Topic: [Warning] Muhammed Zakir (Read 1661 times)

@Muhammed Zakir: I was trying to help clarify things by pointing out points still needing to be answered by him (see my post above), just as other forum users apparently tried to do, to help him clearing the issue he reported. So far, by judging with the available evidence here & there combined with symantec deleting his own post, I am convinced that both FuckIdolPlus and Symantec were trying to scam each other so I gave both a -ve trust feedback. I also have a duty to let admins know about the ban evasion since any decision is up to them, thus my post in Trust spam happens thread.

@abyrnes81: Is UP to you to decide If you want to report OP to mods and admins. If you want, you could use the Report to moderator link at the bottom of OP posts or you could send a PM to mods and admins (may BadBear) or something else. By the while, the link of Trust spam happens thread MZ was referring to is: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1000239.0;all.

kinglong maybe, if you stop spamming fake feedbacks to people who are trying to help clear things and start providing verifiable evidence, users here could stop thinking you're only spamming FUD.

EcuaMobi's questions here: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5

Muhammed Zakir's questions here: 1, 2, 3, 4.

Can you give me the link of thread? I can't find it, please.

Grand_Voyageur made post in Meta to tell about the ban evasion.

See how you do. I replied to all this earlier. You read it? Why copy-paste? Why not reply to my replies? Because of these type of action, I couldn't help you. Better reply this time forth than copy-pasting(aka bumping).

Have you reported the OP? I'm going to report him for ban evasion and I hope the forum team will ban him (as soon as possible). He deserve the ban because he is a spammer.

Thank you! I am removing your annoying font size and colors for easy reading. I kindly request you to not do copy-pastings.


Both wrong. I only send a message after you made the scam accusation. I heard about him first when anti-vod threads popped out.


I understand why you are accusing but it is pure misunderstanding.


-1: I didn't have access to FuckIdolPlus' account. I told him to give the account to me or a trusted person and he replied in publicly but in PM he told he can't give password but he can show the account via TeamViewer.
-2: The answer is given in above answer and also I never received a PM from FuckIdolPlus regarding password of his account or TeamViewer password.
-3: Oops. Sorry about that. I wrote "false accusation" when you lied but before writing I asked you whether this accusation was for "evasion" or for not receiving the keys. Thanks to Quickseller for answering doubt of mine which is why I am changing the feedback.


I had no intention to protect her, never. As I have mentioned above, Quickseller showed me to the image which you said I can buy for $3 per key and she agreed to it. After that, you only received 4 keys for $56. You are owed 19 keys if the rate was $3 per key. When I asked FuckIdolPlus, he told the rate was $14 per key and as a result, he got 4 keys which he paid for. So I asked you what was the rate you both agreed to. If it was $3 per key, I will try to message FuckIdolPlus but if it was $14 per key, I probably will leave that matter.


It's good. I recommend you to delete the whole trust-spam and put a negative feedback with a detailed explanation and you can put link to this thread as reference.


That is ban evasion. You ought to be careful. This account may get banned and also the ban period of symantec may extend.

Here we are in Scam Accusation so he's actually ban evading!  
By the while he is still spamming fake retaliation feedback to people disagreeing with him (me included) so, now I become an Indian bitch me too while being a Caucasian male from another continent! 
OP and all his alt accounts is not interested to provide the required evidence for peer review as asked here and he is simply spamming fake trust to everyone who is not agreeing with him.

You can post in the Meta section while being banned but only to ask a query about your ban or to appeal. I don't think posting about a Scam Accusation is allowed while being banned.

You seems to still avoid replying to EcuaMobi & MZ requests there: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1012548.0;all. Sadly, no things can be cleared up if you are not providing full verifiable evidence to peer review!


Very well. Be warned that in this case you posting outside Meta would be considered ban evasion!

post it in the scam accusations board and you will probably have a few people look into it and either back you up or call you out on your FUD

FuckIdolPlus is Mohammed Zakir or a friend of him.

I accused him based on two reasons:

1. https://i.imgur.com/OChMSjX.png and https://i.imgur.com/hLDpXFW.png

- Why did he have access to the account of FuckIdolPlus
- Why FuckIdolPlus send his account for Muhammed Zakir
- Why did he tell me False accusation + Blackmailing the seller

2. https://i.imgur.com/jTDrnMf.png

- When everything has passed, why did he send me message to protect FuckIdolPlus

PS: Based on the above reasons, My purpose is warning everyone when trade with this Indian dog


I was banned for 14 days by trust spam and now me have to use a new nickname . Did you understand?

OP accuse MZ of being FuckIdolPlus or one of her associates because since OP main account Symantec was scammed by FuckIdolPlus and after MZ tried to help sending a PM to wich her replied, Symantec became fixated about also MZ being a scammer. Symantec however locked the accusation thread likely after he was given -ve trust feedback due to him spamming fake feedback to people who disagreed with him.

Read all links in the OP, can you just make the pics and quoted posts displayed in the post instead of annoying links?
But I can't still figure out what happened, you mean FuckIdolPlus is one of alt of Muhammed Zakir?

Now you will see, there are many indian dog is here and fight with me, with the aim of ensuring the mutual.

Image: https://i.imgur.com/1iSrpAL.png

I don't think a new thread was need since OP main account symantec (uid: 382389) already was posting the same accousation againts MZ in this other thread. Since OP self-admitted owing the symantec account I see no need to have duplicate threads in multiple boards over the same topic (Symantec/kinglong accusing MZ to be FuckIdolPlus or a FuckIdolPlus associate).

Then move this thread in the scam accusation board, the meta section is used only for "things" related to the forum (in general).

This is the section: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=83.0

I accused him based on two reasons:

1. https://i.imgur.com/OChMSjX.png and https://i.imgur.com/hLDpXFW.png

- Why did he have access to the account of FuckIdolPlus
- Why FuckIdolPlus send his account for Muhammed Zakir
- Why did he tell me False accusation + Blackmailing the seller

2. https://i.imgur.com/jTDrnMf.png

- When everything has passed, why did he send me message to protect FuckIdolPlus

PS: Based on the above reasons, My purpose is warning everyone when trade with this Indian dog

It should be renamed to "Complaints" if it's for all types of complaints. There's a difference between a scam (fraud) and just a complaint. I suggested Meta, because a few other people used it for complaints:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--905210
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/id-quickseller-these-people-ruin-my-good-name-1011858
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/vod-abusing-trust-system-999252

I think the scam accusation is the correct section, also for the complaint about users or company. We don't need another section to create more "fight", this is just my personal opinion.