Also please let met know how the pricing works here
Topic: Unobtanium In-House Exchange - page 64. (Read 104924 times)
Still looking to buy 5 UNO , in BTC or XRP.
Also please let met know how the pricing works here
Also please let met know how the pricing works here
@cragv ... yes we need a webpage (google,tumbler,other freebie)
---
tech help ... logged in try to send nxxty (block chain current & connect to peers) ... "Incorrect passphrase"
?
---
tech help ... logged in try to send nxxty (block chain current & connect to peers) ... "Incorrect passphrase"
?
pss OFFER to buy 4 UNO for $14 paypal ... good until Monday.
I'll sell you 4 UNO for $14 via paypal
Accepted check PM
Un-Ex 7/12/2014 [Western Australia – a half a day ahead of the U.S.]
Unobtanium 'solid': .00760/.00700
https://www.cryptsy.com/markets/view/133
https://bittrex.com/Market/Index?MarketName=BTC-UNO
https://bleutrade.com/exchange/UNO/BTC
https://coinbroker.io/trade/?symbol=UNO.BTC;
Trusted Traders:
http://indiamikezulu.com.au/454/list-of-trusted-traders/
Silver: $US 16:29
DVC: 11.594 [Yup: same as yesterday]
Unobtanium 'solid': .00760/.00700
https://www.cryptsy.com/markets/view/133
https://bittrex.com/Market/Index?MarketName=BTC-UNO
https://bleutrade.com/exchange/UNO/BTC
https://coinbroker.io/trade/?symbol=UNO.BTC;
Trusted Traders:
http://indiamikezulu.com.au/454/list-of-trusted-traders/
Silver: $US 16:29
DVC: 11.594 [Yup: same as yesterday]
@ cragv: woo hoo!! 16 weeks old. 18 TTs. A unique currency launched. Big ideas out the wazoo. And hella loads of activity.
Yes, let's work together in administratively taming the project.
Yes, let's work together in administratively taming the project.
@ swg: "Also I have a question about DVC, if you want to hold one DVC you need to own 2 ounces of silver & you can't hold more than 2 DVC. Also you need to be verified as a TT and it can only be 50 DVC TT so basically it's going to be a closed exchange between 50 persons that can't own more than 2 DVC ? I must be missing something."
No.
DVC are basically an experiment in community trust-building. Our goal is something much much bigger. DVC is very rare. It is 'invitation only'. It is traded exclusively on Un-Ex (here). The 'distributed vault' holds 2 ounces (Verified) for every DVC in circulation. It is traded only among people who know and trust each other.
DVC price for the ticker: for theoretical reasons, we work on Uno's price in US$. The equation is
(a) find the price-per-ounce of silver bullion ($US) [Say, $15.25]
(b) double it (2 ounces per DVC) [Thus, $30.50]
(c) check the price of Uno (in cents) on Coinmarketcap [Say, 400]
(d) divide 3050 by 400 [7.625]
(e) therefore 1 DVC = 7.625 Uno (but the price will vary: premiums and discounts!)
No.
DVC are basically an experiment in community trust-building. Our goal is something much much bigger. DVC is very rare. It is 'invitation only'. It is traded exclusively on Un-Ex (here). The 'distributed vault' holds 2 ounces (Verified) for every DVC in circulation. It is traded only among people who know and trust each other.
DVC price for the ticker: for theoretical reasons, we work on Uno's price in US$. The equation is
(a) find the price-per-ounce of silver bullion ($US) [Say, $15.25]
(b) double it (2 ounces per DVC) [Thus, $30.50]
(c) check the price of Uno (in cents) on Coinmarketcap [Say, 400]
(d) divide 3050 by 400 [7.625]
(e) therefore 1 DVC = 7.625 Uno (but the price will vary: premiums and discounts!)
Great start, guys. Good on you!
-
Unrelated thought: there's a rapidly-increasing amount of varied information in this thread and trawling through it for reference will become increasingly tiresome. There are many ways to organise, maintain and present information (wiki, stand-alone forum, maintained info page, etc) - I wonder whether it's time to start looking at options before this thread gets completely out-grown?
-
Unrelated thought: there's a rapidly-increasing amount of varied information in this thread and trawling through it for reference will become increasingly tiresome. There are many ways to organise, maintain and present information (wiki, stand-alone forum, maintained info page, etc) - I wonder whether it's time to start looking at options before this thread gets completely out-grown?
function getData(){
$.getJSON('http://coinmarketcap-nexuist.rhcloud.com/api/uno/price', function(resp) {
var usdPrice = resp['usd']*100;
$.getJSON('http://www.quandl.com/api/v1/datasets/WSJ/AG_EIB', function(resp) {
var AGPrice = resp['data'][0][1]*2;
var finalOutcome = usdPrice / AGPrice;
document.write(finalOutcome+" "+"");
}
);
setTimeout(getData(), 11500);
}
);
}
getData();
Fixed your code for you But be careful this timeout is hella small so I got "kicked" from the API because of too many request. Also this silver price is only uploaded once a day.
Not sure for the +"" part but \n is not working.
$.getJSON('http://coinmarketcap-nexuist.rhcloud.com/api/uno/price', function(resp) {
var usdPrice = resp['usd']*100;
$.getJSON('http://www.quandl.com/api/v1/datasets/WSJ/AG_EIB', function(resp) {
var AGPrice = resp['data'][0][1]*2;
var finalOutcome = usdPrice / AGPrice;
document.write(finalOutcome+" "+"");
}
);
setTimeout(getData(), 11500);
}
);
}
getData();
Fixed your code for you
But be careful this timeout is hella small so I got "kicked" from the API because of too many request. Also this silver price is only uploaded once a day.Not sure for the +"" part but \n is not working.
thanks, but there's no point in running it multiple times considering the price only updates once a day.
function getData(){
$.getJSON('http://coinmarketcap-nexuist.rhcloud.com/api/uno/price', function(resp) {
var usdPrice = resp['usd']*100;
$.getJSON('http://www.quandl.com/api/v1/datasets/WSJ/AG_EIB', function(resp) {
var AGPrice = resp['data'][0][1]*2;
var finalOutcome = usdPrice / AGPrice;
document.write(finalOutcome+" "+"");
}
);
setTimeout(getData(), 11500);
}
);
}
getData();
Fixed your code for you But be careful this timeout is hella small so I got "kicked" from the API because of too many request. Also this silver price is only uploaded once a day.
Not sure for the +"" part but \n is not working.
$.getJSON('http://coinmarketcap-nexuist.rhcloud.com/api/uno/price', function(resp) {
var usdPrice = resp['usd']*100;
$.getJSON('http://www.quandl.com/api/v1/datasets/WSJ/AG_EIB', function(resp) {
var AGPrice = resp['data'][0][1]*2;
var finalOutcome = usdPrice / AGPrice;
document.write(finalOutcome+" "+"");
}
);
setTimeout(getData(), 11500);
}
);
}
getData();
Fixed your code for you
But be careful this timeout is hella small so I got "kicked" from the API because of too many request. Also this silver price is only uploaded once a day.Not sure for the +"" part but \n is not working.
swg -- we were talking about a 'ticker' that provides the price of DVC (2 times the price of one ounce of silver divided by the number of cents that one Uno is worth on Coinmarketcap). If that makes sense to you, let's hear your ideas. (You'll find the discussion about two pages back).
m
m
Working on this so far : http://bad.ass.ink/test.html
let me know if thats what you mean
edit : i think that is price in btc , or did I do something wrong? earlier post from you show price of DVC @ ~$12. So, I think I did...
these are my calculations:
x = price of uno , usd * 100 = amount in cents
y = price of silver , per toz , * 2
y / x = what display on site -- that's right, correct?
thanks
Hey !
So I'm looking to buy 5 UNO in either XRP or BTC I don't know how the price policy works compared to public exchanges, but let me know !
Also I have a question about DVC, if you want to hold one DVC you need to own 2 ounces of silver & you can't hold more than 2 DVC. Also you need to be verified as a TT and it can only be 50 DVC TT so basically it's going to be a closed exchange between 50 persons that can't own more than 2 DVC ? I must be missing something.
On another side if you guys doesn't care about the design, your ticker can be done in a few minutes. Then we'll just need to find a place to host it. Eventually we could use a graph library to draw a nice chart for it, but well that's another story.
So I'm looking to buy 5 UNO in either XRP or BTC I don't know how the price policy works compared to public exchanges, but let me know !
Also I have a question about DVC, if you want to hold one DVC you need to own 2 ounces of silver & you can't hold more than 2 DVC. Also you need to be verified as a TT and it can only be 50 DVC TT so basically it's going to be a closed exchange between 50 persons that can't own more than 2 DVC ? I must be missing something.
On another side if you guys doesn't care about the design, your ticker can be done in a few minutes. Then we'll just need to find a place to host it. Eventually we could use a graph library to draw a nice chart for it, but well that's another story.
swg -- we were talking about a 'ticker' that provides the price of DVC (2 times the price of one ounce of silver divided by the number of cents that one Uno is worth on Coinmarketcap). If that makes sense to you, let's hear your ideas. (You'll find the discussion about two pages back).
m
m
swg Trade 001 complete -- thank you.
my first uno!
my first uno!
Okay, swg: when the Uno turns up, you post 'swg Trade 001 complete.'
You are now a one-star Trusted Trader. Best decision you ever made!!
http://indiamikezulu.com.au/454/list-of-trusted-traders/
At this second: 3.5 Uno = 0.02625 Btc. I sent 3.5
m
You are now a one-star Trusted Trader. Best decision you ever made!!
http://indiamikezulu.com.au/454/list-of-trusted-traders/
At this second: 3.5 Uno = 0.02625 Btc. I sent 3.5
m
Didn't have as much BTC as I thought ...
I sent you about $9 worth ( 0.024202 ) so you can send me uno of what that's worth, I don't expect 5.
uno : uW3VociQyRghtNvyZr2yo2GBa6WsFv7ccB
Thanks!
I sent you about $9 worth ( 0.024202 ) so you can send me uno of what that's worth, I don't expect 5.
uno : uW3VociQyRghtNvyZr2yo2GBa6WsFv7ccB
Thanks!
'Patch' on Verification lookin' good. I think I agree with Ian. Cragv's idea makes simple sense. And my notion is of patiently strengthening the fabric over time: meet-ups, callings-out, re-(double)Verifications, the supply of the bullion by other known members, etc.
I suggest that -- luckily -- we will be able to improve the model as we proceed. We can triple or quadruple the number of DVC traders without going beyond the 'original' core community.
M.
I suggest that -- luckily -- we will be able to improve the model as we proceed. We can triple or quadruple the number of DVC traders without going beyond the 'original' core community.
M.
Face to face is a pain in the arse as verification method but might be viable for community building.
Google Hangouts (When working) could get us all sitting around a round table.
Not likely all at one time but face to face hi is as close to a handshake as we can get online.
Great to see more coiners in the community.
Google Hangouts (When working) could get us all sitting around a round table.
Not likely all at one time but face to face hi is as close to a handshake as we can get online.
Great to see more coiners in the community.
Verification Alert: Please Read This, Campers
My mate Craig -- 'cragv' -- has done us a favour by punching a hole in our Verification Protocol. I just finished reading an email of his that contained a faked Verification post that he reckons took him just 29.5 minutes to create.
The 'patch' is to implement the 'fuller model' of Verification that I originally conceived -- but which I felt a bit old-man-fuddy-duddy about insisting on.
I don't think we've had a breach thus far simply because the DVC Project involves at this point only those who have (on bended knee, my thanks) puddled along the path of posts and replies and 'Phase One' and blah blah blah -- but we're gonna be hard-arses about Verifying newcomers henceforth!! (I sugest)
Go, us!
m
My mate Craig -- 'cragv' -- has done us a favour by punching a hole in our Verification Protocol. I just finished reading an email of his that contained a faked Verification post that he reckons took him just 29.5 minutes to create.
The 'patch' is to implement the 'fuller model' of Verification that I originally conceived -- but which I felt a bit old-man-fuddy-duddy about insisting on.
I don't think we've had a breach thus far simply because the DVC Project involves at this point only those who have (on bended knee, my thanks) puddled along the path of posts and replies and 'Phase One' and blah blah blah -- but we're gonna be hard-arses about Verifying newcomers henceforth!! (I sugest)
Go, us!
m
Face to face video chat between a new and a trusted member for verification might be too much trouble, but perhaps requiring two photos of the precious metals could work: One in front of logged in screen with accompanying scrap of paper with user name scrawled next to the coin/bullion, then a second photo of the c/b in the hand with accompanying scrawled user name also there. The thinking is that two photos of the same subject with different angles and light is much harder to convincingly fake, even if you have *real skills* (that I didn't use for my MS Paint effort!).
Verification Alert: Please Read This, Campers
My mate Craig -- 'cragv' -- has done us a favour by punching a hole in our Verification Protocol. I just finished reading an email of his that contained a faked Verification post that he reckons took him just 29.5 minutes to create.
The 'patch' is to implement the 'fuller model' of Verification that I originally conceived -- but which I felt a bit old-man-fuddy-duddy about insisting on.
I don't think we've had a breach thus far simply because the DVC Project involves at this point only those who have (on bended knee, my thanks) puddled along the path of posts and replies and 'Phase One' and blah blah blah -- but we're gonna be hard-arses about Verifying newcomers henceforth!! (I sugest)
Go, us!
m
My mate Craig -- 'cragv' -- has done us a favour by punching a hole in our Verification Protocol. I just finished reading an email of his that contained a faked Verification post that he reckons took him just 29.5 minutes to create.
The 'patch' is to implement the 'fuller model' of Verification that I originally conceived -- but which I felt a bit old-man-fuddy-duddy about insisting on.
I don't think we've had a breach thus far simply because the DVC Project involves at this point only those who have (on bended knee, my thanks) puddled along the path of posts and replies and 'Phase One' and blah blah blah -- but we're gonna be hard-arses about Verifying newcomers henceforth!! (I sugest)
Go, us!
m
Jump to: