Topic: the new model of fundrising is IEO (Read 937 times)
For a long time, a crypto community will select the optimal fundraising model, and only by trial and error will we determine the most reasonable and safer way. IEO has not yet been verified by time, and possible manipulations have not been studied. Time will tell.
Thats more credible way of fund raising, investor dont need to fear about things like fake project, and scam. Exchange hold the responsibility to offer a good project to its traders also for caring their name. When it comes to investment, ieo have a big advantage to ICO, everyone can focus about if the project can do what ever it takes to stand in the market situation. The token will be for sure go to your designated wallet.
That will only work for the exchanges that have a reputation to lose, there are many exchanges that have a very bad reputation around the forum that are still operating and we know they selectively scam their customers, so if such an exchange promises that the project that is going to be traded in their platform is good you cannot really assume it is true because the seal of approval that comes from a scammer has no value at all. the BTC market in 2018 is very bad and created a bear market. and that affects the fundraising model (ICO). finally a new alternative fundraising was coming such as STO and new model fundrising can attracted many large investors is the IEO.
We know that ICO can make money quickly because of the public sales model, but the fundrising model is often used by scammers to get money quickly and only for the benefit of the team. even some projects don't care about their projects. so they only create bad coin coins that have no value on the market.
coins from the IEO can be directly traded in the exchange after the sale is complete. but the ICO model must wait a long time to trade after it is listed in the exchange. so I think IEO is reliable and user friendly. how about you all ?
do you see bad results from the IEO?
We know that ICO can make money quickly because of the public sales model, but the fundrising model is often used by scammers to get money quickly and only for the benefit of the team. even some projects don't care about their projects. so they only create bad coin coins that have no value on the market.
coins from the IEO can be directly traded in the exchange after the sale is complete. but the ICO model must wait a long time to trade after it is listed in the exchange. so I think IEO is reliable and user friendly. how about you all ?
do you see bad results from the IEO?
When ICO is not working anymore, IEO is the new flavor with a twist. Since IEO offers much greater security to investors due to guaranteed listing when IEO is completed.
But beware, Some Low rate exchange starts offering IEO for projects without any due diligence so its open new doors for ICO scammers.
Scammers are now not going to act by themselves alone but with the help of accomplices like the exchanges as their cahoots. So the scam busters will have to dig further to uncover it all and I guess the new scam busters might not be any users in the forum but from the exchange business or probably from the SEC.
As an investor both ICO and IEO must be taken care very carefully on current conditions. As we know many scam projects around we need to do very good research before choosing any type of new investments. For myself I think i will not invest any normal ICO or IEO because current market condition i can find many other half developed project undervalued and promising to invest 
I am not in support of this new model, Exchanges are becoming too powerful in the space that is suppose to be decentralised and people seems to be getting carried away because of greed, there is no way to be sure these exchanges are not selling these tokens to themselves. Before you can trace the funds on blockchain to see the amount of tokens being sold, but now just believe their words
Yes it is and the reason for this is to reduce scams which might be achieved if more improvement is done. At least now before a project is listed for IEO or plans to conduct IEO the exchange will verify them to ensure they are reliable and trustworthy.
Hope all exchange will do that and not only after the money, we can't removed the fact that developers also knows that taking the risk of funding the IEO can bring more investors money to flow around the exchange chances that also scammer can make it's way to penetrate and deceived the people by all means including IEO's.
Most ICOs these days do not masks much sakes as IEOs do. This is why project that were formerly running ICO now result into going for the fast means of sales, which is IEO.
I am not surprised that IEO is succeeding now and investors are fast opting for it, because through it, they can quickly make their profits. Past IEO models have proven to be effective.
I am not surprised that IEO is succeeding now and investors are fast opting for it, because through it, they can quickly make their profits. Past IEO models have proven to be effective.
Yes it is and the reason for this is to reduce scams which might be achieved if more improvement is done. At least now before a project is listed for IEO or plans to conduct IEO the exchange will verify them to ensure they are reliable and trustworthy.
Many people now perceive IEO as a new kind of ICO,but the reality is that not everyone can participate in this.
Here, the main income are the major players,the people who use scripts.
When investors ' interest in IEO starts to disappear,then exchanges will start to struggle with algorithms and make participation more transparent for everyone.
Here, the main income are the major players,the people who use scripts.
When investors ' interest in IEO starts to disappear,then exchanges will start to struggle with algorithms and make participation more transparent for everyone.
Its just a added a new flavor in doing ICO projects.,
Only Binance Launchpads has strict guidelines before anyone can participate and buy in an IEO projects.,
It is not about the form, no matter if it is ICO, IEO or STO. People lose their patient and they are not more interested in investing in something what only promises without delivering the real solution. So many scams made this industry dead. 
I think that IEO is capable of addressing majority of the issues that were there is case of ICO. Scams have been on the peak when it was ICOs time and I think that is the reason why would people not pay attention but surprisingly people are paying attention. You need to check out the success of the IEOs held so far. Binance Launchpad has been a huge success so far. No place for scams and instant token selling. You should check it out.
Many people now perceive IEO as a new kind of ICO,but the reality is that not everyone can participate in this.
Here, the main income are the major players,the people who use scripts.
When investors ' interest in IEO starts to disappear,then exchanges will start to struggle with algorithms and make participation more transparent for everyone.
Here, the main income are the major players,the people who use scripts.
When investors ' interest in IEO starts to disappear,then exchanges will start to struggle with algorithms and make participation more transparent for everyone.
The only problem I see is that MultiVac was sold in 7 seconds. Well, who the hell bought it and how come it was that fast? Maybe is was a bot or something, but we can't really discount that there could still be manipulations from behind. I guess EIO model should have put something in place to check and prevent this kind of manipulation.
What if there an instance of a big whale just scoop up the entire MuiltiVac? It was very easy if the advertisement and marketing is really good, there is no reason for us doubt the project and in that case, it can somehow increase the reputation that IEOs has just started. More partnerships to come, I will going to look further on this.
In 2018, more than 67% of investment in ICO failed. That is why this form is no longer attractive to investors. Therefore, the IEO was born with many new forms, attracting many investors to make them safer.IEO is becoming the new trend of this year because it is very prestigious and always selects good projects for the investors.
Of course, an IEO is a huge step forward compared to ICO, where investors are given much more guarantees. However, this type of tokensale appeared quite recently, which is why it is too early to draw conclusions about its effectiveness. I think it should take at least a year to see all the strengths and weaknesses of the IEO.
IEO under Binance is quite very effective and I don’t doubt its future effectiveness under Binance, I cannot say much about other exchanges IEO, a copy version can never be as real as the original, I know we should not create a monopolized system.So, if I say only Binance IEO should be recognized would be unreasonable, but it has to be limited to few top and reliable exchanges, I wish these exchanges can also be under a control too to out their activities to check, but it will be possible to do so under this decentralized system, so IEO to me will be more effective than ICO if done under these reliable exchanges, otherwise, IEO will end up being exactly like ICO.
The IEO aims to raise funds in a safer way than ICO. By following the IEO, investors will be safer because Exchanger has already sorted out, which projects are good and projects that are not good for IEO on their exchanger.
Indeed, its already guaranted will be listed in exchanger and mostly the price surge after start trade in market. Right now, IEO is more attractive and more profitable than ICOs and many investor trauma with ICOs condition in 2018
The IEO concept is a very good and promising one, but personal interest that has been put ahead of other people’s interest will make the ICO have negative reputations, because the only good news I hear about IEO is that they get sold out, but I have not heard of any ordinary investor hear successfully invest in the projects.
IEO has the hype. You can't say that IEO is more secure because crypto ain't regulated, are you sure that all investors who'd buy on IEO are insured with their investments? What if it's a sh*tcoin who's just riding the hype? It's a brand new name for ICO but has the same sh*t inside.
IEO's is much more worthless then ICO's on a smart contracts basis. It is a step down in the technology development. Greedy exchanges just want more money to their hands.
I strongly agree!!!
IEO's is much more worthless then ICO's on a smart contracts basis. It is a step down in the technology development. Greedy exchanges just want more money to their hands.
I strongly agree!!!
As long as the IEO is conducted on a popular exchange then it could be safe for investors but recently I found some new exchanges offering the same service which is not recommended since they are not known in crypto space.
Just today it is a new trend and all exchanges are trying to repeat this success,because it attracts investors.Perhaps when the IEO is held on a well-known major exchange - it is safe,but does not guarantee the success of the coin. Recently, the VBK coin demonstrated this on the Bittrex exchange.
It's progressing. But in this case, we see how the ICO market ends its life. Since ICO is not believed now. IEO saves investors but does not improve the product.
IEO's is much more worthless then ICO's on a smart contracts basis. It is a step down in the technology development. Greedy exchanges just want more money to their hands.
As long as the IEO is conducted on a popular exchange then it could be safe for investors but recently I found some new exchanges offering the same service which is not recommended since they are not known in crypto space.
It's progressing. But in this case, we see how the ICO market ends its life. Since ICO is not believed now. IEO saves investors but does not improve the product.
Jump to: