Pages:
Author

Topic: Unified ASICMINER orderbook (Read 16363 times)

legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 1083
Legendary Escrow Service - Tip Jar in Profile
April 19, 2013, 01:35:48 PM
Is this thread really dead? I mean if someone would post here an offer that could be filled fast and another user sees it then this thread could lead to a sell without new threads coming out everywhere.
I mean there mustnt be an orderbook when buyer and seller chose for themselve where to buy/sell and contact via pm...
donator
Activity: 714
Merit: 510
Preaching the gospel of Satoshi
April 19, 2013, 01:33:42 PM
Why PT shares price rise faster than here?
This thread is dead.
John, please close this thread.
legendary
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1227
Away on an extended break
April 19, 2013, 02:34:19 AM
Why PT shares price rise faster than here?
This thread is dead.
legendary
Activity: 1912
Merit: 1020
April 19, 2013, 02:27:43 AM
Why PT shares price rise faster than here?
hero member
Activity: 557
Merit: 500
April 17, 2013, 10:47:27 PM
Cancel ask #15
sr. member
Activity: 313
Merit: 250
April 17, 2013, 09:37:41 AM
sr. member
Activity: 313
Merit: 250
April 17, 2013, 09:34:37 AM
cancel bid 229 please
donator
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1001
April 17, 2013, 06:05:31 AM
Ask 200 @ 0.82

withdraw the above order

place the order below
ASK 200 @ 1.5
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 1083
Legendary Escrow Service - Tip Jar in Profile
April 14, 2013, 04:42:18 PM
In case some didnt notice... the thread doesnt live anymore. If you claim bids or asks you have to be lucky that someone comes by and wants to fulfill your order. Dont forget using an escrow then.
But the normal orderbook wont be created again. You have to solve this through PMs personally with the seller/buyer.
newbie
Activity: 26
Merit: 0
April 14, 2013, 04:29:05 PM
donator
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1001
April 07, 2013, 04:16:21 AM
Ask 200 @ 0.82
sr. member
Activity: 800
Merit: 250
April 06, 2013, 11:28:30 PM
If we only traded shares through passthroughs, wouldn't the smaller market result in higher prices?
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 1083
Legendary Escrow Service - Tip Jar in Profile
March 28, 2013, 02:10:16 PM
Well asiminer-pt on btct.co has a 50 share minimum for exchanging into real shares, which is the same as the thread minimum anyway. However, maintaining the thread is a lot of work, that does in my opinion bypass the benefit gained, when people are free to do separate threads if they are so inclined.

Do be aware that over 13% (and growing) of all outstanding ASICMINER shares HAVE been transferred to the PT exchanges.

I'd say this, if there is a profusion of folks doing willy nilly threads for asicminer shares than we should reconsider the orderbook, if not probably not worth the work. (In any case I won't be doing the work, so don't let me stand in anyone's way.)

-Brian

Yes, i read know too that the minimum with burnside is lower, even though he wrote actually with "no minimum shares". Im not sure whats true but at least it would work as a replacement for this thread.
full member
Activity: 131
Merit: 100
March 28, 2013, 12:43:12 PM
I posted my reply to your first post before reading your second one. It's to maintain and see what an actual AM share value is (compared to PT shares). This was just an idea; if people don't like it, that's fine too. Are we prepared to have AM share threads spam the Auction sub forum?

I'm saying that AM trading activity on the forums seems to have dried up, as people are starting to trust the passthroughs. It's not like it was a month ago, where there were like twenty threads going.

I thought it was valuable until I realized that both passthroughs allow transfers in and out of actual ASICMINER shares, so one can just buy on exchange and transfer them to yourself if you want to own the "real shares".

I'm not going to stop you, and I might even use it just to have all my bases covered, but I don't really see the NEED anymore.

Its not that easy as you claim. You have to own at least 240? shares from deadterra to change them to real shares. I dont know if its possible with the other passthrough anyway. But i believe you can change your real shares in passthroughs with both issuers. So that doesnt look to me like this thread isnt needed anymore.

Well asiminer-pt on btct.co has a 50 share minimum for exchanging into real shares, which is the same as the thread minimum anyway. However, maintaining the thread is a lot of work, that does in my opinion bypass the benefit gained, when people are free to do separate threads if they are so inclined.

Do be aware that over 13% (and growing) of all outstanding ASICMINER shares HAVE been transferred to the PT exchanges.

I'd say this, if there is a profusion of folks doing willy nilly threads for asicminer shares than we should reconsider the orderbook, if not probably not worth the work. (In any case I won't be doing the work, so don't let me stand in anyone's way.)

-Brian
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 1083
Legendary Escrow Service - Tip Jar in Profile
March 28, 2013, 09:28:28 AM
I posted my reply to your first post before reading your second one. It's to maintain and see what an actual AM share value is (compared to PT shares). This was just an idea; if people don't like it, that's fine too. Are we prepared to have AM share threads spam the Auction sub forum?

I'm saying that AM trading activity on the forums seems to have dried up, as people are starting to trust the passthroughs. It's not like it was a month ago, where there were like twenty threads going.

I thought it was valuable until I realized that both passthroughs allow transfers in and out of actual ASICMINER shares, so one can just buy on exchange and transfer them to yourself if you want to own the "real shares".

I'm not going to stop you, and I might even use it just to have all my bases covered, but I don't really see the NEED anymore.

Its not that easy as you claim. You have to own at least 240? shares from deadterra to change them to real shares. I dont know if its possible with the other passthrough anyway. But i believe you can change your real shares in passthroughs with both issuers. So that doesnt look to me like this thread isnt needed anymore.
legendary
Activity: 2955
Merit: 1049
March 28, 2013, 09:11:17 AM
If you make a new thread link it here. I'm not really trading right now but I will place some low and high bids.
is there a new thread or is this still active?
full member
Activity: 131
Merit: 100
March 28, 2013, 12:10:00 AM
I posted my reply to your first post before reading your second one. It's to maintain and see what an actual AM share value is (compared to PT shares). This was just an idea; if people don't like it, that's fine too. Are we prepared to have AM share threads spam the Auction sub forum?

I'm saying that AM trading activity on the forums seems to have dried up, as people are starting to trust the passthroughs. It's not like it was a month ago, where there were like twenty threads going.

I thought it was valuable until I realized that both passthroughs allow transfers in and out of actual ASICMINER shares, so one can just buy on exchange and transfer them to yourself if you want to own the "real shares".

I'm not going to stop you, and I might even use it just to have all my bases covered, but I don't really see the NEED anymore.
hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 500
March 28, 2013, 12:04:23 AM
I posted my reply to your first post before reading your second one. It's to maintain and see what an actual AM share value is (compared to PT shares). This was just an idea; if people don't like it, that's fine too. Are we prepared to have AM share threads spam the Auction sub forum?
full member
Activity: 131
Merit: 100
March 27, 2013, 11:59:38 PM
This was what I had in mind: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0ArEKHOCcuc3fdDJhQVhzZkZzWkNOeTJjRTRsWGV5Z0E#gid=0

We could slowly add people to be able to access/edit the doc. It shows a revision history so those that abuse it could have their access removed.

This way, it doesn't have to be just one person. Thoughts?

My thought is to open it up and have people put in their quotes. People can and will other people's edits. For one person to do it themselves, it's not fair unless we're paying that one person to be updating it on a constant basis for the next several weeks.

Did you read the rest of my post regarding me questioning, if this thread has outlived its purpose?
hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 500
March 27, 2013, 11:57:55 PM
This was what I had in mind: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0ArEKHOCcuc3fdDJhQVhzZkZzWkNOeTJjRTRsWGV5Z0E#gid=0

We could slowly add people to be able to access/edit the doc. It shows a revision history so those that abuse it could have their access removed.

This way, it doesn't have to be just one person. Thoughts?

My thought is to open it up and have people put in their quotes. People can and will other people's edits. For one person to do it themselves, it's not fair unless we're paying that one person to be updating it on a constant basis for the next several weeks.
Pages:
Jump to: