with just over a week left before the distribution... wouldn't others be interested to know if they are really going to get an airdrop or will they have to sacrifice the 0.01 ETH required in their wallet? or if even these tokes will ever actually be distributed? after all this crap put up and out byt the DEV then to find out it was a simple social experiment!by a high school student from BumFuked Egypt.just to see the results! lololol
Human donkeys never seem to amaze me. A freely distributed airdrop, that you choose to join out of you own accord. Rather than keep the thread positive, a piece of shit like you always gotta come with that negative energy, cos you always got an ache in your heart. Though I doubt it, I really wish the devs will take their time to peruse the thread and kick fuckers you out, the thought of having a fowl like you contribute to important decision makes me shudder.
I would bet he's one of the users that joined the airdrop and then didn't vote and got penalized -70% ... There really is no reason to spread FUD against a free airdrop... Its like the FUDDERS of deeponion ... They get a few thousand dollars handed to them for basically doing nothing... and then go around calling it a scam lol ... makes absolutely no sense... Why not just take your free money and be happy?
No, there are may be reasons. I don't mean the DAO project. But for others. Someone got free money, but who did pay for it? Some people buys the "free" tokens and they may be scammed by devs or other participants who shill or hype the coin. I saw a many "free" projects which started as airdrop and ended as scam. Devs may create many addresses for yourself or got a big premine or something else and dump it on newcomers.
But I agree in the case of the DAO, I don't see any scam flags yet.
And I also think the deeponion is probably scam. And I wrote about that in one trading chat: I think you can make a good money with deeponion, but probably this is a p&d scam, be careful (I don't remember the exact reason cause I wrote about it for a long time ago, maybe it's all about a lot of coins that the developers left themselves).
what would you consider scam flags?
any credentials of a dev?
a dev who pretends to be a bot?
at first imposing that you have eth but no minimum requirements , then changing his mind and making it 0.001, then changing his mind again and making it more than 0.01 ETH all changes without asking the community and just posting it .
dosent update even the OP!
gives no indication of validity to the coin or project? a dev who does not answer questions either directly or not?
changes rules and procedures at his own will without informing the community?
then imposing his will and choice without allowing the community to choose? and calls this a community coin?
makes vote but doesnt tally even when it was over untill later days?
no proof of even this token does actually exist?
no whitepaper?
the list could seriously go for days!
no red/scam flags?
my message are as follows
