Pages:
Author

Topic: [TOP-200] The most generous users giving merits - page 30. (Read 38401 times)

sr. member
Activity: 616
Merit: 279
Nice stats Smiley

If you ever wondered about who were the merit sources, now you have the answer Smiley

I see suchmoon is doing a very good job in spreading merit to a lot of people. Cheers suchmoon!  Cheesy

yea I am a source, but anyone who PM's me asking for merits (as has happened twice since this thread) will be reported as spam.

Please don't pester me with your Pajeet posts.
TMAN, you always crack me up with your sarcastic comments  Grin
legendary
Activity: 1414
Merit: 1808
Exchange Bitcoin quickly-https://blockchain.com.do
yea I am a source, but anyone who PM's me asking for merits (as has happened twice since this thread) will be reported as spam.

Please don't pester me with your Pajeet posts.
legendary
Activity: 2240
Merit: 10532
There are lies, damned lies and statistics. MTwain
I agree with you, but there are many posts out there that are not qualified but get a lot of awards
Not that many really… Without going into the post’s content to see whether or not it got the merit it deserved (which is subjective, except for obvious cases of abuse), if we focus on merit awarded between the 1st of June 2018 and the 6th of July 2018 (most recent transactions), we’ve got:

sMerit awarded in a Transaction:
Code:
sMerit nTxs %
1 6779 66,92%
2 1590 15,70%
3 437 4,31%
4 168 1,66%
5 681 6,72%
6..10 302 2,98%
11..20 95 0,94%
21..30 37 0,37%
31..40 13 0,13%
41..50 28 0,28%
That goes to say that there are not that many sMerit Transactions of a high value, but rather that when we encounter them, they standout and stick to our mind. A more detailed view, covering all historical transactions, can be seen in the Analysis- sMerits per transaction and sMerit transactions per post-Are they low?
newbie
Activity: 182
Merit: 0
Definitely for a post to receive upto 50+ merit from an individual, the person that merited the post must be very impressed with the post.
I agree with you, but there are many posts out there that are not qualified but get a lot of awards
legendary
Activity: 2422
Merit: 2166
Edited: Nice thread out there, you can also give us the top 200 users who received a large number of merits as I think ( or is it already done by somebody?  Tongue)

No, I didn't see such table on the forum yet. Probably you are saying about the table just ordered by the amount of received merits.

User nameReceived merits
1)TestX (in Y txns from Z users)

I will analyze all the merit transfer transactions and will show such TOP-200 in the future.
newbie
Activity: 229
Merit: 0
Few people gave 50+ merit on a single post. Is it too must useful post? Or is it really appropriate to receive 50+ merit on such a post?

Definitely for a post to receive upto 50+ merit from an individual, the person that merited the post must be very impressed with the post.
legendary
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1165
🤩Finally Married🤩
Few people gave 50+ merit on a single post. Is it too must useful post? Or is it really appropriate to receive 50+ merit on such a post?
They're just giving it away as a gift though, nothing to do with their post actually. Only the legendary people with the outmost knowledge of bitcoin can only receive such high merits. And yes, as long as the merit source find it very useful and unique I guess, that will also be considered to receive a high number of merits.
To make it short, it all depends on the Merit Giver.

Edited: Nice thread out there, you can also give us the top 200 users who received a large number of merits as I think ( or is it already done by somebody?  Tongue)
legendary
Activity: 2422
Merit: 2166
Maybe the OP could include the number of unique accounts merit was sent to?

I wished to calculate the indicator "Generosity" of the users and create this table. I will include the number of unique accounts later.

My first post on the first page was updated. The number of unique accounts whom merit was sent to is included. There are some user shifts in the table. The new merit sources are detected.
full member
Activity: 672
Merit: 127
Hello! Can I suggest to remove the sources part?
We know them, by we i mean established members. No need for random spammers to know them...
I agree with it. Spammers will eventually troll the sources just to have merits in their part. Better disclose it like what have theymos noted

Quote
Certain users are designated as "merit sources". They can create new merit out of nothing, up to a limited number per month (which differs per source). I will not be posting a definitive list of merit sources (so that people don't bug them too much), though you'll soon figure out who they are if you pay attention.
Just let them find it by themselves just to give them a challenge in the forum.
legendary
Activity: 3486
Merit: 9384
#1 VIP Crypto Casino
Few people gave 50+ merit on a single post. Is it too must useful post? Or is it really appropriate to receive 50+ merit on such a post?

If you spot that very often it’s likely to be Merit abuse & you should report it unless it’s been given to a Legendary/very old iconic post which is deserving of such a big Merit give away.
copper member
Activity: 210
Merit: 7
Few people gave 50+ merit on a single post. Is it too must useful post? Or is it really appropriate to receive 50+ merit on such a post?
legendary
Activity: 2422
Merit: 2166
Maybe the OP could include the number of unique accounts merit was sent to?

I wished to calculate the indicator "Generosity" of the users and create this table. I will include the number of unique accounts later.
newbie
Activity: 364
Merit: 0
I am really impressed with this statistic. They are really very liberated people. Besides, I appreciate their development and support for this community.
legendary
Activity: 2422
Merit: 2166
User nameSent meritsReceived meritsGenerosity
1)QuestionAuthority2255 (in 179 txns)307 (in 96 txns)2101 (max 2105)
You're using old data, you can find the latest data here.

Yes, I know about that.

The most generous users giving merits (24 Jan 2018 - 20 Jun 2018)

I will update my first post later.


I think LoyceV and Ognasty should have more source merits to distribute. I guess LoyceV is in the test phase and doesn't have that much sMerits yet. if he/she keeps at meriting more random members it would be great.
I've recently decided to merit more posts, not to lower my standards of "quality", but just because "good posts" deserve merit too. Any "good post" is far above the average spam for which the Merit system was introduced, and I don't think people with "good posts" should be restricted in leveling up.
Most of the time, I leave just 1 Merit though. I haven't really decided on when to increase it.

In my opinion, you deserve to be a merit source. Your merit distribution policy is fair.



I think I resent the fact that I'm rated 82nd for generosity. Am I being penalised because i try to help more people with my awards?

No any penalizing. Don't change your merit distribution policy.


I'm not sure what we have gained by publishing that list. Also, if it failed to detect me ( an admitted source ) then surely the analysis is flawed.

Probably this analysis will detect you as a merit source later. Wink



So the maximum per person depends on both rank and activity, meaning that the 205 barrier to detect a merit source is incorrect since not all merit sources are Legendries, and even so the maximum would have been 400 sMerit, and no lower limit was officially provided.

Agree with you. But it is more difficult to detect such non-Legendary user as a merit source. I guess it is almost impossible. Smiley
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
In my opinion, you deserve to be a merit source. Your merit distribution policy is fair.
Thanks Cheesy
jr. member
Activity: 36
Merit: 12
Mountains in my mind.
I can see that those listed person give merit in a legitimate way. But what can others say about this? 

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/coincidence-standard-or-by-chance-or-totally-abuse-4522340

Is it legal? 

I think this totally dependant on person sending the merit.

What is Merit?
Merit is a new system created in order to reward quality contributions to the forum. Now to rise through ranks you will also need to acquire Merit in addition to Activity.

How do I receive merit?
You are awarded merit by people of the community if they find your post helpful or informative.

For more information read this post: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/faq-everything-you-need-to-know-about-forum-activity-account-ranks-and-merit-2766177
legendary
Activity: 2422
Merit: 2166
Here is a statistics of a merit distribution by the merit sources below. This table shows how many merits has been given by each merit source to other users, namely to Jr. Members, Members, Full Members, Senior Members, Hero Members, Legendaries respectively. The analysis takes into consideration the ranks of the users at the moment of a merit transferring.



Merit distribution by the merit sources (Jan 24, 2018 - Aug 12, 2018)

User nameMerits to JuniorsTo MembersTo FullsTo SeniorsTo HeroesTo Legendaries
1)suchmoon491 (to 163 users)614 (to 105 users)467 (to 90 users)464 (to 63 users)632 (to 75 users)1391 (to 168 users)
2)QuestionAuthority63 (to 15 users)152 (to 15 users)776 (to 49 users)534 (to 30 users)921 (to 52 users)218 (to 21 users)
3)Foxpup42 (to 23 users)85 (to 26 users)115 (to 24 users)163 (to 21 users)266 (to 23 users)1065 (to 71 users)
4)TMAN164 (to 67 users)242 (to 63 users)173 (to 50 users)189 (to 31 users)462 (to 44 users)602 (to 67 users)
5)dbshck231 (to 80 users)397 (to 58 users)440 (to 55 users)274 (to 27 users)36 (to 16 users)116 (to 33 users)
6)EFS226 (to 96 users)212 (to 55 users)253 (to 53 users)228 (to 42 users)119 (to 23 users)415 (to 45 users)
7)Vod201 (to 89 users)179 (to 55 users)207 (to 50 users)94 (to 27 users)278 (to 52 users)679 (to 101 users)
8)qwk135 (to 61 users)217 (to 48 users)240 (to 47 users)159 (to 28 users)130 (to 29 users)330 (to 62 users)
9)xandry249 (to 68 users)405 (to 47 users)242 (to 41 users)30 (to 18 users)44 (to 18 users)62 (to 26 users)
10)paxmao286 (to 181 users)211 (to 94 users)125 (to 81 users)130 (to 53 users)116 (to 47 users)247 (to 100 users)
11)DarkStar_128 (to 64 users)187 (to 70 users)122 (to 34 users)86 (to 19 users)155 (to 39 users)197 (to 64 users)
12)bones26175 (to 44 users)91 (to 30 users)108 (to 40 users)103 (to 26 users)75 (to 28 users)180 (to 65 users)
13)JayJuanGee58 (to 50 users)62 (to 46 users)83 (to 51 users)75 (to 36 users)85 (to 49 users)317 (to 120 users)
14)malevolent78 (to 34 users)59 (to 19 users)76 (to 18 users)66 (to 16 users)97 (to 23 users)148 (to 43 users)
15)mindrust61 (to 33 users)79 (to 31 users)107 (to 25 users)32 (to 15 users)106 (to 22 users)195 (to 49 users)
16)mprep37 (to 25 users)87 (to 36 users)52 (to 33 users)64 (to 20 users)66 (to 26 users)291 (to 57 users)
17)frodocooper138 (to 50 users)95 (to 18 users)52 (to 7 users)12 (to 4 users)45 (to 9 users)169 (to 28 users)
18)BobLawblaw7 (to 7 users)17 (to 9 users)76 (to 15 users)112 (to 13 users)50 (to 10 users)447 (to 51 users)
19)OgNasty109 (to 101 users)66 (to 56 users)58 (to 41 users)64 (to 36 users)106 (to 47 users)225 (to 104 users)
20)achow10164 (to 43 users)134 (to 26 users)136 (to 23 users)128 (to 21 users)169 (to 20 users)67 (to 16 users)
21)Vlad2Vlad113 (to 20 users)88 (to 5 users)31 (to 7 users)53 (to 8 users)52 (to 4 users)140 (to 5 users)
22)Micio68 (to 20 users)90 (to 18 users)54 (to 12 users)88 (to 10 users)40 (to 4 users)112 (to 13 users)
23)vapourminer115 (to 98 users)72 (to 58 users)66 (to 44 users)45 (to 30 users)44 (to 32 users)84 (to 54 users)
24)sapta76 (to 16 users)122 (to 17 users)103 (to 17 users)70 (to 9 users)19 (to 5 users)60 (to 9 users)
25)chimk94 (to 42 users)123 (to 41 users)116 (to 44 users)28 (to 14 users)27 (to 13 users)22 (to 11 users)
26)LFC_Bitcoin17 (to 14 users)10 (to 9 users)35 (to 24 users)38 (to 16 users)97 (to 26 users)219 (to 77 users)
27)Welsh41 (to 32 users)90 (to 40 users)68 (to 23 users)70 (to 21 users)106 (to 25 users)139 (to 45 users)
28)teramit59 (to 24 users)68 (to 21 users)76 (to 21 users)70 (to 15 users)8 (to 4 users)94 (to 9 users)
29)rickbig4147 (to 25 users)38 (to 15 users)69 (to 22 users)18 (to 8 users)52 (to 11 users)129 (to 25 users)
30)LoyceV115 (to 96 users)71 (to 49 users)70 (to 38 users)67 (to 37 users)127 (to 46 users)181 (to 80 users)
31)iCEBREAKER66 (to 17 users)25 (to 9 users)34 (to 15 users)35 (to 16 users)82 (to 18 users)80 (to 18 users)
32)Jet Cash177 (to 118 users)52 (to 35 users)84 (to 43 users)52 (to 24 users)77 (to 35 users)155 (to 52 users)
33)redsn0w5 (to 1 user)75 (to 11 users)20 (to 4 users)54 (to 8 users)28 (to 6 users)109 (to 24 users)
34)ebliever34 (to 13 users)35 (to 8 users)32 (to 10 users)15 (to 6 users)62 (to 17 users)104 (to 22 users)
35)Mitchell33 (to 5 users)27 (to 6 users)19 (to 7 users)25 (to 4 users)24 (to 6 users)230 (to 22 users)
36)theymos_away21 (to 7 users)38 (to 12 users)82 (to 10 users)16 (to 4 users)30 (to 6 users)93 (to 17 users)
37)Globb018 (to 7 users)40 (to 12 users)13 (to 6 users)29 (to 6 users)25 (to 7 users)181 (to 33 users)
38)CjMapope54 (to 26 users)36 (to 15 users)38 (to 16 users)86 (to 15 users)28 (to 11 users)10 (to 1 user)
39)Dabs33 (to 15 users)15 (to 9 users)63 (to 14 users)66 (to 20 users)21 (to 9 users)102 (to 33 users)
40)cAPSLOCK21 (to 9 users)12 (to 6 users)90 (to 10 users)54 (to 4 users)12 (to 6 users)142 (to 24 users)
41)phantastisch52 (to 4 users)67 (to 5 users)115 (to 6 users)06 (to 2 users)69 (to 8 users)
42)jbreher12 (to 8 users)22 (to 8 users)26 (to 14 users)40 (to 9 users)47 (to 15 users)134 (to 36 users)
43)digaran38 (to 10 users)59 (to 19 users)54 (to 17 users)18 (to 5 users)33 (to 16 users)77 (to 35 users)
44)stingers18 (to 9 users)22 (to 12 users)29 (to 11 users)11 (to 5 users)80 (to 5 users)70 (to 13 users)
45)Vadi232358 (to 39 users)37 (to 22 users)54 (to 23 users)11 (to 9 users)60 (to 7 users)11 (to 9 users)
46)klarki39 (to 23 users)54 (to 27 users)60 (to 29 users)26 (to 10 users)59 (to 9 users)1
47)RegulusHr58 (to 22 users)81 (to 22 users)93 (to 15 users)21 (to 3 users)3 (to 2 users)7 (to 3 users)
48)OmegaStarScream38 (to 16 users)40 (to 12 users)58 (to 8 users)17 (to 5 users)34 (to 8 users)69 (to 20 users)
49)Anon1107357 (to 17 users)63 (to 10 users)41 (to 7 users)17 (to 3 users)2 (to 1 user)21 (to 4 users)
50)Halab38 (to 17 users)30 (to 10 users)21 (to 8 users)9 (to 4 users)4 (to 1 user)2 (to 1 user)
51)nanna27 (to 15 users)32 (to 7 users)30 (to 7 users)2 (to 2 users)11
52)esmanthra30 (to 19 users)54 (to 19 users)48 (to 12 users)2 (to 1 user)4 (to 2 users)1



Obviously, the policy of a merit distribution by the merit sources is evenly and fair.

This post was updated on Aug 12, 2018.
legendary
Activity: 2422
Merit: 2166
The detecting algorithm was upgraded. Now the analysis takes into consideration the ranks of the users at the day of a deploying the merit system.

The maximal initial amounts of sMerit that were credited on Jan 24, 2018:
  • Legendary - 200 sMerit
  • Hero Member - 88 sMerit
  • Senior Member - 32 sMerit
  • Full Member - 7 sMerit
  • Member - 1 sMerit
  • Jr. Member - 0 sMerit

Such a way the merit sources of all ranks were detected. Here is the table ordered by the indicator "Maximal generosity" below.



Detected merit sources (Jan 24, 2018 - Aug 12, 2018)

User nameRank at Jan 24, 2018GenerosityComment
1)suchmoonwas Legendary3824
2)QuestionAuthoritywas Legendary2506
3)Foxpupwas Legendary1692
4)TMANwas Hero Member1525
5)dbshckwas Legendary1435moderator of the indonesian local forum
6)EFSwas Legendary1362moderator of the turkish local forum
7)Vodwas Legendary1328
8)qwkwas Legendary1046active in the german local forum
9)xandrywas Legendary1019moderator of the russian local forum
10)paxmaowas Full Member1008active in the spanish local forum
11)DarkStar_was Legendary717
12)bones261was Legendary583
13)JayJuanGeewas Legendary524
14)malevolentwas Legendary514moderator of the polish local forum
15)mindrustwas Legendary510
16)mprepwas Legendary501moderator of the section "Altcoins"
17)frodocooperwas Senior Member497moderator of the section "Mining"
18)BobLawblawwas Legendary496
19)OgNastywas Legendary475
20)achow101was Legendary449moderator of the section "Technical Discussion"
21)Vlad2Vladwas Legendary438
22)Miciowas Legendary415active in the italian local forum
23)vapourminerwas Legendary398
24)saptawas Legendary391moderator of the indonesian local forum
25)chimkwas Full Member371active in the russian local forum
26)LFC_Bitcoinwas Legendary356
27)Welshwas Legendary356
28)teramitwas Legendary342active in the turkish local forum
29)rickbig41was Legendary324moderator of the philippine local forum
30)LoyceVwas Legendary298
31)iCEBREAKERwas Legendary298
32)Jet Cashwas Hero Member296
33)redsn0wwas Legendary281active in the italian local forum
34)eblieverwas Legendary277
35)Mitchellwas Legendary276
36)theymos_awaywas Jr. Member272
37)Globb0was Legendary266
38)CjMapopewas Legendary250
39)Dabswas Legendary248moderator of the philippine local forum
40)cAPSLOCKwas Legendary246
41)phantastischwas Legendary243moderator of the german local forum
42)jbreherwas Legendary243
43)digaranwas Hero Member229not a merit source anymore
44)stingerswas Legendary226not a merit source anymore
45)Vadi2323was Legendary219active in the russian local forum
46)klarkiwas Legendary217active in the russian local forum
47)RegulusHrwas Full Member214active in the croatian local forum
48)OmegaStarScreamwas Legendary211moderator of the arabic local forum
49)Anon11073was Senior Member192moderator of the japanese local forum
50)Halabwas Member94moderator of the french local forum
51)nannawas Full Member76active in the japanese local forum
52)esmanthrawas Jr. Member31active in the russian local forum



Probably the rest of such users will be detected later. Also, see on the current page the statistics of a merit distribution by the merit sources.

This post was updated on Aug 12, 2018.
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
Hello! Can I suggest to remove the sources part?
We know them, by we i mean established members. No need for random spammers to know them...
Agreed. If theymos wanted to publish a list, he could easily do that by himself.
PM-begging a merit source is a good way to get red trust though for the spammers Wink

Maybe the OP could include the number of unique accounts merit was sent to?
I've included this in my weekly updates (link in my previous post).
Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
I think I resent the fact that I'm rated 82nd for generosity. Am I being penalised because i try to help more people with my awards?

Maybe the OP could include the number of unique accounts merit was sent to?

Pages:
Jump to: