I need to take a dump..
I guess this confirms it, the off topic section of the off topic part of the forum is totally off topic
Topic: Totally Off-Topic! - page 24. (Read 104868 times)
I guess this confirms it, the off topic section of the off topic part of the forum is totally off topic
Yeah, totally off topic.
I need to take a dump..
off-topic under off-topic... very interesting.... what topic is off-topic under this off-topic topic???
this threads
Totally Off-Topic!
agree Totally Off-Topic!
this threads
Totally Off-Topic!
Totally Off-Topic!
The site is very fun 
What's up with the forum bots lately? You see at least 3-4 per thread with their 2 word responses to a quote, extremely generic all the time.Or four word responses.
woooo yes, woooo no
I don't think they're bots, though. More likely fifteen year old kids.
You're too kind. Probably just third world people.
Haha! I feel myself fifteen as sometimes I write only 1-2 words and that's it. Or no words just Smile
i love sex
No, I think they're fifteen year old kids. Maybe fourteen.
i love sex
The site is very fun
What's up with the forum bots lately? You see at least 3-4 per thread with their 2 word responses to a quote, extremely generic all the time.Or four word responses.
woooo yes, woooo no
I don't think they're bots, though. More likely fifteen year old kids.
You're too kind. Probably just third world people.
The site is very fun
What's up with the forum bots lately? You see at least 3-4 per thread with their 2 word responses to a quote, extremely generic all the time.Or four word responses.
woooo yes, woooo no
I don't think they're bots, though. More likely fifteen year old kids.
The site is very fun
What's up with the forum bots lately? You see at least 3-4 per thread with their 2 word responses to a quote, extremely generic all the time.
The site is very fun
We had a guy come in who was being foreclosed on. For a house in California. That he didn't own, didn't live in, in fact - he'd never been to California. The guy just had the same name as the California homeowner, and the bank was like 'Alright, that matches up! Serve him the papers, Johnny!'
You'd think this could be cleared up by a friendly phone call, but the bank totally DNGAF. They wanted this guy to show up at the hearing IN CALIFORNIA and prove he wasn't the guy. No idea how it ended up (The guy just came in for a consultation, don't think he retained as that wasn't really our field) but we've had other clients in the same situation with foreclosure judgments for property they didn't own, that was owned by some person in the same area with a similar name. Not too many, but the banks seriously did not do any detailed research for a time when everything was foreclosing. It was a huge mess.
Like, people owning two properties, one in FC and the other current - the bank would lock them out of the current home. The bank would FC on the house but forget to notify the HOA, and two years down the road the former homeowner gets sued for non-payment of HOA fees...that the bank was responsible for when they took over ownership. Banks confirming they got the suggestion of bankruptcy (which will stop a foreclosure) and then just having the foreclosure sale anyway. I am so glad I'm not dealing with that anymore.
You'd think this could be cleared up by a friendly phone call, but the bank totally DNGAF. They wanted this guy to show up at the hearing IN CALIFORNIA and prove he wasn't the guy. No idea how it ended up (The guy just came in for a consultation, don't think he retained as that wasn't really our field) but we've had other clients in the same situation with foreclosure judgments for property they didn't own, that was owned by some person in the same area with a similar name. Not too many, but the banks seriously did not do any detailed research for a time when everything was foreclosing. It was a huge mess.
Like, people owning two properties, one in FC and the other current - the bank would lock them out of the current home. The bank would FC on the house but forget to notify the HOA, and two years down the road the former homeowner gets sued for non-payment of HOA fees...that the bank was responsible for when they took over ownership. Banks confirming they got the suggestion of bankruptcy (which will stop a foreclosure) and then just having the foreclosure sale anyway. I am so glad I'm not dealing with that anymore.
I haven't read this so I can't post a on topic response becuse I'm not allowed to said PG.
We had a guy come in who was being foreclosed on. For a house in California. That he didn't own, didn't live in, in fact - he'd never been to California. The guy just had the same name as the California homeowner, and the bank was like 'Alright, that matches up! Serve him the papers, Johnny!'
You'd think this could be cleared up by a friendly phone call, but the bank totally DNGAF. They wanted this guy to show up at the hearing IN CALIFORNIA and prove he wasn't the guy. No idea how it ended up (The guy just came in for a consultation, don't think he retained as that wasn't really our field) but we've had other clients in the same situation with foreclosure judgments for property they didn't own, that was owned by some person in the same area with a similar name. Not too many, but the banks seriously did not do any detailed research for a time when everything was foreclosing. It was a huge mess.
Like, people owning two properties, one in FC and the other current - the bank would lock them out of the current home. The bank would FC on the house but forget to notify the HOA, and two years down the road the former homeowner gets sued for non-payment of HOA fees...that the bank was responsible for when they took over ownership. Banks confirming they got the suggestion of bankruptcy (which will stop a foreclosure) and then just having the foreclosure sale anyway. I am so glad I'm not dealing with that anymore.
You'd think this could be cleared up by a friendly phone call, but the bank totally DNGAF. They wanted this guy to show up at the hearing IN CALIFORNIA and prove he wasn't the guy. No idea how it ended up (The guy just came in for a consultation, don't think he retained as that wasn't really our field) but we've had other clients in the same situation with foreclosure judgments for property they didn't own, that was owned by some person in the same area with a similar name. Not too many, but the banks seriously did not do any detailed research for a time when everything was foreclosing. It was a huge mess.
Like, people owning two properties, one in FC and the other current - the bank would lock them out of the current home. The bank would FC on the house but forget to notify the HOA, and two years down the road the former homeowner gets sued for non-payment of HOA fees...that the bank was responsible for when they took over ownership. Banks confirming they got the suggestion of bankruptcy (which will stop a foreclosure) and then just having the foreclosure sale anyway. I am so glad I'm not dealing with that anymore.
I haven't read this so I can't post a on topic response becuse I'm not allowed to said PG.
We had a guy come in who was being foreclosed on. For a house in California. That he didn't own, didn't live in, in fact - he'd never been to California. The guy just had the same name as the California homeowner, and the bank was like 'Alright, that matches up! Serve him the papers, Johnny!'
You'd think this could be cleared up by a friendly phone call, but the bank totally DNGAF. They wanted this guy to show up at the hearing IN CALIFORNIA and prove he wasn't the guy. No idea how it ended up (The guy just came in for a consultation, don't think he retained as that wasn't really our field) but we've had other clients in the same situation with foreclosure judgments for property they didn't own, that was owned by some person in the same area with a similar name. Not too many, but the banks seriously did not do any detailed research for a time when everything was foreclosing. It was a huge mess.
Like, people owning two properties, one in FC and the other current - the bank would lock them out of the current home. The bank would FC on the house but forget to notify the HOA, and two years down the road the former homeowner gets sued for non-payment of HOA fees...that the bank was responsible for when they took over ownership. Banks confirming they got the suggestion of bankruptcy (which will stop a foreclosure) and then just having the foreclosure sale anyway. I am so glad I'm not dealing with that anymore.
You'd think this could be cleared up by a friendly phone call, but the bank totally DNGAF. They wanted this guy to show up at the hearing IN CALIFORNIA and prove he wasn't the guy. No idea how it ended up (The guy just came in for a consultation, don't think he retained as that wasn't really our field) but we've had other clients in the same situation with foreclosure judgments for property they didn't own, that was owned by some person in the same area with a similar name. Not too many, but the banks seriously did not do any detailed research for a time when everything was foreclosing. It was a huge mess.
Like, people owning two properties, one in FC and the other current - the bank would lock them out of the current home. The bank would FC on the house but forget to notify the HOA, and two years down the road the former homeowner gets sued for non-payment of HOA fees...that the bank was responsible for when they took over ownership. Banks confirming they got the suggestion of bankruptcy (which will stop a foreclosure) and then just having the foreclosure sale anyway. I am so glad I'm not dealing with that anymore.
I eat bacon because it tastes like bacon.
woooo yes, woooo no
There will be always someone who breaks the rules and post on topic in off topic thread 
But total total, huh?
Jump to: