Topic: Trust flags - page 16. (Read 12952 times)

I don't think it is as negative has kind-of-become ineffective. I've been asked this several times today actually.

Is countering feedback still a thing?

Feels a little clunky, but I definitely support the idea behind it and the direction we can go with the update. I agree with others that the symbols need some updating as well, I don't think the # is fantastic. I don't know that you need a ! or WARNING or any red/yellow/orange colors, even something that just says, "This user has feedback" click here:_____ to see it would work. My only major complaint to this point with the trust system was that red or green letters and arbitrary numbers can be misleading. Just saying, Hey this guy has feedback, why don't you check it out is useful in my opinion.

Separating the, this guy likes lemons! Anyone who doesn't like lemons should avoid this trader! And, hey this guy scammed me, without disallowing either is a good step.


*edit*



No one has flagged them yet.

Sounds and looks trustworthy to me. Where are the victims?

How 'bout an non-random example ...

https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/inaba-8198

I like it, It's simple and easy to understand. 

@Hhampuz  already asked this, most probably it will be implemented.

@theymos

Is it possible to get some Page Numbers on the Feedback pages ?

Something like this here :

Theymos, I mentioned this a few times in the past.

Using the following random (seriously, truly random; don't know the guy) user as an example - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1980983 - NONE of the red or black Trust feedbacks are indexed by Google or any other search engine. In fact, one must be logged in on BCT to view the feedbacks.

So for the crypto community at large, truly major scammers weeded out on BCT go unnoticed on the rest of the Net.

Thanks in advance, theymos, for seeing what you can do to rectify this situation.

Bruno (one of crypto's top ten scammy asses)

Blah Blah .....  Blah everytime the same Story CH.

You should going again outside to get some fresh Air , maybe you will be feeling better after that .

You know nothing  , i never worked with or for Cryptopia or was employed there .
I also was an victim and lost there. But you can write that all in there thread there .

I was only asking how to handle that things of case with malware links , sry i forgot that you just can thing back 30 seconds in the past !

The taggs i have done on the Malware shit posting links Gang was just for warning other users so they dont get damaged .

In that time i have done this , you just was crying about anything .

Again a waste of time to write to you , and welcome again on my ignore list !

Cheers

Possibly. Just like many active users have some non-trusted feedback ratings that don't mean anything. Inactive flags are buried even deeper so it shouldn't be much of a problem.

I suggest the newbie-flag barks just a little louder. Having a # +0 / =0 / -2 seems a bit tame.   I was going to give an example of this person that I tagged, today. iramsarwar. However, it appears that he just got nuked.  

Sorry dude, I forgot to add a typical scammers profile example. Edited. Now you are a super celeb.


https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.51442422

So you are NOT ABLE to demonstrate any instances of scamming but wish to tell lies and make up stories. Sounds like fun you are having there.

Even beginners are likely not as low functioning as you and will research the feedback themselves.

Moronpigschnoz - lol - come at me bro.

We asked you to present a specific instance of scamming. YOU FAILED. Well done you're a FAILURE. Keep going though, it is amusing. We like attention, keep bringing it our way. nom nom nom.



Now enough derailing. We want to talk about the new transparent and much fairer trust system that has been introduced. No listen to your crying, lying and trolling.

@bones if people are not smart enough to be cautious with a brand new account what do you suggest? sorry, i thought you were talking about someone with a scam flag.

anyway what do you mean if can you provide an example of what you are envisioning?

a newbie comes into a thread they did not start and does what exactly. Describe the exact scenario so we can see what you are talking about. Do you mean a newbie comes to the thread that is not previously flagged a scammer but has some negative remarks? and makes some 10 bucks for 500 bucks gift card offer? or something else?


I mean obviously a lot of 2 bit scammers and chancers are going to need flags added where there is a clear case of scamming, but then again FFS if you are a member here handing over bitcoins do some of your OWN DD read the feedback also.

As I have said we have to balance the lowest functioning and most greedy losing some micro btc dust against the entire boards free speech being eroded.  Any problems that pop up are NOT theymos's fault here. THIS IS DUE TO PEOPLE TRUST ABUSING AND CREATING THE NEED FOR CHANGE.

People do need to be forced to do their OWN research before throwing their btc at strangers on the internets. I mean they are aware btc is not reversible right?

Even where there is a loss of 2 and a gain of 200 . You still gained 198 net right. We are all clear on this.

If someone wants to risk their 20 bucks bitcoin to get a 500 bucks amazon gift card from a newbie account, then that is there choice. That was their parents job to tell them that is a risky proposition. I don't feel the entire boards free speech and ability to present observable instances without fear of their account being ruined is a fair price to pay, by any stretch of the imagination.

Actually it is NOT just laudas fault it is your fault bones, it is suchmoons fault it is every DT that did not reverse blatant abuse that had nothing to do with being a scammer. If you had all used the trust system as he initially designed it then it would not have required changes. You were ALL told it was for scammers and those you could provide STRONG case were scammers or intending to scam. None of you listened and continued to brand anyone as scammers for any reason you liked or supported those that were doing so. No person stood against them. Except once ACTMYNAME who is more reasonable although he does selectively like to lecture people who are not gang members and ignore their very same behaviors from gang members,  and at least he does remain civil most of the time. Mikeywith also did try to be as fair as he could without putting his own account up for enemy status. You bones were not the worst, but still it was quite clear you were not going to reverse any of the blatant abuse.

Now the changes are here make sure you all use this system as theymos  has told you it is to be used or get blacklisted. Simple.


LOOK at lafu here crying -- FORGETS TO MENTION the old system didn't just stop the HUGE EXIT SCAM from cryptopia did, it you insider weasel. Where was the old system there??? THE BIGGEST AND BEST SCAMS WILL NEVER GIVE YOU A WARNING BEFORE THEY GO.  They directly or indirectly use the trust system to SCAM BIGGER.

Lafu worked with cryptopia -- where were your warning flags for that exit scam . Perhaps people trusted cryptopia because you had it in your sig mr DT1  I want to warn people about scammer and scams. LOL. Perhaps the trust system of any kind INCREASES the chances for BIG SCAMS?

The old system never stopped the BIG SCAMS so stop pretending it did.

The BIGGEST scams here are the convincing ALTS with whitepapers 99.99% of this board don't understand. They will all erode to dust and be forgotten after sucking BILLIONS of dollars from average joes here. Stop worrying about mr $500 bucks gift cards for 20 bucks. Focus on the HUGE scams that are ruining 1000's of investors at a time and spoiling the entire crypto environment.  They can be tackled on thread or with the use of other threads.

If they can not be removed, then we can get to the point that the inscription on the inactive flag will be for everyone.

No red on someone until: a) He's already finished his scamming. b) The victim comes out forward and creates the flag. Even if everyone is 100% sure that the user will scam, the best that you can do is yellow. This system actually incentivizes one-account-one-scam and de-incentivizes leaving support as you risk getting blacklisted.

Yea, it was so long ago (1969) that I lost it all because of the drugs and free sex during "the summer of love."  I guess that does qualify as not having one.  My better half agrees after all these years.  Never thought I'd make it to my 50th reunion (or 50th anniv) but I did but my brain is still pretty fried.  

As Vinnie Barbarino /John Travolta said:  "I'm sooooooo confused."    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xfGzyKRJSuA

So with the Flag system the chance is bigger now that other users will be a victim of the Malware links , because we cant tagg them so others see the warning for it  !
Sounds linke a step back in this case !

Would be good to know how we can do this for that things !

To answer your question no i wasnt a victim about that links , but i look and search for them and try to warn other users that they dont get into this trap download links!



Thanks so i will doing that in that cases if there is something like that !

Flags can't be removed (I guess admin can do it in exceptional cases). You can withdraw your support though.

Please tell me. If I created a flag, can I remove it or not? And if not, who can remove it?