Gender inequality has suddenly become a topic of debate among nations and individuals every now and then, on the other hand I ask are they really being marginalized?
Let's not forget in a hurry the format of home and societal hierarchy as stated by nature whereby the man as the head fights(protects), labours and governs the family while the woman as the helper keeps the home and makes sure of the implementation of the man's directives in his absence. Let's also remember that women came to the realization of what vocational independence is during the world wars when almost all the men were in the battle front then the industries and gov't institutions were short of labour so the women had to be engaged in replacement of that vacuum.
The men at the war front gave their lives for a better society which is what both genders are benefiting from today, yes they should be given rights as well but not on an equal scale with a man because diving into societal welfare I still don't think that women has that fragile heart in certain political decisions.
Finally Women should be integrated into the system but not as the head so that there can still balance between both genders in the society.
Topic: The danger of gender inequality - page 5. (Read 789 times)
This depends on the quality of work required, sometimes equality is required and sometimes it is not good.
In jobs that require more physical strength and patience, men are preferred and will be chosen. As for cases that require good looks and kindness, such as tourism or secretarial work, women are preferred.
Therefore, we cannot say that equality between men and women is always required.
In jobs that require more physical strength and patience, men are preferred and will be chosen. As for cases that require good looks and kindness, such as tourism or secretarial work, women are preferred.
Therefore, we cannot say that equality between men and women is always required.
I don't think there's gender inequality on that. If the person who's assigned to choose the best candidate sees the best in one, then that's the decision that must be done. This is just the tough situation of the hiring, application, and selection process. There's nothing wrong with that if that's the quality that the CMD is looking for in a candidate. Usually in this hiring process, if a company has already found the one that they are looking for, they'll reject and stop wasting time in the selection and also saves time the applicants.
Gender inequality is a tolerance system underrating ones ability and capacity to do work and delivering of a given task.
Nowadays what a man can do a woman can do better so the thoughts of genders inequality should be abolished as human qualities depends on individuals and not of the gender differences.
Give it a benefit of doubt before you can conclude because there are women who does some muscular and manpower's job better than some men though majority of men a likely to attain stamina's in a stressful occasion.
This is the same of a mentality that states kitchen works is meant for women and they do it better than men but there are male genders out there who does it better than the women such as the cooking.
Knowledge and skills doesn't only comes from a particular gender.
Nowadays what a man can do a woman can do better so the thoughts of genders inequality should be abolished as human qualities depends on individuals and not of the gender differences.
Give it a benefit of doubt before you can conclude because there are women who does some muscular and manpower's job better than some men though majority of men a likely to attain stamina's in a stressful occasion.
This is the same of a mentality that states kitchen works is meant for women and they do it better than men but there are male genders out there who does it better than the women such as the cooking.
Knowledge and skills doesn't only comes from a particular gender.
We know where all gender equality bullshit comes from, just like we are now struggling with the alphabet gangs and their so-called rights. A man can never be equal to a woman, and each gender has roles that they are best suited for.
We see all the human rights activists and feminists (who, by the way, are there just to make money) bitching about gender inequality in white-collar jobs, but you will never see them advocating for more women to work in Sewers or other blue collar jobs. Why is it so?
We see all the human rights activists and feminists (who, by the way, are there just to make money) bitching about gender inequality in white-collar jobs, but you will never see them advocating for more women to work in Sewers or other blue collar jobs. Why is it so?
I think that if the job requires strength and a man is best fit for it, the employer should drop all the equality bullshit and simply write that in the offer, but that would get him all the backlash from big and strong women, so maybe a strength test would show the applicants what's what?
I've been there on the other side of the fence. I was unemployed and they were looking for an office assistant, so I applied. When I came to the interview I was the only guy in the room with 3 good looking girls and the employer was a balding guy in his 40s. I knew I had no chance and I wasn't angry because of that, but because they wouldn't simply say they needed a female secretary. They wanted to be polite and that made me waste my time on that whole charade.
I've been there on the other side of the fence. I was unemployed and they were looking for an office assistant, so I applied. When I came to the interview I was the only guy in the room with 3 good looking girls and the employer was a balding guy in his 40s. I knew I had no chance and I wasn't angry because of that, but because they wouldn't simply say they needed a female secretary. They wanted to be polite and that made me waste my time on that whole charade.
I don't think women should even have the vote!
Two candidates visited my office two days ago to submit their applications for the position of a health assistant. I had the honor of taking part in the interviews with them.After the interview, the candidate did very well, but the CMD chose to hire the male candidate because of his physical strength and height as the best contender for the position.He didn't even give the female applicant a chance to demonstrate her qualifications.What do you think about this?
Jump to: