambling sites but this is not new. I know that since two years ago this technology was adopted from such sites. I have no proof or link to put it here but even my news may not be true, this kind of news which promote gambling in some way, according to me, is wrong.
It's bullish dear because there are a lot of money in the gambling scene, A LOT !!
Latest poker sites were using online banks like Neteller, Skrill and such. But Bitcoin would be a killer here
I don't agree with you about the gambling and you reasons to consider bullish those. But everyone has its ideas and the world is beauty because is different.
The key is volume in this area, and I have to say I see a ton of BTC thrown around.
But I think that not every ton of bitcoins can be important. I cannot say that the bitcoins of Silk Road are important. The bitcoin without the moral is nothing according to me. In this case we are not in the same situation because the regulated gambling is legit but near of that, I think, yes. I'm sure that most people play to earn and lose the money of the everyday bread hoping that one time will have jackpot only trying without stopping themselves. Maybe the problem is the person itself but i see that the gambling has the power to convert to many people like the above person. And this is wrong. As for me gambling is wrong and must have very severe rules for this kind of "entertainment".
October 06, 2015, 06:30:59 PM
It is bullish because they want to create a digital coin for USA. It is the realization of your wish (expressed in my thread) for the creation of the digital money for every country. You are the author of the bullish thread. Can be more bullish than that some news?
For this will be used the technology used to create bitcoin. As for the risk of this for bitcoin this is only a journalistic "scoop". They cannot destroy bitcoin. Are unable to do this. For more they have regulated bitcoin. Have no sense the meaning of the interpretation made from the author of article as below:
"It was only a matter of time. The ultra-advanced, superior technology of the digital currency Bitcoin and it's Blockchain public ledger system are in danger of being co-opted."
Co-opted doesn't mean destroyed - if is this the meaning of kick-off made by the author of article. I think that most probably the meaning of this word is to copy or imitate bitcoin. And a little more down from the above phrase, but that can be seen in my photo in my post put in your thread, is written the very news as it is below:
"IBM, in conjunction with your centralized banking elite, have discussed plans to perpetuate the future of national currencies, like the U.S. Dollar, through their own digital fiat-currency system."
It is your wish this or I'm wrong?
For this will be used the technology used to create bitcoin. As for the risk of this for bitcoin this is only a journalistic "scoop". They cannot destroy bitcoin. Are unable to do this. For more they have regulated bitcoin. Have no sense the meaning of the interpretation made from the author of article as below:
"It was only a matter of time. The ultra-advanced, superior technology of the digital currency Bitcoin and it's Blockchain public ledger system are in danger of being co-opted."
Co-opted doesn't mean destroyed - if is this the meaning of kick-off made by the author of article. I think that most probably the meaning of this word is to copy or imitate bitcoin. And a little more down from the above phrase, but that can be seen in my photo in my post put in your thread, is written the very news as it is below:
"IBM, in conjunction with your centralized banking elite, have discussed plans to perpetuate the future of national currencies, like the U.S. Dollar, through their own digital fiat-currency system."
It is your wish this or I'm wrong?
Oh ok, got it. Yes, this was my idea
I don't agree with you about the gambling and you reasons to consider bullish those. But everyone has its ideas and the world is beauty because is different.
The key is volume in this area, and I have to say I see a ton of BTC thrown around.
crazywack sums it all. Thank my friend for your reply.
October 06, 2015, 06:25:50 PM
Jump to: