The gauntlet has officially been thrown down by Trendon Shavers aka. pirateat40 - page 4.

Bjork

sr. member

Activity: 457

Merit: 250

Look for the bear necessities!!

Quote from: Matthew N. Wright on August 23, 2012, 01:38:14 AM

Quote from: Bjork on August 23, 2012, 01:34:47 AM

Bitlane is the hero bitcointalk.org deserves, but not the one it needs right now. So we'll hunt him. Because he can take it. Because he's not our hero. He's a silent guardian, a watchful protector. A dark knight.

or possibly just an idiot. or maybe even a sockpuppet for pirate to drive the prices up or down.

This would be pretty funny.

Matthew N. Wright

hero member

Activity: 588

Merit: 500

Hero VIP ultra official trusted super staff puppet

Quote from: Bjork on August 23, 2012, 01:34:47 AM

Bitlane is the hero bitcointalk.org deserves, but not the one it needs right now. So we'll hunt him. Because he can take it. Because he's not our hero. He's a silent guardian, a watchful protector. A dark knight.

or possibly just an idiot. or maybe even a sockpuppet for pirate to drive the prices up or down.

Bjork

sr. member

Activity: 457

Merit: 250

Look for the bear necessities!!

Bitlane is the hero bitcointalk.org deserves, but not the one it needs right now. So we'll hunt him. Because he can take it. Because he's not our hero. He's a silent guardian, a watchful protector. A dark knight.

Matthew N. Wright

hero member

Activity: 588

Merit: 500

Hero VIP ultra official trusted super staff puppet

Quote from: iCEBREAKER on August 23, 2012, 01:23:44 AM

Quote from: Mousepotato on August 21, 2012, 04:14:50 PM

Quote from: smoothie on August 21, 2012, 04:04:47 PM

I'm getting my popcorn ready for this.

Dear Pirate,

Can you please at least pay Bitlane his coins so he'd quit making terrible threads?

Sincerely,
Everybody

Bitlame's threads are terrible. Terribly entertaining that is. I love reading his impotent ALLCAPS laced rants of Internet Tough Guy hilarity.

Smoothie is right, it's time to get the popcorn ready for our latest Bitcoin misadventure.

Bitlame must have broken Rule #1 of investing and sent pirate more than he can afford to lose. Much more, judging by how high the pitch of his screeching and how loud his blustering baffoonery have become.

Hell, I'll pay pirate BTC100 to not ever give Bitlame one satoshi just to keep watching the meltdown go totally China Syndrome. Cheesy

But then I'd owe almost 5,000BTC so I'd have to offer him more. lol

iCEBREAKER

legendary

Activity: 2156

Merit: 1072

Crypto is the separation of Power and State.

Quote from: Mousepotato on August 21, 2012, 04:14:50 PM

Quote from: smoothie on August 21, 2012, 04:04:47 PM

I'm getting my popcorn ready for this.

Dear Pirate,

Can you please at least pay Bitlane his coins so he'd quit making terrible threads?

Sincerely,
Everybody

Bitlame's threads are terrible. Terribly entertaining that is. I love reading his impotent ALLCAPS laced rants of Internet Tough Guy hilarity.

Smoothie is right, it's time to get the popcorn ready for our latest Bitcoin misadventure.

Bitlame must have broken Rule #1 of investing and sent pirate more than he can afford to lose. Much more, judging by how high the pitch of his screeching and how loud his blustering baffoonery have become.

Hell, I'll pay pirate BTC100 to not ever give Bitlame one satoshi just to keep watching the meltdown go totally China Syndrome. Cheesy

Electricbees

sr. member

Activity: 322

Merit: 250

We are bees, and we hate you.

Quote from: Matthew N. Wright on August 22, 2012, 10:47:39 PM

...cause I got their rent moneyz herp derp

Matthew N. Wright

hero member

Activity: 588

Merit: 500

Hero VIP ultra official trusted super staff puppet

Quote from: mem on August 22, 2012, 11:02:12 PM

Quote from: muyuu on August 22, 2012, 09:11:12 PM

Quote from: Matthew N. Wright on August 22, 2012, 09:05:47 PM

Wouldn't someone have to break a contract and have no intention to pay to be considered a scammer? Has there been a contract broken? Is there implied intention to pay?

Yes. I know you have a lax understanding of what a deadline is, but Pirate failed to repay bitlane on time and then again on his second self-given deadline. That's a broken contract already, regardless of possible future mitigation.

Then he proceeded to add insult to injury with his messages.

Just me spreading FUD but: Im going to call it, at least one of the admins are involved with pirate and want to give him as much time as possible to wind up his scam.

Conspiracy theory #2512: Administrative involvement

mem

hero member

Activity: 644

Merit: 501

Herp Derp PTY LTD

Quote from: muyuu on August 22, 2012, 09:11:12 PM

Quote from: Matthew N. Wright on August 22, 2012, 09:05:47 PM

Wouldn't someone have to break a contract and have no intention to pay to be considered a scammer? Has there been a contract broken? Is there implied intention to pay?

Yes. I know you have a lax understanding of what a deadline is, but Pirate failed to repay bitlane on time and then again on his second self-given deadline. That's a broken contract already, regardless of possible future mitigation.

Then he proceeded to add insult to injury with his messages.

Just me spreading FUD but: Im going to call it, at least one of the admins are involved with pirate and want to give him as much time as possible to wind up his scam.

notme

legendary

Activity: 1904

Merit: 1002

Oh, and I'm still waiting on my magazine boys.... 5 weeks and counting and all your support has to say is don't "bug me again for two weeks".

notme

legendary

Activity: 1904

Merit: 1002

Quote from: Matthew N. Wright on August 22, 2012, 10:47:39 PM

Quote from: notme on August 22, 2012, 10:45:55 PM

Quote from: Vladimir on August 22, 2012, 09:50:25 PM

Quote from: Matthew N. Wright on August 22, 2012, 09:12:43 PM

Quote from: muyuu on August 22, 2012, 09:11:12 PM

Quote from: Matthew N. Wright on August 22, 2012, 09:05:47 PM

Wouldn't someone have to break a contract and have no intention to pay to be considered a scammer? Has there been a contract broken? Is there implied intention to pay?

Yes. I know you have a lax understanding of what a deadline is, but Pirate failed to repay bitlane on time and then again on his second self-given deadline. That's a broken contract already, regardless of possible future mitigation.

Fair enough. I suppose he does deserve a scammer tag at least until he pays.

Could we maybe instead have "naive and greedy" tag for all the pirate's "investors". This way all the new (and old) scammers could concetrate on working those marks and leave the rest of this forum alone maybe? Just a thought... Wink

Yup... I'm so greedy I paid out my pass through customers from my personal funds even though my terms say I only owed them 25% until pirate paid up. All together, I paid out 189% of what was paid in to me. But sure throw us all together and make blanket statements.

This is what the purpose of the bet is, to allow them the right to make blanket accusations. If they're right, they win big. If they're wrong, they'll make less blanket accusations in the future cause I got their rent moneyz herp derp

Except 'ol Vlady hasn't put his money down Tongue

.

Hunterbunter

hero member

Activity: 994

Merit: 1000

Quote from: notme on August 22, 2012, 03:56:02 PM

So basically we're still waiting because bitlane won't leave pirate alone long enough to get anything done?

Actually his remarks have bumped you up one on the queue, so you should be thankful. The replies pirate has made would hardly have taken more than 5 minutes of a day. Did you give coins to p40?

Matthew N. Wright

hero member

Activity: 588

Merit: 500

Hero VIP ultra official trusted super staff puppet

Quote from: notme on August 22, 2012, 10:45:55 PM

Quote from: Vladimir on August 22, 2012, 09:50:25 PM

Quote from: Matthew N. Wright on August 22, 2012, 09:12:43 PM

Quote from: muyuu on August 22, 2012, 09:11:12 PM

Quote from: Matthew N. Wright on August 22, 2012, 09:05:47 PM

Wouldn't someone have to break a contract and have no intention to pay to be considered a scammer? Has there been a contract broken? Is there implied intention to pay?

Yes. I know you have a lax understanding of what a deadline is, but Pirate failed to repay bitlane on time and then again on his second self-given deadline. That's a broken contract already, regardless of possible future mitigation.

Fair enough. I suppose he does deserve a scammer tag at least until he pays.

Could we maybe instead have "naive and greedy" tag for all the pirate's "investors". This way all the new (and old) scammers could concetrate on working those marks and leave the rest of this forum alone maybe? Just a thought... Wink

Yup... I'm so greedy I paid out my pass through customers from my personal funds even though my terms say I only owed them 25% until pirate paid up. All together, I paid out 189% of what was paid in to me. But sure throw us all together and make blanket statements.

This is what the purpose of the bet is, to allow them the right to make blanket accusations. If they're right, they win big. If they're wrong, they'll make less blanket accusations in the future cause I got their rent moneyz herp derp

notme

legendary

Activity: 1904

Merit: 1002

Quote from: Vladimir on August 22, 2012, 09:50:25 PM

Quote from: Matthew N. Wright on August 22, 2012, 09:12:43 PM

Quote from: muyuu on August 22, 2012, 09:11:12 PM

Quote from: Matthew N. Wright on August 22, 2012, 09:05:47 PM

Wouldn't someone have to break a contract and have no intention to pay to be considered a scammer? Has there been a contract broken? Is there implied intention to pay?

Yes. I know you have a lax understanding of what a deadline is, but Pirate failed to repay bitlane on time and then again on his second self-given deadline. That's a broken contract already, regardless of possible future mitigation.

Fair enough. I suppose he does deserve a scammer tag at least until he pays.

Could we maybe instead have "naive and greedy" tag for all the pirate's "investors". This way all the new (and old) scammers could concetrate on working those marks and leave the rest of this forum alone maybe? Just a thought... Wink

Yup... I'm so greedy I paid out my pass through customers from my personal funds even though my terms say I only owed them 25% until pirate paid up. All together, I paid out 189% of what was paid in to me. But sure throw us all together and make blanket statements.

bitcoinBull

legendary

Activity: 826

Merit: 1001

rippleFanatic

Quote from: Vladimir on August 22, 2012, 09:50:25 PM

Quote from: Matthew N. Wright on August 22, 2012, 09:12:43 PM

Quote from: muyuu on August 22, 2012, 09:11:12 PM

Quote from: Matthew N. Wright on August 22, 2012, 09:05:47 PM

Wouldn't someone have to break a contract and have no intention to pay to be considered a scammer? Has there been a contract broken? Is there implied intention to pay?

Yes. I know you have a lax understanding of what a deadline is, but Pirate failed to repay bitlane on time and then again on his second self-given deadline. That's a broken contract already, regardless of possible future mitigation.

Fair enough. I suppose he does deserve a scammer tag at least until he pays.

Could we maybe instead have "naive and greedy" tag for all the pirate's "investors". This way all the new (and old) scammers could concetrate on working those marks and leave the rest of this forum alone maybe? Just a thought... Wink

Yes, please.

Vladimir

hero member

Activity: 812

Merit: 1001

-

Quote from: Matthew N. Wright on August 22, 2012, 09:12:43 PM

Quote from: muyuu on August 22, 2012, 09:11:12 PM

Quote from: Matthew N. Wright on August 22, 2012, 09:05:47 PM

Wouldn't someone have to break a contract and have no intention to pay to be considered a scammer? Has there been a contract broken? Is there implied intention to pay?

Yes. I know you have a lax understanding of what a deadline is, but Pirate failed to repay bitlane on time and then again on his second self-given deadline. That's a broken contract already, regardless of possible future mitigation.

Fair enough. I suppose he does deserve a scammer tag at least until he pays.

Could we maybe instead have "naive and greedy" tag for all the pirate's "investors". This way all the new (and old) scammers could concetrate on working those marks and leave the rest of this forum alone maybe? Just a thought... Wink

Matthew N. Wright

hero member

Activity: 588

Merit: 500

Hero VIP ultra official trusted super staff puppet

Quote from: muyuu on August 22, 2012, 09:11:12 PM

Quote from: Matthew N. Wright on August 22, 2012, 09:05:47 PM

Wouldn't someone have to break a contract and have no intention to pay to be considered a scammer? Has there been a contract broken? Is there implied intention to pay?

Yes. I know you have a lax understanding of what a deadline is, but Pirate failed to repay bitlane on time and then again on his second self-given deadline. That's a broken contract already, regardless of possible future mitigation.

Fair enough. I suppose he does deserve a scammer tag at least until he pays.

muyuu

donator

Activity: 980

Merit: 1000

Quote from: Matthew N. Wright on August 22, 2012, 09:05:47 PM

Wouldn't someone have to break a contract and have no intention to pay to be considered a scammer? Has there been a contract broken? Is there implied intention to pay?

Yes. I know you have a lax understanding of what a deadline is, but Pirate failed to repay bitlane on time and then again on his second self-given deadline. That's a broken contract already, regardless of possible future mitigation.

Then he proceeded to add insult to injury with his messages.

Matthew N. Wright

hero member

Activity: 588

Merit: 500

Hero VIP ultra official trusted super staff puppet

Quote from: elux on August 22, 2012, 08:56:20 PM

Quote from: totaleclipseofthebank on August 22, 2012, 07:46:09 PM

Quote from: muyuu on August 22, 2012, 07:42:56 PM

Lovely treatment to a creditor.

Isn't this, together with bitlane's PMs, grounds for a scammer tag? What a cunt.

Easily. Not that it will matter though.

pirateat40
Avast Ye!
SCAMMER

Posts: 1145

The bitlane PMs alone should be sufficient. Mods? Theymos?

Wouldn't someone have to break a contract and have no intention to pay to be considered a scammer? Has there been a contract broken? Is there implied intention to pay?

elux

legendary

Activity: 1458

Merit: 1006

Quote from: totaleclipseofthebank on August 22, 2012, 07:46:09 PM

Quote from: muyuu on August 22, 2012, 07:42:56 PM

Lovely treatment to a creditor.

Isn't this, together with bitlane's PMs, grounds for a scammer tag? What a cunt.

Easily. Not that it will matter though.

pirateat40
Avast Ye!
SCAMMER

Posts: 1145

The bitlane PMs alone should be sufficient. Mods? Theymos?

teflone

hero member

Activity: 770

Merit: 500

You're fat, because you dont have any pics on FB

Quote from: muyuu on August 22, 2012, 07:42:56 PM

Quote

[05:26] pirateat40: can you start paying people soon?
[05:27] <+_matthew_> Topic: I'm giving 100% ROI away to anyone who thinks pirate is a fraud (Read 6434 times)
[05:27] <+_matthew_> lawl
[05:27] <+BTCHero> don't do it

[05:27] <@pirateat40> Luceo, im use to it.
[05:27] <+_matthew_> One of the most popular threads on the forum
06[05:27] * TimothyA 's stomach growls
[05:27] I really want to eat something on my birthday..
[05:27] happy birthday to you
[05:27] cake
[05:27] <@pirateat40> AnonX, the more you ask the longer I spent finding your account to add to the end of the line.

Lovely treatment to a creditor.

Isn't this, together with bitlane's PMs, grounds for a scammer tag? What a cunt.

Pirate is a first Rate douche..

So are all his shills...

Topic: The gauntlet has officially been thrown down by Trendon Shavers aka. pirateat40 - page 4. (Read 31002 times)