Topic: THEYMOS GIVES NEW MANDATE TO DT MEMBERS - will they take heed?????????????????? - page 2. (Read 1032 times)

This is why i say Power is blind as you people do not want to listen anyone. Try to click each of the references mentioned in the snapshot.  Its just like few people have a group here and they will help each other only and don't even want to listen to anyone and use this forum for their own benefit.

Here is a brief recap of my false Red Trust:

I said some harsh word to Hampaz and he used his power of red trust and give me  Red paint on assumption that my any other alt account was not accepted in fortuneJack while i don't have any.

The Pharmacist, Gave me Red trust because i offered to buy an account but the deal was never finalized. You can find the post here.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.14591746

The Rest of the people just copy pasted the "The Pharmacist", to make the blood even more RED  

I've gotten quite the reputation tagging people indeed. Dangerous kitty.

Everyone who I don't tag is my pal? I'll be damned, gotta tag 99.99% of the forum then.

I don't see your evidence that we are an alt of anyone ?

We DO SEE that you will not deny that you are a liar and scammer. Since the evidence is there in black and white. I guess there can be no denying it.

Why do you not have a red tag?? Red tags are for scammers you clearly are a scammer?

Why do you think you can give people red trust because they say they will invite others to investigate your past?  

How does an observable scammer not get red trust?

Persons who say they will encourage others to review the past of observable scammers are given red trust by those scammers??

How does that work?

Thanks for confirming you will continue to abuse the trust system and pay no heed to Theymos.

You wish to keep abusing red trust and you will continue to keep abusing it.  

I see the only option is to black list you and any other person that wishes to abuse red trust.

I would also black list any DT that refuses to give an observable liar and scammer red trust given the observable evidence  in this thread combined with all of the other Financially Motivated schemes you seem to be linked to. You must be the most dangerous scammer on this board.

@LFC shit posting bot

Looks like double standards.  Complaining that account sellers are "apparently scammers"

Ignores his pal nutildah calling people EVIL for selling their accounts and claiming they can be used to scam



Then decides to by his own perception facilitate scamming by selling his own account

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.16312368


A lot of these DT members are observably clearly untrustworthy when it comes to money. Why the fuck are they on DT?

@2girls

U OK HUN?

I don't know who is he but he did not admit anywhere that he is crypto hunter. What worse is that "LFC_Bitcoin"  has given merit to "Lauda" on his baseless  assumptions. Isn't a merit abuse too.  

Power do make people blind as they start to consider themselves God

I have better things to do than play around with a child using alt accounts all day. You got to create more threads to attract my full attention, these are rookie numbers.

So now everyone knows and openly admits that  "DT is a mafia"  
 



Maybe OP is not happy but i am Hopeful that things will be better one day. This decision shows Theymos is not only concerned about the shit posters but he is also concerned about few DT members who are also spoiling this forum for their own benefits.

Nice attempt at a diversion.

I see no admission of any such thing nice attempt to divert. But enough side tracking let's discuss your lying and scamming and using red trust to silence people who point out the truth you are observably a liar and scammer.

Let's keep to YOUR PAST. No diverting scammer.

SO WITH YOUR POCKETS STUFFED WITH DARK COINS THERE WAS NO PREMINE BECAUSE YOU WERE ON THE LAUNCH HEY???

Look at the people here crying to keep the power to give red tags to anyone that presents observable instances of their previous behaviors.

Sorry but scam tags for SCAMMERS ONLY. Obviously EXTORTIONISTS and those MESSING with escrow funds should also get a strong look at.

EDIT - lauda?? where have you gone? we were going to debate your lying and scamming? but you seem to have vanished?

Nice of you to admit that you're cryptohunter. 

That sounds like you are reaching and guessing? We can discuss your theories later, let's stick to the hard evidence that is observable. We are not an alt of anyone.

Where as we have observable instances of you lying and scamming?


Here you are LYING for financial gain. Trying to scam investors into believing there was no instamine??  You are a liar and a scammer.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7535561

there was an instamine and the project dev offered a 2 000 000 000 usd (peak) to compensate those miners that were shut out when the instamine.

You always have been since the start. It does not surprise me at all that you are now trying to extort people and shut them down with red trust.

You should have a red tag.  Lying for financial gain is scamming. You are a scammer.

You are using red trust to silence people presenting instances from your past.

In light of your natural scamming and lying behavior it makes the extortion attempt

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/laudatmanminifrijironmarvel2owlcatz-extortion-attempt-1764757

We think the escrow details of you possibly moving 3000 BTC and profiting from the fork should be made transparent and open.


Why are you applying red trust to people who simply say they will investigate your post history if you have NOTHING TO HIDE??

You are the scammer here, you should have red trust.

If you make more alt accounts, I'll tag them too. Dodging your red trust via alts does not work (scammer or not).

Really? can you present your strong case that I am a scammer because I can present observable instances where you have

1. Lied for financial gain (scammed)
2. Trust abused the system, and given red trust to individuals for them merely stating they will encourage others to examine your post history
3. Been STRONGLY implicated in an extortion scheme


We will welcome a full debate with such an observable liar, scammer, trust abuser and one STRONGLY implicated in a serious extortion scheme. Not to mention the escrow details on that 3000 btc move you pulled, not that we are saying that has as yet a strong case behind it but we feel it should have a transparent full investigation done on it.


What's wrong guys?? you don't wish to see scammers ONLY given scam tags?

A step back to centralization hahah. What lauda means is that red trust is being gradually taken away from him to silence whistle blowers that present observable instances of his lying and scamming.

Time to ensure ONLY scammers get scam tags, not just anyone who mentions observable instances in your own past you would like to hide.

Seems okay I guess (although this is a step back towards centralization), and it looks like I don't have to modify any existing ratings.

This thread is like a honey pot for trust abusers LOL

Come on now guys let's have some sensible enforcement to prevent the reals scammers silencing whistle blowers.

Looks like so far the idea of giving scam tags to scammers is not too popular. haha

Shut up, scammer! 

You will not take my money, scammer.

Theymos obviously doesn't want to do that, despite all your nagging and whining from this and presumably other accounts. 

Just woke up to see this new thing by Theymos, and it seems to be more of a disclaimer that DT feedback might not be given for straight-up scamming reasons, which most of us already knew.  I guess it does put more responsibility on DT members to leave feedback for "the right reasons", it doesn't look like there's a penalty for not doing so.  That's fair.  DT has always policed itself and will continue to.  Members who leave garbage tags won't stay in DT for long, and it puts the onus of relying on trust ratings squarely on whoever is looking at them.  That sounds like something Theymos would do.

Doesn't make OP happy, and I'm not surprised.  He'll never be happy until the trust system is destroyed and there's nothing left to this forum but a shitposted-over toxic wasteland.  Not the kind of forum most DT members are looking for.

I'm almost certain that cryptohunter isn't banned, but The-One-Above-All is his alt and wants everyone to think his old account was banned because it supports his narrative of censorship and oppression or whatever.

I'm not sure cryptohunter is banned.  She doesn't show up on the seclog or the modlog, and bpip has no mention of a ban.  She hasn't logged on since the 13th, well not with that account anyway.  Now we get to deal with CH Uber Alles.

I might start taking bets on when he gets his new account banned, like the last one.

I have you on ignore so I cant see what you're writing, but I dont think you added enough question marks to your subject title. Is it really a question? I'm not certain...