Topic: The impact of war on global economy. - page 10. (Read 2948 times)

The answer is simple. This is one of the terrorists' "technologies" - to hide and cover themselves as civilians, exposing them to attacks, in order to create a flow of information in the media and "show evil". Such behavior is displayed by all terrorists - from MAHASA to terrorist troops of Russia ! And in the latter case even their so to speak president (in fact the head of the terrorist gang, an international criminal), openly said that they would put civilians of Ukraine in front of their terrorist fighters, and "let's see what they will do". This speech of the international criminal Putin V.V. is easy to find on YouTube
Also terrorists place their strike teams among residential buildings, and even in apartments of apartment buildings, for terrorist strikes - this is how Hamas launched rockets at Israel, the video is also easy to find.
Whether you read my posts or not is up to you, I don't care what you do The most important thing is that everyone knows who the terrorist are, what they are doing, and what they are responsible for. And the most important thing is that peaceful Gazans are dying, being framed by the very hands of Hamas.... So all questions about who and how they use Gaza's civilians, and what they die as a result of - ask Hamas....

The UN Children’s Fund, or UNICEF, on Tuesday raised the alarm over the rising number of child deaths in the Gaza Strip since Oct. 7, when Israel-Palestine tensions flared into an armed conflict.

"Our gravest fears about the reported numbers of children killed going from dozens into hundreds into thousands have been realized in just a fortnight," UNICEF spokesperson James Elder told a UN press briefing in Geneva, lamenting that the death toll among minors had exceeded 3,450.

"Staggeringly, this number rises significantly every single day," Elder warned, saying that Gaza "has become a graveyard of children. It is a living hell for everyone else."

Elder reiterated UNICEF's call for an immediate cease-fire and humanitarian access to supplies for the enclave, saying children in Gaza are dying not only due to airstrikes but also because of lack of needed medical care.

"And yet the threats to children go beyond bombs," he said, underling that water and trauma were among other threats faced in besieged Palestinian enclave.

He warned that more than 1 million children of Gaza faced a critical water crisis as Gaza's daily water output was at 5% of its production capacity.

"So, child deaths to dehydration, particularly infant deaths to dehydration, are a growing threat," he said.

On trauma, the spokesperson said: "When finally the fighting stops the cost to children and their communities are going to be borne out for generations to come."

Elder stressed that before the current conflict began, more than 800,000 children in Gaza — three quarters of its entire child population — were identified as in need of mental health and psychological support.

Since last weekend the Israeli army has widened its air and ground attacks on the Gaza Strip – including houses and hospitals – which has been under relentless airstrikes since the surprise offensive by the Palestinian group Hamas on Oct. 7.

More than 10,000 people have been killed in the Gaza conflict, including 8,306 Palestinians and more than 1,538 Israelis, and also including 3,457 children in Gaza, according to official figures.

An Israeli blockade of the strip has also cut Gaza off from fuel, electricity, and water supplies, and reduced aid deliveries to a small trickle unable to satisfy the needs of the over 2 million Palestinians there.

By the way, a question for everyone: can anyone tell me why countries and groups that supposedly "care about the people of Gaza" do not accept them? Iran, Lebanon, and other supporters of terrorists do not accept Gazans in their countries, do not provide them with funding, do not provide them with housing.... But they continue to fund Hamas. Isn't that an amazing situation ?  

As we all know, war is never a good approach to conflict resolution, we see this menace continually occurring, where countries raise against countries because of either dominance or personal reasons, when there is war, so many business activities are being crippled and some commodities are temporary scarce, and this portrays a high-level demand in such commodity, the nations in one are been sanctioned as the case may be, the most nation that does business with them are being kept in jeopardy, the impact of war to the global economy is very enormous. 

The world is interconnect and war in one region affects other regions. Generally, war threatens global economic stability, potentially resulting in inflation  higher prices and slower growth across different sectors. War affects the oil market and leads to adverse economic repercussions potentially causing increased oil prices globally triggering inflation and economic instability worldwide. War also leads to shortages of energy-related commodities influencing prices and growth not only in the region but also in surrounding areas.

I think that changes in society are initiated by individual behavior but in the global economy they are completely controlled by governments. Each price level is fixed by the government we do not monitor or monitor here. There is some lack of governance, some lack of efficiency another issue is transparency and accountability. This is wasted corruption is a big deal economic continuity growth and employment especially international trade is at a fairly satisfactory level compared to many other countries.

2. Oil is considered the most crucial resource in modern warfare.
3. War affects the stock market by causing a decline in stock prices.

What do you guys think? Is this true or false?

Then why in the world they're attacking peaceful residents of Gaza? Destroy the terrorists, not hospitals and nurseries.

Then I stopped reading your post, because a bit fat chunk of propaganda follows... "Entire large cities and hundreds of small towns and villages were destroyed" please name at least a single "large city" "destroyed" by Russia. 

What do you guys think? Is this true or false?

Should we assume that war is a means of replenishment to delapidated economic performance all over the world or not, if we consider the past event of the experience in war, the cost of lives and the rate of amounts worth countless rates being lost at the cause together with the innocent souls being affected, we can see that war is not the perfect economical solution, but people are, if we can start the beginning of the change in us right from our individual behaviors in the society.

In my opinion a war of between two countries can make economical problem of other country. War make a nation ill damage their economical condition. A country suffer a lot because of war. Not that country who has connect with it every country of the world suffer a lot because of the war. Not every Nation make everything there depend of the other national for those what they can make. Because of war there is shortest up that goods or item in the market. Because of the shortest supply of this item in the market the price of the items high. Because of war not the price increase of item sometimes oil gold etc price is too high. Because of increasing price of item or some other components are commodities the people of lower income suffer a lot because of increasing price. In every country there is huge amount of people who live under the provety line because of the price hike and mainly war is the reason of the price high that's the reason why impact on the global economy.

If you are talking in terms of power and money, you may be right, but in terms of ethics and human rights I don't think it benefits anyone.

And, as we've seen with Covid-19, globalization has broken the natural boundaries that always existed between countries/continents, so nowadays any war impacts every country in some degree. I don't know where you live, but chances are that you have witnessed it yourself the last time you went to a supermarket.

Wars doesnt harm every country. i think some of the country gets benefited because of it.

Certainly 100% true. War means loss. Maybe those who know how to make good use of technology or those who are in a strong financial position are relatively less harmed in war, but it is sure to be harmed by both parties. However, the war that is being practiced in worldwide is definitely not a good sign. All the powerful countries here want to keep their power over other countries. When there is no agreement between the two then the war starts. Wherever war is consisted, it has more or less impact on the people of the world, directly or indirectly. Therefore, instead of supporting war, any conflict should be resolved through reconciliation. If war is seen as a tool to sell arms then surely those countries will lose everything at one stage.

1. Increase in the national GDP is least likely to be caused by a war.

2. Oil is considered the most crucial resource in modern warfare.

3. War affects the stock market by causing a decline in stock prices.

What do you guys think? Is this true or false?

War is never a good thing, the only ones who benefit from this are the arms dealers and those who resell war machines after the fact. No one, not even the rich are exempt when a threat of global conflict occurs.

I understand that Nazism, especially such a yardstick variety as RASHISM, has one concept - lie, lie, lie and lie again. Lie everywhere and always. And deny all the facts.
I will not continue this topic with you, you are behaving extremely disgustingly towards dead, peaceful, innocent people. This is called “dancing on bones” and denouncing crimes, trying to reduce the real tragedy.
I hope that sooner or later this will be rewarded to you, and you will know what the “boomerang of fate” is...
I apologize to all participants in this thread, but this is disgusting to read and listen to... This is the face of RASHISM and the “Russian world” - to kill, destroy... and then lie and deny, with a vile grin...

PS According to the Ilyichevsk morgue, 87 thousand deaths were documented in Mariupol.
There is also a database of unidentified people. Unidentified bodies of civilians are in mass graves. According to the latest data, there were about 26 thousand such people. There is a database on them in the Novoazovsky Prosecutor's Office.
However, even these figures are not final, because there are still bodies in the courtyards and under the rubble, and some of the dead were taken out by the occupiers and buried in unknown graves.

Only in the Mariupol Drama Theater, where civilians were hiding from the terrible bombing with FAB-500 bombs, at least 600 civilians died under the ruins. It will most likely not be possible to find out the exact number of victims. The Russian occupiers then simply brought in excavators, loaded the remains of the destroyed building mixed with body parts and took them away for a hidden burial so that no one would know the scale of this massacre....

On 16 March 2022, during the Russian invasion of Ukraine, the Russian Armed Forces[1][3] bombed the Donetsk Academic Regional Drama Theatre in Mariupol, Ukraine. It was used as an air raid shelter during the siege of Mariupol, sheltering a large number of civilians. The estimations of the number of deaths that occurred due to the bombing have varied, from at least 12[1] (Amnesty International) to 600 (Associated Press).

Russia denied the allegations and instead accused the Azov Battalion of blowing up the building

You also forgot about the most important factor in an economy and a war: Manpower. When a large-scale war happens, people who are supposed to work in the production are instead pooled into military service to better give their country chances at winning the war. Thus the decline in stock prices and the ensuing economic collapse that happens right after the war. Not to mention the fact that most war veterans can't go back to work so it's not like they are given the job security they are hoping for.

War is never a good thing, the only ones who benefit from this are the arms dealers and those who resell war machines after the fact. No one, not even the rich are exempt when a threat of global conflict occurs.

You also forgot about the most important factor in an economy and a war: Manpower. When a large-scale war happens, people who are supposed to work in the production are instead pooled into military service to better give their country chances at winning the war. Thus the decline in stock prices and the ensuing economic collapse that happens right after the war. Not to mention the fact that most war veterans can't go back to work so it's not like they are given the job security they are hoping for.

War is never a good thing, the only ones who benefit from this are the arms dealers and those who resell war machines after the fact. No one, not even the rich are exempt when a threat of global conflict occurs.