Topic: The SportsBet.io Gang (Read 1281 times)

I'm not sure you understand what the word "baseless" means. It means there is no basis upon which your claims can rest. You did not do the slightest bit of any research whatsoever, which means you could not present your fictional research in a manner that would support the base or basis of your claims, which means your claims are baseless. Instead, you just said, "if you look here and here you will come to the same conclusion I did." That means there is no actual basis for your claims.

Try harder or prepare to be ridiculed yet again.

Look, your lying is old news. But exposing you never gets boring.

Caught red-handed, as usual:


https://archive.is/0laka

The topic was posted on February 26 (the same day you left the campaign, btw), but you updated it a week later (March 4), which means that your claim that you left the campaign because you are taking a break from the forum is actually a lie.

As for the "promise" of 100 posts per month, the topic title itself says: "$2.5/post or $250/month". Do the math.

The application was edited to "removed" not long after it was posted, which is when I made the decision.


This was posted on February 26, when I still intended to be active in the forum, weeks before I decided officially to take a break. Also, that thread did not promise at least 100 posts per month. All it did was state my average amount of posts since in the last year.


I've explained my way of thinking multiple times when it comes to signature campaigns. You both choose not to understand it, and default to the label of hypocrisy. I refuse to indulge in this comment further as I know that you are only making this post to get the same response as you have when you have made it in the past.


They're not baseless though...Just have ninjastic.space open on one monitor and the sportsbet thread open in another, and look at the flow of merits between the most active participants over the last 20+ pages. You will see that very low quality posts are frequently merited there, and that is only one sign of the abuse that is surrounding the sportsbet.io brand and fan-base. If you look for a while like I have, and extend your searches into trust pages, you'll end up with a network of members who have helped each other to rank up at an expedited rate in comparison to a member who actually contributes value to the forum.

Though if you aren't interested in doing that and you want to conclude my opinions are baseless (ironically, with no proof of them being baseless), sure.

Definitely doesn't matter if they're cycling the merits for themselves but I think that what OP is trying to say is that it's a bit unfair that the merits are not fairly distributed to other users that are outside of their clique, at least that's what I believe this is what it means. I guess, the merit sources should up their game if they don't want people like OP to be starting this kind of thread and to you OP, maybe the reason you're not getting the merits or you feel like the merits are distributed unfairly is because you're not posting what qualifies to the people that give merits as quality posts.

WO is a forum of it's own, there's no way to describe how that works.

With the offer he made to promote signatures it seems clear he did not intend to take a break, only he can explain the discrepancy in his statement but if we are being honest it will not have been the first time he has sent out conflicting messages. I could never fully work out why he would have a particular anti-agenda against the number of members and companies he chose to post about. Furthermore, the hypocrisy about what he would not promote and why, followed by the completely opposite course of action.

Are we surprised?

Did everyone receive invitations for Sportsbet gang annual special meeting yet? 

I am going to propose free gang membership to all BSFL participants because we must have growth and not stagnation.
From next season we are introducing paid membership only

Well, not really. Whatever the reason for your leaving the campaign, that was maybe a convenient excuse, but not the truth.  You applied to a new one just a few minutes later, and we all know inactive accounts don't participate in campaigns.  But to make your claims sound even more ridiculous, you even created your own topic offering your signature space and "promising" at least 100 posts per month.  How would you be able to do that if you were planning on "taking a break from the forum"?

Because you're not doing that, you're throwing a lot of baseless accusations around and slighting individuals and entire companies without really having the first clue what you're talking about. That's the main problem. Nobody is going to interfere with your right to do that here, but you don't get to remain free of judgment or criticism; that is also our right to point out when what you're saying is wrong, contradictory, or simply doesn't make sense.

I quit my signature campaign because I was taking a break from the forum. Not the other way around.

[/quote]

I'd also like to add to my last response here.

I'm not that committed to a forum dominated by people like JollyGood and the likes.

If the forum community was one that I loved, I might. Though there is a lot about this community that make me only like it, not love it.

I didn't chime in on the other thread because I've witnessed what is being discussed in this thread first-hand and did some digging months before this thread arose. In essence, I was saying "Hey, I've seen this going on as well". I'm not sure how that is a problem?

You are literally wasting your time with him. Hopefully he will fade away in to a permanent absence now that he is no longer in any campaign.

What are you trying to do here? Either you are genuinely raising a concern about something you feel strongly about or you are effectively trying to tarnish the reputation of a brand for reasons not yet known. The way you conduct yourself it seems obvious to be the latter.

Did you ever complain about the number of merits sent and received by other members? Will you be able to find any example of merits being sent/received by certain members which you can use as a comparator to make a case for your allegation? Where is the evidence?

Do you realise nutildah has contributed far more to this forum than you could ever dream of? Of course you do, yet you still make assumptions about him simply because he pointed out the agenda that seems to the driving force behind you.

I do not have the privilege of having enough time to fight uphill battles. I give a shit enough to chime in. I do not give a shit enough to get into arguments with tens of members who are fighting on the other side of the truth.

I did not chime into the other thread because I haven't personally observed it, nor have I taken the time to investigate it. LoyceV can vouch that I had investigated this situation long before this thread was ever created, and I came here to share that I see where the OP is coming from because I have seen it first hand. What do you want me to do, make a thread? Who will actually give a shit since majority of DefaultTrust are corrupt or silent because they don't want to be attacked by the corrupt DTs?

I'm also not sticking up for the OP. I am only sharing that I have had the same observation long ago, and that there is legitimacy to his claims.

Theymos owns the forum and he allowed the creation of new accounts to speak on sensitive matters. You can have your own views for which no one gives a fuck about, including me.

Posting from the main account matters, why? So that you can attack the account with your friends? Lol, that's the exact reason of using a throwaway account.

Guys like you are those who don't credit newbies and scratch the back of reputed members even when they talk BULLSHIT.


10 years on forum? You have NOT done any favors to anyone expect for yourself by earning money posting shit like this.



Someone wearing the signature of SHITCOIN is sad about people talking SHIT lol

You don't give a shit enough either, otherwise you would be conducting said investigation. Your post is just as useless as this thread. Besides, you missed the fact that OP already started another thread. Why didn't you chime in on that one? Its quite obvious OP works for a competing sportsbook and is just trying to shit on as many other casinos and campaign managers as possible. And you're sticking up for him. Well done.

The OP is not making up entirely false claims so i dont think that outburst was really warranted to be honest. If this all upsets you so much, stop looking and don't waste the time that you're taking to type your tantrum?

Even I have noticed the fuckery going on with the users mentioned in the OP and the sportsbet thread over 6 months before this thread. It's not a myth, you can see the circle jerking clearly on ninjastic and through a deep look of the trust system. Proof is there, though seems like you choose not to pay any attention to those important details for some reason

There is something that could genuinely something be investigated here if there was anyone in DT who first and foremost gave a shit, was committed to protecting the integrity of this forum, was 100% not corrupt or influenced in any way by forces like sportsbet, and not fearful of tue slap they might receive by members like yourself, who for some reason always assume and defend 100% innocence for accused parties.

TLDR There would be a legitimate investigation here if anyone gave a shit enough so in my opinion, your post is both uncalled for and invalid.

This is at least your second account made for shit talking purposes, is it not?

Fuck you and your big nothingburger of a thread.

If you had one singular functional testicle you would have posted this nonsense under your main account.

Go fuck yourself.


Sorry to everyone else but after almost 10 years here I just can't stand shittalking cowards.

This negative feedback for instance, blindly trusting whatever SB says and giving feedback based on that.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=3534812

If jeremypwr is not an employee, he surely doesn't know who is lying and what exactly happened and hence should not give out red trust to users complaining.

Returning the deposit is not good enough in most cases because then it's a free bet for the website. If won, they will return deposit and if lost, the bet stands.




Don't assume

I can assume Patrick Mahomes doesn't get paid by Chiefs doesn't make it true.

I'm with you on the merit dumping not being a big deal. Also, giving each other trust isn't that big of a deal either. One thing that I'm against is giving people negative trust for the sole reason of not agreeing with an opinion. It's "trust", not opinion. That was the second claim of the OP.

Lookin at the OP's link and to be clear, I'm not talking about any negative trust given out by holydarkness since that would be warranted. I respect holydarkness.

I'm coming very late to this topic by chance, hardly check reputation section but I saw Sportsbet.io mentioned.

And I kinda expected to see one username mentioned, because jeremypwr manages a lot of giveaways but I seriously doubt he's an actual employee, and it never crossed my mind to see such an accusation when clearly, in many other megathreads merits are just dumped all on daily basis, why is that a problem? I can give it to whoever I want, if I think it deserves my merit. I'm sure these users do the same.

Personally, I know LFC_Bitcoin and buwaytress also for years, if they are Sportsbet employees I will eat my BTC wallet seriously. These guys are the most helpful people, years ago I personally got help for nothing from them, education, yes even merits to help my account grow. I know for sure they still run competitions and community events for not getting paid, buwaytress also a very outspoken member of all services here. I've 100% seen him criticize Sportsbet.io and in fact for years you can even see he runs pools for RIVALS of Sportsbet.io

Why would an employee do that??

To my best knowledge they're not even getting a cent paid for their work on this forum. People should be grateful there are people like these spending their time for free to make the forum a better place. Instead, they get accused on threads like this.

We need to recognize contributions but people seem to spend more time looking to take people down. Crazy.

Kinda my point though, people distribute it however they want basically. Aside from selling it, anything is pretty much allowed with merit.

Of all the arguments in this thread, the marketing of the jackpot is the only thing that IMO should have been done differently, but either way I do not feel anyone is at risk playing there.

They spend tens of millions on sponsorships in the Premier League, but somehow it got stuck that the disputed merit distribution is in their thread.
As far as I know, the amount of merit distributed in the Sportsbet ANN thread is almost insignificant compared to WO (which is more meaningless), but that is another story that has already been discussed.