Understanding the Ponzi Narrative - page 2.

stomachgrowls

hero member

Activity: 3010

Merit: 794

Quote from: South Park on January 17, 2022, 03:54:23 PM

Quote from: Zilon on January 07, 2022, 05:48:20 PM

Quote from: titular on December 14, 2021, 02:41:09 PM

What is the best argument against the Ponzi scheme narrative?

In what ways are Ponzi schemes different from bitcoin?

How do they generate value differently?

Educating the masses would help clearify the issue of Bitcoin seen as ponzi. Many people have been a victim of ponzi schemes and most of them now generalize any online investment or opportunity as ponzi. But educating the masses can throw some enlightenment and clear the notion off. Ponzi is very different from ponzi in the sense that Bitcoin is completely decentralized and once a fraction is purchased either through a p2p network or throw any other means it remains in your wallet giving the buyer complete possession of the coin. In the area of ponzi the investor is investing in a project that isn't self explanatory. The attractive attributes is the promise to double the investment by an attractive percentage and most investors fall for that

But that assumes that people want to be educated when it comes to their financial future, something that I have found out is not true most of the time, people are so tired from their jobs and the problems they have on their everyday lives that the last thing they want is to have to learn about something else, so they dump that responsibility on money managers, politicians and economists so they think for them, and if they say bitcoin is bad and a Ponzi scheme then they will simply believe them.

This had been the reality and thats why these people are isolated on things which could potentially freed them on such situation because the world is big and if you do look out on bigger picture you would

really able to realize on how things should be treated up and deal on and as you do gain up more experience you would able to handle things around you.Whether its a new one or

not then you would able to make yourself get along with it.The most common thing is that people do initially rushed up into something but once you do learn then you are
able to handle up things well.

Fortify

legendary

Activity: 2688

Merit: 1192

Quote from: titular on December 14, 2021, 02:41:09 PM

One of the largest roadblocks I have in defending bitcoin (and cryptocurrency in general) is when people compare it to a Ponzi scheme.

There is plenty of bitcoin FUD that is easy to defend, but when people pull the Ponzi-card, that is when I begin to get agitated. This is because I don't have a sound argument to combat this claim.

For those who are not readily familiar; A Ponzi scheme is a form of fraud that lures investors and pays profits to earlier investors with funds from more recent investors. The scheme leads victims to believe that profits are coming from legitimate business activity, and they remain unaware that other investors are the source of funds.

People compare bitcoin to a Ponzi scheme because the price increases when more money flows into the underlying asset. If I buy for X and sell for X+100 that 100 profit of mine came from another person who bought into the scheme after me. In the eyes of many, this is dangerously close to how Ponzi schemes generate value.

What is the best argument against the Ponzi scheme narrative?

In what ways are Ponzi schemes different from bitcoin?

How do they generate value differently?

I can see where the comparisons come in but a Ponzi scheme is an intentional scam, which is not a fair representation of Bitcoin which has a very functional usage as a conveniently trade-able currency. You'll find people who use terminology like this struggle to understand the blockchain technology behind it or intentionally mischaracterize it because they themselves do not assign any value to it. However even if you are not a fan of Bitcoin, you should be able to see that it makes transfers of money without centralized third parties possible across borders, which can save all sorts of people from paying unnecessary fees to middlemen and banks. Even if you are talking about selling to a greater fool theory, that can be equally applied to any speculative asset like cars, wines or art.

South Park

hero member

Activity: 2884

Merit: 794

I am terrible at Fantasy Football!!!

Quote from: Zilon on January 07, 2022, 05:48:20 PM

Quote from: titular on December 14, 2021, 02:41:09 PM

What is the best argument against the Ponzi scheme narrative?

In what ways are Ponzi schemes different from bitcoin?

How do they generate value differently?

Educating the masses would help clearify the issue of Bitcoin seen as ponzi. Many people have been a victim of ponzi schemes and most of them now generalize any online investment or opportunity as ponzi. But educating the masses can throw some enlightenment and clear the notion off. Ponzi is very different from ponzi in the sense that Bitcoin is completely decentralized and once a fraction is purchased either through a p2p network or throw any other means it remains in your wallet giving the buyer complete possession of the coin. In the area of ponzi the investor is investing in a project that isn't self explanatory. The attractive attributes is the promise to double the investment by an attractive percentage and most investors fall for that

But that assumes that people want to be educated when it comes to their financial future, something that I have found out is not true most of the time, people are so tired from their jobs and the problems they have on their everyday lives that the last thing they want is to have to learn about something else, so they dump that responsibility on money managers, politicians and economists so they think for them, and if they say bitcoin is bad and a Ponzi scheme then they will simply believe them.

Ebede

member

Activity: 868

Merit: 38

Join hands and help me to grow everybody...

Quote from: qwertyup23 on January 17, 2022, 01:05:38 PM

Quote from: titular on December 14, 2021, 02:41:09 PM

What is the best argument against the Ponzi scheme narrative?
In what ways are Ponzi schemes different from bitcoin?
How do they generate value differently?

First and foremost, ponzi schemes already existed long before cryptocurrencies were created. The idea is simple- people would offer ridiculous amounts of interest rates in exchange for a minimum investment in a project, to be cashed out in a minimum of days or months depending on the deal/package you offer.

Bitcoin is definitely not a ponzi-scheme. It can be so difficult to imagine it being associated with it since it is entirely a system where people would invest in a certain project for a 'guaranteed' investment. Like what the name suggests, it is a 'scheme' where the risk of losing your money is so great that most people (myself included) got scammed by it.

As someone who consistently reports ponzi-schemes being advertised in the forum, I tell you that most have poorly-designed websites that were created in order to attract newbies into thinking that they can generate this amount of money in a short amount of time.

The way i understand ponzi scheme is not the another person will understand ponzi scheme, but ponzi the way i see it, is something that happens to be illegal that have no trust and is already existing before introduction of bitcoin, that is why some people encroached it to bitcoin area, is investing that does not have bottom root

qwertyup23

hero member

Activity: 2268

Merit: 789

Quote from: titular on December 14, 2021, 02:41:09 PM

What is the best argument against the Ponzi scheme narrative?
In what ways are Ponzi schemes different from bitcoin?
How do they generate value differently?

First and foremost, ponzi schemes already existed long before cryptocurrencies were created. The idea is simple- people would offer ridiculous amounts of interest rates in exchange for a minimum investment in a project, to be cashed out in a minimum of days or months depending on the deal/package you offer.

Bitcoin is definitely not a ponzi-scheme. It can be so difficult to imagine it being associated with it since it is entirely a system where people would invest in a certain project for a 'guaranteed' investment. Like what the name suggests, it is a 'scheme' where the risk of losing your money is so great that most people (myself included) got scammed by it.

As someone who consistently reports ponzi-schemes being advertised in the forum, I tell you that most have poorly-designed websites that were created in order to attract newbies into thinking that they can generate this amount of money in a short amount of time.

gabbie2010

sr. member

Activity: 2842

Merit: 326

Vave.com - Crypto Casino

Quote from: pinggoki on December 18, 2021, 01:00:49 PM

People still think that bitcoin is akin to a Ponzi scheme? I don't exactly know how they go on about their lives being such a dumbass, it's like they're trying to make things wrong for bitcoin and discourage people from getting into it, plus who is at the top of bitcoin that's getting all the money then?

Honestly it's a herculean task trying to convince unknowledgeable people that bitcoin is not a Ponzi scheme, most of the basis of their assumptions is the fact that a hodler earns some reasonable amount of profits
whenever there is pump in the price of the coin during a bullish run equally losing during the a bearish run, a concept that they think is synonymous with Ponzi scheme, which is absolutely untrue, infact an illerate will never get convinced about the whole idea about bitcoin thus will always discourage any newbie.

witcher_sense

legendary

Activity: 2450

Merit: 4415

🔐BitcoinMessage.Tools🔑

Quote from: Wind_FURY on January 17, 2022, 06:15:20 AM

But it was a natural-occuring Ponzi.

Okay, you made me do some research. A natural occurring Ponzi is a term that was coined by Noble prize-winning economist Robert Shiller. Here is the definition of this kind of scheme that can be found in his book called "Irrational Exuberance":

“Ponzi schemes do arise from time to time without the contrivance of a fraudulent manager. Even if there is no manipulator fabricating false stories and deliberately deceiving investors in the aggregate stock market, tales about the market are everywhere. When prices go up a number of times, investors are rewarded sequentially by price movements in these markets just as they are in Ponzi schemes. There are still many people (indeed, the stock brokerage and mutual fund industries as a whole) who benefit from telling stories that suggest that the markets will go up further. There is no reason for these stories to be fraudulent; they need to only emphasize the positive news and give less emphasis to the negative.”

This term was also mentioned by World Bank that criticized and attacked Bitcoin back in 2014: https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2014/07/17/world-bank-report-bitcoin-is-a-naturally-occurring-ponzi/

As far as I understand, "a natural-occurring Ponzi scheme" is another way of saying "a bubble driven by natural laws of supply and demand", which is basically correct because bitcoin has always been the product of a free market. The problem with the word "Ponzi" is that it implies malicious activities of some kind and sounds very negative. Natural occurring malicious activity sounds no better than a Ponzi scheme. I think that this term is mostly used by those who want to attack bitcoin and make others into incorrect thinking. It is misleading and dangerous, and doesn't help much to explain things.

Wind_FURY

legendary

Activity: 2898

Merit: 1823

Quote from: witcher_sense on January 17, 2022, 05:16:02 AM

Quote from: Wind_FURY on January 13, 2022, 06:00:36 AM

I’m asking about Bitcoin before it was used as amedium if exchange, before the Silk Road. How did it have the value against fiat, if not from a group of people buying and selling it from each other, which grew, and therefore the value grew. I believe you, and I cannot answer that because we were not there.

This is how I look at it. There is a difference between a speculative demand for bitcoin and a "transactional" demand for bitcoin.

The speculative demand is when buyers and sellers meet and exchange bitcoin for fiat back and forth for the sake of temporary profit. The transactional demand is when people use bitcoin as a medium of exchange not because it has some value in fiat terms but because bitcoin should be used and seen as a medium of exchange.

It is a sort of demand that is driven primarily by ideological reasons rather than economic ones. People would send bitcoin to each other and exchange it for different services and goods so that they could prove that bitcoin actually works as unstoppable electronic cash without authorities behind it.

It is natural that they wanted other people to recognize the significance of Satoshi's invention, and that is why they spread awareness that bitcoin exists and works. It was not a Ponzi scheme because the motivation to spread the word was different from that driven by greed and profit-seeking. It was to convince other people to use bitcoin as a medium of exchange. Obviuosly, they didn't succeed and only attracted speculators who don't care about the transactional value of bitcoin.

But it was a natural-occuring Ponzi. Bitcoin accrued value through buying and selling, and which it should have a willing participant to buy it higher from a participant before the willing participant. But it’s not a scam. There was no central entity scamming the users, the “Ponzi-process” was simply a necessary function to bootstrap the system.

Is it a Ponzi today? No, because a circular economy has been building, and developing behind it. But it started as one, a natural-occuring Ponzi, not a scam-Ponzi.

witcher_sense

legendary

Activity: 2450

Merit: 4415

🔐BitcoinMessage.Tools🔑

Quote from: Wind_FURY on January 13, 2022, 06:00:36 AM

I’m asking about Bitcoin before it was used as amedium if exchange, before the Silk Road. How did it have the value against fiat, if not from a group of people buying and selling it from each other, which grew, and therefore the value grew. I believe you, and I cannot answer that because we were not there.

This is how I look at it. There is a difference between a speculative demand for bitcoin and a "transactional" demand for bitcoin. The speculative demand is when buyers and sellers meet and exchange bitcoin for fiat back and forth for the sake of temporary profit. The transactional demand is when people use bitcoin as a medium of exchange not because it has some value in fiat terms but because bitcoin should be used and seen as a medium of exchange. It is a sort of demand that is driven primarily by ideological reasons rather than economic ones. People would send bitcoin to each other and exchange it for different services and goods so that they could prove that bitcoin actually works as unstoppable electronic cash without authorities behind it. It is natural that they wanted other people to recognize the significance of Satoshi's invention, and that is why they spread awareness that bitcoin exists and works. It was not a Ponzi scheme because the motivation to spread the word was different from that driven by greed and profit-seeking. It was to convince other people to use bitcoin as a medium of exchange. Obviuosly, they didn't succeed and only attracted speculators who don't care about the transactional value of bitcoin.

Wind_FURY

legendary

Activity: 2898

Merit: 1823

Quote from: witcher_sense on January 13, 2022, 03:27:36 AM

Quote from: Wind_FURY on January 12, 2022, 06:32:23 AM

But how did Bitcoin start to have value before the Silk Road? It didn’t start with investors coming into the system to bid, and holders to sell, and as new investors came in, the market and the value of the coin didn’t become larger?

You said that Bitcoin stopped being "a natural occurring Ponzi scheme" once it was recognized as a currency in the dark markets. Why did they recognize bitcoin if it never hadn't been used as a currency or a medium of exchange before? The thing is that it has constantly been used as a medium of exchange since its very first exchange, which was a situation where a guy bought two pizzas (real goods) for bitcoin. According to the definition you provided, that was the turning point when bitcoin stopped being a Ponzi scheme and started its development as a currency. But before this happened, no one was trading bitcoin for real goods or other currencies, everyone was just mining and casually sending useless transactions. No one was expecting to become rich from hodling bitcoin or selling it to others, so there was nothing there that indicated any signs of a scheme.

I’m asking about Bitcoin before it was used as amedium if exchange, before the Silk Road. How did it have the value against fiat, if not from a group of people buying and selling it from each other, which grew, and therefore the value grew. I believe you, and I cannot answer that because we were not there.

Peanutswar

legendary

Activity: 1708

Merit: 1280

Top Crypto Casino

Most of the ponzi schemes are just promising one of the most common things.

Your money is safe.
Can double your earning
Can get back your capital immediately.
100% safe THIS IS NOT A SCAM

This is better to make yourself keep aware on the possible things might happen if you are trying to make an investment to different projects always make a full potential research.

witcher_sense

legendary

Activity: 2450

Merit: 4415

🔐BitcoinMessage.Tools🔑

Quote from: Wind_FURY on January 12, 2022, 06:32:23 AM

But how did Bitcoin start to have value before the Silk Road? It didn’t start with investors coming into the system to bid, and holders to sell, and as new investors came in, the market and the value of the coin didn’t become larger?

You said that Bitcoin stopped being "a natural occurring Ponzi scheme" once it was recognized as a currency in the dark markets. Why did they recognize bitcoin if it never hadn't been used as a currency or a medium of exchange before? The thing is that it has constantly been used as a medium of exchange since its very first exchange, which was a situation where a guy bought two pizzas (real goods) for bitcoin. According to the definition you provided, that was the turning point when bitcoin stopped being a Ponzi scheme and started its development as a currency. But before this happened, no one was trading bitcoin for real goods or other currencies, everyone was just mining and casually sending useless transactions. No one was expecting to become rich from hodling bitcoin or selling it to others, so there was nothing there that indicated any signs of a scheme.

Wind_FURY

legendary

Activity: 2898

Merit: 1823

Quote from: franky1 on January 13, 2022, 12:59:11 AM

i gotta laugh here.

im agreeing with blackhatcoiner and disagreeing with windfury.
(expect social drama from them later)

bitcoin is not a ponzi.

I never said that Bitcoin is a Ponzi like the OVERT Ponzi schemes made by central entities, or a cabal to intentionally scam investors. I said that it started as a natural-occuring Ponzi, like Gold.

franky1

legendary

Activity: 4410

Merit: 4766

i gotta laugh here.

im agreeing with blackhatcoiner and disagreeing with windfury.
(expect social drama from them later)

bitcoin is not a ponzi.
bitcoin does not earn people dividends or interest for holding on..
bitcoins profit is from letting go of the asset.

no one earns anything until they sell it. and when they sell it only that seller gets the profit of his sale.
and once sold, the seller gets nothing after the sale. and got nothing before the sale. he just gets the value of the sale

there is no treasury pot of cash that is saved up, which takes buyers money in and spreads it out to existing investors to keep them in.

its simply trade. if i have 1 banana. i make no money unless i sell my banana. and selling my banana i get the full amount of the sale. no one else. and then i no longer have a banana. there is no 'continual income' for holding. there is no income from other investors for holding. you just buy and sell. thats it

its that simple

bitcoin is a tradable asset, not a ponzi investment.

Wind_FURY

legendary

Activity: 2898

Merit: 1823

Quote from: witcher_sense on January 12, 2022, 05:42:55 AM

Quote from: Wind_FURY on January 12, 2022, 04:30:29 AM

That’s why it’s called a “natural-occuring” Ponzi, not an overt Ponzi. That’s how Bitcoin started to have surging value, as a “Ponzi”. For it to pay profit to a holder for higher value, newer investors must enter the system and buy them from those holders. BUT, like Gold, it stopped being a “Ponzi” when it was started to be used as currency in the dark markets, creating a circular economy.

Before bitcoin was started to be used as a currency of dark markets, it had no market value, and couldn't give any profit to early holders because newer investors had no reason to invest in something with no market value.

Is that a fact? It had market value if it had a market.

Plus what did the market look like for Bitcoin before its acceptance in the Silk Road? I believe the chart would be like some pumps, some crashes, like illiquid shitcoins.

Quote

Moreover, even if they wanted to invest in bitcoin, they couldn't do it anyway because early adopters saw no reason to "sell" their bitcoin. Those who wished to obtain bitcoin didn't buy it but rather invested their money to buy hardware with which to acquire useless (priceless) bitcoin. It was but an indirect purchase that didn't involve other people except for the miner himself.

There wasn’t a market to buy, or sell Bitcoin?

Quote

No one could have predicted that bitcoin would transform into something that has a non-zero value, but the fact that did happen doesn't make early adopters somehow look like nefarious creators of Ponzi schemes. This is an example of the natural-occurring evolution of money when it starts its journey as being collectible/commodity and ends up being used as a universal unit of measurement.

But how did Bitcoin start to have value before the Silk Road? It didn’t start with investors coming into the system to bid, and holders to sell, and as new investors came in, the market and the value of the coin didn’t become larger?

witcher_sense

legendary

Activity: 2450

Merit: 4415

🔐BitcoinMessage.Tools🔑

Quote from: Wind_FURY on January 12, 2022, 04:30:29 AM

That’s why it’s called a “natural-occuring” Ponzi, not an overt Ponzi. That’s how Bitcoin started to have surging value, as a “Ponzi”. For it to pay profit to a holder for higher value, newer investors must enter the system and buy them from those holders. BUT, like Gold, it stopped being a “Ponzi” when it was started to be used as currency in the dark markets, creating a circular economy.

Before bitcoin was started to be used as a currency of dark markets, it had no market value, and couldn't give any profit to early holders because newer investors had no reason to invest in something with no market value. Moreover, even if they wanted to invest in bitcoin, they couldn't do it anyway because early adopters saw no reason to "sell" their bitcoin. Those who wished to obtain bitcoin didn't buy it but rather invested their money to buy hardware with which to acquire useless (priceless) bitcoin. It was but an indirect purchase that didn't involve other people except for the miner himself. No one could have predicted that bitcoin would transform into something that has a non-zero value, but the fact that did happen doesn't make early adopters somehow look like nefarious creators of Ponzi schemes. This is an example of the natural-occurring evolution of money when it starts its journey as being collectible/commodity and ends up being used as a universal unit of measurement.

Wind_FURY

legendary

Activity: 2898

Merit: 1823

Quote from: BlackHatCoiner on December 30, 2021, 08:01:20 AM

Quote from: Wind_FURY on December 30, 2021, 07:30:01 AM

Bitcoin IS a “Ponzi”, but a natural-occuring Ponzi, like Gold.

There's no such thing as a natural-occuring ponzi. Something is a ponzi or it isn't. Neither gold and bitcoin are ponzis as there are no promised returns from (the) creators.

That’s why it’s called a “natural-occuring” Ponzi, not an overt Ponzi. That’s how Bitcoin started to have surging value, as a “Ponzi”. For it to pay profit to a holder for higher value, newer investors must enter the system and buy them from those holders. BUT, like Gold, it stopped being a “Ponzi” when it was started to be used as currency in the dark markets, creating a circular economy.

BuNga_cute

full member

Activity: 1736

Merit: 116

Quote from: TimeTeller on January 09, 2022, 04:14:11 PM

Quote from: Zilon on January 07, 2022, 05:48:20 PM

Educating the masses would help clearify the issue of Bitcoin seen as ponzi. Many people have been a victim of ponzi schemes and most of them now generalize any online investment or opportunity as ponzi. But educating the masses can throw some enlightenment and clear the notion off. Ponzi is very different from ponzi in the sense that Bitcoin is completely decentralized and once a fraction is purchased either through a p2p network or throw any other means it remains in your wallet giving the buyer complete possession of the coin. In the area of ponzi the investor is investing in a project that isn't self explanatory. The attractive attributes is the promise to double the investment by an attractive percentage and most investors fall for that

Yes, education is the key for these people to change their perspectives towards bitcoin.
Because most people who are identifying btc as comparable to ponzi scheme don't know what they are talking about.
If they try to learn more about btc and these alt projects, they can easily check the difference.
Understanding on what's really happening in crypto market starts from educating yourself.

Therefore, when I introduce Bitcoin to other people, I will always recommend that person learn Bitcoin from a trusted source. Then before investing
in Bitcoin, we really have to learn everything about Bitcoin first, that way will understand how Bitcoin works, this will finally be able to make
people understand that Bitcoin cannot be equated with a ponzi scheme. Most people I find around me who say that Bitcoin is a ponzi scheme,
usually he reads about Bitcoin from the wrong sources or he got a story about Bitcoin from a Bitcoin hater. Actually people who say Bitcoin is
a ponzi scheme, they don't understand what they are saying. So my advice try to learn Bitcoin properly and from various sources, so being able
to compare how Bitcoin works with a ponzi scheme is very much different. This is why I always want Bitcoin to be included in school subjects,
so that people understand Bitcoin from an early age.

TimeTeller

hero member

Activity: 2744

Merit: 588

Quote from: Zilon on January 07, 2022, 05:48:20 PM

Educating the masses would help clearify the issue of Bitcoin seen as ponzi. Many people have been a victim of ponzi schemes and most of them now generalize any online investment or opportunity as ponzi. But educating the masses can throw some enlightenment and clear the notion off. Ponzi is very different from ponzi in the sense that Bitcoin is completely decentralized and once a fraction is purchased either through a p2p network or throw any other means it remains in your wallet giving the buyer complete possession of the coin. In the area of ponzi the investor is investing in a project that isn't self explanatory. The attractive attributes is the promise to double the investment by an attractive percentage and most investors fall for that

Yes, education is the key for these people to change their perspectives towards bitcoin.
Because most people who are identifying btc as comparable to ponzi scheme don't know what they are talking about.
If they try to learn more about btc and these alt projects, they can easily check the difference.
Understanding on what's really happening in crypto market starts from educating yourself.

Taskford

hero member

Activity: 2520

Merit: 783

Quote from: Zilon on January 07, 2022, 05:48:20 PM

Quote from: titular on December 14, 2021, 02:41:09 PM

What is the best argument against the Ponzi scheme narrative?

In what ways are Ponzi schemes different from bitcoin?

How do they generate value differently?

Educating the masses would help clearify the issue of Bitcoin seen as ponzi. Many people have been a victim of ponzi schemes and most of them now generalize any online investment or opportunity as ponzi. But educating the masses can throw some enlightenment and clear the notion off. Ponzi is very different from ponzi in the sense that Bitcoin is completely decentralized and once a fraction is purchased either through a p2p network or throw any other means it remains in your wallet giving the buyer complete possession of the coin. In the area of ponzi the investor is investing in a project that isn't self explanatory. The attractive attributes is the promise to double the investment by an attractive percentage and most investors fall for that

There are so many educational videos scattering everywhere towards this ponzi schemes but unfortunately many still fall from it due to their own greed and laziness because many still believe that they can earn passive income without doing nothing. We see it keep existing and I believe this kind of investment schemes will never stops as many are hungry to earn without doing anything.

Topic: Understanding the Ponzi Narrative - page 2. (Read 932 times)