Good luck with this. Lots of time people do start scammer threads when sig campaign sponsors don't pay but obviously by then the damage is done.
Sure. I guess what I'm talking about is that I've seen it such that several people aren't paid, they start the scammer thread, but then others who were paid continue on bearing the signature. Then others jump into the spots vacated by the people who got scammed. Thus the sponsor can contiue to half-pay or pay when he chooses as long as he doesn't alienate everyone obviously, he can get a lot of free advertising. I think what's ever worse is that when the next campaign starts, people start to think that this is the way things are (everyone for himself!) and things just get worse and worse for the ad-bearers.
It looks like up/down bit may be a good chance to try and see if your proposal can get any traction.
You may be right, things are looking bleak there. I'll probably drop a line in that thread and ask folks to consider my proposal (act together!). IMHO, it's a shame that a lot of hero and senior members are still wearing the ad. If you ask me, they should all drop the ad immediately and demand payment in order to put it back. Obviously, this only really works if people act as a unified front. If only a few remove the ad, up/down will prolly just say "see, they cheated, no payment for them..."
I would actually be more worried about borderline spammers making scores of low value posts that essentially "drain" the sponsors bank compelling them to limit or end the campaign or so alienate users that they ignore all of us who have rented out our space. While sponsors should look out for themselves there are so many people in campaigns that they just impose limits or give up.
I really think that quality of posts is orthogonal to this issue. Spam/low-value posts obviously clog up the board and make us all unhappy. What's more, advertisers who legitimately care about their image don't want to be associated with such antisocial activity. IMHO, the scheme by bitmixer.io is really honorable, it doesn't encourage folks to post any more than they already would. However, the rates are so low there that it's not very competitive. Nevertheless, I think the problem of weeding low-value posters out of the campaign is not related to the problem of sponsors failing to uphold their contracts in a whimsical way.