The Log Chart Myth - page 3. | Bitcointalksearch.org

ElectricMucus

legendary

Activity: 1666

Merit: 1057

Marketing manager - GO MP

Log chartist reporting.

What's up? Cool

srsly what's your problem, just thing of it this way: Blow up the chart to 2030 or so and draw a tanh() funtion over it.
It only behaves linearly (or exponential on a linear chart) because we are looking at a small fraction of it.

here did that for ya:

Elwar

legendary

Activity: 3598

Merit: 2386

Viva Ut Vivas

Quote from: fcmatt on September 06, 2011, 02:59:35 PM

Quote from: Elwar on September 06, 2011, 02:58:27 PM

This:

Hey Elwar, you did not start your chart at 0.000001. Why is that?
Are you trying to show some type of bias here that others who post a chart starting at .000001 do not
seem to have? ;-)

The random chart I found on the Internet did not start at .000001

I just wanted to feel included in the chart posting.

Tongue

Jixtreme

full member

Activity: 121

Merit: 100

*standing*

Math major here, vouching for log chart.

fcmatt

legendary

Activity: 2072

Merit: 1001

Quote from: Elwar on September 06, 2011, 02:58:27 PM

This:

Hey Elwar, you did not start your chart at 0.000001. Why is that?
Are you trying to show some type of bias here that others who post a chart starting at .000001 do not
seem to have? ;-)

Elwar

legendary

Activity: 3598

Merit: 2386

Viva Ut Vivas

This:

N12

donator

Activity: 1610

Merit: 1010

Quote from: NothinG on September 06, 2011, 02:54:26 PM

I don't see why everyone has their panties in a wad.

Because there is a lot at stake.

Will the log chartists please stand up? Show me evidence this is a normal correction and not an exceptionally deep and long one!

NothinG

hero member

Activity: 560

Merit: 500

I don't see why everyone has their panties in a wad.

N12

donator

Activity: 1610

Merit: 1010

Does this really like like a healthy, historically normal correction to you?

Topic: The Log Chart Myth - page 3. (Read 4891 times)