I mean, yeah this is Champions League but it's not actually started yet, betting at this stage is just like betting on Third or Fourth tier football. I blame it on lack of La Liga!
As i always say everybody now plays football. Before it was much easier on this qualifiers teams quality was a big difference .
But yeah Dinamo was an apsolute favorite and to lose to such a weak estonian club is a shock. Be careful with this bets in the future
That's some truth to it, I mean I don't mind there is Conference League and everyone gets their chance for international club football but now yes I even see weird teams playing to qualify for Champions league, now it's really 90% of the teams I don't recognize.
No use to be more careful, but maybe useful to bet on the other team facing favorites!
This is why I believe that we should be getting the qualifiers of UCL a bit less, not have this many, instead move those to europa right now, and the high amount of qualifiers for europa should be moved to conference league instead. Have the conference league a VAST thing that all the weird smaller clubs could play, and have the eruopa to be few smaller clubs and then mediocre European ones, and only the greatest ones and champions at the champions league.
Why would you have teams that worth less than literally bench player of a big club as a whole. We see literally bench player of City being worth more than Dinamo as a whole for example, that just doesn't make sense, send them to europa and they would have a chance.
Well, the comparison of the player from the bench with one from Dinamo is a bit exaggerated, but if it transmits in a certain way what is wanted to be transmitted, and it really has been something important, but the reality is, if the number of quotas for the UCL will not cause more pain in some countries? many want to go up to the first division of their countries because they dream of playing in the UCL, I know that only the best qualify in the UCL, but it would be entering into a non-inclusion issue and for what reason? I don't think that for now UEFA is going to get into a big problem in FIFA just for saying that other teams are not up to the task.
Fener having a good game there still didn't mean much, why? Because they attacked with absolutely no frustration. I mean they had a few chances where they could have scored, but they had the ball so many times where they just didn't know what to do and that is a big problem. Just ignore any team that doesn't know how to attack to a team that is laying back and waiting to be attacked.
Dynamo ended up doing that tactic a lot, let Fener attack a ton, and then when they got the ball they counter attacked and it worked like a charm. Maybe no team won the first game, but I feel like Dynamo could end up winning the second game if they score least once because I doubt Fener could.
Fenerbahce was better in the match and should have won,but i still think they are missing a really good striker. They got a good coach and i think they will win at home against Dinamo Kiev. But still a rough match for both teams and a lot is at stake
Many are embracing that, they say that they will easily beat Dynamo kyiv, although I did not trust myself very much, Dynamo kyiv can do things differently and make a difference, I think that one of their tactics and that it can work for them is look for the early goal and then all get on defense, to precisely defend the score, and play counterattack, many times a ball from defense can be taken by a striker and score a goal, it's something like the Italian style, and play with desperation of the opposing team.