This Is How To Kill XT… - page 5. | Bitcointalksearch.org

VirosaGITS

legendary

Activity: 1302

Merit: 1068

Quote from: Sourgummies on August 22, 2015, 11:37:35 PM

Quote from: jonald_fyookball on August 22, 2015, 11:26:48 PM

Quote from: Sourgummies on August 22, 2015, 11:13:57 PM

Another XT thread. Why keep this up?

-snip-
Block size is no reason to support XT.

OP doesn't support XT. I guess you didn't read it carefully.
that's why more discussion is good.

Read his other threads and come back and tell me that. Grin

Well i went over it and it seem he's bashing anti-XT FUDer/sheep's way of being against XT without any logical evidence. That doesn't make him Pro-XT. But i can't say i went through pages of the thing. ^_^"

Sourgummies

hero member

Activity: 728

Merit: 500

Never ending parties are what Im into.

Quote from: jonald_fyookball on August 22, 2015, 11:26:48 PM

Quote from: Sourgummies on August 22, 2015, 11:13:57 PM

Another XT thread. Why keep this up?

-snip-
Block size is no reason to support XT.

OP doesn't support XT. I guess you didn't read it carefully.
that's why more discussion is good.

Read his other threads and come back and tell me that. Grin

RGBKey

hero member

Activity: 854

Merit: 658

rgbkey.github.io/pgp.txt

We don't need or want XT, but we need the block size increase. Adopt BIP 101, but not XT.

VirosaGITS

legendary

Activity: 1302

Merit: 1068

Quote from: ralle14 on August 22, 2015, 11:30:19 PM

maybe op really hates on xt lol
they increase block size for the future
want to see where this is going

If XT didnt include other unrelated code and simply implemented the block size, i wouldn't really have as much problem with it as i have now.
Care to read this up? https://github.com/bitcoinxt/bitcoinxt/commit/73c9efe74c5cc8faea9c2b2c785a2f5b68aa4c23

ralle14

legendary

Activity: 3374

Merit: 1922

Shuffle.com

maybe op really hates on xt lol
they increase block size for the future
want to see where this is going

jonald_fyookball

legendary

Activity: 1302

Merit: 1008

Core dev leaves me neg feedback #abuse #political

Quote from: Sourgummies on August 22, 2015, 11:13:57 PM

Another XT thread. Why keep this up?

-snip-
Block size is no reason to support XT.

OP doesn't support XT. I guess you didn't read it carefully.
that's why more discussion is good.

VirosaGITS

legendary

Activity: 1302

Merit: 1068

Quote from: GPUmonitor on August 22, 2015, 11:14:27 PM

Quote from: BitProdigy on August 22, 2015, 11:01:16 PM

Increase the BlockSize on Core.
As the Core developers will not allow for a block size increase on Core, the only logical solution is to vote for XT. If you want to drop XT in it's tracks, support a block size increase on Core.

There is no difference for the XT or core being increased blocksize! The debate is to focu on the increase of blocksize.

XT has gained the consensus from the majority! What is the point of finding counter arguments to be against the public?

What consensus? You mean the 400 nodes running less than 1% of the total hashrate? XT is a sham, people don't actually support it

BitProdigy

full member

Activity: 322

Merit: 115

We Are The New Wealthy Elite, Gentlemen

Quote from: GPUmonitor on August 22, 2015, 11:14:27 PM

There is no difference for the XT or core being increased blocksize! The debate is to focu on the increase of blocksize.

XT has gained the consensus from the majority! What is the point of finding counter arguments to be against the public?

XT has not gained consensus from the majority, Xt has maybe 14%.

XT is not just a block size increase but is also an implementation of other features, this is why I would prefer a block size increase on Core. I want the block size increase, I do not want Hearn's added features, and I want consensus.

I believe we have probably 90% consensus for a block size increase on Core, the problem is that much of the opposition 10% is the Core developers themselves. (I hear they think BlockStream will do well...)

GPUmonitor

full member

Activity: 147

Merit: 100

Quote from: BitProdigy on August 22, 2015, 11:01:16 PM

Increase the BlockSize on Core.
As the Core developers will not allow for a block size increase on Core, the only logical solution is to vote for XT. If you want to drop XT in it's tracks, support a block size increase on Core.

There is no difference for the XT or core being increased blocksize! The debate is to focu on the increase of blocksize.

XT has gained the consensus from the majority! What is the point of finding counter arguments to be against the public?

Sourgummies

hero member

Activity: 728

Merit: 500

Never ending parties are what Im into.

Another XT thread. Why keep this up?
The more a few people push this the more its going to smell.
Block size is no reason to support XT. The more a salesman pushes the more reason to walk away.

jonald_fyookball

legendary

Activity: 1302

Merit: 1008

Core dev leaves me neg feedback #abuse #political

OP is 100% right. We just need someone to create a bigger block fork of core ...cough cough Garzik cough cough. and there you go.

VirosaGITS

legendary

Activity: 1302

Merit: 1068

Well, conspiracy aside. Gradually increasing the block size limit on demand/need of bitcoin core would certainly keep the sheep mass from adopting XT without understanding that it comes with code commits not related to the block size limit.

BitProdigy

full member

Activity: 322

Merit: 115

We Are The New Wealthy Elite, Gentlemen

Increase the BlockSize on Core.

It's obvious. We all want to increase the block size. Virtually no one disagrees about that. We have consensus!

But why doesn't it happen? Because the Core developers have invested 21 million dollars in BlockStream which requires small block sizes to maximize it's usefulness and profits. If you want to talk about a hostile takeover of Bitcoin, its' this TINY group of people who don't want to increase the block size vs the VAST MAJORITY of everyone else that wants to increase the Blocksize on Core.

The only reason XT is even in serious consideration, the only reason people are threatening to split bitcoin into two chains and go against consensus, is because the OBVIOUS SOLUTION to our problem is being stone walled by these developers who have more incentive for the success of BlockStream than they have incentive for the success of Bitcoin.

As the Core developers will not allow for a block size increase on Core, the only logical solution is to vote for XT. If you want to drop XT in it's tracks, support a block size increase on Core.

Topic: This Is How To Kill XT… - page 5. (Read 3953 times)