Pages:
Author

Topic: Tornado Cash mixing service is now blacklisted in US (Read 850 times)

legendary
Activity: 3010
Merit: 1460
According to this Dune analytics dashboard page by a user called @phabc, Tether has banned 716 addreses already with $420 million of USDT held by the addresses in total. Circle has banned 82 addresses with $4 million held in total.

We can use this information if there are updates on Tether and if Paolo will wait for instruction from the government concerning funds that came from Tornado Cash.

https://dune.com/phabc
legendary
Activity: 3010
Merit: 1460
On Tether, this is an admirable act from them, however, this is risky for the cryptospace because the US treasury department might be given a reason to sanction them before law enforcement instruction can be given. This is only another speculation but it might presently be safer to hold another type of stablecoin or only hold bitcoin.



Tether Holds Firm on Decision Not To Freeze Tornado Cash Addresses, Awaits Law Enforcement Instruction

Tether works closely with law enforcement worldwide to assist in investigations, including freezing addresses. We are in almost daily contact with key law enforcement officers and pride ourselves on the timeliness with which we respond to their requests. When Tether receives an applicable/legitimate request from a verified law enforcement agent to freeze a privately held wallet, the Company complies with the freeze (we do not freeze wallets of exchanges/services).


Source https://tether.to/en/tether-holds-firm-on-decision-not-to-freeze-tornado-cash-addresses-awaits-law-enforcement-instruction/

legendary
Activity: 3010
Merit: 1460
News update.

A small group of people from the cryptospace community and what appears to also be from the opensource development community are starting to organize themselves to protest against the arrest of Alex Pertsev.

Everyone can sign the petition in their change.org page.

https://www.change.org/p/open-source-development-is-in-danger-take-action-before-it-s-too-late-opensourcenotacrime-privacynotacrime-freealex-freepertsev-freealekseypertsev

If you are in Amsterdam, you can join the rally.

https://www.meetup.com/cryptocanal/events/287867009



The global crypto community is spearheading a campaign to raise awareness about Tornado Cash developer Alexey Pertsev’s arrest earlier this month.

The supporters of Alexey Pertsev, the top contributor to Tornado Cash’s open-source code, have raised 2,070 signatures in a petition to free him as part of a campaign to raise awareness about his recent arrest and its potential impact on the future of open-source software. Netherlands’ Fiscal Information and Investigation Service sparked outrage in the crypto community after arresting Pertsev in Amsterdam on August 10—two days after the U.S. Treasury Department sanctioned Tornado Cash—on suspicion of “involvement in concealing criminal financial flows and facilitating money laundering.”

Despite the significant outcry from the global crypto and open-source communities, Dutch authorities haven’t yet revealed the laws Pertsev has allegedly broken. According to a statement shared by crypto policy and advocacy group DeFi Education Fund, the Fiscal Information and Investigation Service thinks that Tornado Cash was created solely for money laundering. “About the concerns, the development of a tool is not prohibited, but if a tool has been created for the purpose of committing criminal acts, for example to conceal criminal flows of money, then putting online/making available a developed tool may be punishable,” the agency told the DeFi Education Fund in an email response.


Source https://cryptobriefing.com/crypto-fans-launch-campaign-arrested-tornado-cash-developer/
legendary
Activity: 2758
Merit: 6830
Users can also interact with the smart contracts directly without the front end. Those smart contracts are also immutable because the ownership has been renounced.
Yes, the problem is that some of these are already being blocked on the RPC level. So if you use Infura or Alchemy (which are the default on Metamask), you can't interact with the smart contract. You would need to find a free RPC or run your own.

Also, it has begun. Blocking addresses is expected from centralized exchanges, however, a Defi exchange is also blocking addresses that connects to Tornado Cash hehehe. This is head shaking. They might be very afraid of being arrested and given a lawsuit for moneylaundering.
There is also an open source browser extension that intercepts and bypasses the requests responsible for checking if your address is dirty/sanctioned: https://github.com/qd-qd/pineapple
legendary
Activity: 3010
Merit: 1460
How is a service that's "fully decentralized", not have an option for a tor version or even have an option for one to run their own node and run a network of a censorship resistant decentralized service? I mean as soon as the sanction came into play, the main website went offline, default RPC protocols blocked, GitHub deleted, etc
Tornado Cash's contract is still up and running, that's where the decentralization comes from. You could claim that it's too hard to run your own Ethereum node (for the RPC access) and host your own copy of their frontend, but this is still possible.

Users can also interact with the smart contracts directly without the front end. Those smart contracts are also immutable because the ownership has been renounced.

Also, it has begun. Blocking addresses is expected from centralized exchanges, however, a Defi exchange is also blocking addresses that connects to Tornado Cash hehehe. This is head shaking. They might be very afraid of being arrested and given a lawsuit for moneylaundering.



Uniswap the Decentralised exchange has blocked 253 crypto addresses over the last four months that it worked with TRM Labs, which is a blockchain analytics firm. The reason behind the blocking was tied to connections with stolen funds.

This makes it the first ever time Uniswap disclosed data which is related to wallet blacklisting. These stolen funds were related to transaction mixing services that included Tornado Cash which was received as sanction from the US Treasury.


Source https://bitcoinist.com/uniswap-blocked-253-crypto-addresses-heres-why/
copper member
Activity: 2114
Merit: 1814
฿itcoin for all, All for ฿itcoin.
Tornado Cash's contract is still up and running, that's where the decentralization comes from. You could claim that it's too hard to run your own Ethereum node (for the RPC access) and host your own copy of their frontend, but this is still possible.
I agree that contract is still up and running, but of what use is it if an average Joe can not access the platform to mix his Ether?

Where is the said contract going to get volumes of ETH so that it's possible to obfuscate them and thus make it a fully functional decentralized mixer that anyone can access?

IMO, I believe decentralization becomes more meaningful when it involves masses as well, just like what we are seeing with Bitcoin right now  Wink
legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 16328
Fully fledged Merit Cycler - Golden Feather 22-23
]

This proves how it is impossible to accuse people just because they use mixers . And how easy it is to just make 4 transactions and become "clean"

Protecting privacy isn’t a crime.
The huge majority of mixing services are doing mixes because of perfectly legitimate reasons.
I am happy to see that many users are using mixers: it should be a default way of doing transactions (and soon it will be with Cross Input Signature Aggregation).
legendary
Activity: 2352
Merit: 6089
bitcoindata.science
I just found some interesting information that I would like to share

Nearly 41% of all aether addresses have been 2 hops from Tornado cash. More than 90% 4 gopa from it.


This proves how it is impossible to accuse people just because they use mixers . And how easy it is to just make 4 transactions and become "clean"
legendary
Activity: 2758
Merit: 6830
How is a service that's "fully decentralized", not have an option for a tor version or even have an option for one to run their own node and run a network of a censorship resistant decentralized service? I mean as soon as the sanction came into play, the main website went offline, default RPC protocols blocked, GitHub deleted, etc
Tornado Cash's contract is still up and running, that's where the decentralization comes from. You could claim that it's too hard to run your own Ethereum node (for the RPC access) and host your own copy of their frontend, but this is still possible.
legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 16328
Fully fledged Merit Cycler - Golden Feather 22-23
[Tornado cash was fully decentralized, non-custodial, unlike most of these garbage mixers.
Someone correct me if I am wrong, pardon my not so technical knowledge background.

How is a service that's "fully decentralized", not have an option for a tor version or even have an option for one to run their own node and run a network of a censorship resistant decentralized service? I mean as soon as the sanction came into play, the main website went offline, default RPC protocols blocked, GitHub deleted, etc

Guess what? It wasn’t decentralised.
As wasabi debacle showed, fully decentralised, censorship resistant, privacy preserving reliable mixers are still to come.

GitHub and Discord servers being taken down is a different (sad) story, involving our trust toward platforms should be neutral.
copper member
Activity: 2114
Merit: 1814
฿itcoin for all, All for ฿itcoin.
[Tornado cash was fully decentralized, non-custodial, unlike most of these garbage mixers.
Someone correct me if I am wrong, pardon my not so technical knowledge background.

How is a service that's "fully decentralized", not have an option for a tor version or even have an option for one to run their own node and run a network of a censorship resistant decentralized service? I mean as soon as the sanction came into play, the main website went offline, default RPC protocols blocked, GitHub deleted, etc
legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 16328
Fully fledged Merit Cycler - Golden Feather 22-23
Another worrying aspect is the fact that Tornado Cash has been deleted by GitHub.
Please remember GitHub hosts also Bitcoin Core code.
There is nothing really special about github except the fact that most people got used to using it, but knowing that microsoft purchased it should make people switch to some alternative, and Git is already decentralized.
It's not that hard to self host bitcoin code, but for start t would be smart to make cloned code to Gitlab, Gitea or Gogs that are all open source.
They would really have to switch off internet if they want to stop Bitcoin, but they can much easier control shitcoins and PoS coins.

As I said, there are many other alternatives to GitHub, and probably we will soon have some kind of decentralized web (something built on Holepunch maybe?).
But the idea that a code can be taken down without being used only for fraudulent activities is a very worrying aspect of the centralization of Github. We all shall start thinking about alternatives (thinking about Bitcoin Core repository).
legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 7064
Another worrying aspect is the fact that Tornado Cash has been deleted by GitHub.
Please remember GitHub hosts also Bitcoin Core code.
There is nothing really special about github except the fact that most people got used to using it, but knowing that microsoft purchased it should make people switch to some alternative, and Git is already decentralized.
It's not that hard to self host bitcoin code, but for start t would be smart to make cloned code to Gitlab, Gitea or Gogs that are all open source.
They would really have to switch off internet if they want to stop Bitcoin, but they can much easier control shitcoins and PoS coins.
legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 16328
Fully fledged Merit Cycler - Golden Feather 22-23
Another worrying aspect is the fact that Tornado Cash has been deleted by GitHub.
Please remember GitHub hosts also Bitcoin Core code.

Nothing really that can potentially stop Bitcoin, but once again. it's a slippery slope.


Reference:

'It Doesn’t Change Anything' Says Tornado Cash After Code Disappears From GitHub
legendary
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1427
...
Pretty sure this guy was arrested earlier. I think there's actually two people of age 29 that got arrested, one of whom being the developer of TC.

So, I think that there is another important thing that might have to be discussed although we will probably never know:
- Was tornadocash compromised since launch and it didn't offer the claimed privacy at all?
I have a really bad feeling about this, I can remember how the alpha bay then hansa market episode went.
You can use google ?
I'm pretty sure at least some people have audited the contract code since then. Tornado cash was fully decentralized, non-custodial, unlike most of these garbage mixers. perhaps there is a way to backdoor the cryptography they use (zk-snark), no idea.
legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 16328
Fully fledged Merit Cycler - Golden Feather 22-23
- Was tornadocash compromised since launch and it didn't offer the claimed privacy at all?
I have a really bad feeling about this, I can remember how the alpha bay then hansa market episode went.



Dear lord.
This would be so worrisome.
But in the end, having a protocol completely unlinked from a central entity, as also the Wasabi saga showed, is of utter importance for the privacy of the users.

TC being a rotten product acting only as a shell for proper laundering operation would be a disastrous outcome for every privacy inspired user.
legendary
Activity: 2912
Merit: 6403
Blackjack.fun
This means he was directly involved in the money laundering, not only providing the TC protocol.

I was curious about something when I read the DOJ release:
https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/alleged-russian-money-launderer-extradited-netherlands-us

Quote
In July 2019, Dubnikov allegedly laundered more than $400,000 in Ryuk ransom proceeds. Those involved in the conspiracy laundered at least $70 million in ransom proceeds.

The first question that came to mind, was when was tornadocash launched and, no surprise, "Tornado Cash was launched in August 2019 ".
So, I think that there is another important thing that might have to be discussed although we will probably never know:
- Was tornadocash compromised since launch and it didn't offer the claimed privacy at all?
I have a really bad feeling about this, I can remember how the alpha bay then hansa market episode went.

legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 16328
Fully fledged Merit Cycler - Golden Feather 22-23
Random piece of news stating the guy was arrested not as a TC developer but because he was actively involved in cash recycling.
Not that this changes much in the situation, but it is only a bit less worrying as he wasn't arrested for only writing code.


Apparently this is the reason.
The fact he was a TC developers has little to do with the arrest. The reason why he was arrested is because money laundering:

Alleged Crypto Ransomware Money Launderer Extradited to US

Quote
The US Department of Justice accuses Denis Dubnikov of laundering more than $400,000 in funds lifted from Ryuk ransomware attacks as part of a $70 million scheme, according to a statement by the Department of Justice on Wednesday.

Dubnikov and others involved in the scheme are alleged to have laundered funds from the attacks through various national and international transactions in a bid to conceal the funds’ provenance.
This means he was directly involved in the money laundering, not only providing the TC protocol.

Then, we can discuss why/if money laundering is a criminal offence or not.
legendary
Activity: 3010
Merit: 1460
Random piece of news stating the guy was arrested not as a TC developer but because he was actively involved in cash recycling.
Not that this changes much in the situation, but it is only a bit less worrying as he wasn't arrested for only writing code.


It should not change anything because he was really being arrested for writing code for protection and enhancement of privacy and they presently are using mainstream media news to make it appear that he is a money launderer and a criminal hehehe. This is head shaking. Cryptospace developers should go back to being anonymous.

@ETFbitcoin. It was cleary a question for the purpose of supporting the argument only hehehehe.

I know, but i wanted to mention it's not impossible.

Also, on the 1990s case, was it in America? Was it also when it was declared that code is speech and also protected by the first amendment?

Yes, it was on America. I don't know the details, but people usually call it crypto wars in 90s.

Is it Bernstein vs. the Department of Justice?
legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 7064
Random piece of news stating the guy was arrested not as a TC developer but because he was actively involved in cash recycling.
Not that this changes much in the situation, but it is only a bit less worrying as he wasn't arrested for only writing code.
Can you post source link for this information and how exactly did they found him?
It's funny coincidence that in the same time this arrest happened, lot of github accounts with tornado cash code contribution got deleted/banned.
So writing source code was obviously a big problem for someone when he had to do all this, and maybe this is not so important but in July Tornado Cash Classic UI became fully open-source


Pages:
Jump to: