Pages:
Author

Topic: The release of Satoshi's personal data - page 3. (Read 1590 times)

member
Activity: 112
Merit: 20
December 09, 2018, 03:00:16 PM
#10
As of now and in the supposed year(2021),I doubt there will be any reason whatsoever to reveal satoshi's Pm's for whatever reasons,as such informations remain private as Theymos has reiterated numerous times,but you just get that feeling that with satoshi things will be a bit different as we've got numerous groups clamouring for his identity and probably an inkling could be gotten from his private messages.
I've rethought this, and I won't be releasing the PMs in 2021. I'm convinced that nobody will ever identify Satoshi no matter what info comes out
And this I think this settles it all, for now at least
hero member
Activity: 2436
Merit: 516
December 09, 2018, 02:29:31 PM
#9
I used to think Satoshi invented this forum, that he invented the forum to help discuss the promotion of the token and community. If he did, who got the forum administration employed ? and if he was not the one, then there was a link to him along the line of transferring the forum's leadership. He is not actually anonymous, am sure some people or organisation or government are hiding him
legendary
Activity: 2604
Merit: 2353
December 09, 2018, 02:13:12 PM
#8
Great. AverageGlabella will be happy now... Roll Eyes
administrator
Activity: 5222
Merit: 13032
December 09, 2018, 02:00:34 PM
#7
I've rethought this, and I won't be releasing the PMs in 2021. I'm convinced that nobody will ever identify Satoshi no matter what info comes out, so I'm not worried about that, but I am concerned about the privacy of those who communicated with him. For example, kiba once said that he tried to send a gift to Satoshi, but Satoshi declined (reportedly saying something like "I already have plenty of BTC"). If the PMs for this exchange exist in the database and hypothetically look like this:
Quote
kiba: Hey, I know it's worth peanuts, but do you want a gift of 10k BTC?
satoshi: lol, no thanks scrub

Then it would put a big target on kiba's back. (This is only a hypothetical example: in reality, kiba never published the amount he offered Satoshi, if any amount was even specified.) Even if I screened the PMs in advance for obvious stuff like this, it's impossible to find everything. Eg. maybe someone who talked to Satoshi was trying to be anonymous, but people are able to find him just based on his writing style or knowledge.

I do think that there could be historically-relevant info in there, so maybe if Bitcoin has taken over the world in like 50 years and historians are clamoring to know more about its history, I or my successors could be convinced to revisit the issue. Or maybe not; don't get your hopes up. (I still haven't read the PMs, BTW; maybe they're all really boring.)
member
Activity: 168
Merit: 15
Future of Security Tokens
December 09, 2018, 01:57:49 PM
#6
There is the possibility that Satoshi wished his PMs and logged IP addresses released at some point, and considering the reference to the future and the time span of 8 years, could be possible that it would be impossible to track the identity of Satoshi through the proposed details.
copper member
Activity: 630
Merit: 420
We are Bitcoin!
December 09, 2018, 01:42:28 PM
#5
Can we leave Satoshi alone! Who cares to identify the person? Focusing on the creation will help the human being than focusing to the creator. What is bad with Bitcoin?
legendary
Activity: 2310
Merit: 2073
December 09, 2018, 01:11:04 PM
#4
We don't need to know who Satoshi really is. I don't think there's any information about him in his private messages. He always remained anonymous. I have no reason to mistrust Theymos, he is a man of his word.
copper member
Activity: 2856
Merit: 3071
https://bit.ly/387FXHi lightning theory
December 09, 2018, 01:04:57 PM
#3
Haven't you heard?  Craig Steven Wright is Satoshi.

Grin




We have information on a lot of personal information from history, people used to write books and letters which were kept over generations/malleniums.

8 years may be a bit short but what’s the harm in posting someone’s pms, a lot of his emails were leaked already.
member
Activity: 348
Merit: 22
December 09, 2018, 12:22:41 PM
#2
Haven't you heard?  Craig Steven Wright is Satoshi.
legendary
Activity: 1232
Merit: 1080
December 09, 2018, 12:01:17 PM
#1
Following my What if? Satoshi Nakamoto's identity was public information   thread. Despite the conspiracy theories going on in the replies a user pointed out something interesting. That theymos is considering releasing the personal messages of Satoshi.

theymos posted this:
I'll probably release Satoshi's PMs and logged IPs addresses in ~8 years. This'd probably be of great historical interest. (Though he always used Tor, as far as I can tell.)

He posted that back in 2013. 8 years from then would be 2021. However I'm a little concerned about exposing personal information just because Satoshi is the one to have created the forum and Bitcoin. His personal data should be handled the exact same as any other user.

Theymos in the past has said that our data is safe from information requests unless he has reason to believe you are scamming or breaking the law. I'm pretty sure I've read that theymos has rejected several subpoenas because he didn't think there was sufficient reason to do so. Taking this into consideration why is theymos willing to release personal messages and logged IPs. Even if he used Tor to connect over the forum his data shouldn't be released. Sure its interesting information but he should not be treated any different.

As you can probably tell from this thread and my what if thread  I'm very against exposing any sort of personal data unless there's a good enough reason. I don't think that historic significance to the cryptocurrency world would be a good enough reason to expose his personal data.

I don't read PMs for fun. Very very rarely, I need to read PMs for technical, administrative, or legal reasons, but I try to avoid this as much as possible. I don't want to spy on anyone's personal business.

obviously lol, i bet the first thing theymos did when he became admin was to read satoshi's pms.

I've never read Satoshi's PMs.

There is nothing to say they didn't subpoena the records of the shroomery

They did.
theymos hadn't read Satoshi's PM's up until this quote and he said that he doesn't like to spy on peoples personal business. I don't think Satoshi should be treated any differently. Even if the information was of historic value and would be interesting to view.
Pages:
Jump to: