Pages:
Author

Topic: [TOP-200] The most generous users giving merits - page 4. (Read 39059 times)

legendary
Activity: 1974
Merit: 2124
but you can't blame those new members who do such, they're all struggling and fighting to get those sMerits coming in.
You just need to be original in your post and don't treat merits as something special given to only few members as whenever you contribute something useful you will receive them so for some it may take time but others can get it fast but I won't say newbies struggle for merits but they are not interested in learning aspects first of all which makes smerit incoming easy for you.

unfortunately the hard work of some new members or other members did it wrong. post with some long paragraphs using AI. you can see it on the reputation board. undeniably, it was a new members hard work to gain Merit.
AI helps someone write, but with good ideas and good sentences arranged makes us have a discussion with robots. not the result of creative thoughts and ideas from people.
I think if someone isn't able to write something on his own and using AI tools for help and then except to get merits from it then it should not be appreciated ar all.We have long debates about how AI posts can be treated under plagiarism also so be original in your posts.
hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 583
but you can't blame those new members who do such, they're all struggling and fighting to get those sMerits coming in.

unfortunately the hard work of some new members or other members did it wrong. post with some long paragraphs using AI. you can see it on the reputation board. undeniably, it was a new members hard work to gain Merit.
AI helps someone write, but with good ideas and good sentences arranged makes us have a discussion with robots. not the result of creative thoughts and ideas from people.
sr. member
Activity: 756
Merit: 454
Merits might be hard to earn, but if you're not putting any effort into your posts; if you can't write well; and if you're posting in threads with dozens, hundreds, or over a thousand pages long then you shouldn't expect anyone to give you their sMerits.  And a lot of times it's the lower-ranked members who are doing all of those things.

Merits is indeed very hard to earn, if I should use those words VERY HARD. Lack of effort can never generate even half a merit for anyone so the effort you put to your post get it done. And some members think that whenever you make a very long post that it makes someone to give them at least a merit (so I thought when I started) but if it's not informative it can't move anybody to drop any sMerit and I noticed that so many users don't like reading post with thousands of words like you made mentioned above, but you can't blame those new members who do such, they're all struggling and fighting to get those sMerits coming in.
legendary
Activity: 3892
Merit: 11105
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"

...............Merits might be hard to earn, but if you're not putting any effort into your posts; if you can't write well; and if you're posting in threads with dozens, hundreds, or over a thousand pages long then you shouldn't expect anyone to give you their sMerits.  And a lot of times it's the lower-ranked members who are doing all of those things.

You make several good points in your post TSC.. and in regards to this last point, I would elaborate that there are a lot of members who do not necessarily write well, and I am not even saying that my writing style is the greatest because I know that sometimes I ramble and repeat myself a bit, but there comes some luxury when any of us have been around for a while that sometimes we will get merits for mediocre posts because members feel that they know us from our other posts. 

Accordingly, I would say that if you are a newer member, then you likely have to try to spend time to write higher quality posts in order that members will want to read your posts and thereby end up getting to know you whether they like what you say or not.  I don't even necessarily need to agree with posts that are fairly well presented or they have some good points that are either well-expressed or seeming to come from an experiential or otherwise informed perspective.  Of course, sometimes smerits will get sent merely because there is some kind of humor in the post, but if you are not somehow weaving some seriousness in with your humor, you might not have as much luck getting merits because non-contextual humor may well be interpreted as trolling by quite a few members (including members who have smerits at their disposal to be able to send in the event that they come across what they believe to be a "merit-worthy" post.

So in regards to writing quality, it seems to me that writing quality can be improved, and it will help to have some decent writing skills to get your point across, but having good writing skills is not necessarily a condition precedent to receive smerits... - even though surely it can help to either have decent writing skills or just to recognize that if your writing skills are not very good, then to go over your post several times in order to help you to improve your writing skills.. and especially helpful while you are a new member, and after members get to know you, then you can likely be more lackadaisical in your writing/presentation skills - but having had gone through a period of meticulousness (in posting) will likely end up improving your writing skills in such a way that you end up expressing yourself better without even having to try as hard as you had to try when you were in the process of improving such writing/presentation skills..

Oh, and by the way, sometimes a decent number of non-native English speakers/writers wrongly believe that they have to write/speak formally in order to be understood or even to use proper words, which surely is not the case; however, in the beginning it probably is better to learn and present with the more formal versions of writing so that you know the difference between formal presentations and informal presentations... so if you are going informal, then you know that you are doing it.. rather than not really knowing what the fuck you are doing and just spouting out a bunch of informal nonsense that might "kind of be understood," yet most of the time, members are not going to want to try to figure out what kind of puzzle that you had presented. 

Maybe another point might be that part of the reason that any of us might give any shits about our audience could be either reputation and/or wanting to get recognition and responses, such as receiving merits or just substantive comments/help to our concerns.  At the same time, it is not exactly necessary that anyone gives many shits about his/her reputation - but at the same time, it is not as likely to receive smerits if other members cannot really relate to you or consider you as a disingenuine poster... In other words, you are not really prejudiced greatly from not receiving smerits if you are largely just wanting to read forum threads, but if you want to have some kind of "meaningful" interactive participation with other members, and of course, some newbies want to be able to "earn" money on the forum, then it is more likely that you are going to want to earn merits in order to show contribution which will increase likelihoods that you might be accepted into a signature campaign or some other kind of a project or even receiving a loan (if there are members who are loaning to lower ranking members?)
legendary
Activity: 1372
Merit: 2017
Take the last update above as a rough reference, 11809 merits were received by the population of 3009 legendaries, while the combination of Full+Senior+Hero members received just a total of 8037 merits despite making a whooping 31,715 in population. That number is more than x10 of the former's population, yet they receive even fewer merits.

I still urge our senior friends to consider this.

Apart from the good explanation that The Skeptical Chemist has given you, I would add that you do not seem to take into account that whoever created the system was not thinking of a socialist system of distribution of merits, which is what you are proposing, where you have to give them more merits to those who have fewer merits (lower-ranked members) simply because they have fewer. If he had wanted that, he would have stuck with the old system, where people ranked up by time and activity in the forum, regardless of the quality or garbage of the content they wrote.

That being said, there are several merit source that help lower-ranking members rank up when they need to. So the ones who make a decent contribution to the forum, even if they aren't some of the best posters, have plenty of opportunities and end up moving up the ranks.
legendary
Activity: 3500
Merit: 6981
Top Crypto Casino

I think that it's high time that we do the thing again where veteran forum users or just forum users with a good judgment recommend posts that are neglected or are in-between other replies that are of quality and share it to other users for them to check out so they can judge for themselves if it's merit worthy
Not for nothing, but you're on my ignore list.  I don't know when I put you on it, but I don't ignore users for any reason other than that their posts are crap.  You might have improved since I did it, so I'll take a look.

What you suggested above has been tried a number of times since the merit system kicked off in 2018 you know.  The reason those merit giveaway threads or related ones burned out is because they quickly became overrun with members wanting their shitposts merited.  People desperate for merits will try their luck any time it looks like an opportunity to get them is available, and you wouldn't believe how many PMs I've gotten from shitposters who want their post history reviewed for merits.  I've had to tell so many of them no that these days if their posts are bad enough, I'll just block their PMs.

Merits might be hard to earn, but if you're not putting any effort into your posts; if you can't write well; and if you're posting in threads with dozens, hundreds, or over a thousand pages long then you shouldn't expect anyone to give you their sMerits.  And a lot of times it's the lower-ranked members who are doing all of those things.
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 343
Jolly? I think I've heard that name before. hmm
BUT

BUT

ALSO

THERERFORE


I've seen several posts by legendary members and heroes. Some are really good and many are no different from us new members. The logic goes like that, higher ranking members are more likely to make good posts than lower ranking posts. So there really has to be a difference in receiving the merit, if it's the same it's not even logical.

Like the post you made. Too good with interesting word emphasis, especially in bold. Of course I'd give a merit, but I have limited stock and you don't need it, so I better save it. But what you wrote proves that high level is better (though not all).
sr. member
Activity: 1554
Merit: 334
Merits seem to be acting as a yardstick for post quality, and even though it seems like those poor lower-ranked members are being ignored/neglected/whatever, I think what we're seeing is just a brutally honest system at work.  The merit system is akin to natural selection in nature where the weak posters get stuck at Jr. Member, good ones make it further, and really good ones get to Legendary.  Them's my thoughts, anyway.
If we're talking about post quality and the fact that some of us feel like lower-ranked members that post quality replies are getting ignored or neglected, I think that it's high time that we do the thing again where veteran forum users or just forum users with a good judgment recommend posts that are neglected or are in-between other replies that are of quality and share it to other users for them to check out so they can judge for themselves if it's merit worthy, I've seen a thread like that before here although I don't feel it's presence at all, maybe incentivizing those who recommend those posts might work but who knows, I'm probably talking bull here.
legendary
Activity: 3500
Merit: 6981
Top Crypto Casino
That number is more than x10 of their population, yet they receive even fewer merits.
I get where you're coming from, and it's good that you're advocating for lower-ranked members to receive more merits,

BUT

Higher-ranked members typically make more interesting and more informative posts--which, if they had yet to reach said ranks when the merit system was created, is why they achieved Hero/Legendary in the first place.  So you'd kind of expect the most merits to be sent to them, right?  Seems logical to me.

BUT

Then there's the question as to whether it's worth it to merit posts made by Legendary members.  I've always held the position that sMerits should be sent mostly to members under Legendary, since the merit system has the dual purpose of being the equivalent of a "like" but also the mechanism by which members rank up.  

ALSO

If lower-ranked members really deserved merits, they'd probably get them.  And if they get them, they're no longer going to be amongst the lower ranks given time and activity.  I don't seriously think there's favoritism going on.  Think about it: there are a LOT of members with sMerits to give.  There would have to be a massive number of them having a bias toward Hero/Legendary members--and what would be their motivation?

THERERFORE

Merits seem to be acting as a yardstick for post quality, and even though it seems like those poor lower-ranked members are being ignored/neglected/whatever, I think what we're seeing is just a brutally honest system at work.  The merit system is akin to natural selection in nature where the weak posters get stuck at Jr. Member, good ones make it further, and really good ones get to Legendary.  Them's my thoughts, anyway.
hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 641
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
As far as I can see from the chart, the amount of merits sent is quite volatile and ranges from 19K to 28K per month.
Good one again, thanks for this and happy to see my name once again here. This simplicity helps to quickly detect some hidden facts and names that are and aren't performing their duties.

Sending merits is voluntary.  Not a duty.


Even though I understand your point, at least in regards to Theymos could assign someone else to perform merit source duties and remove merit source status (or reduce merit source monthly allotment) from merit source members who are not sending source merits.

Quote
In March 2023 total sent 28905 merits (in 13780 txns to 1566 users):
  • 1% to Newbies: 325 merits (to 194 users)
  • 2% to Jr. Members: 670 merits (to 197 users)
  • 9% to Members: 2613 merits (to 248 users)
  • 9% to Full Members: 2605 merits (to 185 users)
  • 14% to Sr. Members: 4149 merits (to 221 users)
  • 15% to Hero Members: 4271 merits (to 251 users)
  • 49% to Legendaries: 14272 merits (to 435 users)

Total user count on April 1, 2023:
  • 2993 Legendaries (1669 of them sent merits)
  • 3905 Hero Members (1703 of them sent merits)
  • 9206 Sr. Members (3207 of them sent merits)
  • 18567 Full Members (5773 of them sent merits)
  • 32686 Members (9717 of them sent merits)
  • 24402 Jr. Members (2901 of them sent merits)
  • about three million newbies
These statistics have also revealed my suspicion of an imbalanced proportion of the number/percentage of merit earned to the number/percentage of ranks. This is inversely propositional and the extent is too much. This suggests bias in meriting as far as I'm concerned.

Yes.  The bias is that merit sources can send merits to whoever they like, as long as they are not currying favors.. so if you believe that the evidence supports that some members are currying favors, then report that (those) members.. .. there is a pretty large latitude and discretion for merit source member, yet you seem to suggest that there is some kind of obligation for them to have some kind of an acceptable objective standard(s), which is not the case in the current way that theymos has assigned merit sources, at least to my knowledge of the situation is that they can give merits to whoever the fuck they want and under whatever standard so long as their is no quid pro quo going on... I think theymos used the expression that merit sources are not allowed to "sell" their merits and you can figure out what "don't sell" means, but it surely does not rise to the level of creating other kinds of fairness and/or objectivity obligations upon merit source members.
I guess you didn't get the gist right, and by the way, I was just saying what I noticed by the regular observation of the stats posted by @Coin-1, I never said quid pro quo is going on, and neither did I say merits couldn't be given to whosoever the sources choose. All I was pointing out is that they should also pay attention to the lower ranks or perhaps randomise it among ranks so that the difference would not be too much as it is now.

You and a few others distribute it so effectively that it can't result in the huge difference we are seeing now, unfortunately, the larger part doesn't.

Quote
In June 2023 total sent 22423 merits (in 11383 txns to 1451 users):
  • 1% to Newbies: 173 merits (to 118 users)
  • 2% to Jr. Members: 419 merits (to 141 users)
  • 9% to Members: 1985 merits (to 231 users)
  • 8% to Full Members: 1902 merits (to 171 users)
  • 12% to Sr. Members: 2746 merits (to 210 users)
  • 15% to Hero Members: 3389 merits (to 259 users)
  • 53% to Legendaries: 11809 merits (to 412 users)

Total user count on July 1, 2023:
  • 3009 Legendaries (1689 of them sent merits)
  • 3927 Hero Members (1726 of them sent merits)
  • 9195 Sr. Members (3199 of them sent merits)
  • 18593 Full Members (5802 of them sent merits)
  • 32775 Members (9776 of them sent merits)
  • 24674 Jr. Members (2937 of them sent merits)
  • about three million newbies

Take the last update above as a rough reference, 11809 merits were received by the population of 3009 legendaries, while the combination of Full+Senior+Hero members received just a total of 8037 merits despite making a whooping 31,715 in population. That number is more than x10 of the former's population, yet they receive even fewer merits.

I still urge our senior friends to consider this.
legendary
Activity: 3892
Merit: 11105
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
As far as I can see from the chart, the amount of merits sent is quite volatile and ranges from 19K to 28K per month.
Good one again, thanks for this and happy to see my name once again here. This simplicity helps to quickly detect some hidden facts and names that are and aren't performing their duties.

Sending merits is voluntary.  Not a duty.


Even though I understand your point, at least in regards to Theymos could assign someone else to perform merit source duties and remove merit source status (or reduce merit source monthly allotment) from merit source members who are not sending source merits.

Quote
In March 2023 total sent 28905 merits (in 13780 txns to 1566 users):
  • 1% to Newbies: 325 merits (to 194 users)
  • 2% to Jr. Members: 670 merits (to 197 users)
  • 9% to Members: 2613 merits (to 248 users)
  • 9% to Full Members: 2605 merits (to 185 users)
  • 14% to Sr. Members: 4149 merits (to 221 users)
  • 15% to Hero Members: 4271 merits (to 251 users)
  • 49% to Legendaries: 14272 merits (to 435 users)

Total user count on April 1, 2023:
  • 2993 Legendaries (1669 of them sent merits)
  • 3905 Hero Members (1703 of them sent merits)
  • 9206 Sr. Members (3207 of them sent merits)
  • 18567 Full Members (5773 of them sent merits)
  • 32686 Members (9717 of them sent merits)
  • 24402 Jr. Members (2901 of them sent merits)
  • about three million newbies
These statistics have also revealed my suspicion of an imbalanced proportion of the number/percentage of merit earned to the number/percentage of ranks. This is inversely propositional and the extent is too much. This suggests bias in meriting as far as I'm concerned.

Yes.  The bias is that merit sources can send merits to whoever they like, as long as they are not currying favors.. so if you believe that the evidence supports that some members are currying favors, then report that (those) members.. .. there is a pretty large latitude and discretion for merit source member, yet you seem to suggest that there is some kind of obligation for them to have some kind of an acceptable objective standard(s), which is not the case in the current way that theymos has assigned merit sources, at least to my knowledge of the situation is that they can give merits to whoever the fuck they want and under whatever standard so long as their is no quid pro quo going on... I think theymos used the expression that merit sources are not allowed to "sell" their merits and you can figure out what "don't sell" means, but it surely does not rise to the level of creating other kinds of fairness and/or objectivity obligations upon merit source members.
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 343
Jolly? I think I've heard that name before. hmm
These are the monthly statistics for June 2023 below.



The most generous users giving merits (June 2023)

I'm curious about the merit data sent and received by each member here. So I started learning how to use ddmrddmr tool

I took data for June 2023 starting from June 01 at 12:00 AM - June 30 at 11:59:59 PM



It seems that the data I took is very different, I don't know why it's different
legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 16328
Fully fledged Merit Cycler - Golden Feather 22-23
Something I didn't expect:

For sure he sent way more merits in June:

I was also surprised to see him at 54th position while he sends them at fast pace and as per
records also he has send 408 merits in past 30 days while at this time if we take 14 days into consideration he has send 42 merits so it makes 366 till 14 june only not counted before that.So surely he has send more merits but don't know how the charts are prepared.
42

I guess calendar months are considered.
So, according to his own Bitcointalk Merit Dashboard @ddmrddmr sent a total of 390 merits having received  39 merits. This should translate in a generosity index of 371.

legendary
Activity: 1974
Merit: 2124
Something I didn't expect:

For sure he sent way more merits in June:

I was also surprised to see him at 54th position while he sends them at fast pace and as per
records also he has send 408 merits in past 30 days while at this time if we take 14 days into consideration he has send 42 merits so it makes 366 till 14 june only not counted before that.So surely he has send more merits but don't know how the charts are prepared.
42
legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 16328
Fully fledged Merit Cycler - Golden Feather 22-23
Something I didn't expect:


User nameSent meritsReceived meritsGenerosity
54)DdmrDdmr43 (in 21 txns to 17 users)36 (in 15 txns from 9 users)25 (max 25)


For sure he sent way more merits in June:





In the merits spree only, @ddmrddmr sent 347 merits.
You accounted only for the first merits spree, apparently, and not for the second one.
Any particular reason why you left those out?
hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 641
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
As far as I can see from the chart, the amount of merits sent is quite volatile and ranges from 19K to 28K per month.
Good one again, thanks for this and happy to see my name once again here. This simplicity helps to quickly detect some hidden facts and names that are and aren't performing their duties.

Quote
In March 2023 total sent 28905 merits (in 13780 txns to 1566 users):
  • 1% to Newbies: 325 merits (to 194 users)
  • 2% to Jr. Members: 670 merits (to 197 users)
  • 9% to Members: 2613 merits (to 248 users)
  • 9% to Full Members: 2605 merits (to 185 users)
  • 14% to Sr. Members: 4149 merits (to 221 users)
  • 15% to Hero Members: 4271 merits (to 251 users)
  • 49% to Legendaries: 14272 merits (to 435 users)

Total user count on April 1, 2023:
  • 2993 Legendaries (1669 of them sent merits)
  • 3905 Hero Members (1703 of them sent merits)
  • 9206 Sr. Members (3207 of them sent merits)
  • 18567 Full Members (5773 of them sent merits)
  • 32686 Members (9717 of them sent merits)
  • 24402 Jr. Members (2901 of them sent merits)
  • about three million newbies
These statistics have also revealed my suspicion of an imbalanced proportion of the number/percentage of merit earned to the number/percentage of ranks. This is inversely propositional and the extent is too much. This suggests bias in meriting as far as I'm concerned.
legendary
Activity: 1624
Merit: 2594
Top Crypto Casino
As far as I can see from the chart, the amount of merits sent is quite volatile and ranges from 19K to 28K per month.
Thanks for the update as always, Coin-1.  I've not been paying attention to merit stats like that, ever, so is that kind of volatility normal?  If it's not, I wonder what's going on.

I think that's pretty normal. From what I've seen, the number of merits sent has consistently stayed above 20k since June 2021, typically ranging from 23k to 28k. So I'm not exactly sure where Coin-1 got the figure of 19k from. Although, it's possible that I overlooked some monthly stats during my quick review.
legendary
Activity: 3500
Merit: 6981
Top Crypto Casino
As far as I can see from the chart, the amount of merits sent is quite volatile and ranges from 19K to 28K per month.
Thanks for the update as always, Coin-1.  I've not been paying attention to merit stats like that, ever, so is that kind of volatility normal?  If it's not, I wonder what's going on.

It'd be so, so nice if Theymos would drop some data on merit sources (anonymously of course) and how they're doing.  I think most of them are known, but I'm not exactly sure about that.  I'm wondering if there are any who aren't distributing a lot of merits, if maybe some of them need to be replaced, and so forth.  And jeez, I haven't seen a merit source application in a looong time.
legendary
Activity: 2618
Merit: 2304
Another update.

As far as I can see from the chart, the amount of merits sent is quite volatile and ranges from 19K to 28K per month.

I have also published two statistical list. DdmrDdmr is the leader of this TOP-200 in May 2023. El duderino_ took first place in June 2023. Cool
legendary
Activity: 2618
Merit: 2304
These are the monthly statistics for June 2023 below.

Note: This list has been corrected on July 22, 2023.



The most generous users giving merits (June 2023)

User nameSent meritsReceived meritsGenerosity
1)hugeblack1020 (in 283 txns to 153 users)33 (in 19 txns from 18 users)1003 (max 1005)
2)El duderino_1036 (in 93 txns to 44 users)189 (in 76 txns from 22 users)941 (max 943)
3)fillippone1026 (in 422 txns to 119 users)225 (in 112 txns from 51 users)913 (max 925)
4)Ratimov1049 (in 261 txns to 122 users)345 (in 181 txns from 74 users)876 (max 884)
5)ETFbitcoin815 (in 348 txns to 198 users)87 (in 53 txns from 27 users)771 (max 776)
6)JayJuanGee781 (in 764 txns to 349 users)140 (in 92 txns from 49 users)711 (max 711)
7)LoyceV767 (in 153 txns to 90 users)158 (in 108 txns from 58 users)688 (max 688)
8)The Sceptical Chymist699 (in 230 txns to 41 users)75 (in 42 txns from 32 users)661 (max 662)
9)vapourminer615 (in 410 txns to 183 users)51 (in 24 txns from 14 users)589 (max 589)
10)EFS502 (in 65 txns to 46 users)12 (in 8 txns from 8 users)496 (max 497)
11)LFC_Bitcoin505 (in 130 txns to 57 users)97 (in 55 txns from 27 users)456 (max 458)
12)klarki448 (in 171 txns to 86 users)101 (in 83 txns from 15 users)397 (max 397)
13)Julien_Olynpic405 (in 131 txns to 42 users)66 (in 50 txns from 18 users)372 (max 374)
14)DdmrDdmr390 (in 346 txns to 242 users)39 (in 17 txns from 11 users)370 (max 370)
15)o_e_l_e_o500 (in 125 txns to 81 users)352 (in 195 txns from 53 users)324 (max 336)
16)paxmao274 (in 70 txns to 19 users)1273 (max 273)
17)pooya87311 (in 131 txns to 79 users)87 (in 45 txns from 28 users)267 (max 280)
18)philipma1957352 (in 102 txns to 64 users)179 (in 99 txns from 44 users)262 (max 262)
19)xandry294 (in 172 txns to 48 users)89 (in 41 txns from 14 users)249 (max 268)
20)dbshck216 (in 42 txns to 27 users)3 (in 3 txns from 3 users)214 (max 214)
21)Halab218 (in 75 txns to 51 users)15 (in 8 txns from 6 users)210 (max 210)
22)Vispilio204 (in 49 txns to 31 users)0204 (max 204)
23)Pmalek223 (in 107 txns to 67 users)86 (in 40 txns from 24 users)180 (max 188)
24)dkbit98194 (in 116 txns to 59 users)70 (in 43 txns from 22 users)159 (max 159)
25)BlackHatCoiner196 (in 43 txns to 28 users)76 (in 33 txns from 15 users)158 (max 159)
26)1miau212 (in 103 txns to 43 users)111 (in 44 txns from 23 users)156 (max 156)
27)mikeywith193 (in 51 txns to 25 users)88 (in 33 txns from 21 users)149 (max 162)
28)The Cryptovator136 (in 22 txns to 18 users)2 (in 2 txns from 2 users)135 (max 135)
29)bitmover151 (in 65 txns to 35 users)35 (in 30 txns from 19 users)133 (max 134)
30)CryptopreneurBrainboss137 (in 72 txns to 34 users)12 (in 10 txns from 8 users)131 (max 131)
31)NeuroticFish131 (in 67 txns to 41 users)4 (in 4 txns from 3 users)129 (max 129)
32)krogothmanhattan157 (in 41 txns to 29 users)56 (in 18 txns from 10 users)129 (max 129)
33)nutildah214 (in 80 txns to 60 users)211 (in 94 txns from 52 users)108 (max 112)
34)deadsea33111 (in 81 txns to 22 users)10 (in 6 txns from 5 users)106 (max 106)
35)OgNasty162 (in 63 txns to 59 users)113 (in 44 txns from 37 users)105 (max 135)
36)NotATether150 (in 83 txns to 79 users)121 (in 60 txns from 33 users)89 (max 95)
37)Buchi-88104 (in 94 txns to 48 users)29 (in 22 txns from 15 users)89 (max 90)
38)Daniel9180 (in 30 txns to 16 users)17 (in 12 txns from 4 users)71 (max 71)
39)franky1100 (in 2 txns to 2 users)60 (in 26 txns from 16 users)70 (max 93)
40)joker_josue168 (in 111 txns to 48 users)202 (in 71 txns from 38 users)67 (max 71)
41)mole081562 (in 61 txns to 39 users)9 (in 9 txns from 7 users)57 (max 57)
42)d500094 (in 52 txns to 41 users)82 (in 47 txns from 25 users)53 (max 59)
43)Hueristic68 (in 63 txns to 31 users)29 (in 16 txns from 9 users)53 (max 53)
44)babo80 (in 50 txns to 23 users)61 (in 33 txns from 15 users)49 (max 50)
45)Husna QA73 (in 46 txns to 35 users)49 (in 22 txns from 18 users)48 (max 54)
46)bitebits59 (in 19 txns to 9 users)21 (in 10 txns from 7 users)48 (max 59)
47)GazetaBitcoin106 (in 25 txns to 15 users)126 (in 68 txns from 33 users)43 (max 45)
48)HedgeFx51 (in 25 txns to 9 users)20 (in 11 txns from 7 users)41 (max 42)
49)shahzadafzal47 (in 45 txns to 22 users)14 (in 8 txns from 7 users)40 (max 40)
50)mprep40 (in 1 txn)5 (in 2 txns from 2 users)37 (max 37)
51)nullama36 (in 4 txns to 4 users)3 (in 3 txns from 2 users)34 (max 34)
52)fruktik64 (in 55 txns to 21 users)65 (in 28 txns from 14 users)31 (max 42)
53)hosseinimr9364 (in 29 txns to 23 users)74 (in 43 txns from 25 users)27 (max 28)
54)Mitchell30 (in 8 txns to 5 users)6 (in 3 txns from 3 users)27 (max 27)
55)FatFork61 (in 54 txns to 35 users)71 (in 40 txns from 27 users)25 (max 25)
56)shivansps25 (in 3 txns to 3 users)025 (max 25)
57)Heisenberg_Hunter27 (in 19 txns to 11 users)3 (in 2 txns from 2 users)25 (max 25)
58)theymos50 (in 1 txn)52 (in 3 txns from 3 users)24 (max 24)
59)LocalMonero39 (in 17 txns to 10 users)32 (in 7 txns from 4 users)23 (max 23)
60)bbigtart42 (in 38 txns to 31 users)39 (in 21 txns from 10 users)22 (max 28)
61)uchegod-2124 (in 7 txns to 6 users)3 (in 2 txns from 2 users)22 (max 22)
62)indah rezqi24 (in 23 txns to 21 users)8 (in 7 txns from 4 users)20 (max 21)
63)Cryptmuster28 (in 17 txns to 9 users)17 (in 9 txns from 7 users)19 (max 20)
64)tokeweed22 (in 22 txns to 14 users)6 (in 5 txns from 5 users)19 (max 19)
65)tyz19 (in 7 txns to 1 user)019 (max 19)
66)d_eddie44 (in 44 txns to 29 users)50 (in 29 txns from 14 users)19 (max 19)
67)CryptSafe21 (in 6 txns to 4 users)6 (in 5 txns from 5 users)18 (max 20)
68)Merit.s19 (in 11 txns to 3 users)3 (in 3 txns from 2 users)17 (max 18)
69)Synchronice35 (in 24 txns to 17 users)35 (in 16 txns from 9 users)17 (max 18)
70)mamesso19 (in 19 txns to 18 users)4 (in 2 txns from 2 users)17 (max 17)
71)icalical18 (in 3 txns to 3 users)117 (max 18)
72)Sithara00719 (in 10 txns to 10 users)5 (in 4 txns from 3 users)16 (max 16)
73)Welsh17 (in 5 txns to 5 users)2 (in 2 txns from 2 users)16 (max 16)
74)HajiBagi32 (in 14 txns to 7 users)34 (in 18 txns from 11 users)15 (max 16)
75)Die_empty17 (in 9 txns to 6 users)3 (in 1 txn)15 (max 15)
76)nara189217 (in 17 txns to 17 users)3 (in 2 txns from 2 users)15 (max 16)
77)mv198624 (in 20 txns to 14 users)17 (in 16 txns from 11 users)15 (max 15)
78)UniJoin20 (in 12 txns to 10 users)11 (in 5 txns from 4 users)14 (max 14)
79)betnomi14 (in 2 txns to 2 users)014 (max 14)
80)F2b18 (in 18 txns to 6 users)8 (in 3 txns from 3 users)14 (max 14)
81)Trofo45 (in 39 txns to 18 users)62 (in 50 txns from 27 users)14 (max 16)
82)Ndabagi0124 (in 12 txns to 5 users)22 (in 7 txns from 5 users)13 (max 13)
83)Ryu_Ar124 (in 24 txns to 18 users)21 (in 15 txns from 9 users)13 (max 14)
84)khiholangkang19 (in 17 txns to 16 users)12 (in 10 txns from 9 users)13 (max 13)
85)aylabadia0516 (in 16 txns to 16 users)5 (in 5 txns from 5 users)13 (max 13)
86)Aanuoluwatofunmi30 (in 13 txns to 6 users)36 (in 18 txns from 15 users)12 (max 12)
87)Gladitorcomeback23 (in 13 txns to 6 users)22 (in 19 txns from 15 users)12 (max 16)
88)seek3r23 (in 16 txns to 11 users)22 (in 17 txns from 10 users)12 (max 13)
89)HmmMAA14 (in 7 txns to 6 users)4 (in 4 txns from 2 users)12 (max 13)
90)icopress109 (in 55 txns to 36 users)193 (in 97 txns from 63 users)12 (max 23)
91)MarjorieZimmermanGinger17 (in 17 txns to 16 users)12 (in 8 txns from 4 users)11 (max 12)
92)ajiz13818 (in 18 txns to 15 users)14 (in 11 txns from 10 users)11 (max 11)
93)alterra5718 (in 10 txns to 7 users)14 (in 4 txns from 3 users)11 (max 11)
94)darkangel1118 (in 16 txns to 14 users)13 (in 7 txns from 5 users)11 (max 13)
95)Uruhara29 (in 29 txns to 27 users)38 (in 17 txns from 10 users)10 (max 10)
96)salad daging19 (in 19 txns to 18 users)17 (in 16 txns from 12 users)10 (max 12)
97)aga068510 (in 1 txn)010 (max 10)
98)tothemoonsands10 (in 1 txn)010 (max 10)
99)Spendulus10 (in 1 txn)010 (max 10)
100)Xal0lex58 (in 23 txns to 20 users)96 (in 34 txns from 29 users)10 (max 16)
101)topbitcoin21 (in 19 txns to 18 users)21 (in 21 txns from 18 users)10 (max 14)
102)DogecoinMachine10 (in 1 txn)010 (max 10)
103)Iroh9 (in 5 txns to 1 user)09 (max 9)
104)harapan9 (in 4 txns to 4 users)09 (max 9)
105)Sandra_hakeem14 (in 9 txns to 6 users)10 (in 4 txns from 4 users)9 (max 10)
106)owengtam0914 (in 3 txns to 2 users)10 (in 8 txns from 4 users)9 (max 10)
107)SatsLife14 (in 12 txns to 9 users)9 (in 4 txns from 3 users)9 (max 9)
108)zasad@25 (in 20 txns to 18 users)31 (in 21 txns from 14 users)9 (max 12)
109)sky99913 (in 4 txns to 3 users)8 (in 8 txns from 4 users)9 (max 11)
110)Johnyz10 (in 10 txns to 9 users)19 (max 10)
111)Fuso.hp32 (in 31 txns to 8 users)47 (in 26 txns from 13 users)8 (max 9)
112)l99l22 (in 22 txns to 18 users)28 (in 22 txns from 17 users)8 (max 8)
113)Fiatless13 (in 9 txns to 8 users)10 (in 5 txns from 5 users)8 (max 9)
114)internetional32 (in 12 txns to 10 users)47 (in 23 txns from 9 users)8 (max 12)
115)darkv0rt3x26 (in 24 txns to 16 users)36 (in 28 txns from 12 users)8 (max 14)
116)aysg7612 (in 10 txns to 8 users)8 (in 7 txns from 6 users)8 (max 8)
117)cozytrade9 (in 5 txns to 5 users)18 (max 9)
118)somac.10 (in 7 txns to 7 users)4 (in 4 txns from 3 users)8 (max 9)
119)DrBeer15 (in 13 txns to 11 users)14 (in 12 txns from 7 users)8 (max 11)
120)xhomerx1075 (in 71 txns to 34 users)133 (in 59 txns from 19 users)8 (max 9)
121)mhanbostanci8 (in 4 txns to 4 users)08 (max 8)
122)alegotardo30 (in 17 txns to 11 users)44 (in 14 txns from 8 users)8 (max 8)
123)LeGaulois36 (in 12 txns to 11 users)55 (in 23 txns from 6 users)8 (max 11)
124)stompix52 (in 29 txns to 18 users)87 (in 50 txns from 33 users)8 (max 10)
125)Volgastallion14 (in 9 txns to 8 users)14 (in 11 txns from 6 users)7 (max 7)
126)flyingcarpet14 (in 14 txns to 12 users)13 (in 4 txns from 4 users)7 (max 8)
127)Mr.suevie24 (in 10 txns to 5 users)34 (in 18 txns from 10 users)7 (max 8)
128)Cryptogreatdane8 (in 1 txn)17 (max 7)
129)Bushdark8 (in 4 txns to 2 users)17 (max 7)
130)NicNacCoin8 (in 6 txns to 5 users)2 (in 2 txns from 2 users)7 (max 7)
131)Godday8 (in 6 txns to 6 users)2 (in 2 txns from 2 users)7 (max 7)
132)SquirrelJulietGarden8 (in 5 txns to 2 users)2 (in 2 txns from 2 users)7 (max 7)
133)MFahad7 (in 7 txns to 6 users)07 (max 7)
134)rdluffy24 (in 24 txns to 11 users)33 (in 27 txns from 14 users)7 (max 9)
135)slaman2920 (in 19 txns to 17 users)26 (in 12 txns from 8 users)7 (max 7)
136)ChiBitCTy10 (in 6 txns to 6 users)5 (in 4 txns from 4 users)7 (max 7)
137)Avirunes8 (in 8 txns to 8 users)17 (max 7)
138)uche621528 (in 7 txns to 3 users)44 (in 16 txns from 6 users)6 (max 6)
139)Unknown Op11 (in 4 txns to 1 user)9 (in 9 txns from 8 users)6 (max 10)
140)Patrol696 (in 3 txns to 3 users)06 (max 6)
141)ginsan10 (in 6 txns to 6 users)8 (in 8 txns from 2 users)6 (max 8)
142)_act_19 (in 15 txns to 12 users)26 (in 11 txns from 11 users)6 (max 7)
143)Gachapin51 (in 50 txns to 27 users)89 (in 55 txns from 20 users)6 (max 12)
144)JoyMarsha7 (in 3 txns to 2 users)2 (in 2 txns from 2 users)6 (max 7)
145)Pierre 216 (in 11 txns to 8 users)19 (in 15 txns from 10 users)6 (max 7)
146)rohang7 (in 3 txns to 1 user)2 (in 2 txns from 2 users)6 (max 6)
147)Unbunplease9 (in 9 txns to 4 users)6 (in 6 txns from 4 users)6 (max 6)
148)rdbase19 (in 13 txns to 10 users)26 (in 10 txns from 7 users)6 (max 6)
149)mp3.Maniac6 (in 2 txns to 2 users)06 (max 6)
150)lovesmayfamilis38 (in 38 txns to 29 users)63 (in 34 txns from 22 users)6 (max 10)
151)bittraffic8 (in 2 txns to 2 users)4 (in 4 txns from 3 users)6 (max 8)
152)rby18 (in 18 txns to 15 users)24 (in 15 txns from 13 users)6 (max 6)
153)bakasabo10 (in 7 txns to 6 users)8 (in 8 txns from 7 users)6 (max 7)
154)tranthidung23 (in 15 txns to 12 users)34 (in 19 txns from 18 users)6 (max 6)
155)Mame8914 (in 14 txns to 13 users)15 (in 11 txns from 11 users)6 (max 8)
156)spirits7 (in 5 txns to 2 users)16 (max 6)
157)Becassine33 (in 26 txns to 22 users)54 (in 28 txns from 18 users)6 (max 6)
158)armanda907 (in 7 txns to 7 users)2 (in 2 txns from 2 users)6 (max 6)
159)delfastTions16 (in 12 txns to 10 users)19 (in 9 txns from 5 users)6 (max 7)
160)Real-Duke25 (in 24 txns to 15 users)38 (in 26 txns from 14 users)6 (max 9)
161)buwaytress39 (in 27 txns to 12 users)65 (in 39 txns from 18 users)6 (max 7)
162)Lucius47 (in 47 txns to 37 users)81 (in 41 txns from 28 users)6 (max 8)
163)Hhampuz35 (in 30 txns to 29 users)58 (in 42 txns from 34 users)6 (max 8)
164)Tuturtinular8 (in 8 txns to 8 users)5 (in 5 txns from 5 users)5 (max 6)
165)Kelward11 (in 10 txns to 10 users)11 (in 7 txns from 3 users)5 (max 6)
166)Z_MBFM26 (in 26 txns to 22 users)42 (in 19 txns from 14 users)5 (max 9)
167)letteredhub18 (in 9 txns to 4 users)26 (in 15 txns from 12 users)5 (max 5)
168)EarnOnVictor12 (in 11 txns to 11 users)14 (in 11 txns from 8 users)5 (max 7)
169)Faisal220221 (in 16 txns to 14 users)32 (in 22 txns from 15 users)5 (max 5)
170)GxSTxV15 (in 8 txns to 5 users)19 (in 8 txns from 6 users)5 (max 7)
171)SatoPrincess7 (in 7 txns to 6 users)4 (in 4 txns from 4 users)5 (max 5)
172)RickDeckard104 (in 68 txns to 36 users)197 (in 76 txns from 31 users)5 (max 6)
173)angelbbs5 (in 1 txn)05 (max 5)
174)mvdheuvel198315 (in 8 txns to 6 users)20 (in 9 txns from 6 users)5 (max 6)
175)royalfestus6 (in 6 txns to 6 users)15 (max 5)
176)BenCodie7 (in 7 txns to 6 users)4 (in 2 txns from 2 users)5 (max 5)
177)CageMabok41 (in 39 txns to 29 users)72 (in 40 txns from 33 users)5 (max 8)
178)karabiber15 (in 12 txns to 9 users)20 (in 8 txns from 6 users)5 (max 5)
179)pixie858 (in 6 txns to 6 users)5 (in 4 txns from 4 users)5 (max 5)
180)m201713 (in 13 txns to 11 users)15 (in 9 txns from 7 users)5 (max 6)
181)coolcoinz6 (in 6 txns to 5 users)2 (in 2 txns from 2 users)5 (max 5)
182)jayce8 (in 8 txns to 7 users)6 (in 6 txns from 6 users)5 (max 5)
183)sandy-is-fine5 (in 1 txn)05 (max 5)
184)krishnaverma5 (in 3 txns to 3 users)05 (max 5)
185)elianite6 (in 5 txns to 5 users)15 (max 5)
186)Quickseller5 (in 1 txn)05 (max 5)
187)edgar5 (in 1 txn)05 (max 5)
188)mjglqw9 (in 7 txns to 7 users)8 (in 7 txns from 7 users)5 (max 5)
189)kryptqnick10 (in 9 txns to 8 users)9 (in 4 txns from 4 users)5 (max 7)
190)Don Pedro Dinero24 (in 19 txns to 14 users)38 (in 16 txns from 8 users)5 (max 10)
191)Arenga pinnata8 (in 8 txns to 8 users)7 (in 3 txns from 3 users)4 (max 4)
192)Sakanwa23 (in 10 txns to 8 users)37 (in 14 txns from 12 users)4 (max 5)
193)Nothingtodo9 (in 9 txns to 5 users)10 (in 9 txns from 9 users)4 (max 5)
194)Dimitri946 (in 5 txns to 5 users)4 (in 4 txns from 3 users)4 (max 5)
195)Nwada00125 (in 8 txns to 8 users)42 (in 24 txns from 14 users)4 (max 5)
196)citb0in4 (in 2 txns to 2 users)04 (max 4)
197)Hamza242419 (in 18 txns to 13 users)30 (in 17 txns from 9 users)4 (max 4)
198)pbies4 (in 4 txns to 3 users)04 (max 4)
199)tiCeR5 (in 5 txns to 2 users)2 (in 2 txns from 2 users)4 (max 4)
200)Igebotz11 (in 3 txns to 2 users)14 (in 10 txns from 8 users)4 (max 6)



In June 2023 total sent 24259 merits (in 12359 txns to 1496 users):
  • 1% to Newbies: 186 merits (to 127 users)
  • 2% to Jr. Members: 465 merits (to 147 users)
  • 9% to Members: 2166 merits (to 252 users)
  • 9% to Full Members: 2074 merits (to 177 users)
  • 12% to Sr. Members: 2872 merits (to 217 users)
  • 15% to Hero Members: 3600 merits (to 267 users)
  • 53% to Legendaries: 12896 merits (to 414 users)

Total user count on July 1, 2023:
  • 3009 Legendaries (1689 of them sent merits)
  • 3927 Hero Members (1726 of them sent merits)
  • 9195 Sr. Members (3199 of them sent merits)
  • 18594 Full Members (5803 of them sent merits)
  • 32779 Members (9776 of them sent merits)
  • 24678 Jr. Members (2936 of them sent merits)
  • about three million newbies
Pages:
Jump to: