Having less attention doesn't necessarily make you less secure. In fact it may be the exact opposite.
You may be right. I found user reviews of different wallets on the bitbox website. see https://bitbox.swiss/bitbox02/#compare and https://www.trustpilot.com/review/bitbox.swiss
I compared several kinds of wallets and recorded the theft situation myself, as follows:
Trezor, User score: 3.5, Number of reviews: 405, Number of stolen users: 12, Some details: Robert in AU, 160,000$ stolen; Curtis in US, 100,000$ stolen; Donald in US, 60,000$ stolen; Voodoo in AU, 0.4BTC stolen.
Ledger, User score: 2.8, Number of reviews: 1559, Number of stolen users: 12, Some details: Di in IT, 1 eth stolen; Ale in AU, 0.33BTC stolen.
Keepkey, User score: 2.4, Number of reviews: 290, Number of stolen users: 1, Some details: Gennady, 5000$ stolen.
BitBox, User score: 4.9, Number of reviews: 547, Number of stolen users: None
Keystone, User score: 4.2, Number of reviews: 47, Number of stolen users: None
Onekey, User score: 3.5, Number of reviews: 56, Number of stolen users: None
The theft of the Trezor hardware wallet is the most serious. Is it possible that there is a bad man inside the Trezor company who left a backdoor in the manufacturing process of a small number of wallets? And the genuine firmware of Trezor and Trezor Suite did not recognize it?