In other words, you don't connect with other people as if they were people.
Oh, we've established that long ago. He's a brain in a vat, and everyone else is just computer simulations.
Who are making fun of him for being a brain in a vat.
Topic: This is the thread where you discuss free market, americans and libertarianism - page 48. (Read 33901 times)
April 17, 2013, 04:29:05 PM
Oh, we've established that long ago. He's a brain in a vat, and everyone else is just computer simulations.
Who are making fun of him for being a brain in a vat.
April 17, 2013, 04:23:36 PM
Ultimately, the point is, if you understand my position, if you understand why violence is not a barrel of monkeys, and if you understand that supporting the state will inevitably kill someone you probably won't know, and you're still okay with it, then you lack empathy. In other words, you don't connect with other people as if they were people. From that point, there's no argument; you're not like me, who does feel something about hurting people, so we're never going to see eye-to-eye on anything. You're the same breed of robot that the system loves to reward. I don't know how to help you out, there. That's the line, I'm afraid.
April 17, 2013, 04:23:16 PM
I can agree with that. yes, i support rehabilitation.
Then can you explain how locking a man in a cage will achieve that? April 17, 2013, 04:22:10 PM
You lock him up.
Dude, what is your fetish with cages?In what way is putting a man in a cage resisting with proportional force?
You don't "lock him up," you prevent or stop him hitting you. Simple as that.
NO, you lock him up!
April 17, 2013, 04:21:20 PM
You lock him up.
Dude, what is your fetish with cages?In what way is putting a man in a cage resisting with proportional force?
You don't "lock him up," you prevent or stop him hitting you. Simple as that.
NO, you lock him up!
April 17, 2013, 04:18:47 PM
You lock him up.
Dude, what is your fetish with cages?In what way is putting a man in a cage resisting with proportional force?
You don't "lock him up," you prevent or stop him hitting you. Simple as that.
NO, you lock him up!
(on the fetish thing: yes i have.)
Well, that explains a few things. April 17, 2013, 04:15:56 PM
Well, that explains a few things.
That only explains everything
April 17, 2013, 04:12:15 PM
You lock him up.
Dude, what is your fetish with cages?In what way is putting a man in a cage resisting with proportional force?
You don't "lock him up," you prevent or stop him hitting you. Simple as that.
NO, you lock him up!
(on the fetish thing: yes i have.)
Well, that explains a few things. April 17, 2013, 04:08:54 PM
You lock him up.
Dude, what is your fetish with cages?In what way is putting a man in a cage resisting with proportional force?
You don't "lock him up," you prevent or stop him hitting you. Simple as that.
NO, you lock him up!
(on the fetish thing: yes i have.)
April 17, 2013, 04:05:11 PM
You lock him up.
Dude, what is your fetish with cages?In what way is putting a man in a cage resisting with proportional force?
You don't "lock him up," you prevent or stop him hitting you. Simple as that.
April 17, 2013, 03:58:41 PM
No, your interpretation is wrong. If anyone punches you in the face for being from Denmark, you have every right to be mad. You did nothing.
and still somehow the other person felt provoked... don't you find that odd? April 17, 2013, 03:56:58 PM
No, your interpretation is wrong. If anyone punches you in the face for being from Denmark, you have every right to be mad. You did nothing.
and still somehow the other person felt provoked... don't you find that odd? April 17, 2013, 03:53:21 PM
No, your interpretation is wrong. If anyone punches you in the face for being from Denmark, you have every right to be mad. You did nothing.
and still somehow the other person felt provoked... don't you find that odd? April 17, 2013, 03:51:20 PM
No, your interpretation is wrong. If anyone punches you in the face for being from Denmark, you have every right to be mad. You did nothing.
and still somehow the other person felt provoked... don't you find that odd? April 17, 2013, 03:43:02 PM
No, your interpretation is wrong. If anyone punches you in the face for being from Denmark, you have every right to be mad. You did nothing.
and still somehow the other person felt provoked... don't you find that odd? April 17, 2013, 03:37:35 PM
No, your interpretation is wrong. If anyone punches you in the face for being from Denmark, you have every right to be mad. You did nothing.
April 17, 2013, 03:34:42 PM
Now we must define provocation...
pro·voke
/prəˈvōk/
Verb
Stimulate or give rise to (a reaction or emotion, typically a strong or unwelcome one) in someone.
Stimulate or incite (someone) to do or feel something, esp. by arousing anger in them.
Let's just assume that "doing nothing" cannot be in line with "provocation," because "doing nothing" implies no verb has taken place.
oh, i can provoke by doing nothing. your interpretation is wrong. pro·voke
/prəˈvōk/
Verb
Stimulate or give rise to (a reaction or emotion, typically a strong or unwelcome one) in someone.
Stimulate or incite (someone) to do or feel something, esp. by arousing anger in them.
Let's just assume that "doing nothing" cannot be in line with "provocation," because "doing nothing" implies no verb has taken place.
April 17, 2013, 03:31:39 PM
Now we must define provocation...
pro·voke
/prəˈvōk/
Verb
Stimulate or give rise to (a reaction or emotion, typically a strong or unwelcome one) in someone.
Stimulate or incite (someone) to do or feel something, esp. by arousing anger in them.
Let's just assume that "doing nothing" cannot be in line with "provocation," because "doing nothing" implies no verb has taken place.
pro·voke
/prəˈvōk/
Verb
Stimulate or give rise to (a reaction or emotion, typically a strong or unwelcome one) in someone.
Stimulate or incite (someone) to do or feel something, esp. by arousing anger in them.
Let's just assume that "doing nothing" cannot be in line with "provocation," because "doing nothing" implies no verb has taken place.
April 17, 2013, 03:28:43 PM
Are you okay with violence being used against me, even when I have not provoked it?
but you have, by not following the rules. April 17, 2013, 03:28:38 PM
but you have, by not following the rules.
So if I was sitting in my home, minding my own business, and then someone burst in and said, "GIVE ME ALL YOUR MONEY OR YOU WILL GO TO JAIL, AND IF YOU RESIST I WILL KILL YOU"
It's okay if it's a law. So how's the box working out for ya?
That's because my first statement was a statement. The second one implies that you're still not thinking about what I'm saying