Pages:
Author

Topic: The SportsBet.io Gang - page 2. (Read 2078 times)

newbie
Activity: 79
Merit: 0
June 12, 2024, 10:05:55 PM
#73
purely disgusting from administrator allowing these pieces of shit wearing their signatures to not be investigated

What makes you think the "administrator" is "allowing" Sportsbet campaign members "to not be investigated"?

You're responsible for making the change you want to see in the world. Feel free to investigate away, nobody is stopping you.


look for yourself. It is all right there in front of you to see

https://talkimg.com/images/2024/06/13/chn71.jpeg
https://talkimg.com/images/2024/06/13/chQam.jpeg

the three stooges giving each other wank jobs per their campaign quota for the week

Sportsbet.io is using several high profile users to dominate the forum. Below are some of them:

Incentivizing users to post in their topic (Against the forum rules)

Any kind of incentive to post in your thread is against the rules. But sportsbet gang have found an easy way to bypass this rule.

Gang member #1 - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=379487

You will notice 90% of the merits are given to people posting their wins, discussing about sports in the sportsbet.io or livecasino.io (sister sites) threads. And the posts are nothing spectacular either, it's simple posts showing their wins and discussing normal topics like soccer.

Merits are hard to earn and when people notice that LFC will shower some merits just for posting anything in their topic, they post and hence it's clearly incentivized posting.

Gang member #2 - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=137185

This guy holds several Sportsbet.io giveaways and hence should be considered an employee. 100% of his merits are given to posters in Sportsbet.io thread.

Gang member #3 - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=901859

Again the same patterns. These people are obviously paid to lure people into posting in the sportbet.io thread and keep it bumping.


Anyone speaking against sportsbet.io is attacked with red trust for no reason.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5439809.40

I don't see where the OP lied in the above case but was given -ve trust. He was impatient and yeah should have remained calmed but not many of us would be able to remain calm when the sportsbook denies to pay the winnings from bets placed on NFL FINAL, which can't be rigged I think.

Misleading marketing by Sportsbet.io called out by Peeps Place

Sportsbet.io created a NEW thread despite already announcing in their original thread about the same. If every casino were to created threads for big wins, the forum would be a mess. Anyways, that's the least of the issues here.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/unreal-sportsbetio-pays-out-a-42000000-usdt-casino-win-5480517

Steve from sportsbet advertises as "Sportsbet.io pays out a $42,000,000 USDT Casino WIN!" which was misleading since it's the provider who pays out the winnings not sportbet and it was called out publicly by Peeps who was then attacked by the Gang members, as expected.

Over 100 merits were given by LFC on the posts about this record win

Paid press releases are being shared to mislead users into believing that sportsbet actually paid the winnings.


all listed in order gang members lined up for their mug shots

the corrupt merit source unchecked by any moderator or administrator for giving merits for nothing shill posts
demote this loser

pure corruption at its finest
sr. member
Activity: 700
Merit: 470
Hope Jeremiah 17vs7
June 03, 2024, 12:05:36 AM
#72
purely disgusting from administrator allowing these pieces of shit wearing their signatures to not be investigated

What makes you think the "administrator" is "allowing" Sportsbet campaign members "to not be investigated"?

You're responsible for making the change you want to see in the world. Feel free to investigate away, nobody is stopping you.
Actually if the user knows how truly the "administrator" act against forum rules then he/she will shut the hell up because I haven't seen any rule breakers still standing after being caught and so they should bring up a proper proofs and not the if and merit system.

Look, your lying is old news. But exposing you never gets boring.

You shut him down so hard that he never came back to the forum, lol.
It's funny how though this guy has been around for long but since this year, he has been acting too dramatic especially in meta
legendary
Activity: 3010
Merit: 8114
June 02, 2024, 09:06:15 PM
#71
purely disgusting from administrator allowing these pieces of shit wearing their signatures to not be investigated

What makes you think the "administrator" is "allowing" Sportsbet campaign members "to not be investigated"?

You're responsible for making the change you want to see in the world. Feel free to investigate away, nobody is stopping you.

Look, your lying is old news. But exposing you never gets boring.

You shut him down so hard that he never came back to the forum, lol.
newbie
Activity: 79
Merit: 0
June 02, 2024, 10:53:28 AM
#70
why has this thread not been actioned yet

oh the moderators are paid shills for the sites here who hold their signatures

all makes complete sense for anyone whos not wearing shit smeared goggles to blind those greedy assholes

purely disgusting from administrator allowing these pieces of shit wearing their signatures to not be investigated
newbie
Activity: 79
Merit: 0
May 24, 2024, 05:41:27 PM
#69
this is disgusting and should be looked into by staff who are not in those campaigns

merit source solely giving campaigners and manager to get paid is unethical
legendary
Activity: 3010
Merit: 8114
March 18, 2024, 08:13:12 PM
#68
They're not baseless though...Just have ninjastic.space open on one monitor and the sportsbet thread open in another, and look at the flow of merits between the most active participants over the last 20+ pages. You will see that very low quality posts are frequently merited there, and that is only one sign of the abuse that is surrounding the sportsbet.io brand and fan-base. If you look for a while like I have, and extend your searches into trust pages, you'll end up with a network of members who have helped each other to rank up at an expedited rate in comparison to a member who actually contributes value to the forum.

Though if you aren't interested in doing that and you want to conclude my opinions are baseless (ironically, with no proof of them being baseless), sure.

I'm not sure you understand what the word "baseless" means. It means there is no basis upon which your claims can rest. You did not do the slightest bit of any research whatsoever, which means you could not present your fictional research in a manner that would support the base or basis of your claims, which means your claims are baseless. Instead, you just said, "if you look here and here you will come to the same conclusion I did." That means there is no actual basis for your claims.

Try harder or prepare to be ridiculed yet again.
legendary
Activity: 1624
Merit: 2594
Top Crypto Casino
March 18, 2024, 05:20:48 AM
#67
Well, not really. Whatever the reason for your leaving the campaign, that was maybe a convenient excuse, but not the truth.  You applied to a new one just a few minutes later, and we all know inactive accounts don't participate in campaigns. 

The application was edited to "removed" not long after it was posted, which is when I made the decision.

But to make your claims sound even more ridiculous, you even created your own topic offering your signature space and "promising" at least 100 posts per month.  How would you be able to do that if you were planning on "taking a break from the forum"?

This was posted on February 26, when I still intended to be active in the forum, weeks before I decided officially to take a break. Also, that thread did not promise at least 100 posts per month. All it did was state my average amount of posts since in the last year.

Look, your lying is old news. But exposing you never gets boring.

Caught red-handed, as usual:


https://archive.is/0laka

The topic was posted on February 26 (the same day you left the campaign, btw), but you updated it a week later (March 4), which means that your claim that you left the campaign because you are taking a break from the forum is actually a lie.

As for the "promise" of 100 posts per month, the topic title itself says: "$2.5/post or $250/month". Do the math.
legendary
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1037
March 18, 2024, 02:21:55 AM
#66
Well, not really. Whatever the reason for your leaving the campaign, that was maybe a convenient excuse, but not the truth.  You applied to a new one just a few minutes later, and we all know inactive accounts don't participate in campaigns. 

The application was edited to "removed" not long after it was posted, which is when I made the decision.

But to make your claims sound even more ridiculous, you even created your own topic offering your signature space and "promising" at least 100 posts per month.  How would you be able to do that if you were planning on "taking a break from the forum"?

This was posted on February 26, when I still intended to be active in the forum, weeks before I decided officially to take a break. Also, that thread did not promise at least 100 posts per month. All it did was state my average amount of posts since in the last year.

I quit my signature campaign because I was taking a break from the forum. Not the other way around.
Well, not really. Whatever the reason for your leaving the campaign, that was maybe a convenient excuse, but not the truth.  You applied to a new one just a few minutes later, and we all know inactive accounts don't participate in campaigns.  But to make your claims sound even more ridiculous, you even created your own topic offering your signature space and "promising" at least 100 posts per month.  How would you be able to do that if you were planning on "taking a break from the forum"?
With the offer he made to promote signatures it seems clear he did not intend to take a break, only he can explain the discrepancy in his statement but if we are being honest it will not have been the first time he has sent out conflicting messages. I could never fully work out why he would have a particular anti-agenda against the number of members and companies he chose to post about. Furthermore, the hypocrisy about what he would not promote and why, followed by the completely opposite course of action.

Are we surprised?

I've explained my way of thinking multiple times when it comes to signature campaigns. You both choose not to understand it, and default to the label of hypocrisy. I refuse to indulge in this comment further as I know that you are only making this post to get the same response as you have when you have made it in the past.

I didn't chime in on the other thread because I've witnessed what is being discussed in this thread first-hand and did some digging months before this thread arose. In essence, I was saying "Hey, I've seen this going on as well". I'm not sure how that is a problem?

Because you're not doing that, you're throwing a lot of baseless accusations around and slighting individuals and entire companies without really having the first clue what you're talking about. That's the main problem. Nobody is going to interfere with your right to do that here, but you don't get to remain free of judgment or criticism; that is also our right to point out when what you're saying is wrong, contradictory, or simply doesn't make sense.

They're not baseless though...Just have ninjastic.space open on one monitor and the sportsbet thread open in another, and look at the flow of merits between the most active participants over the last 20+ pages. You will see that very low quality posts are frequently merited there, and that is only one sign of the abuse that is surrounding the sportsbet.io brand and fan-base. If you look for a while like I have, and extend your searches into trust pages, you'll end up with a network of members who have helped each other to rank up at an expedited rate in comparison to a member who actually contributes value to the forum.

Though if you aren't interested in doing that and you want to conclude my opinions are baseless (ironically, with no proof of them being baseless), sure.
sr. member
Activity: 1666
Merit: 426
March 15, 2024, 09:26:37 PM
#65
You didn't post the username of these gang members; you just posted the merit link, so let me do it for you.

LFC_Bitcoin, jeremypwr, buwaytress (This will notify them just in case they're using the BitcoinTalk Telegram notification bot).
They are all Legendary Members. I think it doesn't matter if they're giving each other Merit.
Definitely doesn't matter if they're cycling the merits for themselves but I think that what OP is trying to say is that it's a bit unfair that the merits are not fairly distributed to other users that are outside of their clique, at least that's what I believe this is what it means. I guess, the merit sources should up their game if they don't want people like OP to be starting this kind of thread and to you OP, maybe the reason you're not getting the merits or you feel like the merits are distributed unfairly is because you're not posting what qualifies to the people that give merits as quality posts.

They spend tens of millions on sponsorships in the Premier League, but somehow it got stuck that the disputed merit distribution is in their thread.
As far as I know, the amount of merit distributed in the Sportsbet ANN thread is almost insignificant compared to WO (which is more meaningless), but that is another story that has already been discussed.
WO is a forum of it's own, there's no way to describe how that works.
legendary
Activity: 2534
Merit: 1713
Top Crypto Casino
March 14, 2024, 06:29:42 PM
#64
With the offer he made to promote signatures it seems clear he did not intend to take a break, only he can explain the discrepancy in his statement but if we are being honest it will not have been the first time he has sent out conflicting messages. I could never fully work out why he would have a particular anti-agenda against the number of members and companies he chose to post about. Furthermore, the hypocrisy about what he would not promote and why, followed by the completely opposite course of action.

Are we surprised?

I quit my signature campaign because I was taking a break from the forum. Not the other way around.
Well, not really. Whatever the reason for your leaving the campaign, that was maybe a convenient excuse, but not the truth.  You applied to a new one just a few minutes later, and we all know inactive accounts don't participate in campaigns.  But to make your claims sound even more ridiculous, you even created your own topic offering your signature space and "promising" at least 100 posts per month.  How would you be able to do that if you were planning on "taking a break from the forum"?
legendary
Activity: 2086
Merit: 1282
Logo Designer ⛨ BSFL Division1
March 14, 2024, 06:23:57 PM
#63
Did everyone receive invitations for Sportsbet gang annual special meeting yet?  Grin

I am going to propose free gang membership to all BSFL participants because we must have growth and not stagnation.
From next season we are introducing paid membership only Wink

legendary
Activity: 1624
Merit: 2594
Top Crypto Casino
March 14, 2024, 05:59:34 AM
#62
TLDR There would be a legitimate investigation here if anyone gave a shit enough so in my opinion, your post is both uncalled for and invalid.
You don't give a shit enough either, otherwise you would be conducting said investigation. Your post is just as useless as this thread. Besides, you missed the fact that OP already started another thread. Why didn't you chime in on that one? Its quite obvious OP works for a competing sportsbook and is just trying to shit on as many other casinos and campaign managers as possible. And you're sticking up for him. Well done.
You are literally wasting your time with him. Hopefully he will fade away in to a permanent absence now that he is no longer in any campaign.

I quit my signature campaign because I was taking a break from the forum. Not the other way around.

Well, not really. Whatever the reason for your leaving the campaign, that was maybe a convenient excuse, but not the truth.  You applied to a new one just a few minutes later, and we all know inactive accounts don't participate in campaigns.  But to make your claims sound even more ridiculous, you even created your own topic offering your signature space and "promising" at least 100 posts per month.  How would you be able to do that if you were planning on "taking a break from the forum"?
legendary
Activity: 3010
Merit: 8114
March 13, 2024, 10:38:29 PM
#61
I didn't chime in on the other thread because I've witnessed what is being discussed in this thread first-hand and did some digging months before this thread arose. In essence, I was saying "Hey, I've seen this going on as well". I'm not sure how that is a problem?

Because you're not doing that, you're throwing a lot of baseless accusations around and slighting individuals and entire companies without really having the first clue what you're talking about. That's the main problem. Nobody is going to interfere with your right to do that here, but you don't get to remain free of judgment or criticism; that is also our right to point out when what you're saying is wrong, contradictory, or simply doesn't make sense.
legendary
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1037
March 13, 2024, 06:37:23 AM
#60
TLDR There would be a legitimate investigation here if anyone gave a shit enough so in my opinion, your post is both uncalled for and invalid.
You don't give a shit enough either, otherwise you would be conducting said investigation. Your post is just as useless as this thread. Besides, you missed the fact that OP already started another thread. Why didn't you chime in on that one? Its quite obvious OP works for a competing sportsbook and is just trying to shit on as many other casinos and campaign managers as possible. And you're sticking up for him. Well done.
You are literally wasting your time with him. Hopefully he will fade away in to a permanent absence now that he is no longer in any campaign.

I quit my signature campaign because I was taking a break from the forum. Not the other way around.

TLDR There would be a legitimate investigation here if anyone gave a shit enough so in my opinion, your post is both uncalled for and invalid.
You don't give a shit enough either, otherwise you would be conducting said investigation. Your post is just as useless as this thread. Besides, you missed the fact that OP already started another thread. Why didn't you chime in on that one? Its quite obvious OP works for a competing sportsbook and is just trying to shit on as many other casinos and campaign managers as possible. And you're sticking up for him. Well done.
[/quote]

I'd also like to add to my last response here.

I'm not that committed to a forum dominated by people like JollyGood and the likes.

If the forum community was one that I loved, I might. Though there is a lot about this community that make me only like it, not love it.

I didn't chime in on the other thread because I've witnessed what is being discussed in this thread first-hand and did some digging months before this thread arose. In essence, I was saying "Hey, I've seen this going on as well". I'm not sure how that is a problem?
legendary
Activity: 2534
Merit: 1713
Top Crypto Casino
March 10, 2024, 03:53:34 PM
#59
TLDR There would be a legitimate investigation here if anyone gave a shit enough so in my opinion, your post is both uncalled for and invalid.
You don't give a shit enough either, otherwise you would be conducting said investigation. Your post is just as useless as this thread. Besides, you missed the fact that OP already started another thread. Why didn't you chime in on that one? Its quite obvious OP works for a competing sportsbook and is just trying to shit on as many other casinos and campaign managers as possible. And you're sticking up for him. Well done.
You are literally wasting your time with him. Hopefully he will fade away in to a permanent absence now that he is no longer in any campaign.

Justifications given by intellectuals so far to defend the merit abuse
1. They do a lot of giveaways can't you see that
2. You are a competitor fuck off
What are you trying to do here? Either you are genuinely raising a concern about something you feel strongly about or you are effectively trying to tarnish the reputation of a brand for reasons not yet known. The way you conduct yourself it seems obvious to be the latter.

Did you ever complain about the number of merits sent and received by other members? Will you be able to find any example of merits being sent/received by certain members which you can use as a comparator to make a case for your allegation? Where is the evidence?

10 years on forum? You have NOT done any favors to anyone expect for yourself by earning money posting shit like this.
Do you realise nutildah has contributed far more to this forum than you could ever dream of? Of course you do, yet you still make assumptions about him simply because he pointed out the agenda that seems to the driving force behind you.
legendary
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1037
February 17, 2024, 02:48:51 AM
#58
TLDR There would be a legitimate investigation here if anyone gave a shit enough so in my opinion, your post is both uncalled for and invalid.

You don't give a shit enough either, otherwise you would be conducting said investigation. Your post is just as useless as this thread. Besides, you missed the fact that OP already started another thread. Why didn't you chime in on that one? Its quite obvious OP works for a competing sportsbook and is just trying to shit on as many other casinos and campaign managers as possible. And you're sticking up for him. Well done.

I do not have the privilege of having enough time to fight uphill battles. I give a shit enough to chime in. I do not give a shit enough to get into arguments with tens of members who are fighting on the other side of the truth.

I did not chime into the other thread because I haven't personally observed it, nor have I taken the time to investigate it. LoyceV can vouch that I had investigated this situation long before this thread was ever created, and I came here to share that I see where the OP is coming from because I have seen it first hand. What do you want me to do, make a thread? Who will actually give a shit since majority of DefaultTrust are corrupt or silent because they don't want to be attacked by the corrupt DTs?

I'm also not sticking up for the OP. I am only sharing that I have had the same observation long ago, and that there is legitimacy to his claims.
newbie
Activity: 20
Merit: 2
February 16, 2024, 11:40:24 PM
#57


This is at least your second account made for shit talking purposes, is it not?

Fuck you and your big nothingburger of a thread.

If you had one singular functional testicle you would have posted this nonsense under your main account.

Go fuck yourself.


Sorry to everyone else but after almost 10 years here I just can't stand shittalking cowards.

Theymos owns the forum and he allowed the creation of new accounts to speak on sensitive matters. You can have your own views for which no one gives a fuck about, including me.

Posting from the main account matters, why? So that you can attack the account with your friends? Lol, that's the exact reason of using a throwaway account.

Guys like you are those who don't credit newbies and scratch the back of reputed members even when they talk BULLSHIT.


10 years on forum? You have NOT done any favors to anyone expect for yourself by earning money posting shit like this.



Someone wearing the signature of SHITCOIN is sad about people talking SHIT lol


legendary
Activity: 3010
Merit: 8114
February 16, 2024, 07:57:23 PM
#56
TLDR There would be a legitimate investigation here if anyone gave a shit enough so in my opinion, your post is both uncalled for and invalid.

You don't give a shit enough either, otherwise you would be conducting said investigation. Your post is just as useless as this thread. Besides, you missed the fact that OP already started another thread. Why didn't you chime in on that one? Its quite obvious OP works for a competing sportsbook and is just trying to shit on as many other casinos and campaign managers as possible. And you're sticking up for him. Well done.
legendary
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1037
February 16, 2024, 06:42:56 PM
#55

This is at least your second account made for shit talking purposes, is it not?

Fuck you and your big nothingburger of a thread.

If you had one singular functional testicle you would have posted this nonsense under your main account.

Go fuck yourself.


Sorry to everyone else but after almost 10 years here I just can't stand shittalking cowards.

The OP is not making up entirely false claims so i dont think that outburst was really warranted to be honest. If this all upsets you so much, stop looking and don't waste the time that you're taking to type your tantrum?

Even I have noticed the fuckery going on with the users mentioned in the OP and the sportsbet thread over 6 months before this thread. It's not a myth, you can see the circle jerking clearly on ninjastic and through a deep look of the trust system. Proof is there, though seems like you choose not to pay any attention to those important details for some reason

There is something that could genuinely something be investigated here if there was anyone in DT who first and foremost gave a shit, was committed to protecting the integrity of this forum, was 100% not corrupt or influenced in any way by forces like sportsbet, and not fearful of tue slap they might receive by members like yourself, who for some reason always assume and defend 100% innocence for accused parties.

TLDR There would be a legitimate investigation here if anyone gave a shit enough so in my opinion, your post is both uncalled for and invalid.
legendary
Activity: 3010
Merit: 8114
February 14, 2024, 09:23:17 AM
#54

This is at least your second account made for shit talking purposes, is it not?

Fuck you and your big nothingburger of a thread.

If you had one singular functional testicle you would have posted this nonsense under your main account.

Go fuck yourself.


Sorry to everyone else but after almost 10 years here I just can't stand shittalking cowards.
Pages:
Jump to: