Pages:
Author

Topic: Trust spam happens (Read 4108 times)

sr. member
Activity: 322
Merit: 250
https://dadice.com | Click my signature to join!
April 07, 2015, 06:40:48 AM
#69
95 accounts for trust bombing? Really?

Sorry! Admin. I don't remember much

But my purpose is to attack give the bastard is abusing trust here to apply to everyone

We are pulling more members to go to war with me



I don't care what your purpose is, it's still spam, and it accomplishes nothing. Use your time away from the forum to chill out.

He came back with an alt-account kinglong (uid:490032) to evade ban opening an almost identical thread to repeat same accusation against MZ after users asked him to provide verifiable evidence over the FuckIdolPlus scam case he was involved in. Also he still engaged in giving out fake trust feedbacks.

http://gyazo.com/f820c68abd0a5764a0b6ce5a575a3cc9
sr. member
Activity: 322
Merit: 250
https://dadice.com | Click my signature to join!
April 06, 2015, 11:48:57 AM
#68
L+1. Symantec seems to have the habit to resort to retaliation trust feedback abuse;

If I were him, I will stop this. Won't it be boring to login to 95 accounts and leave feedback to different accounts? -x_x-

LOL

recently, at the beginning of the MSDN Key trade affair he sent me a PM saying he left me -ve trust feedback - over the following neutral feedback: Selling Keys from MSDN is not allowed as per Microsoft own TOS (see http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/windows_7-windows_install/selling-product-key-from-msdntechnet-and-or/cf40c328-67ce-49b6-bbb6-c28cda92c06e) and may also be a misdemeanor or felony in your jurisdiction accordingly to IP protection law and/or other laws. This can apply also to Keys from other software houses.

It was discussed earlier but there wasn't much use. As it isn't illegal because at most, it is punishable under Civil law.

Sadly, this wasn't the case in every jurisdiction. As an example, in Italy to IP protection laws qualify users of such Keys as felons due to them being punishable even when you do it not-for-profit, in order to make a "profit" which can also be seen in the simple expense savings due to the fact that you have had paid less money than for the purchase of the original key/software. Since Symantec self-admitted to being using an exploit to illegally obtaining MS Keys an Italian user could also held accountable to article 648 -a felony - of the Italian penal code (if the same user was unaware of the illicit origin of the Keys and simply failed to verify their lecit origin - doubtful - he could hope the be held accountable to article 712 - a misdemeanor - of the same penal code. Civil law punishments can always be applied even if court charges are brought.
However, if I remove a software from a system and resell the same key to another usere this would be OK both to IP, penal laws & to MS (or other software house). Obviously, multi-user key licenses have to be sold in bulk and cannot be sold individually.

Always do your own due diligence before engaging in a trade![/i] - then backtracking.

What Vod did was to get this to attention but it went in a different way as there was "illegal" and "stolen". One the contrary, Vod has a soft corner for Microsoft and that is one of the reason for leaving negative feedback and also one of the reason for anti-vod statements.

As I said above out there are many court jurisdictions. Vod called out MS since he was knowledgeable over it; but sw came from many software house and I am concerned of having to fight in a court not about a developer balance sheet.
hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 506
I prefer Zakir over Muhammed when mentioning me!
April 06, 2015, 10:24:01 AM
#67
[ size=12pt]Sorry! Admin. I don't remember much

This. It clearly states you have created lots of account just for trust spam.

But my purpose is to attack give the bastard is abusing trust here to apply to everyone

This is were you are wrong. If I am abusing trust system, you shouldn't do the same to me, you should post in Meta and we can discuss.

We are pulling more members to go to war with me

Another misunderstanding of yours. I am not a magnet. You can't:

• Clearly post a scam accusation.
• Avoid trust spam.
• Avoid abusive language.
• Clear your doubts.

[ color=green]The people Indian and China are the same: Because I call this the dog[/color][/size]

As you call us Dogs, we are same. Interesting theory.


These are explained above. Have you took the time to read before copy-pasting? Besides, could you teach me how to "suck" these if that solve your problem? Whenever I tried, my mouth is either vaccum or is filled with air. Thank you!
legendary
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1000
April 06, 2015, 10:22:20 AM
#66
Such poppycock. If you don't want Vod or anyone else to leave you negative trust then either 1) Don't sell stolen goods and products which also violate the company's TOU, or 2) Do business on another forum that doesn't rate members or provide such protections.

Just last week in another thread, a user by the name of SellMaster3000 or something was doing the same thing, and seemed shocked that people would leave him negative feedback. Vod is simply making a note of facts which is valuable if you want to make an informed decision. If you like cutting corners you will overlook the trust comments and contine buying from such vendors I am sure. If integrity matters to you, then you will look elsewhere.
legendary
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1127
April 06, 2015, 10:21:54 AM
#65
95 accounts for trust bombing? Really?

Sorry! Admin. I don't remember much

But my purpose is to attack give the bastard is abusing trust here to apply to everyone

We are pulling more members to go to war with me



I don't care what your purpose is, it's still spam, and it accomplishes nothing. Use your time away from the forum to chill out.
member
Activity: 72
Merit: 10
Skype: jsweeney13
April 06, 2015, 10:15:19 AM
#64
95 accounts for trust bombing? Really?

Sorry! Admin. I don't remember much

But my purpose is to attack give the bastard is abusing trust here to apply to everyone

We are pulling more members to go to war with me

The people Indian and China are the same: Because I call this the dog


Shocked Why don't we ban as he/she is clearly spamming. I mean there is ban for post_spam and PM_spam, so why not a ban for "trust_spam"? This will increase if no action is taken and of course, never want a trust moderation. The trust feedback can stay there.

Better go suck travel mouth bitch Indian
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10986221
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10987699
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10987962
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10990204
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10991113
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10991220
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10991683

Important Messages: https://i.imgur.com/OChMSjX.png and https://i.imgur.com/hLDpXFW.png

What is happening when you avoid him questions: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10991993
hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 506
I prefer Zakir over Muhammed when mentioning me!
April 06, 2015, 10:10:37 AM
#63
L+1. Symantec seems to have the habit to resort to retaliation trust feedback abuse;

If I were him, I will stop this. Won't it be boring to login to 95 accounts and leave feedback to different accounts? -x_x-

recently, at the beginning of the MSDN Key trade affair he sent me a PM saying he left me -ve trust feedback - over the following neutral feedback: Selling Keys from MSDN is not allowed as per Microsoft own TOS (see http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/windows_7-windows_install/selling-product-key-from-msdntechnet-and-or/cf40c328-67ce-49b6-bbb6-c28cda92c06e) and may also be a misdemeanor or felony in your jurisdiction accordingly to IP protection law and/or other laws. This can apply also to Keys from other software houses.

It was discussed earlier but there wasn't much use. As it isn't illegal because at most, it is punishable under Civil law.

Always do your own due diligence before engaging in a trade![/i] - then backtracking.

What Vod did was to get this to attention but it went in a different way as there was "illegal" and "stolen". One the contrary, Vod has a soft corner for Microsoft and that is one of the reason for leaving negative feedback and also one of the reason for anti-vod statements.

After this I reminded him - PMs #msg3525723, #msg3526241, #msg3526263 - about how trust feedback was supposed to operate; so now, I think he has no excuse for his abusive behaviour.

For me, he has: "I am an Indian". Undecided

Edit: He has came up with FB profiles which claims she is living in my state. Pretty soon, he will tell she is my neighbour. Hope he atleast won't tell "she is living in my home/house". Roll Eyes
legendary
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1078
I may write code in exchange for bitcoins.
April 06, 2015, 09:59:02 AM
#62
...

95 accounts for trust bombing? Really?

Shocked Why don't we ban as he/she is clearly spamming. I mean there is ban for post_spam and PM_spam, so why not a ban for "trust_spam"? This will increase if no action is taken and of course, never want a trust moderation. The trust feedback can stay there.

This seems like a reasonable approach, I think.  Salty?
sr. member
Activity: 322
Merit: 250
https://dadice.com | Click my signature to join!
April 06, 2015, 09:56:14 AM
#61
IMO anyone that attacks someone based on their race is deducted credibility points in my book and are generally not going to be listened to.

Usually racially charged comments follow from a person that has not legitimate ground to stand on in their accusations. Muhammed Zakir was one of the first people I remembered seeing on here regularly, and although I don't know him well seems like a genuinely nice guy. There are certainly bad actors amongst all races and peoples, so trying to justify this simply because he is an Indian is rather laughable.

+1. Symantec seems to have the habit to resort to retaliation trust feedback abuse; recently, at the beginning of the MSDN Key trade affair he sent me a PM saying he left me -ve trust feedback - over the following neutral feedback: Selling Keys from MSDN is not allowed as per Microsoft own TOS (see http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/windows_7-windows_install/selling-product-key-from-msdntechnet-and-or/cf40c328-67ce-49b6-bbb6-c28cda92c06e) and may also be a misdemeanor or felony in your jurisdiction accordingly to IP protection law and/or other laws. This can apply also to Keys from other software houses. Always do your own due diligence before engaging in a trade! - then backtracking. After this I reminded him - PMs #msg3525723, #msg3526241, #msg3526263 - about how trust feedback was supposed to operate; so now, I think he has no excuse for his abusive behaviour.
hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 506
I prefer Zakir over Muhammed when mentioning me!
April 06, 2015, 09:42:58 AM
#60
...

95 accounts for trust bombing? Really?

Shocked Why don't we ban as he/she is clearly spamming. I mean there is ban for post_spam and PM_spam, so why not a ban for "trust_spam"? This will increase if no action is taken and of course, never want a trust moderation. The trust feedback can stay there.
legendary
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1000
April 06, 2015, 09:37:11 AM
#59
IMO anyone that attacks someone based on their race is deducted credibility points in my book and are generally not going to be listened to.

Usually racially charged comments follow from a person that has not legitimate ground to stand on in their accusations. Muhammed Zakir was one of the first people I remembered seeing on here regularly, and although I don't know him well seems like a genuinely nice guy. There are certainly bad actors amongst all races and peoples, so trying to justify this simply because he is an Indian is rather laughable.
copper member
Activity: 2870
Merit: 2298
April 06, 2015, 09:20:36 AM
#58
Thanks mate. Whose next or am I the last? Smiley


this is obvious spam. I think this probably qualifies to have them removed, however either way it is not going to affect you.

IMO anyone that attacks someone based on their race is deducted credibility points in my book and are generally not going to be listened to.
legendary
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1127
April 06, 2015, 09:13:37 AM
#57
...

95 accounts for trust bombing? Really?
legendary
Activity: 1778
Merit: 1042
#Free market
April 06, 2015, 04:52:20 AM
#56
Thanks mate. Whose next or am I the last? Smiley



Who cares? Negative trusts from brand new/newbie users. I hope no one will trust  their judgments  Roll Eyes. will the trust system be (in the new forum software) the same as now?
hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 506
I prefer Zakir over Muhammed when mentioning me!
April 06, 2015, 04:49:17 AM
#55
Thanks mate. Whose next or am I the last? Smiley

hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 506
I prefer Zakir over Muhammed when mentioning me!
April 06, 2015, 04:01:40 AM
#54

What is with my messages? I was trying to ask FuckIdolPlus to know more about this. If you look my posts, you can clearly see that I have done the same thing earlier.


I asked her to give the password to me or a trusted person so that I or anyone else can verify what she is claiming is true or not.


See the reference.

What is happening when you avoid him questions: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10991993

If you have checked the time, you can easily know I was sleeping at that time. I checked your thread now and if you unlock it, I can reply. Thank you!

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I will find here: Skype: tanya.kuthiala.3 and E-Mail: [email protected] and I'll figure out something like this

https://www.facebook.com/tanya.kuthiala.3 or https://www.facebook.com/tanya.kuthiala (This is Indians, in the state of Kerala)

A fair warning: You maybe going for similar names. I can assure you, I don't know here but I know you won't believe it. If you think it is her's, it's okay but probably, it may belong to someone else and you might be breaking their privacy. Anyway, it's always your choice.

PS: Here's a bitch in Indians...That is why Muhammad Zakir trying to justify the actions of this scam

Muhammad Zakir - https://i.imgur.com/Rmv7Hju.png (This is Indians, in the state of Kerala)[/size]

Yes, I am an Indian. I still don't know why should I protect a person(if he/she is bad) even if the person is living in my country.

This is going a little offtopic. If you think my actions are bad or irrelevant, feel free to start a scam accusation and we can discuss it there.
member
Activity: 72
Merit: 10
Skype: jsweeney13
April 06, 2015, 03:30:35 AM
#53
Yes, self-moderated threads are bad for sales but there can be good intentions too(not saying FuckIdolPlus has/had good/bad intention).

P.S. You can clearly understand what does the forum warning mean. IMHO you have a few misunderstandings but you aren't ready to ask them. Smiley

Better go suck travel mouth bitch Indian:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10986221
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10987699
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10987962
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10990204
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10991113
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10991220
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10991683

Important Messages: https://i.imgur.com/OChMSjX.png and https://i.imgur.com/hLDpXFW.png

What is happening when you avoid him questions: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10991993

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I will find here: Skype: tanya.kuthiala.3 and E-Mail: [email protected] and I'll figure out something like this

https://www.facebook.com/tanya.kuthiala.3 or https://www.facebook.com/tanya.kuthiala (This is Indians, in the state of Kerala)

PS: Here's a bitch in Indians...That is why Muhammad Zakir trying to justify the actions of this scam

Muhammad Zakir - https://i.imgur.com/Rmv7Hju.png (This is Indians, in the state of Kerala)
hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 506
I prefer Zakir over Muhammed when mentioning me!
April 06, 2015, 02:50:04 AM
#52
[ size=12pt]Read it before you open your mouth dog here

- Positive - You trust this person or had a successful trade.
- Neutral - Comments. Your rating will not affect this person's trust score.
- Negative - You were scammed or you strongly believe that this person is a scammer.

They are simple rules for leaving feedback. There are many more rules for leaving trust feedback. Don't claim things only with those three lines. Smiley

This is the last time I speak in this topic:

I don't want you to stop posting in this thread, I want you to stop using unnecessary BBCodes and speak calmly.

1. You and the people Indian and China are the same: Because I call this the dog

This shows how exactly is your personality.

2. You guys are calling for more people to participate to war with me

I (we) aren't in for a war. It looks like you are in for a war. You even can't talk correctly.

3. He and others are abusing the system you trust to apply to everyone

I didn't understand this. However, I am fairly sure you have misunderstood.

4. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/fuckidolplus-scammer-56-please-banned-him-1012548 (This is my topic aims to warn everyone to be careful when trade with him)

Warning is good but you should clarify all things or atleast the questions asked by members. What you did were reposting same post(s).


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

As for my own: I still staying true to conscience and my man and I is not scam anyone here. Here I always have customers and partners trust me

Negative trust feedback wasn't for scamming, it was for bad attitude and possible-false scam accusation.

Those who are taking advantage of trust: Stop the ignorance of him when imposing it for everyone

You did see his profile, right? We aren't ignoring him, you couldn't even make a truthful scam accusation and came up with bad behavior.


Yes, self-moderated threads are bad for sales but there can be good intentions too(not saying FuckIdolPlus has/had good/bad intention).

P.S. You can clearly understand what does the forum warning mean. IMHO you have a few misunderstandings but you aren't ready to ask them. Smiley
member
Activity: 72
Merit: 10
Skype: jsweeney13
April 06, 2015, 01:59:43 AM
#51
To try to clear things up. That's what people are supposed to do in a scam accusation. Unfortunately you weren't helpful so I had to give up.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10990891

Read it before you open your mouth dog here

- Positive - You trust this person or had a successful trade.
- Neutral - Comments. Your rating will not affect this person's trust score.
- Negative - You were scammed or you strongly believe that this person is a scammer.


This is the last time I speak in this topic:

1. You and the people Indian and China are the same: Because I call this the dog

2. You guys are calling for more people to participate to war with me

3. He and others are abusing the system you trust to apply to everyone

4. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/fuckidolplus-scammer-56-please-banned-him-1012548 (This is my topic aims to warn everyone to be careful when trade with him)


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

As for my own: I still staying true to conscience and my man and I is not scam anyone here. Here I always have customers and partners trust me

Those who are taking advantage of trust: Stop the ignorance of him when imposing it for everyone

Especially pay attention to the following topics: This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--1013646
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--987244
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/selling-microsoft-office-windows-keys-for-2-4-1007956
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/psn-steam-xbox-live-itunes-megastore-cheap-prices-btc-and-pm-only-1007795
legendary
Activity: 1862
Merit: 1469
https://Ecua.Mobi
April 06, 2015, 12:23:06 AM
#50
I recently (April 4) received many negative ratings from new accounts - that guy copied my own comments --> 0/10 for effort.

I didn't give a bad rating to symantec, but maybe he maintains more than one bitcointalk account

Yes I'm pretty sure he has at least 2 additional accounts he uses to sell keys (not 100% sure so I won't mention the accounts) and who knows if others besides those.
Pages:
Jump to: