thebitcoinquiz.com is an alt of puzzel.me - page 3.

thebitcoinquiz.com

sr. member

Activity: 280

Merit: 250

Quote from: Quickseller on June 04, 2015, 03:34:14 PM

Quote from: thebitcoinquiz.com on June 04, 2015, 03:25:54 PM

Jus a simple question, does buying negative trusted account and then using them for signature ads and reselling is something against the forum?? I don't think so, and in short that's what I did. I personally do respect each and every member out here and respect their opinions, but really am I being punished for buying negatively trusted accounts? Wow, I really feel these proofs aren't watertight and I just think after qs's few claims went wrong now quickseller is doing all this just to gain name/fame on the forum by pushing down people and making assumptions based on incomplete proofs.
Thanks

No that is not against any rule however the evidence shows that is most likely something that did not happen. As I mentioned previously addresses were posted that connected you with puzzle.me both before and after BadBear outed his alts. If the addresses were only posted after his alts were outed then it would be understandable/believable that you purchased all the accounts from him but this isn't what happened.

There is also the issue that there is zero evidence that the account was purchased (you just so happened to delete the PM's).

Then to top it off there is the issue that puzzle.me created a thread whose title matches your name on his first post.

Edit: to add further suspicion, the posts that both you and several of your alts have created were edited with the addresses removed to make it more difficult to track your alts.

the alts had already got negative trust from others one month before badbear's rating came, and I bought the accounts after those trust rating and I didn't buy em all at the same time. Deals for them were made at different times.
And so hence, badbear's rating doesn't add up to timeline and so is invaluable to the present timeline.
All the other proofs are based on your certain assumptions and suppositions, and they aren't substantial enough to prove that I am wrong.

Quickseller

copper member

Activity: 2996

Merit: 2374

Quote from: thebitcoinquiz.com on June 04, 2015, 03:25:54 PM

Jus a simple question, does buying negative trusted account and then using them for signature ads and reselling is something against the forum?? I don't think so, and in short that's what I did. I personally do respect each and every member out here and respect their opinions, but really am I being punished for buying negatively trusted accounts? Wow, I really feel these proofs aren't watertight and I just think after qs's few claims went wrong now quickseller is doing all this just to gain name/fame on the forum by pushing down people and making assumptions based on incomplete proofs.
Thanks

No that is not against any rule however the evidence shows that is most likely something that did not happen. As I mentioned previously addresses were posted that connected you with puzzle.me both before and after BadBear outed his alts. If the addresses were only posted after his alts were outed then it would be understandable/believable that you purchased all the accounts from him but this isn't what happened.

There is also the issue that there is zero evidence that the account was purchased (you just so happened to delete the PM's).

Then to top it off there is the issue that puzzle.me created a thread whose title matches your name on his first post.

Edit: to add further suspicion, the posts that both you and several of your alts have created were edited with the addresses removed to make it more difficult to track your alts.

thebitcoinquiz.com

sr. member

Activity: 280

Merit: 250

Jus a simple question, does buying negative trusted account and then using them for signature ads and reselling is something against the forum?? I don't think so, and in short that's what I did. I personally do respect each and every member out here and respect their opinions, but really am I being punished for buying negatively trusted accounts? Wow, I really feel these proofs aren't watertight and I just think after qs's few claims went wrong now quickseller is doing all this just to gain name/fame on the forum by pushing down people and making assumptions based on incomplete proofs.
Thanks

gampher

sr. member

Activity: 420

Merit: 250

Quote from: Quickseller on June 04, 2015, 02:38:52 PM

Quote from: gampher on June 04, 2015, 02:12:54 PM

Quote from: thebitcoinquiz.com on June 04, 2015, 01:57:25 PM

Quote from: Quickseller on June 04, 2015, 01:51:23 PM

Quote from: thebitcoinquiz.com on June 04, 2015, 01:33:57 PM

I have already agreed that I posses puzzel.me , mailmansdoge ( the address 1Km9U8gY4ZNjkAoLPiicQcw33JKL9yK4wL is linked with mailmansdoge account, you forgot to mention it). And you never asked me about stellar69 , I also posses that account but they were all bought by me cause they were being offered for cheap prices and I thought they might have a market and I might earn some profit, but I failed to sell them(for a marginal profit), and so these account kept on stinking with me and I used these accounts to get my investment(which I used to buy these accounts) back by joining signature campaigns with them, and that's where I used those addresses. Those addresses are not linked to any scam and have been just used after November/december after I bought these accounts. I now don't know that how do these things makes me a culprit of all the things that other people did?
I've been telling you all these things since the beginning and I don't anything going wrong here. Yes those all addresses are linked and are owned by me cuz those accounts are also owned by me(since the time those addresses were posted I owned those accounts) and so its obvious that if I own an account then ill use m address with it. But there is a huge difference between owning it and creating it.

seller69 was tagged by BadBear both before and after the various addresses were posted. This should serve as evidence that the same person likely controlled the accounts both before and after he tagged the accounts as being probable alts of puzzle.me (the person why tried the failed blackmail attempt).

There is also the issue of the fact that puzzle.me's first post is essentially your handle.

most of the other posts here are "I hate quickseller" posts and are off topic.

Accusations had already been made against stellar69* back in mid of November, badbear just made the mark permanent after a month, it doesn't mean that I was an alt of puzzel.me, its that stellar69 was an alt lf puzzel.me back in November and badbear based on previous evidences left a neg trust in December.

P.S : I am not going to explain any further.

Tldr; I am an account trader and traded a lot and lots of accounts back in December/november(all my customers were happy), I also bought stellar69, mailmansdoge, puzzel.me after they got negative trust(got em for cheap), and so I used those accounts and this guys is indirectly/unknowingly harassing me for using those accounts.
bye
Edit: You all are free to give me negative trust if you believe in quickseller. Thanks

So yet another story. So you mean you bought both puzzel.me and stellar69. Also you stated they were both from different buyers and different places. And now you say that "co-incidentally" stellar69 proved out to be puzzel.me's alt.
Wow, So Weird Story. I tried a lot to make myself think its true but sadly my brain and heart don't agree.

Interesting how puzzel.me is disagreeing with himself.....or maybe he just can't see my rating on his other account by default.

On other account? And lol yes he is disagreeing with himself because he is making stories.

gampher

sr. member

Activity: 420

Merit: 250

Quote from: AccountTrader on June 04, 2015, 02:37:55 PM

Quote from: BitcoinDistributor on June 04, 2015, 01:35:22 PM

Quote from: thebitcoinquiz.com on June 04, 2015, 01:33:57 PM

I have already agreed that I posses puzzel.me , mailmansdoge ( the address 1Km9U8gY4ZNjkAoLPiicQcw33JKL9yK4wL is linked with mailmansdoge account, you forgot to mention it). And you never asked me about stellar69 , I also posses that account but they were all bought by me cause they were being offered for cheap prices and I thought they might have a market and I might earn some profit, but I failed to sell them(for a marginal profit), and so these account kept on stinking with me and I used these accounts to get my investment(which I used to buy these accounts) back by joining signature campaigns with them, and that's where I used those addresses. Those addresses are not linked to any scam and have been just used after November/december after I bought these accounts. I now don't know that how do these things makes me a culprit of all the things that other people did?
I've been telling you all these things since the beginning and I don't anything going wrong here. Yes those all addresses are linked and are owned by me cuz those accounts are also owned by me(since the time those addresses were posted I owned those accounts) and so its obvious that if I own an account then ill use m address with it. But there is a huge difference between owning it and creating it.

Just another example of where Quickseller is trying to abuse his trust power to get rid of account sellers besides himself. Nothing new to see here guys, move along.

That is a funny example you have there about someone who no longer sells accounts, where was this "trying to get rid of account sellers" with me? Nothing new to see with the post above Just your average hater troll and all around scammer Roll Eyes

as usual QS is doing the job other scammers would prefer he never, glad he does.

I do agree QS at times doesn't see the situation properly and goes ahead with giving a negative trust even without having solid proofs.
But this time, he is all correct. All his proofs are good enough to prove that thebitcoinquiz.com is a scammer and an alt of puzzel.me

Too Many Haters for QS around here Roll Eyes

Quickseller

copper member

Activity: 2996

Merit: 2374

Quote from: gampher on June 04, 2015, 02:12:54 PM

Quote from: thebitcoinquiz.com on June 04, 2015, 01:57:25 PM

Quote from: Quickseller on June 04, 2015, 01:51:23 PM

Quote from: thebitcoinquiz.com on June 04, 2015, 01:33:57 PM

I have already agreed that I posses puzzel.me , mailmansdoge ( the address 1Km9U8gY4ZNjkAoLPiicQcw33JKL9yK4wL is linked with mailmansdoge account, you forgot to mention it). And you never asked me about stellar69 , I also posses that account but they were all bought by me cause they were being offered for cheap prices and I thought they might have a market and I might earn some profit, but I failed to sell them(for a marginal profit), and so these account kept on stinking with me and I used these accounts to get my investment(which I used to buy these accounts) back by joining signature campaigns with them, and that's where I used those addresses. Those addresses are not linked to any scam and have been just used after November/december after I bought these accounts. I now don't know that how do these things makes me a culprit of all the things that other people did?
I've been telling you all these things since the beginning and I don't anything going wrong here. Yes those all addresses are linked and are owned by me cuz those accounts are also owned by me(since the time those addresses were posted I owned those accounts) and so its obvious that if I own an account then ill use m address with it. But there is a huge difference between owning it and creating it.

seller69 was tagged by BadBear both before and after the various addresses were posted. This should serve as evidence that the same person likely controlled the accounts both before and after he tagged the accounts as being probable alts of puzzle.me (the person why tried the failed blackmail attempt).

There is also the issue of the fact that puzzle.me's first post is essentially your handle.

most of the other posts here are "I hate quickseller" posts and are off topic.

Accusations had already been made against stellar69* back in mid of November, badbear just made the mark permanent after a month, it doesn't mean that I was an alt of puzzel.me, its that stellar69 was an alt lf puzzel.me back in November and badbear based on previous evidences left a neg trust in December.

P.S : I am not going to explain any further.

Tldr; I am an account trader and traded a lot and lots of accounts back in December/november(all my customers were happy), I also bought stellar69, mailmansdoge, puzzel.me after they got negative trust(got em for cheap), and so I used those accounts and this guys is indirectly/unknowingly harassing me for using those accounts.
bye
Edit: You all are free to give me negative trust if you believe in quickseller. Thanks

So yet another story. So you mean you bought both puzzel.me and stellar69. Also you stated they were both from different buyers and different places. And now you say that "co-incidentally" stellar69 proved out to be puzzel.me's alt.
Wow, So Weird Story. I tried a lot to make myself think its true but sadly my brain and heart don't agree.

Interesting how puzzel.me is disagreeing with himself.....or maybe he just can't see my rating on his other account by default.

AccountTrader

sr. member

Activity: 321

Merit: 250

Quote from: BitcoinDistributor on June 04, 2015, 01:35:22 PM

Quote from: thebitcoinquiz.com on June 04, 2015, 01:33:57 PM

I have already agreed that I posses puzzel.me , mailmansdoge ( the address 1Km9U8gY4ZNjkAoLPiicQcw33JKL9yK4wL is linked with mailmansdoge account, you forgot to mention it). And you never asked me about stellar69 , I also posses that account but they were all bought by me cause they were being offered for cheap prices and I thought they might have a market and I might earn some profit, but I failed to sell them(for a marginal profit), and so these account kept on stinking with me and I used these accounts to get my investment(which I used to buy these accounts) back by joining signature campaigns with them, and that's where I used those addresses. Those addresses are not linked to any scam and have been just used after November/december after I bought these accounts. I now don't know that how do these things makes me a culprit of all the things that other people did?
I've been telling you all these things since the beginning and I don't anything going wrong here. Yes those all addresses are linked and are owned by me cuz those accounts are also owned by me(since the time those addresses were posted I owned those accounts) and so its obvious that if I own an account then ill use m address with it. But there is a huge difference between owning it and creating it.

Just another example of where Quickseller is trying to abuse his trust power to get rid of account sellers besides himself. Nothing new to see here guys, move along.

That is a funny example you have there about someone who no longer sells accounts, where was this "trying to get rid of account sellers" with me? Nothing new to see with the post above Just your average hater troll and all around scammer Roll Eyes

as usual QS is doing the job other scammers would prefer he never, glad he does.

gampher

sr. member

Activity: 420

Merit: 250

Quote from: xetsr on June 04, 2015, 02:18:28 PM

Hate quickseller all you want but look through what he posted. More then enough "evidence" has been posted IMO.

I do think he can be a little quick once in awhile but it looks like he's done a fair amount of research and is probably right this time.

Yes he looks all right this time and I have reverified all those things and confirm that thebitcoinquiz is a scammer and is making stories to save himself.
Xestr can you leave a negative feedback? As neither I not Quickseller is in default list.

xetsr

legendary

Activity: 1120

Merit: 1000

Hate quickseller all you want but look through what he posted. More then enough "evidence" has been posted IMO.

I do think he can be a little quick once in awhile but it looks like he's done a fair amount of research and is probably right this time.

gampher

sr. member

Activity: 420

Merit: 250

Quote from: thebitcoinquiz.com on June 04, 2015, 01:57:25 PM

Quote from: Quickseller on June 04, 2015, 01:51:23 PM

Quote from: thebitcoinquiz.com on June 04, 2015, 01:33:57 PM

I have already agreed that I posses puzzel.me , mailmansdoge ( the address 1Km9U8gY4ZNjkAoLPiicQcw33JKL9yK4wL is linked with mailmansdoge account, you forgot to mention it). And you never asked me about stellar69 , I also posses that account but they were all bought by me cause they were being offered for cheap prices and I thought they might have a market and I might earn some profit, but I failed to sell them(for a marginal profit), and so these account kept on stinking with me and I used these accounts to get my investment(which I used to buy these accounts) back by joining signature campaigns with them, and that's where I used those addresses. Those addresses are not linked to any scam and have been just used after November/december after I bought these accounts. I now don't know that how do these things makes me a culprit of all the things that other people did?
I've been telling you all these things since the beginning and I don't anything going wrong here. Yes those all addresses are linked and are owned by me cuz those accounts are also owned by me(since the time those addresses were posted I owned those accounts) and so its obvious that if I own an account then ill use m address with it. But there is a huge difference between owning it and creating it.

seller69 was tagged by BadBear both before and after the various addresses were posted. This should serve as evidence that the same person likely controlled the accounts both before and after he tagged the accounts as being probable alts of puzzle.me (the person why tried the failed blackmail attempt).

There is also the issue of the fact that puzzle.me's first post is essentially your handle.

most of the other posts here are "I hate quickseller" posts and are off topic.

Accusations had already been made against stellar69* back in mid of November, badbear just made the mark permanent after a month, it doesn't mean that I was an alt of puzzel.me, its that stellar69 was an alt lf puzzel.me back in November and badbear based on previous evidences left a neg trust in December.

P.S : I am not going to explain any further.

Tldr; I am an account trader and traded a lot and lots of accounts back in December/november(all my customers were happy), I also bought stellar69, mailmansdoge, puzzel.me after they got negative trust(got em for cheap), and so I used those accounts and this guys is indirectly/unknowingly harassing me for using those accounts.
bye
Edit: You all are free to give me negative trust if you believe in quickseller. Thanks

So yet another story. So you mean you bought both puzzel.me and stellar69. Also you stated they were both from different buyers and different places. And now you say that "co-incidentally" stellar69 proved out to be puzzel.me's alt.
Wow, So Weird Story. I tried a lot to make myself think its true but sadly my brain and heart don't agree.

gampher

sr. member

Activity: 420

Merit: 250

Quote from: thebitcoinquiz.com on June 04, 2015, 01:43:12 PM

Quote from: legendster on June 04, 2015, 01:37:35 PM

Quote from: thebitcoinquiz.com on June 04, 2015, 01:33:57 PM

I have already agreed that I posses puzzel.me , mailmansdoge ( the address 1Km9U8gY4ZNjkAoLPiicQcw33JKL9yK4wL is linked with mailmansdoge account, you forgot to mention it). And you never asked me about stellar69 , I also posses that account but they were all bought by me cause they were being offered for cheap prices and I thought they might have a market and I might earn some profit, but I failed to sell them(for a marginal profit), and so these account kept on stinking with me and I used these accounts to get my investment(which I used to buy these accounts) back by joining signature campaigns with them, and that's where I used those addresses. Those addresses are not linked to any scam and have been just used after November/december after I bought these accounts. I now don't know that how do these things makes me a culprit of all the things that other people did?
I've been telling you all these things since the beginning and I don't anything going wrong here. Yes those all addresses are linked and are owned by me cuz those accounts are also owned by me(since the time those addresses were posted I owned those accounts) and so its obvious that if I own an account then ill use m address with it. But there is a huge difference between owning it and creating it.

Out of curiosity, why did you buy these accounts and from whom ?

Puzzel.me was bought from a guy on primedice, others were brought from btctalk users.
And I know the original owner of puzzel.me account, we used to discuss ideas together on dogecoin IRC, later on he sold that account, and then after a few months I bought that account from this pd guy. Don't know much about what happened in between.
And as account trading is allowed on the forum, I don't think I did anything wrong.

Quote from: gampher on June 04, 2015, 01:41:13 PM

Quote from: legendster on June 04, 2015, 01:26:55 PM

Disagreed. This is a kid who's giving his boards. I have his residential address as well. Also added him on FB. If this is puzzel.me then puzzle.me has to be an Indian school kid.

PS : I do not know puzzle.me or have any recollection of what his origin story was or the fallout of his scam attempts(??), I was absent from the forum for a good amount of 2014.

Why can't puzzel.me be an Indian school kid? I am pretty sure thebitcoinquiz.com is his alt. Legenster sorry to say but you are just backing up a scammer. Your statements don't prove that thebitcoinquiz.com isn't his alt.
Also I got another proof though might not be a valid one. Puzzel.me ran a quiz game and it was all scam. He asked for bitcoins to reveal answers to people. Everyone knows about that scam quiz thing. Also thebitcoinquiz.com was registered during the same time period. Thus, another quiz game after puzzel.me was a flop.
This is just my small accusation adding in the list of BIG accusation of Quickseller.

Very well done Quickseller.

The quiz idea was mine's and puzzel.me's both. Later on he went on to conduct it alone. And I don't know much what happened after it, but I know that puzzel.me got sold. And yes, puzzel.me was indian, idk if he was school kid or not.
And the accounts weren't registered during the same period, and there weren't any accusations against the quiz (IIRC), but I don't remember much.

Please stop now. You have made enough stories. You are literally trying to get out of the situation by making silly excuses. Stop making more stories. If I put up another accusation I am sure I will get a nice story once again.

Its really sad that legendster is backing him up.
The best thing we can do now is PM theymos to check IP Logs and if the IPs are close to similar ( many people have dynamic IPs ) its obvious this scam accusation is 100% correct.

thebitcoinquiz.com

sr. member

Activity: 280

Merit: 250

Quote from: Quickseller on June 04, 2015, 01:51:23 PM

Quote from: thebitcoinquiz.com on June 04, 2015, 01:33:57 PM

I have already agreed that I posses puzzel.me , mailmansdoge ( the address 1Km9U8gY4ZNjkAoLPiicQcw33JKL9yK4wL is linked with mailmansdoge account, you forgot to mention it). And you never asked me about stellar69 , I also posses that account but they were all bought by me cause they were being offered for cheap prices and I thought they might have a market and I might earn some profit, but I failed to sell them(for a marginal profit), and so these account kept on stinking with me and I used these accounts to get my investment(which I used to buy these accounts) back by joining signature campaigns with them, and that's where I used those addresses. Those addresses are not linked to any scam and have been just used after November/december after I bought these accounts. I now don't know that how do these things makes me a culprit of all the things that other people did?
I've been telling you all these things since the beginning and I don't anything going wrong here. Yes those all addresses are linked and are owned by me cuz those accounts are also owned by me(since the time those addresses were posted I owned those accounts) and so its obvious that if I own an account then ill use m address with it. But there is a huge difference between owning it and creating it.

seller69 was tagged by BadBear both before and after the various addresses were posted. This should serve as evidence that the same person likely controlled the accounts both before and after he tagged the accounts as being probable alts of puzzle.me (the person why tried the failed blackmail attempt).

There is also the issue of the fact that puzzle.me's first post is essentially your handle.

most of the other posts here are "I hate quickseller" posts and are off topic.

Accusations had already been made against stellar69* back in mid of November, badbear just made the mark permanent after a month, it doesn't mean that I was an alt of puzzel.me, its that stellar69 was an alt lf puzzel.me back in November and badbear based on previous evidences left a neg trust in December.

P.S : I am not going to explain any further.

Tldr; I am an account trader and traded a lot and lots of accounts back in December/november(all my customers were happy), I also bought stellar69, mailmansdoge, puzzel.me after they got negative trust(got em for cheap), and so I used those accounts and this guys is indirectly/unknowingly harassing me for using those accounts.
bye
Edit: You all are free to give me negative trust if you believe in quickseller. Thanks

Quickseller

copper member

Activity: 2996

Merit: 2374

There is also this thread
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/why-did-quickseller-add-this-negative-trust-without-any-reason-1053201

The account is spend-linked to thebitcoinquiz and puzzle.me however he claimed to know nothing about puzzle.me Roll Eyes

Quickseller

copper member

Activity: 2996

Merit: 2374

Quote from: thebitcoinquiz.com on June 04, 2015, 01:33:57 PM

I have already agreed that I posses puzzel.me , mailmansdoge ( the address 1Km9U8gY4ZNjkAoLPiicQcw33JKL9yK4wL is linked with mailmansdoge account, you forgot to mention it). And you never asked me about stellar69 , I also posses that account but they were all bought by me cause they were being offered for cheap prices and I thought they might have a market and I might earn some profit, but I failed to sell them(for a marginal profit), and so these account kept on stinking with me and I used these accounts to get my investment(which I used to buy these accounts) back by joining signature campaigns with them, and that's where I used those addresses. Those addresses are not linked to any scam and have been just used after November/december after I bought these accounts. I now don't know that how do these things makes me a culprit of all the things that other people did?
I've been telling you all these things since the beginning and I don't anything going wrong here. Yes those all addresses are linked and are owned by me cuz those accounts are also owned by me(since the time those addresses were posted I owned those accounts) and so its obvious that if I own an account then ill use m address with it. But there is a huge difference between owning it and creating it.

seller69 was tagged by BadBear both before and after the various addresses were posted. This should serve as evidence that the same person likely controlled the accounts both before and after he tagged the accounts as being probable alts of puzzle.me (the person why tried the failed blackmail attempt).

There is also the issue of the fact that puzzle.me's first post is essentially your handle.

most of the other posts here are "I hate quickseller" posts and are off topic.

thebitcoinquiz.com

sr. member

Activity: 280

Merit: 250

Quote from: legendster on June 04, 2015, 01:46:47 PM

Quote from: thebitcoinquiz.com on June 04, 2015, 01:43:12 PM

Quote from: legendster on June 04, 2015, 01:37:35 PM

Out of curiosity, why did you buy these accounts and from whom ?

Puzzel.me was bought from a guy on primedice, others were brought from btctalk users.
And I know the original owner of puzzel.me account, we used to discuss ideas together on dogecoin IRC, later on he sold that account, and then after a few months I bought that account from this pd guy. Don't know much about what happened in between.
And as account trading is allowed on the forum, I don't think I did anything wrong.

If you knew what he was upto then you knew very well about the kind of heat it would bring if you bought such an account. Now you have to deal with it.

Quickie boy is a moron; so dont worry about him, try to stay true to the people who you trade with and maintain transparency in everything you do here, no one will care about his accusations.

The original owner was a pretty fine person and I don't really think that he would have done something wrong. But idk much.

legendster

hero member

Activity: 1778

Merit: 764

www.V.systems

Quote from: thebitcoinquiz.com on June 04, 2015, 01:43:12 PM

Quote from: legendster on June 04, 2015, 01:37:35 PM

Out of curiosity, why did you buy these accounts and from whom ?

Puzzel.me was bought from a guy on primedice, others were brought from btctalk users.
And I know the original owner of puzzel.me account, we used to discuss ideas together on dogecoin IRC, later on he sold that account, and then after a few months I bought that account from this pd guy. Don't know much about what happened in between.
And as account trading is allowed on the forum, I don't think I did anything wrong.

If you knew what he was upto then you knew very well about the kind of heat it would bring if you bought such an account. Now you have to deal with it.

Quickie boy is a moron; so dont worry about him, try to stay true to the people who you trade with and maintain transparency in everything you do here, no one will care about his accusations.

thebitcoinquiz.com

sr. member

Activity: 280

Merit: 250

Quote from: legendster on June 04, 2015, 01:37:35 PM

Quote from: thebitcoinquiz.com on June 04, 2015, 01:33:57 PM

I have already agreed that I posses puzzel.me , mailmansdoge ( the address 1Km9U8gY4ZNjkAoLPiicQcw33JKL9yK4wL is linked with mailmansdoge account, you forgot to mention it). And you never asked me about stellar69 , I also posses that account but they were all bought by me cause they were being offered for cheap prices and I thought they might have a market and I might earn some profit, but I failed to sell them(for a marginal profit), and so these account kept on stinking with me and I used these accounts to get my investment(which I used to buy these accounts) back by joining signature campaigns with them, and that's where I used those addresses. Those addresses are not linked to any scam and have been just used after November/december after I bought these accounts. I now don't know that how do these things makes me a culprit of all the things that other people did?
I've been telling you all these things since the beginning and I don't anything going wrong here. Yes those all addresses are linked and are owned by me cuz those accounts are also owned by me(since the time those addresses were posted I owned those accounts) and so its obvious that if I own an account then ill use m address with it. But there is a huge difference between owning it and creating it.

Out of curiosity, why did you buy these accounts and from whom ?

Puzzel.me was bought from a guy on primedice, others were brought from btctalk users.
And I know the original owner of puzzel.me account, we used to discuss ideas together on dogecoin IRC, later on he sold that account, and then after a few months I bought that account from this pd guy. Don't know much about what happened in between.
And as account trading is allowed on the forum, I don't think I did anything wrong.

Quote from: gampher on June 04, 2015, 01:41:13 PM

Quote from: legendster on June 04, 2015, 01:26:55 PM

Disagreed. This is a kid who's giving his boards. I have his residential address as well. Also added him on FB. If this is puzzel.me then puzzle.me has to be an Indian school kid.

PS : I do not know puzzle.me or have any recollection of what his origin story was or the fallout of his scam attempts(??), I was absent from the forum for a good amount of 2014.

Why can't puzzel.me be an Indian school kid? I am pretty sure thebitcoinquiz.com is his alt. Legenster sorry to say but you are just backing up a scammer. Your statements don't prove that thebitcoinquiz.com isn't his alt.
Also I got another proof though might not be a valid one. Puzzel.me ran a quiz game and it was all scam. He asked for bitcoins to reveal answers to people. Everyone knows about that scam quiz thing. Also thebitcoinquiz.com was registered during the same time period. Thus, another quiz game after puzzel.me was a flop.
This is just my small accusation adding in the list of BIG accusation of Quickseller.

Very well done Quickseller.

The quiz idea was mine's and puzzel.me's both. Later on he went on to conduct it alone. And I don't know much what happened after it, but I know that puzzel.me got sold. And yes, puzzel.me was indian, idk if he was school kid or not.
And the accounts weren't registered during the same period, and there weren't any accusations against the quiz (IIRC), but I don't remember much.

gampher

sr. member

Activity: 420

Merit: 250

Quote from: legendster on June 04, 2015, 01:26:55 PM

Disagreed. This is a kid who's giving his boards. I have his residential address as well. Also added him on FB. If this is puzzel.me then puzzle.me has to be an Indian school kid.

PS : I do not know puzzle.me or have any recollection of what his origin story was or the fallout of his scam attempts(??), I was absent from the forum for a good amount of 2014.

Why can't puzzel.me be an Indian school kid? I am pretty sure thebitcoinquiz.com is his alt. Legenster sorry to say but you are just backing up a scammer. Your statements don't prove that thebitcoinquiz.com isn't his alt.
Also I got another proof though might not be a valid one. Puzzel.me ran a quiz game and it was all scam. He asked for bitcoins to reveal answers to people. Everyone knows about that scam quiz thing. Also thebitcoinquiz.com was registered during the same time period. Thus, another quiz game after puzzel.me was a flop.
This is just my small accusation adding in the list of BIG accusation of Quickseller.

Very well done Quickseller.

legendster

hero member

Activity: 1778

Merit: 764

www.V.systems

Quote from: thebitcoinquiz.com on June 04, 2015, 01:33:57 PM

I have already agreed that I posses puzzel.me , mailmansdoge ( the address 1Km9U8gY4ZNjkAoLPiicQcw33JKL9yK4wL is linked with mailmansdoge account, you forgot to mention it). And you never asked me about stellar69 , I also posses that account but they were all bought by me cause they were being offered for cheap prices and I thought they might have a market and I might earn some profit, but I failed to sell them(for a marginal profit), and so these account kept on stinking with me and I used these accounts to get my investment(which I used to buy these accounts) back by joining signature campaigns with them, and that's where I used those addresses. Those addresses are not linked to any scam and have been just used after November/december after I bought these accounts. I now don't know that how do these things makes me a culprit of all the things that other people did?
I've been telling you all these things since the beginning and I don't anything going wrong here. Yes those all addresses are linked and are owned by me cuz those accounts are also owned by me(since the time those addresses were posted I owned those accounts) and so its obvious that if I own an account then ill use m address with it. But there is a huge difference between owning it and creating it.

Out of curiosity, why did you buy these accounts and from whom ?

BitcoinDistributor

sr. member

Activity: 350

Merit: 250

Quote from: thebitcoinquiz.com on June 04, 2015, 01:33:57 PM

I have already agreed that I posses puzzel.me , mailmansdoge ( the address 1Km9U8gY4ZNjkAoLPiicQcw33JKL9yK4wL is linked with mailmansdoge account, you forgot to mention it). And you never asked me about stellar69 , I also posses that account but they were all bought by me cause they were being offered for cheap prices and I thought they might have a market and I might earn some profit, but I failed to sell them(for a marginal profit), and so these account kept on stinking with me and I used these accounts to get my investment(which I used to buy these accounts) back by joining signature campaigns with them, and that's where I used those addresses. Those addresses are not linked to any scam and have been just used after November/december after I bought these accounts. I now don't know that how do these things makes me a culprit of all the things that other people did?
I've been telling you all these things since the beginning and I don't anything going wrong here. Yes those all addresses are linked and are owned by me cuz those accounts are also owned by me(since the time those addresses were posted I owned those accounts) and so its obvious that if I own an account then ill use m address with it. But there is a huge difference between owning it and creating it.

Just another example of where Quickseller is trying to abuse his trust power to get rid of account sellers besides himself. Nothing new to see here guys, move along.

Topic: thebitcoinquiz.com is an alt of puzzel.me - page 3. (Read 3071 times)