Topic: The Real Solution to Dumping - page 10. (Read 1481 times)

It makes more sense to pay bounty hunters in altcoins or other means than paying with a new launched token to prevent dumping but it seems that most developers don't have the money to pay other than relying on there own token to pay bounty hunters so I guess the devs are the only ones who can control dumping

A good idea, paying bounty participants with Altcoin might be a solution to not token dumps. If you still pay the token, the price of the token is definitely destroyed after the listing on the market.

The point you said is very reasonable, but the project party will only pay the token as a job. For them, the token is free and there is no need to pay any legal currency as a publicity fee.

If their projects pay for bounty hunters with BTC, ETH, .. I think the cryptocurrency market will appear lots of bounty hunters and maybe the reward for us will be much lower 

I think avoiding a dumping is a bit tricky, by dividing the reward into several times of distribution also not so effective to prevent dumping, I think its just delaying the dumping, cause everyone who get rather small amount of coin will wait until all of the coins distributed before they sell them.

Yes, this will be a good solution for the development of tokens. If the hunter is paid with USD or Ethereum it is very good because it can improve the quality of Ethereum coins. Even though it's paid in USD, it's also very good. So the token developed does not immediately collapse when the person is registered in the exchange market.

Never say bitcoin hunter is dump all of coin price, how ever with little allocation from all of coin impossible bounty hunter could make price dump, just check only 2 until 3% token allocation for bounty participants and 30% for team and its why price will be dump.

I also agree that why many people blame bounty hunters when they just sell and receive their achievements. If projects want to control the amount of tokens are sold in market in the first time, they can lock it for the certain time and announce clearly for participants

It will be more difficult for the ICO if they decide to pay with USD. Where will they get that from? They even struggle to raise up to a million dollar from the tokens sales.

many comments that blame the bounty hunter. I think that many people are involved in this problem.
more potential investors to throw tokens with a greater amount than bounty hunters.
investors do not have insight into projects in the future so they sell them.

The original, brilliant idea of spreading the word/advertising organically, via the Internet still works, particularly when large crowds focus their intent on a sustained daily/weekly basis.  However, this continued "bear" market in cryptocurrencies has lasted long enough to distort the average participant/enthusiasts' perception to the point where a lot of people are asking themselves if this is all worth it (capitulation?)  We don't see this sort of massive, focused advertising, such as found in bounties, anywhere else but in crypto.  Hmm.  Makes you wonder why it feels like we are all collectively barking into the void/wind.  Bounty activity is the BEST kind of Internet advertising in the world, yet it's going nowhere, world-wide.  What's going on?

The cause of the sustained bear market in cryptos is no different than the sustained bear markets in any other asset that directly competes with the current fiat world reserve currency for dominance.  As has been the case nearly every time this millennium, the group with 'unlimited' resources has managed to come out on top somehow, up until now.  The Internet is breaking the monopoly.  It's up to us regular folks to recognize this and take advantage.

Generations and generations (millions?) of progress have been wasted/thwarted under the yoke of oppression we are still witnessing today.  Despite their 'unlimited' resources and throwing everything and the kitchen sink to avoid a change in the status quo, our tiny group of crypto-enthusiasts compared to the size of the worlds' population is causing such a gigantic response from our 'handlers', perceptive individuals see that simply continuing on the course we are on as the eventual bridge to our dreams of individual and sovereign freedom.

If we have these bastards this nervous so early in the inevitable paradigm shift, it should not surprise anyone that if we keep pressing ahead and spreading the word like prophets, our efforts will lead to generational profits.

And we are only need big liquidity to prevent them all, used the coin with big liquidity to pay the hunters can prevent all of these problems and at the same time it has become the best choice. Some platforms have proven it in the past and it can keep the price from dump.

This is a question that has always played out on my mind for a while now but the bitter truth is that there is no perfect solution to dumping as this is mainly controlled by prevailing market conditions. A key method of attempting to limit dumping is by ensuring that tokens have a specific use case before hitting the market as this will ensure buy orders are rolling in. Another reasonable method is the locking of some tokens for a fixed period of time in order to ensure demand exceeds supply of the tokens. All this should actually play their part in ensuring that price of the specific tokens remains stable.

Are they effective or people are doing it? I don't think that they used those things in order to stop from dumping. For the huge numbers of bounty hunters,  we cant stop them from selling their coins in cheap cause we are not controlling them.

You offered a great solution, I fully support it, but most developers will not agree. But in the future your idea is sure to be popular.

You have a point. If the project is good and has a potential then they don't need to bother bounty hunters and blame if their token dump. Or if they don't want to pay for hunters,simply they don't ask hunters to promote their project. There are many projects that blaming hunters for dumping their tokens. Why? Where is their strategy to keep their project attractive and where is their investors? Hunters do their best to support and promote the project that's why they are deserve to be paid whatever happen to the project.

I think that solutions quite a lot, really a lot, so projects that are crying that it's all bounty hunters, in my eyes instantly fall.

Maybe this is a good solution if the prize is paid with Ethereum or USD. Because this will keep the price of the coin stable and not fall after entering the stock market. Even coins will grow and investors, I think, will invest more.

Give away project tokens for early at the time of major sales. What tokens could sell to investors. This is a good solution to all problems. And everyone will be happy.

Different project teams have now devices means, to prevent dump of their tokens, because they belief bounty hundreds are the cause of dumb. Sometimes they lock the tokens paid to bounty participants. There sometimes postpone the payment for bounty, yet some tokens still dump.
I am just trying to figure some tji GS put to see the number of projects that are doing this and to also check if truly most did not dump.