I think in IEO hidden their problems. They are that you can buy absolutely unpromising coin with which it will be impossible to work in the future. Yes, it is the best tool for speculation. But IEO does not improve the blockchain system but makes the community speculate a lot and do not pay attention to more important details of the market and industry.
Topic: the new model of fundrising is IEO - page 2. (Read 937 times)
It is not about the form, no matter if it is ICO, IEO or STO. People lose their patient and they are not more interested in investing in something what only promises without delivering the real solution. So many scams made this industry dead. 
Not at all and have you seen how most of IEO that run on the binance? The only problem that investors are looking for fast profit and it can't be got easily. Beside of the scam and short term players will become the next problem. 
Yes, I am fed up with ICO now, almost all of them have not succeeded in the exchange market, they dropped the price so deeply that my capital did not return from the ICO project. I hope the IEO is a big success from the ICO.
The IEO is still new and there is still much debate about the IEO, especially regarding transparency that is not so clear because in seconds sales can be completed and sold out 
IEO is a profitable business for our world, but I think that cryptocurrency will still generally have a good benefit only in order to raise funds. I hope that the scammers still will not find opportunities for normal life and they will not continue to deceive people.
the use with customs helps as the release of token on returns to gives with chance on field as owners to manage with use on modest as segregated to follows with returns of work from different developer and collects on decision as expending use with spares on possession of resource with the authorization.
You can't trust this new scheme. Yes now it shows very good results but it will not last forever. Now enterprising people will understand all the nuances and will sell wrappers that will lose their prices immediately after purchase at IEO. So I advise you not to be greedy and constantly follow the news.
It is not about the form, no matter if it is ICO, IEO or STO. People lose their patient and they are not more interested in investing in something what only promises without delivering the real solution. So many scams made this industry dead.
You are right, the emergence of many false projects, fraud, led to the fact that the ICO is dying, investors losing money have lost confidence. And it is replaced by IEO and STO. This is a natural result of evolution.IEO is more attractive to investors, as the marketplace puts its reputation on the line, and thus increases investor confidence in the project.
Yes, I am fed up with ICO now, almost all of them have not succeeded in the exchange market, they dropped the price so deeply that my capital did not return from the ICO project. I hope the IEO is a big success from the ICO.
ICO was success in the previous years because it was a new "thing" and it offers investors to invest in a start up company without too much paper work involve, But this also opens doors to serial scammers that creates a bad image for ICO market
Yes, I am fed up with ICO now, almost all of them have not succeeded in the exchange market, they dropped the price so deeply that my capital did not return from the ICO project. I hope the IEO is a big success from the ICO.
With ICO getting less popularity due to lack of investment security, IEO is taking over. Its history is just the beginning, it has got much popularity. And it is happening for a good cause I think. It has many good features which are attracting investors. One of the main concerns of investors is investment security. IEO to its maximum level gives investment security and ensures listing of projects on exchanges.
I also believe in IEO, and think that today ICO should have an ieo to be a successful token sale and for better price later.
ieo maybe safer than ico's because we can easily choose on who is legit and who is not but the chance of loosing is still be there because every investment is risky . ieo owners can dump thier project same as what he had on crypto but the chance of earning is also high because ieo's are slowly getting momentum .
from the summer it was obvious that ICO dies
no they didnt . ico didnt totally die because if we can see there are still ico bounties on this forum and on other websites as well . ico will even more try harder to be able to attract investors because they are now threatened by a ieo's .
IEO is now spreading very quickly throughout the entire cryptocurrency sphere, and many companies prefer to choose IEO between ICO and STO, and how we see that many companies make the right choice and become successful with IEO.
Every things have merits and demerits too. In my personal sense IEO is relatively safer than ICO because here you don't need to bother about many things like project legality, team, exchange listing. But one thing is unfamiliar for IEO in recent times which is new investors are getting lower chances to buy due to a big number of investors on existing exchange.
That is because, we are now pertaining to a project backed up already by an existing project that has established reputation in the market. Through that, the risk that investors will going to take will be lessened as it was already handled by exchanges such as binance, bittrex, and etc. In fact, even I don't start investing on IEO's I have a good feeling that it will going to be effective. Sooner or later I might try.
maybe IEO system can be the best option due to many scam ICO project nowadays, but personally i think IEO still not save because not transparancy of their fund raised.
It seems that IEO is going to be very popular now, i think it is much faster then ICO, but the question is - is it safer? Not sure. For me it is some sort of gambling. As usually nobody can guarantee any profits.
for convenience I think it is more comfortable than the ICO, but in terms of security or protection it all depends on the exchange that holds the IEO. where now the popular one is probably only done by the Binance exchange. and now another exchange starts doing it. but on a system basis I think the IEO is indeed more comfortable and faster. 
Actually, IEOs have been around for a long time.
Binance, for example, has had them from the beginning.
So its nothing new.
Honestly, I see IEOs as only a tiny improvement.
In the end, a bear market is a bear market and if there's no new money coming in, and low trade volume, then IEOs won't change much.
Also, you need to really question the logic of a company that tries to start a new business in these conditions.
Especially if that project is similar to already existing projects.
Smart developers and ceos would launch at more opportune times.
A new business being hasty is never a good sign.
Binance, for example, has had them from the beginning.
So its nothing new.
Honestly, I see IEOs as only a tiny improvement.
In the end, a bear market is a bear market and if there's no new money coming in, and low trade volume, then IEOs won't change much.
Also, you need to really question the logic of a company that tries to start a new business in these conditions.
Especially if that project is similar to already existing projects.
Smart developers and ceos would launch at more opportune times.
A new business being hasty is never a good sign.
It seems that IEO is going to be very popular now, i think it is much faster then ICO, but the question is - is it safer? Not sure. For me it is some sort of gambling. As usually nobody can guarantee any profits.
Multivac the ieo on kucoin has seen alright outcome so far
https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/multivac same for https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/bilaxy-token on bilaxy
Both are recent
https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/multivac same for https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/bilaxy-token on bilaxy
Both are recent
Jump to: