Pages:
Author

Topic: thug life - page 7. (Read 4326 times)

full member
Activity: 234
Merit: 100
April 15, 2016, 01:00:01 PM
#38
BTC2.3 for #1
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1005
PGP ID: 78B7B84D
April 15, 2016, 12:38:34 PM
#37
Thanks for the warning!

1.9BTC on serial 5.
member
Activity: 102
Merit: 10
April 15, 2016, 12:35:16 PM
#36
WARNING!

I just had an email from a fake newb Kialara ` account attempting to get me to deposit my bid amount in a BTC address.

BEWARE SCAMMER

Also 1.8BTC bid on serial number five
newbie
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
April 15, 2016, 11:45:24 AM
#35
2.2 for #1.

Saw the email. Can't pass it up.
member
Activity: 102
Merit: 10
April 15, 2016, 10:12:53 AM
#34
2.1BTC bid for #1

I'm at work now but will provide some proof and/or send you the funding amount as you asked. I'll be home before any auctions close Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1005
PGP ID: 78B7B84D
April 15, 2016, 08:31:54 AM
#33
1.7BTC for #3

I wonder if I will have any shipping issues because I remember seing some posters around customs about money and coins being shipped in. Can't remember exactly what it was about though.

Ive had certain counties not allow coins or fiat currency on customs sheets. I just use collectible tokens rather than coins on the sheets. Never had an issue. Just label them "privately owned paper rendered by the thug in life."  Wink

GLWS. These are beautiful.

I would probably ask to label it as that if I bought it. They did hold back my lealana's a while back but after some explanation that it's not Fiat money. All part of the fun I guess.
legendary
Activity: 910
Merit: 1006
BCH Advocate.
April 15, 2016, 08:20:28 AM
#32
1.7BTC for #3

I wonder if I will have any shipping issues because I remember seing some posters around customs about money and coins being shipped in. Can't remember exactly what it was about though.

Ive had certain counties not allow coins or fiat currency on customs sheets. I just use collectible tokens rather than coins on the sheets. Never had an issue. Just label them "privately owned paper rendered by the thug in life."  Wink

GLWS. These are beautiful.
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1005
PGP ID: 78B7B84D
April 15, 2016, 08:12:42 AM
#31
1.7 on serial 5
hero member
Activity: 840
Merit: 500
April 15, 2016, 07:20:44 AM
#30
Disregard my comment, didn't see that more posts had been made. 2.1BTC on nr #3
hero member
Activity: 840
Merit: 500
April 15, 2016, 07:19:45 AM
#29
1.5BTC per, bidding on all 3.
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1005
PGP ID: 78B7B84D
April 15, 2016, 03:13:32 AM
#28
1.7BTC for #3

I wonder if I will have any shipping issues because I remember seing some posters around customs about money and coins being shipped in. Can't remember exactly what it was about though.
newbie
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
April 15, 2016, 02:43:52 AM
#27
2BTC for #1. I'm happy to fund before shipping. I'm not interested in involving escrow with someone else on the site. I might be a newbie with this forum but I've done business with Kialara before.
donator
Activity: 3136
Merit: 1167
April 15, 2016, 02:08:10 AM
#26
That works for me, many thanks, will check back tomorrow...
hero member
Activity: 551
Merit: 789
April 15, 2016, 01:53:32 AM
#25
...


I might suggest that you somehow mark any bills as being "unfunded" and/or "buyer funded" in the event that any of the winners declines to fund the bills with .23BTC in order to prevent someone from presenting one of these bills as being funded when in fact it is not. 

They are worth more funded so the buyers will do so, it's easy enough to check which any secondary buyer would, to alter the billls now would invalidate the sale offering.

I assume all are slabbed like the example #1.

You bring up a good point about these reading as saying they are funded.

Maybe I just need to require they be funded before I ship them like I had originally planned. I think everyone would be okay with that. It's a fraction of the selling price at this point.


Yep, that would be best and also any newbie bidders (no offense guys) should also escrow 1 BTC per bill that they bid on by sending to your addie so that everyone can see they are legit, you define newbie, maybe less than 3 months on the forum &/or over 20 posts that aren't spam/BS, your call.

Okay, so the bars must be funded by the winning bidders prior to shipping. Done.

Another idea that might be better than the escrow would be if every newbie (or bidder) from here forward had to send 0.23BTC to a reputable escrow member on the site. Then everyone would get back their .23 btc except the winner. Their .23btc would be sent to the bill.

I will leave the escrow part up to you all Smiley This is thug life.

My address is listed so feel free to send deposits there. It's safe.

donator
Activity: 3136
Merit: 1167
April 15, 2016, 01:24:09 AM
#24
...


I might suggest that you somehow mark any bills as being "unfunded" and/or "buyer funded" in the event that any of the winners declines to fund the bills with .23BTC in order to prevent someone from presenting one of these bills as being funded when in fact it is not. 

They are worth more funded so the buyers will do so, it's easy enough to check which any secondary buyer would, to alter the billls now would invalidate the sale offering.

I assume all are slabbed like the example #1.

You bring up a good point about these reading as saying they are funded.

Maybe I just need to require they be funded before I ship them like I had originally planned. I think everyone would be okay with that. It's a fraction of the selling price at this point.


Yep, that would be best and also any newbie bidders (no offense guys) should also escrow 1 BTC per bill that they bid on by sending to your addie so that everyone can see they are legit, you define newbie, maybe less than 3 months on the forum &/or over 20 posts that aren't spam/BS, your call.
hero member
Activity: 551
Merit: 789
April 15, 2016, 01:14:29 AM
#23
...


I might suggest that you somehow mark any bills as being "unfunded" and/or "buyer funded" in the event that any of the winners declines to fund the bills with .23BTC in order to prevent someone from presenting one of these bills as being funded when in fact it is not. 

They are worth more funded so the buyers will do so, it's easy enough to check which any secondary buyer would, to alter the billls now would invalidate the sale offering.

I assume all are slabbed like the example #1.

You bring up a good point about these reading as saying they are funded.

Maybe I just need to require they be funded before I ship them like I had originally planned. I think everyone would be okay with that. It's a fraction of the selling price at this point.

donator
Activity: 3136
Merit: 1167
April 15, 2016, 01:08:47 AM
#22
...


I might suggest that you somehow mark any bills as being "unfunded" and/or "buyer funded" in the event that any of the winners declines to fund the bills with .23BTC in order to prevent someone from presenting one of these bills as being funded when in fact it is not. 

They are worth more funded so the buyers will do so, it's easy enough to check which any secondary buyer would, to alter the billls now would invalidate the sale offering.

I assume all are slabbed like the example #1.
donator
Activity: 3136
Merit: 1167
April 15, 2016, 01:01:47 AM
#21
1.6 BTC on each, bidding on all three.
hero member
Activity: 551
Merit: 789
April 15, 2016, 12:49:48 AM
#20
1.4 for #3

I recognize you also  Smiley thanks for coming.
hero member
Activity: 551
Merit: 789
April 15, 2016, 12:49:03 AM
#19
Sent you an email. I'm one of your existing customers that was pointed towards this auction by your email. I lurk on bitcointalk a lot but I never had any reason to post.

knifefight thank you very much! Yes of course I know you and all is good. Thanks again.
Pages:
Jump to: