How about Yobit 
ICOs on their Exchanger
~snip~
ICOs on their Exchanger
~snip~
IEO is not just an ICO that had tokens sold by exchanges.
and I don't mention yobit as IEO, I just said ICOs on their Exchanger
Topic: the new model of fundrising is IEO - page 6. (Read 914 times)
IEO is not just an ICO that had tokens sold by exchanges.
and I don't mention yobit as IEO, I just said ICOs on their Exchanger
Yes IEO is next solution for fundrising and many succcess project using IEO, and i think because this reason, in the future will give impact to bountyhunter, Because IEO doesn't need a bounty hunter to help promotion, so maybe the extinction of the bounty hunter will happen, what do think guys??
As far as I remember, Kucoin was the first one to offer IEO (correct me if I am wrong.)
~snip~
How about Yobit ~snip~
ICOs on their Exchanger
IEO is not just an ICO that had tokens sold by exchanges. It is necessary that the project has undergone some kind of verification of the exchange and it will offer some guarantees for those who acquire part of the project. Exchange tokens such as the BNB could perhaps be considered an IEO. And they were released longer than this token.
Edit.: BNB is from 2017-07-07. So I am not so sure
As far as I remember, Kucoin was the first one to offer IEO (correct me if I am wrong.)
~snip~
How about Yobit ~snip~
ICOs on their Exchanger
the BTC market in 2018 is very bad and created a bear market. and that affects the fundraising model (ICO). finally a new alternative fundraising was coming such as STO and new model fundrising can attracted many large investors is the IEO.
We know that ICO can make money quickly because of the public sales model, but the fundrising model is often used by scammers to get money quickly and only for the benefit of the team. even some projects don't care about their projects. so they only create bad coin coins that have no value on the market.
coins from the IEO can be directly traded in the exchange after the sale is complete. but the ICO model must wait a long time to trade after it is listed in the exchange. so I think IEO is reliable and user friendly. how about you all ?
do you see bad results from the IEO?
If that is all the difference that exists between icos and ieos then I do not see why you seem to think they are that different, if the developers of a coin were dedicated enough to their project they could allow investors to exchange their coins from the very beginning and yet that did not protect investors from scammers at all, to me this is nothing but a desperate attempt from developers and scammers to try to convince the community that they have changed and they should keep throwing money at them but I doubt it is going to work. We know that ICO can make money quickly because of the public sales model, but the fundrising model is often used by scammers to get money quickly and only for the benefit of the team. even some projects don't care about their projects. so they only create bad coin coins that have no value on the market.
coins from the IEO can be directly traded in the exchange after the sale is complete. but the ICO model must wait a long time to trade after it is listed in the exchange. so I think IEO is reliable and user friendly. how about you all ?
do you see bad results from the IEO?
Now that things have changed, it’s entirely possible that we might be seeing further increases in the prices of these native exchange tokens. Moreover, users are also required to be holding them over a certain period, which is also likely to curb the selling pressure.
Of course, high demand for IEOs can always be interpreted as a very positive signal for the industry, in general. The question is whether IEO investors are there for the projects themselves, or just for the relatively quick gains and the more important issue is how long will it last.
Of course, high demand for IEOs can always be interpreted as a very positive signal for the industry, in general. The question is whether IEO investors are there for the projects themselves, or just for the relatively quick gains and the more important issue is how long will it last.
Agree with you, this IEO can be a very effective alternative to replace the unclear ICO. It is not even possible that scammers will enter into a fundraising such as this IEO.
the BTC market in 2018 is very bad and created a bear market. and that affects the fundraising model (ICO). finally a new alternative fundraising was coming such as STO and new model fundrising can attracted many large investors is the IEO.
We know that ICO can make money quickly because of the public sales model, but the fundrising model is often used by scammers to get money quickly and only for the benefit of the team. even some projects don't care about their projects. so they only create bad coin coins that have no value on the market.
coins from the IEO can be directly traded in the exchange after the sale is complete. but the ICO model must wait a long time to trade after it is listed in the exchange. so I think IEO is reliable and user friendly. how about you all ?
do you see bad results from the IEO?
We know that ICO can make money quickly because of the public sales model, but the fundrising model is often used by scammers to get money quickly and only for the benefit of the team. even some projects don't care about their projects. so they only create bad coin coins that have no value on the market.
coins from the IEO can be directly traded in the exchange after the sale is complete. but the ICO model must wait a long time to trade after it is listed in the exchange. so I think IEO is reliable and user friendly. how about you all ?
do you see bad results from the IEO?
The poor results of the IEO at the weak exchanges is enough. Only very large exchanges are kept, however, I would not call them an IEO successful. In their sale can get only a measly couple of percent of people from those who want it and this is very bad. I think this is a bad result.
IEO is still the same thing as ico, but the fundraising process is just different. Initial exchange offering (IEO) is conducted on the platform of a cryptocurrency exchange on behalf of the startup that seeks to raise funds with its newly issued tokens. Why investors now prefer IEO to ICO is because of the high fraudulent activity that ICOs are conducted with, and IEO are more safer because the exchange won't want to jeopardize its integrity by conducting tokensale for a scam project, which gives investors assurance that their money is safe.
Of course, in this case, the exchange may use the passport data and personal information of the developer by the project, in order to avoid any problems if there are big risks regarding fraud. But we must also assume that the scammers are also working on their improvement and they will find any way out to deceive not only ICO, but also IEO.
IEO is still the same thing as ico, but the fundraising process is just different. Initial exchange offering (IEO) is conducted on the platform of a cryptocurrency exchange on behalf of the startup that seeks to raise funds with its newly issued tokens. Why investors now prefer IEO to ICO is because of the high fraudulent activity that ICOs are conducted with, and IEO are more safer because the exchange won't want to jeopardize its integrity by conducting tokensale for a scam project, which gives investors assurance that their money is safe.
Crypto people don't want to believe and invest in any ICOs, they are tried of scam or fishing ICOs. So something new way to funds rise and provide that this ICOs is active with have enough trusted members to successful this ICO. Initial exchange offer is good way to check right ICO and also for invest.
Yes, it is completely reliable. I earned more than $ 60000 from OKex's IEO project. I bought it quite quickly and its price was x17 times the price of the IEO.
They paid the number of tokens immediately to my wallet and I was able to trade quickly without fear of being cheated. it's a great thing for ICO replacement.
They paid the number of tokens immediately to my wallet and I was able to trade quickly without fear of being cheated. it's a great thing for ICO replacement.
The IEO seems to be a more attractive option for token sale due to the assurance it gives the investors that the tokens will be listed, at least in the exchange in which the IEO was carried out. But that doesn't guarantee that the project will be successful in the long run.
Yes, it is true that the IEO sales brought investors back to life with confidence that all of them would have a good impact, the IEO in exchange would definitely be registered there.
I think the idea behind an IEO is actually a great one considering the fact that over 50% of crypto enthusiasts are kinda tired of the word ICO and all that it seeks to represent.. Personally, it's boring also. I believe this will make people more interested after a long bored time.
IEO is indeed a new model of fundraising after ICO and STO. But the purpose is still the same which is to raise fund for project development from public. IEO may be more trusted because it is done in an exchange so that the issue of listing can be guaranteed. While the background of the project should have been verified by the exchange organizer of the IEO.
However, it does not rule out the possibility that the project failed and the price dropped after the IEO was completed due to the inability of developers to implement plans in the development of the project. So, everything goes back to the developer team in making the project a success.
However, it does not rule out the possibility that the project failed and the price dropped after the IEO was completed due to the inability of developers to implement plans in the development of the project. So, everything goes back to the developer team in making the project a success.
It is now, it's actually good news for investors because they now invest safely and profitably and a wake-up call for ICO and those who are involved on it, like these rating sites to clean up all their mess, or they will be gone in a year or two.
legendary
Activity: 2156
Merit: 2100
Marketing Campaign Manager |Telegram ID- @LT_Mouse
Yeah, IEO has been already a trend and people are likely to go with it. I have observed one thing that after some of the successful IEO bitcoin has started to risex does it have any connection? Has IEO made a positive look to the cryptocurrency market?
I think IEO will be a good to go for investment. And it will be better for both the project and investors.
I think IEO will be a good to go for investment. And it will be better for both the project and investors.
I am still startled with the way it is increasingly getting popularity, certainly it will be infiltrated by scammers as well, but just that investors should be careful not to invest in those that are traded on shitty exchanges. IEO's bring some confidence though than ICO's
As you know about ICO's,Various ICO's was scams and investor was lost their money so IEO is going successful and hope grow in future.
In my own opinion, IEO will be better than the ICO which was known for scam. With the advent of IEO Bounty Hunters will not be benefiting from the programme as this is purely base on Exchange. The era of IEO will bring hope to investors which was lost during the days of ICO. Hope the standard be maintain by these Exchanges to give confidence to investors.
Any form of fund raising has its good sides and bad sides but as for me, I think IEO is less riskier to ICO because with it, all the necessary background checks that one has an investor needs to do would have been done by the exchange because they also will not want to tarnish their own image with scam project
Jump to: