Topic: [UNO] Unobtanium Info & Discussion - Hardfork block 1042000 - Merge Mine w/BTC! - page 304. (Read 1047075 times)

Your build was working fine, until it wasn't a week ago.  "No Blocksource Available".  Also, your build isn't available to redownload anywhere.

There are no Mac Wallets available that "just work".

But side chains and sandboxes and all sorts of other stuff vying for attention seems to be happening.  But no Mac wallet that just works.  Thus, two tons and change sitting on Cryptsy for sale at .012.

The basics.  If the basics are not working, and the fancy pants stuff is the discussion du jour, seriously guys.

"Proto^TM the derp around coin"

Doge is too expensive for derping.

There are coins out there trading for under 0.00000001 UNO!

Have master plan to grant every person on the planet 100 coin share of these micros if they so choose to take ahold of some crypto  

Permission-less innovation, no center of authority, all are invited to play, the opportunity for ANYBODY to participate at any level.

----------
http://www.guogao.com/

never seen this one ex ... trades unc why not un-O?


----------

Again what was the reason to NOT coordinating with DMDs on invading China?
Pool resources ... why not?

I mentioned this a few posts back, anyone that needs training wheels can always derp around with dogecoin. If you screw up and lose some, so what?

Eventually you graduate and learn to use the full orchestra that sha cryptography provides. Some will never acheive the balance and stay with the lesser coins for the rest of their time in cryptocurrency. Takes all kinds I guess.

"The purpose of a testnet is for development testing; testing out new code and new features . . . "

tl;dr: will accept any sort of consensus

If any sort of monetisation-of-test-net-is-inappropriate position reaches any sort of consensus, I will willingly abandon the notion of giving Proto to people to play with -- and Hagbard will have picked up a good few beers' worth of Uno for his trip to the convention!

I don't accept Tertius's point that it's-okay-to-lose-just-little-bits-of-Uno (the Precious!); but I sure do accept his use-some-other-(worthless)-altcoin-for-the-purpose point simply because IndiaMikeZulu has done just that, and I have repeatedly recommended it.

EDIT:

Post 9663: "I have enough to share 5 1% chunks and will offer them for 10 Un each, that's a 1Un:250PR ratio; all proceeds will go towards further development and the conference in September. PM me if you're interested!"

This post of Hagbard's is what got me started.



IMZ Mark

I don't know what "Bluechist" is all about, but what is wrong with my build?

Bit in bold - no I don't think it is.  The purpose of a testnet is for development testing; testing out new code and new features - e.g. the merge mining changes should have been tested there first.

Should sidechains ever be implemented they would be tested there first.  Stress testing (if required) should be done there. If it breaks entirely so what? it is the test platform.

Using that same environment for new users to show them how it works and practice on is not I think correct.  For example if whilst these new users are "trying things out" a stress test is underway and it takes hours for a transaction to go through is that going to be a good experience?

The situation we have now is that the test environment is being monetised - and so its use for true test purposes will be compromised.

Still not working.  Same.  404's out.

10.0 still shows "No Block Source Available".

This is getting scary.

New users can test things out with a small quantity of UNO?

Care to fill a UNO faucet with your kilograms?

There might be 100s or 1000s of potential users.

What's a small amount?  

Is it greater than the trans. fee?

Can they take this small amount to an exchange house, deposit it, trade it, and withdraw it?

The intended purpose of UNO testnet is not to use it as a practice forum?

Testing things out on a client that is exactly the same as the UNO client is nonsense?

:/

----
change of subject

Brian Armstrong on Twitter: A lot of people don't realize that for the price of bitcoin to hold steady right now, people have to buy $1M worth (or 3,600 BTC) per day.

found in /r/bitcoin ...  Are the bitcoin only hardliners ready for the hard truth?

I just don't see that at all.  Simply use a small quantity of UNO.

If you "really" feel you need to use another coin, then there are literally dozens of altcoins out there which are worth fractions of a penny for a few thousand (or million) of them.

Using the UNO testnet as a practice forum seems a distortion of its intended purpose.

Here's to crew IMZ ... Emuz included

thanks for stepping onto the bus

"When UNO is running @ $179/kg, do you think you can get mom & pop to dare click send?"

Thanks for that, B.N.! My value here is that I am a compu-klutz. If I would feel more comfortable having a first crypto experience with a 'training-coin,' then so would The 99%.

But more importantly . . .

Big drum roll . . .

"Okay. Bought a penny's worth of UNO.

Mark, Western Australia (IndiaMikeZulu)"

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=527500.1500

Ian and I have been community members for one year today! Thanks to B.N. for his first post to me, offering shelter from the storm for Ian and me and my emu. 95% of that year has been most satisfying, and things are beginning to look brighter again.

Ian and Mark and 'CD' (owns 334 Uno), 'LP' (222), 'JH' (188), 'LR' (12), and 'AB' (104)

^{re: word association linking a product to UNO}

a BigTimSpag product (uno bars)
or
a Coaex.com product

would be a great product to link with UN

----------------

^{re: Proto give-away ads}

See innovation!

One of the biggest humps I personly had to get up and over when wandering into the land of crypto is how the damn thing works.  But with bitcoins worth $25-$5 I was such paranoid to do any play'n that might loss/delete coins.

If I had a 'play' coin then such E Z R to learn about how 2 crypto.

This is a brilliant.  When UNO is running @ $179/kg, do you think you can get mom & pop to dare click send?
Nope.  Mom & pop are going to be terrified of tech plus relatively large sums of money.

Now give them 5/kg of proto running @ penny/kg ... BATA BING!
Now mom & pop are playing and learning and saying ... "Hey this is E Z R than email"  

@IMZ I'll make a post in the otc thread tomorrow, I have just been collecting drips from the faucet until I decide if the testnet is usable or if I'd be better off on another testnet.

@ Proto: I am busting my hump to understand and do what is right for the Uno community. (I like my idea of a training-coin, which is what I want to get some for at present. Put up two Proto give-away ads in two towns already.)

B.N.'s Post 9 here -- https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/prototanium-otc-exchange-1140354 -- which says that monetary value is a distant-second consideration, is what I'm working off at this second.

If consensus says, 'No value!,' I will give away all the Proto I hold. (Got hundreds to give away if anyone wants any.)

@ Sloopy! Good to see you. Taa for the update: yay, Bigtimespaghetti! Yay, Coaex Metals!

@ Project Point Oh One: wa ha ha, go, me! am throwing pennies at this one. Watch this space.

m

Yes, I agree BigTimSpag is top notch, as are these Unobtanium braded bars. I might need a few more, as they are very collectible if you're into Uno or crypto. Besides, it is great time to buy silver.


Also don't forget our friend at Coaex.com for bullion products.

I've placed more than one transaction with both of them, and have enjoyed nothing but positive experiences. They also accept Uno.

I can vouch, these are beautiful bars and make a nice physical place to hold your UNO. bigtimespaghetti is also very friendly and easy to work with.

I know most are familair with the Uno silver bars, but I wanted to drop a quick plug here:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/wts-unobtanium-silver-wallet-plated-physical-wallets-825537

I do nto have mine yet, but I have no doubts they are in transit from somewhere to somewhere and will be in transit again to me soon.

If you haven't seen these yet, this may be the last batch for a while and better grab a couple.
They are not one ounce each, they are well over at 1.65!
Gallery here:
http://postimg.org/gallery/8hk9yvye/

By the way I get nothing for posting this but being supportive of a good thing.

"testnet on a testnet? Get some inception type shit going on"

perhaps

isn't that innovation?

This seems to be a sore topic.  But fear not if for some reason the price of PR is pumped and the hashrate is too damn high, the guy who is holding most of the cookies will likely just dump ... and I don't mind that because it benefits the dev.  Because it is the dev.

This proves 2 things.  Proto can raise funds for dev resources, and we might just have a launch rocket ready-made for side chains.

And if all that is problem.  Then proto could just fork off test net (since it had thus est. some hash), then you have UNO, test, and prototype nets.

That's winning!

The only question is if it might be best to splice proto back onto the UNO chain then fork it off.  That would grant side chain equity back to uno stake holders.

---------------------------------------

NOTES:

1. cannibalising UNO hashrate, given merge mining is a none issue ... want more hash for UNO?  Then petition the big dog pools, a few TH/s are just old rigs that are out dated for BTC PH/s pools.

2. the tech underlining this would allow a prototype net to petition the same big dog pools to attach it as MM.  Also the pure testnet UNO is/will also be MM able.  But why pump the hash on that net?  Not any value gain, but you can't stop big pools from attaching so it is just like that. :/

3. "I have heard absolutely zero in regards to the testnet being used to try or develop new innovative features" ... well then you're not reading the right thread.  Proto thread has posted that proto is specifically a toy for dev/techs to play with, investors be damned should their play cost them $. monetize over innovate NOPe innovate over monetize is the understanding.  

You summed it up rather succintly, I have heard absolutely zero in regards to the testnet being used to try or develop new innovative features. No, the resounding cry is the same as if it were any other coin: Let's point all the hash we can find at it, drive the diff up, and see if we can make a few satoshi off of it: thereby leaving none in the hands of developers it was intended for. You all have fun with that strategy.

Well wtf else is supposed to happen when you brand it? Of course it is going to compromise the test environment by welcoming new people whose objective it is to monetize over innovate.

Can you have a testnet on a testnet? Get some inception type shit going on? It would seem possible, like the number of testnets would have no limit? Is the testnet just an environment where you can have numerous instances running?