It was a very close fight, could've gone eitherway. When its very inconclusive, they generally favor the champ to defend the belt, not in this case though. I gave it to Sean 3-2 but I knew it would've been very very close and hard to understand what judges think. As soon as I saw DDP being declared a winner, I thought there should be a rematch soon but there are a lot of contenders and since Sean hasn't defended his belt even once, should he get a title shot again? without another fight in between? I think he should fight either Whittaker, Cannonier or Izzy round 2 but then again, DDP didn't win it convincingly, should he get to hold the title for a long time? tough call.
It would be really unfair if they would instantly give Sean Strickland a rematch against Du Plessis for sure he needs to work to get it back that is the right thing to do I don't really like Strickland, but this is the right thing to do the UFC should give the opportunity to the other fighters, maybe another shot for Israel Adesanya this is for the canceled fight this two have, maybe Jared Cannonier as I have said giving some chance for the other fighters, and Jared Cannonier needs to fight for sure, and one thing is certain that Dricus Du Plessis can also choose who he liked to fight.
^ I think DDP won as he got the TD's when it mattered but I was kinda drunk. Lol. So I need to watch it again. But yeah because the fight was so close, I think they should go at it again. The UFC doesn't seem interested tho... And DDP said he wants Adesanya next.
I wonder what's next for Strickland. I feel like he's back to just being a gate keeper at top 5. :/
As for the guys saying it's a robbery... The thing with saying that when two fighters had fought a really close match is wrong. A robbery is when the match was clearly won by one guy but then the decision was given to the other guy. That's a robbery.
Sean Strickland had some complaints that Du Plessis got him with a head butt, I haven't seen it yet but maybe I will review the fight later, as I was very busy right now, I just saw it on the news but maybe it was real, but I don't know if a head but can do that much as the punch output the headbutt is not included so maybe the UFC will give Sean Strickland that rematch he wanted, but for sure It has happened in the 4th round when Du Plessis was getting the takedown and when he rises his head that head hit Sean Strickland eye, and in that time Strickland did squinting his eyes maybe that was the headbutt but I will review that later.
-snip-
From what I know, takedowns shouldn't be counted for round scoring unless there's some follow, such as ground and pound or submission attempt. But it's clear that judges are considering them as well.
Some say that the fact that DDP took Strickland down so many times, but couldn't keep him on the ground for longer than 2 minutes combined and couldn't do any damage, should actually be counted against DDP.
Yup! Takedowns are not included in the scoring count what I mean is that Takedown was a part of Strickland disrupting Strickland's momentum and movement for sure instead of Strickland Focusing on Du Plessis punches and kicks he also needs to take care of the takedowns so for sure because of that Du Plessis can get his faints and take the shot, or even a combination of takedowns and strikes.
-snip-
Because UFC puts the money first and the sport element second. What they did makes no sense, if they decided to introduce an interim heavyweight belt, than Jon Jones should be fighting Aspinall after the recovery. If they still want Jones to fight Stipe, then what's the point of the interim belt then. And what happens if Stipe wins? Will he become the undisputed champion?
That is what is crazy about this the UFC is really expecting Jon Jones to win if they still arrange a fight like Jones VS Stipe, this is why Aspinall is frustrated he won the Interim Heavy Belt and for sure he got a chance in getting Jon Jones next but the UFC is still pushing the Jones VS Miocic which this should not care anymore but the fighter with the Interim Belt.