Topic: To all DT1 members | Interesting negative feedback from JollyGood! - page 2. (Read 2369 times)

that's all the claim! thinking of things like that(!)

I'm tired of writing the same things. everyone who came here gave a common opinion on the subject. (injustice of negative feedback)

you have always taken the discussion off topic. you did not provide any valid justification. You talked amongst yourself with nonsense claims. You have damaged my reputation with an unfair negative feedback. there is a 2nd class puppet show collaboration for an unfair court and an unfair result.

@theymos thank you.

It is clear trendcoin is attention-seeking on par with gumusi and some others that have been mentioned before.

Me too, I will probably not be posting here further as there is no need to engage with certain individuals and have decided to simply keep them and those that are equally duplicitous users on my IGNORE and distrust list.

---

---

 

How is that any different than the scam promotions of parodium even to this day, i'll keep bringing this back up till I see a logical answer, stop hidding like bitches behind few death threats.

trendcoin, you are unfair.

I haven't done anything wrong, yet you posted feedback I was an incompetent lawyer.  I want to be remembered for taking down the biggest scammer in bitcointalk history, not for being poor at legal council  :/

I won't post anymore, but obviously you are not 100% innocent in this.

not being able to find god's profile link.

jolygood I told you before. welcome and read here. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.54738961

the same answers apply. however, you continue to make unfounded accusations against your abuse of power every time. please stop somewhere.

I traded with vispilio long before these events. I exchanged money. so I believe he will be a reliable organizer. "If we had experienced the same things as you, I would have thought the same things for you."

Look, there may be some misunderstandings. there may be false accusations. there may be false claims. there may be false feedbacks. review your decision. You are not my friend or enemy.

Think a little to review your decision. like 1 day. It's a good time to think 24 hours. then let's discuss this issue again. think again. Evaluate whether the claims you have are weak or strong

I haven't done anything bad...

---

EDİT:
I will not add a new message to prevent the subject from deviating.

vod, I didn't mean to hurt you. Since I have a bad English, I may have misrepresented myself and my words. Due to the misunderstanding between us, my rightfulness in this matter should not fall below 100%. the world is big enough for us all. thanks.

--------------------

@trendcoin

So what exactly in your opinion is the problem with the feedback I left for you?

The main difference is trendcoin left neutral trust (not malicious), JollyGood appears to have retaliated with negative trust (utilizing that deep-found DT power of his).


Sounds like a case of "boo fucking hoo", trendcoin clearly left neutral feedback to JollyGood that he didn't like and got tagged for it, again.

I guess the only honesty here is that JollyGood had already (indirectly) threatened to return the amended neutral feedback, and has now followed through with this threat:


Sounds like: If you don't drop this discussion criticizing my actions, I'll neg you. Then he negged him. The only circumstances that changed was trendcoin leaving neutral trust, and continuing to argue his point (that he is entitled to, as it's only an opinion). The reference provided for the negative feedback is the the same as before. There is no new information that has come to light regarding trendcoin and his trust-based actions, only his opinions.

This type of behavior reminds me of mosprognoz: great scam buster, but inconsistent with feedback and incapable of not abusing DT power.

I am (currently) not a DT1-member, so I literally have no say in this. But I already shared my opinion, which was considered, and I won't exclude JollyGood over this.
DefaultTrust is decentralized, and I don't think there are users who's feedback I agree with 100%. So I'll have to settle for less than that. If I disagree too much, I'll adjust my Trust list, but the reality is that some disagreements will slip through. It sucks for you, but we'll never have a Trust system in which everyone agrees with everyone else.

jolygood's attorney, you are diverting the subject. I am aware. please do not divert this matter. go here and divert other issues. I don't want you to distort this issue any more. jollygood can defend himself. I don't think he needs a bad lawyer like you.




jollygood, you are starting a "witch hunt" on a topic you have given up before. it's not fair what you're doing. if I am to be judged solely for my opinions, so judge me!Take another proof for you...

---

Thank you Vod, you are right - not everything is trust abuse. Just look at the actual feedback I left, it is very much valid and there are reference links as well. I definitely do not trust him and would never recommend others to trust him too.

So if there is a valid reason you call him unbalanced, he might have a valid reason to not trust you as well.

Not everything is trust abuse. 

read the whole paragraph please! We are talking about someone who changes their decisions day by day and who knows the truth with the help of others.

Do you think someone like that could make sense?

Come on, say "yes" ... so we have a good reason to unplug the world.

---

---

please do not throw messages that deviate from the subject!

You judge him, he judges you - it's normal to compare other people's beliefs to your own. 

What is the non nonsense reason you call him imbalanced? 

will this nonsense continue forever? Are we going to deal with people's childish whims and meaningless attitudes. damn it.

today mr. holyshit thinks me negative or neutral I wonder bla bla... because he can change his mind without stopping. maybe hourly, maybe minute, maybe instant... The momentary changing decisions of a person who cannot distinguish between black and white ... sounds good.

I worked on the Turkish local forum, carried information, shared information. I've been a part of this forum for more than 2 years. This imbalanced person, he shouldn't judge me for nonsense reasons.

@suchmoon @loycev @theymos and other dt1 members whose name I don't know, please say "stop" to this ridiculous situation!

Hi muslol67, glad to see you found this thread that concerns you. I also agree with your assessment of the situation, being tagged simply for endorsing someone's services. I referenced this on Page 2, 6 days ago, but unfortunately JollyGood has chosen to ignore this, instead focusing his attention on gumusi it seems.


Ironically, the reference used against you is to gumusi's post (the save page link, not the archive), not your post, so not even correctly referenced either x2 (copy&paste error, 502 error) 


Either way, that post doesn't look tag-worthy to me either, even if the reference was corrected to point to your post.
Best of luck waiting for a response and resolution, but I wouldn't hold your breath. The more I look into these tags, the worse it gets!

With the same explanation, negative feedback was given to me by @JollyGood. I PM him and I am waiting for his reply because he says he will make a comeback.

And my defense ;

1. never had a connection between groups, person or trust in this forum. I don't even know anyone here personally! I am discussing people in Turkish and I have trust some of them.
2. I never involved any merit abuse or trust circle. No one can judge my trust list because I am talking with these people in my native. And I understand better than anyone who don't know Turkish. Some of these people had bad communication in global boards. But it is not my problem. If someone has a bad relation with each other, please solve these problems with true person!
JollyGood sent me negative feedback, because I supported @Vispilio in his bounty management thread. Yes I did! Because I know he is capable! He can manage. If JollyGood or any other person believes he couldn't, thread in Services board go and write your opinion. Why are you judging me? I don't know JollyGood, if I knew him and trust him I could support him also. For example, I have really trust with @Hhampuz a lot. And I think he is capable and has justice sense. Don't know him well but I have some ideas about him. So what is the point? Someone may not like with Hhampuz also. Should I send him a negative feedback (which I don't have any DT power)

I will wait for @JollyGood's answer first. He answered my first PM very kind. And I think he is reasonable person. I believe that we can solve this issue easily.

I have Jolly as distrust in my trust list from long ago.
Sadly this topic now moving to anther direction where I see Jolly, Vod and Techshare are busy teasing each others.

On a side note, it seems Jolly only listen to some specific users who he respects and if they PM or suggest him to remove or add then only he will react. :-D

But again tagging someone for___
1. connected a group of trolls
2. merit abuse and fake trust circle
3.  promote low-life users
___ seems not a proper use of trust rating.

I disagree with the feedback from Lauda too. I think somewhere theymos mentioned that there are no need of tagging for merit about or something.

A red tag is always valid for a proven scam but not for speculation. If was for speculation then we all would tag the questionable account that seems to be handled by game-protect recently.

I agree, Vod is part of a group of compulsive liars that have their own agenda and they shouldn't be taken seriously.

They are part and parcel from the same group of compulsive liars that have their own agenda. I would advise all to beware of them and to not take their claims seriously.