Topic: THEYMOS GIVES NEW MANDATE TO DT MEMBERS - will they take heed?????????????????? - page 3. (Read 1030 times)
April 27, 2019, 10:21:36 AM
DT is so last week - we've moved on to merits source applications now.
April 27, 2019, 10:18:11 AM
Can you please stop creating a new thread every couple of hours? Did your first account (cryptohunter) got banned? Because if so, you will probably get this one as well very soon.
Isn’t it clear already that no one gives a damn about your ranting essays (theymos included)? It just gets worse for you. Even if you are right, DT is a mafia and trust sucks, you are just losing your credibility (if you still have any left) every time you come here and post a new wall of text.
Legit question.
Isn’t it clear already that no one gives a damn about your ranting essays (theymos included)? It just gets worse for you. Even if you are right, DT is a mafia and trust sucks, you are just losing your credibility (if you still have any left) every time you come here and post a new wall of text.
Legit question.
April 27, 2019, 09:55:20 AM
Logged-out users will now see a warning in trust-enabled sections if more DT members neg-trust the topic starter than positive-trust him.
This increases the responsibility of DT members not to give negative trust for stupid reasons, but only for things that cause you to believe that the person is a scammer.
This increases the responsibility of DT members not to give negative trust for stupid reasons, but only for things that cause you to believe that the person is a scammer.
Will this STOP those observable liars,and scammers on DT using red trust to silence those that whistle blow on them?
We will watch and see. We believe it will make 0 difference. They will continue to issue red trust for any reason they see fit, especially if you say something about them that is observably true and verifiable but they DO NOT WANT people to know about it.
It will remain a tool for observable liars and scammers to attempt to silence their critics and crush free speech.
Better to make an ORDER: prove that someone is a scammer, or bring a very STRONG case that they are a scammer OR GET BLACKLISTED from DT for giving out red trust to other people who should not have a scammer tag.
Perhaps a single temp red tag (3 days) can be applied for investigations to be done and case submitted for instances of serious doubt. It must be removed after this point if no clear evidence or strong case can not be provided. Perhaps caution under investigation tag for them.
If I were THEYMOS i would also make an ORDER that if clear evidence is presented to you that demonstrates clearly the person is a scammer or a STRONG case for them scamming can be presented then you MUST give them a red tag or describe why you will NOT or you get BLACKLISTED. No more double standards. Why should those that are clearly scammers be given a free pass to scam others ??
Grey areas can be put up for Theymos's own assessment but if you are on the wrong side of 3 disputes after he has studied the evidence then you will be BLACKLISTED. Obviously your judgement is not appropriate to be on DT.
This will bring them more in line and encourage others to play fairly with ALL members.
Jump to: