Pages:
Author

Topic: THEYMOS GIVES NEW MANDATE TO DT MEMBERS - will they take heed?????????????????? (Read 1030 times)

Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
This should how the DT members should act. theymos is concern about the abuses being made from the DT. Like in those market place where accounts to be trade is allowed but most sellers are tagged with negative trust. I do not really know if they were really being proven as scammer but I do believe that DT are responsible in giving red trust. Maybe not all DT's are abusing in giving red trust but jist hoping that there are ain't abuses as it seems theymos had made some reactions on this.

I've started deleting trust I've left for wackjobs like notbatman or BADecker.    I sure don't trust anything those idiots say, but Theymos is correct - red trust should be left for scammers.  I fully endorse his philosophy.
full member
Activity: 924
Merit: 220
This should how the DT members should act. theymos is concern about the abuses being made from the DT. Like in those market place where accounts to be trade is allowed but most sellers are tagged with negative trust. I do not really know if they were really being proven as scammer but I do believe that DT are responsible in giving red trust. Maybe not all DT's are abusing in giving red trust but jist hoping that there are ain't abuses as it seems theymos had made some reactions on this.
legendary
Activity: 2982
Merit: 7986
Welp CH, you should probably pack your bags and take off then since you've made it clear (several times) this forum isn't for you. Guess your "talents" will never be appreciated here, and that's a "shame."

See ya later dude.
member
Activity: 252
Merit: 56
Q: What 'DO' you and a broken record have in common notildah?

A. You're both worth way less that 0.02BTC.  

Meh.... My joke was still better.

Look at you CH: feigning a ban and giving your alt a preposterously pretentious name... Are you trying to test the limits of how far you can possibly alienate yourself from this forum while still remaining a member?

Perhaps the funniest part is you now refer to yourself as "we"; you are so desperate to have somebody on your side you have invented fictitious joint account holders. The totality of your schism between fantasy and reality is nearing completion.

At least you'll be remembered as one of the biggest nutjobs to ever infest the forum's pages, which actually is a pretty impressive feat.

But you are a running joke? someone who defines themselves and EVIL https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.50719875

I mean someone defining themselves as EVIL is the NUTjob here clearly NUTildah.

Hilarious and co the most biased mod on this board seems to be giving merits to OFF TOPIC and garbage posts that I have reported for deletion. That are based on the speculation and guesswork of EVIL members.

This mod refuses to delete posts that we correctly report as being off topic but deletes our own ON TOPIC posts when he feels like hiding the truth about himself and his pals. These off topic speculations regarding POSSIBLE alts of members are not on topic.

What an observable mass of dirty dogs have infiltrated this board in positions of trust and control. Disgusting.

The OLD nutildah seemed to be less approving of the hilarious example of an impartial mod.


Fixed. I've still yet to see any proof of accounts being sold to be used for 'mass propganda'.

Who cares what the person is gonna do with the account? Whatever it is, it is BULLSHIT because they are pretending to be a different person. This makes them a liar, an impostor, a bullshitter.

And here you are a staff member defending this behavior.

You guys are greedy beyond belief. What would Satoshi say if he read about this? I can't help but think he would say you destroyed the original intention of his forum and turned it into a breeding ground for scum and villainy.


Then nutildah decides to sell his own account. SCUM AND VILLAIN!! the pair of them, and their pals.

We will gladly be alienated from these types. We don't feel it appropriate that you cast the rest of the "community" in with the observably corrupt and dirty.

Merit is a fucking joke. Pick the most misleading shitposts in any serious thread debating changes for the betterment of this forum, and you will usually locate the posts with the most merits. Great system. 
legendary
Activity: 2982
Merit: 7986
The rest of the bus-bicycle-coup gang is somewhat murky. There was a group of alts in it that probably doesn't belong to CH. Quickseller might have had a hand in it because some of those users popped up after months of being dormant since a prior attack on Lauda. Or it could just be an unrelated group of Lauda's foes.

Pretty sure those are owned by ac2eugenio, who must have had a wrench or two thrown into one or more of the bounties he was managing by Lauda. He has at least 30 alt accounts, maybe more than 50.
legendary
Activity: 3528
Merit: 9525
#1 VIP Crypto Casino
Is it just me or has anybody else ever thought that maybe Thule could be another one of CH’s alts?

I’m probably barking up the wrong tree but I had suspicions that most of the DT take over coup accounts could all have been CH.

No, Thule's problems predate CH's recent hysteria and their language is quite different. Another recent multi-accounting troll is Rambotnic. Those three (Thule, CH, Rambotnic) are almost certainly different users, each with their own set of sockpuppets. Their interests align (troll the shit out of DT/merit/etc) so they support each other.

The rest of the bus-bicycle-coup gang is somewhat murky. There was a group of alts in it that probably doesn't belong to CH. Quickseller might have had a hand in it because some of those users popped up after months of being dormant since a prior attack on Lauda. Or it could just be an unrelated group of Lauda's foes.

I did think about QS. He always seems to be available to reply to their threads fairly quickly & is very active in them. CH started a thread about me in Reputation & QS was on hand to back him up fairly quickly agreeing that I shouldn’t be a Merit source or on DT.
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
Is it just me or has anybody else ever thought that maybe Thule could be another one of CH’s alts?

I’m probably barking up the wrong tree but I had suspicions that most of the DT take over coup accounts could all have been CH.

No, Thule's problems predate CH's recent hysteria and their language is quite different. Another recent multi-accounting troll is Rambotnic. Those three (Thule, CH, Rambotnic) are almost certainly different users, each with their own set of sockpuppets. Their interests align (troll the shit out of DT/merit/etc) so they support each other.

The rest of the bus-bicycle-coup gang is somewhat murky. There was a group of alts in it that probably doesn't belong to CH. Quickseller might have had a hand in it because some of those users popped up after months of being dormant since a prior attack on Lauda. Or it could just be an unrelated group of Lauda's foes.
Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
At least you'll be remembered as one of the biggest nutjobs to ever infest the forum's pages, which actually is a pretty impressive feat.

nah.  Quickseller's alts are forgotten as soon as he grows bored with them.  He simply does not stand behind his words.  :/
legendary
Activity: 2198
Merit: 1989
฿uy ฿itcoin
Here we observe the merit source TMAN ( a great selection, if you want to guarantee the metric is super misleading) using merit to reward an observable double standards untrustworthy account seller when he accuses the whistle blower of being negative for mentioning it. Sorry guys. The merit abuse and politics that it enforces are crystal clear.  I mean the dumb fool notildah can not even correctly present the "joke" 

Everything TMAN does is with the mentality of a scolded child.  He shouldn't be in DT or a Merit Source.  I'm sure time will resolve this.

Perhaps you should start ignoring him if you're confident that it will resolve itself.
legendary
Activity: 2982
Merit: 7986
Q: What 'DO' you and a broken record have in common notildah?

A. You're both worth way less that 0.02BTC.  

Meh.... My joke was still better.

Look at you CH: feigning a ban and giving your alt a preposterously pretentious name... Are you trying to test the limits of how far you can possibly alienate yourself from this forum while still remaining a member?

Perhaps the funniest part is you now refer to yourself as "we"; you are so desperate to have somebody on your side you have invented fictitious joint account holders. The totality of your schism between fantasy and reality is nearing completion.

At least you'll be remembered as one of the biggest nutjobs to ever infest the forum's pages, which actually is a pretty impressive feat.
donator
Activity: 4732
Merit: 4240
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Here we observe the merit source TMAN ( a great selection, if you want to guarantee the metric is super misleading) using merit to reward an observable double standards untrustworthy account seller when he accuses the whistle blower of being negative for mentioning it. Sorry guys. The merit abuse and politics that it enforces are crystal clear.  I mean the dumb fool notildah can not even correctly present the "joke" 

Everything TMAN does is with the mentality of a scolded child.  He shouldn't be in DT or a Merit Source.  I'm sure time will resolve this.
member
Activity: 252
Merit: 56
Most of the DT members gave stupid feedbacks,but theymos doesnt even care which is why this forum has decreasing number of activities and traffics what a shame! only those abusive DT members are making a lot of posts  that are mostly about the forum,but technically about blockchain? nah..

Look Thule: I have thousands of posts about bitcoin and the blockchain whereas every single post of yours with this alt account is in Meta or Reputation. So what is your point exactly?

It seems to be the same handful of whiners continuing to create alt accounts to make it appear they are greater in number than they actually are.

You or the person you purchased this account from? you have 1000's of posts about blockchain over the the years but need now to beg for 0.02btc loans?

Handful of people that stand up to double standards like your clear double standards of saying people should have red trust in 2014 because you believed it increased the probability of scamming. Then in 2016 you decided to facilitate scamming yourself by trying to sell or selling your account? thankfully we have a handful of people pushing for fair treatment.

Please don't seek to lecture others and stay on topic in my thread.  Also please present clear evidence it is thule because let us face it why should we believe a word you say?

Q: What you and a broken record have in common?

A. You both suck.

Here we observe the merit source TMAN ( a great selection, if you want to guarantee the metric is super misleading) using merit to reward an observable double standards untrustworthy account seller when he accuses the whistle blower of being negative for mentioning it. Sorry guys. The merit abuse and politics that it enforces are crystal clear.  I mean the dumb fool notildah can not even correctly present the "joke" 

Q: What 'DO' you and a broken record have in common notildah?

A. You're both worth way less that 0.02BTC. 

Only people that have watched notildah begging for 0.02btc loans will know this, although most likely suspected it was the case.  Although, he is now sig spamming rather frequently his gambling sig. So with careful saving and a meager existence, who knows.



member
Activity: 252
Merit: 56
Most of the DT members gave stupid feedbacks,but theymos doesnt even care which is why this forum has decreasing number of activities and traffics what a shame! only those abusive DT members are making a lot of posts  that are mostly about the forum,but technically about blockchain? nah..

Look Thule: I have thousands of posts about bitcoin and the blockchain whereas every single post of yours with this alt account is in Meta or Reputation. So what is your point exactly?

It seems to be the same handful of whiners continuing to create alt accounts to make it appear they are greater in number than they actually are.

You or the person you purchased this account from? you have 1000's of posts about blockchain over the the years but need now to beg for 0.02btc loans?

Handful of people that stand up to double standards like your clear double standards of saying people should have red trust in 2014 because you believed it increased the probability of scamming. Then in 2016 you decided to facilitate scamming yourself by trying to sell or selling your account? thankfully we have a handful of people pushing for fair treatment.

Please don't seek to lecture others and stay on topic in my thread.  Also please present clear evidence it is thule because let us face it why should we believe a word you say?
legendary
Activity: 3528
Merit: 9525
#1 VIP Crypto Casino
Most of the DT members gave stupid feedbacks,but theymos doesnt even care which is why this forum has decreasing number of activities and traffics what a shame! only those abusive DT members are making a lot of posts  that are mostly about the forum,but technically about blockchain? nah..

See bolded -

Actually this is most likely due to the fact that the price of bitcoin crashed from the ATH. We’re in a period of low volatility, average joe isn’t hearing about bitcoin on mainstream news so he isn’t coming here.

When the peak of the next bull market comes there will again be a massive influx of new people coming here.

It’s nothing to do with people getting red trust. Nobody in real life gives a shit about that.
legendary
Activity: 2982
Merit: 7986
Most of the DT members gave stupid feedbacks,but theymos doesnt even care which is why this forum has decreasing number of activities and traffics what a shame! only those abusive DT members are making a lot of posts  that are mostly about the forum,but technically about blockchain? nah..

Look Thule: I have thousands of posts about bitcoin and the blockchain whereas every single post of yours with this alt account is in Meta or Reputation. So what is your point exactly?

It seems to be the same handful of whiners continuing to create alt accounts to make it appear they are greater in number than they actually are.
member
Activity: 241
Merit: 97
Most of the DT members gave stupid feedbacks,but theymos doesnt even care which is why this forum has decreasing number of activities and traffics what a shame! only those abusive DT members are making a lot of posts  that are mostly about the forum,but technically about blockchain? nah..
member
Activity: 252
Merit: 56
RE topic: Obviously not. The current implementation of the trust system is basically the same as the chinese social credit score system. One post is not going to change that.

edit:
This quote is especially relevant:
but this latest drama with Lauda has opened my eyes a bit...

Yeah, I've distanced myself with her.  What can you do?  You speak out and you get negative trust...

How do I defriend Lauda without getting negative trust from her and ruining five years?

Do you think it’s acceptable that Lauda hasn’t tagged aTriz yet? Do you think there is any reason why everyone shouldn’t tag aTriz for what he did?

Let me answer that this way - how can I leave negative trust for either of them without ruining my account?

As for your account being ruined if you tag one of them, I’m well aware. I guess the difference is that I do what I feel is right regardless of how it may effect me, and you appear to be having your true opinions silenced out of fear. So forgive me if I take your criticisms with a grain of salt.


Those are some of the most damning posts regarding the DT system I have ever read. This will be surely referenced for future use.

Well this post is highly insightful. However, it would seem that OGnasty has recently had a rethink on this matter?  him and lauda seem to have traded some red trust removal. This is great for the individuals but places the entire forum at greater risk. This is a VERY bad move from OGnasty. I wonder what has caused this 180 on lauda?  How soon before Tman and owlcatz remove their red ?  can't do it all in one go since that would appear too colluding. I wonder if this came as part of the deal.
copper member
Activity: 2870
Merit: 2298
RE topic: Obviously not. The current implementation of the trust system is basically the same as the chinese social credit score system. One post is not going to change that.

edit:
This quote is especially relevant:
but this latest drama with Lauda has opened my eyes a bit...

Yeah, I've distanced myself with her.  What can you do?  You speak out and you get negative trust...

How do I defriend Lauda without getting negative trust from her and ruining five years?

Do you think it’s acceptable that Lauda hasn’t tagged aTriz yet? Do you think there is any reason why everyone shouldn’t tag aTriz for what he did?

Let me answer that this way - how can I leave negative trust for either of them without ruining my account?

As for your account being ruined if you tag one of them, I’m well aware. I guess the difference is that I do what I feel is right regardless of how it may effect me, and you appear to be having your true opinions silenced out of fear. So forgive me if I take your criticisms with a grain of salt.
legendary
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1489
I forgot more than you will ever know.
@2girls

U OK HUN?

I'm guessing he is just waiting for 1cup to show up Cheesy
member
Activity: 252
Merit: 56
You must be the most dangerous scammer on this board.
I've gotten quite the reputation tagging people indeed. Dangerous kitty.

Ignores his pal nutildah calling people EVIL for selling their accounts and claiming they can be used to scam
Everyone who I don't tag is my pal? I'll be damned, gotta tag 99.99% of the forum then.

No, you are just a liar and scammer as we have just demonstrated.  

You are great at making straw men.  Your pals are those you let get away with things you red trust others for. Got it now? Not everyone you do not tag. Surely you didn't think that would be acceptable as an answer. Try harder scammer.

So what about your lies and scamming? what's the excuse and why should you not have red trust for that?  Let's hear your explanation.

You tag others who present observable instances demonstrating your scamming and lying?  that is not what red trust is for.

You have stated you will keep trust abusing, so we will keep demonstrating that you are an observable liar, scammer, and trust abuser. We have nothing to lose by doing so.



 
Pages:
Jump to: