Topic: Unitus (UIS): 1st multi-auxPoW - 0.9.3.1 Required Update before Block 25300 - page 14. (Read 102753 times)

Progress!

Take a look in modules/blake_getpowhash - from there run "sudo python setup.py install" - this will compile and install the blake_hash module, and then you should be set to go.

P2Pool doesn't consume a huge amount of bandwidth - latency is the biggest killer.

Thanks for the helpful answer

I have 80 GH myself solo mining.  There are a lot of people like me that have say 20-30 GPUs so a few others like myself can make the difference....also you need to understand that its not actually 1.67 TH.  Its actually closer to 800 GH.  What happens is as (by chance and in conjunction with the other algos difficulty levels) the difficulty adjust reports higher hash as if by chance several blocks are found with one algo in a row...track it over a longer time period and you will see the average is no where near 1.6, thats a high number.

There is a complicated reason for oscillation which I wont get into as it requires an understanding of the difficulty adjustment algo and information delays(remember we only "guess" the actual hash-rate based on the time in between blocks being found, its retroactive with more recent block inter-arrival times being weighted more heavily)...but the bottom line is Unitus does a very good job actually managing the difficulty with imperfect information about actual hash rate.  (side note: when people switch from one algo to another rapidly a consequence is that the range of difficulty/reported hash-rate swings become much larger, this is a major difficulty to manage with a coin that has 5 algos, I am really impressed that the variance seems to be within a factor of 2 of the real hash-rate...for example NEOs couldn't solve this problem).

If this made no sense to you I can further elaborate,

I don't think it's a single solo miner and I don't think the new addresses are to avoid detection, all of the blocks I mined early on from the same wallet went to unique addresses by default.

Does anybody have older working source for P2Pool? I was using this build; https://github.com/kramble/FPGA-Blakecoin-Miner
to solo mine with FPGA's early on and getting on fine but the current source for pool mining doesn't support ZTEX FPGA's.

+27 GH)

Looks like a serious whale is solo mining.
Check http://explorer.unitus.info/blocks
There are so many single address rewards for blake, each reward to a new address most likely not to draw attention. If it was a pool , it wouldn't go unnoticed and there would be further movements from fresh mined coins.
Let's push p2pool with all we've got, i'm throwing almost 100GH at it 

hello

You only need to enter your myriadcoin address in the mining config. Go to this website to register your merged-mining coins.

http://myriad.p2pool.geek.nz/miners

Look for your miner/address and click on More Information and then Change Account Settings, from there you can see what you need to do to get Unitus payout.

The trick with removing bind moved me forward. However, there is now a more serious error in python "No module named blake_hash". Btw, i tried your pool code on other coin daemons, it works just fine. Trying on debian wheezy if it's relevant.

Full trace:
2015-01-07 19:44:13.865851 p2pool (version 13.3-379-g4c2764f)
2015-01-07 19:44:13.886790
2015-01-07 19:44:13.887006 Testing bitcoind RPC connection to 'http://127.0.0.1:50604/' with username 'unitusrpc'...
2015-01-07 19:44:13.922759     ...success!
2015-01-07 19:44:13.923082     Current block hash: 8fe37947a56ba44f7081934f5e6bd538d494c8877ee64e1c5f485532876dc218
2015-01-07 19:44:13.923299     Current block height: 13166
2015-01-07 19:44:13.923416
2015-01-07 19:44:13.923565 Testing bitcoind P2P connection to '127.0.0.1:50603'...
2015-01-07 19:44:14.029161     ...success!
2015-01-07 19:44:14.029857
2015-01-07 19:44:14.030344 Determining payout address...
2015-01-07 19:44:14.031202     ...success! Payout address: UVUR77QKPE67Fnjni42m3zbe1kwFoSuohS.
2015-01-07 19:44:14.031809
2015-01-07 19:44:14.032269 Loading shares...
2015-01-07 19:44:14.033028     ...done loading 0 shares (0 verified)!
2015-01-07 19:44:14.033636
2015-01-07 19:44:14.034122 Initializing work...
2015-01-07 19:44:14.168101 > Unhandled error in Deferred:
2015-01-07 19:44:14.208148 > Unhandled Error
2015-01-07 19:44:14.208473 > Traceback (most recent call last):
2015-01-07 19:44:14.208683 >   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/twisted/internet/defer.py", line 368, in callback
2015-01-07 19:44:14.208830 >     self._startRunCallbacks(result)
2015-01-07 19:44:14.208939 >   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/twisted/internet/defer.py", line 464, in _startRunCallbacks
2015-01-07 19:44:14.209099 >     self._runCallbacks()
2015-01-07 19:44:14.209303 >   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/twisted/internet/defer.py", line 551, in _runCallbacks
2015-01-07 19:44:14.209522 >     current.result = callback(current.result, *args, **kw)
2015-01-07 19:44:14.209634 >   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/twisted/internet/defer.py", line 1101, in gotResult
2015-01-07 19:44:14.209823 >     _inlineCallbacks(r, g, deferred)
2015-01-07 19:44:14.209953 > --- ---
2015-01-07 19:44:14.210110 >   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/twisted/internet/defer.py", line 1045, in _inlineCallbacks
2015-01-07 19:44:14.210222 >     result = g.send(result)
2015-01-07 19:44:14.210389 >   File "/home/trader/unipool/p2pool/node.py", line 218, in poll_header
2015-01-07 19:44:14.210605 >     handle_header((yield self.factory.conn.value.get_block_header(self.bitcoind_work.value['previous_block'])))
2015-01-07 19:44:14.210668 >   File "/home/trader/unipool/p2pool/node.py", line 200, in handle_header
2015-01-07 19:44:14.210789 >     if not (self.net.PARENT.POW_FUNC(bitcoin_data.block_header_type.pack(new_header)) <= self.bitcoind_work.value['bits'].target):
2015-01-07 19:44:14.211026 >   File "/home/trader/unipool/p2pool/bitcoin/networks/unitus_blake.py", line 20, in
2015-01-07 19:44:14.211368 >     POW_FUNC = lambda data: pack.IntType(256).unpack(__import__('blake_hash').getPoWHash(data))
2015-01-07 19:44:14.211548 > exceptions.ImportError: No module named blake_hash
2015-01-07 19:44:14.230779 > Error while requesting best block header:
2015-01-07 19:44:14.231077 > Traceback (most recent call last):
2015-01-07 19:44:14.231346 >   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/twisted/internet/defer.py", line 551, in _runCallbacks
2015-01-07 19:44:14.231602 >     current.result = callback(current.result, *args, **kw)
2015-01-07 19:44:14.231774 >   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/twisted/internet/defer.py", line 1101, in gotResult
2015-01-07 19:44:14.232020 >     _inlineCallbacks(r, g, deferred)
2015-01-07 19:44:14.232312 >   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/twisted/internet/defer.py", line 1043, in _inlineCallbacks
2015-01-07 19:44:14.232493 >     result = result.throwExceptionIntoGenerator(g)
2015-01-07 19:44:14.232704 >   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/twisted/python/failure.py", line 382, in throwExceptionIntoGenerator
2015-01-07 19:44:14.232963 >     return g.throw(self.type, self.value, self.tb)
2015-01-07 19:44:14.233206 > --- ---
2015-01-07 19:44:14.233540 >   File "/home/trader/unipool/p2pool/util/deferral.py", line 41, in f
2015-01-07 19:44:14.233699 >     result = yield func(*args, **kwargs)
2015-01-07 19:44:14.233863 >   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/twisted/internet/defer.py", line 1045, in _inlineCallbacks
2015-01-07 19:44:14.234136 >     result = g.send(result)
2015-01-07 19:44:14.234306 >   File "/home/trader/unipool/p2pool/node.py", line 218, in poll_header
2015-01-07 19:44:14.234547 >     handle_header((yield self.factory.conn.value.get_block_header(self.bitcoind_work.value['previous_block'])))
2015-01-07 19:44:14.234802 >   File "/home/trader/unipool/p2pool/node.py", line 200, in handle_header
2015-01-07 19:44:14.235039 >     if not (self.net.PARENT.POW_FUNC(bitcoin_data.block_header_type.pack(new_header)) <= self.bitcoind_work.value['bits'].target):
2015-01-07 19:44:14.235343 >   File "/home/trader/unipool/p2pool/bitcoin/networks/unitus_blake.py", line 20, in
2015-01-07 19:44:14.235505 >     POW_FUNC = lambda data: pack.IntType(256).unpack(__import__('blake_hash').getPoWHash(data))
2015-01-07 19:44:14.235760 > exceptions.ImportError: No module named blake_hash

I can't make the node public, i'm on 5 mbps DSL. I doubt it's enough, even though i have nice latency. The reason i want to put up a private node is cuz i'm in EU and have really bad pings to your overseas nodes.
Thanks

Have one question guys.

I want to start mining UIS here: http://uk.p2pool.geek.nz:5567/static/

On the top of the page is writen: "This Qubit P2Pool node is part of the myriad.p2pool.geek.nz Merge-Mining P2Pool Network. Mining @ this node will earn you Myriadcoin (MYR) & Unitus (UIS)."

What command should i give to the miner to specify two wallet address to get two kind of coins ?
If anyone knows how should look like the command line, pls post it here.

Thanks in advance.

Blake256 Hashrate   1.67 TH/s
Global Pool Hashrate: 249.02 GH/s (Rejected 10.91 GH/s / 4.38%) - http://us.p2pool.geek.nz/

and where the remaining coins are mined?

Anyone equipped with some mining math want to work out what the break even price is ATM for Unitus??   

It looks really nice.
GJ

Difficulty follows the price (not vice versa).  If mining Unitus become more expensive than marketbuying, miners will leave this coin. You can always mine something more profitable.
Only further development can bring higher price (longterm). (or pump in shortterm)

Two new sections of the website:

Mining Software: http://unitus.info/miners
Services: http://unitus.info/services

Thank you, I'll add to OP

Problem is with your option in unitus.conf: bind=10.0.4.2

That is forcing unitusd to listen only on 10.0.4.2 for Peer-2-Peer traffic, but then p2pool is trying to connect via 127.0.0.1.

Solutions: Either remove the bind=10.0.4.2 from your unitus.conf file, or append '--bitcoind-address 10.0.4.2' to your command to start p2pool - this would force p2pool to connect to that interface in place of the loopback interface.

Let me know if you are going to make this node public and i'll add a link to it on the existing nodes. PM me your geographical location.

Thanks.

No.
I'm not using config file, all is set in my batch.
But hashrate is always different between miners and pools  

And i don't know how interprete cgwatcher stats ...

Ok, so that seems about 2x more than anyone has ever reported.  Does the pool also confirm this hash-rate, not just the miner?  If you have vectors set as 2 in config it would show a double hash rate as a graphical error which would be about 2.7-2.8 for a 6950.

Thanks,

Using miner for P2p UIS Blake Pool.

setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
cgminer.exe -I 13 --blake256 --gpu-engine 875 --gpu-memclock 1325 ...

Drivers 13.12

what settings/miner are you using cgminer 3.7.3?  I can only get 2.7 on my 280xs at 1100 mhz

I am using the 14 omega drivers, is there a previous version that builds a better kernel?

Edit: Blake says a 6950 should pull:  800MH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 6850

you don't have "vectors" set to like 2 or 3 by any chance in your config and are getting a the graphical error?