[UNOFFICIAL] [VNL] Vanillacoin 0.4.1 | Instant ▱ Incentivized ▱ Innovative - page 114.

YAdaminer

hero member

Activity: 829

Merit: 1000

Quote from: bitl0ck on August 31, 2015, 01:30:00 AM

Quote from: heartastack on August 31, 2015, 01:23:07 AM

Quote from: bitl0ck on August 31, 2015, 01:20:30 AM

Great move by john-connor, buying all stock from ztex ( 1.15y) leaving users out of fpga mining.

Also i never spoke but he kept like 100 or 200k when the coin was only cpu minable ( locked thread on bitcointalk, possibly for no new users at that stage ) .

Go suck Smooth's cock

I dont have anything to do with smooth, im just telling vanillacoin community the truth.

Worried about losing money? Grin

How nice of you. Are you worriedd about your plans or community? If you presenting the truth then you should say that fpgas are prettty expensive and ROI on them is not fast so buying VNL on deeps is better short term investment decision than buying ztex 1.15y fpga. I also have lot of coins from the time when it was only CPU minable so it's totaly normal that john-connor have them as well, and what exactly that should mean? I think you have some issues, probably in your head, so you should go mine some evils to help you out with that.

bitl0ck

sr. member

Activity: 240

Merit: 250

Quote from: heartastack on August 31, 2015, 01:23:07 AM

Quote from: bitl0ck on August 31, 2015, 01:20:30 AM

Great move by john-connor, buying all stock from ztex ( 1.15y) leaving users out of fpga mining.

Also i never spoke but he kept like 100 or 200k when the coin was only cpu minable ( locked thread on bitcointalk, possibly for no new users at that stage ) .

Go suck Smooth's cock

I dont have anything to do with smooth, im just telling vanillacoin community the truth.

Worried about losing money? Grin

You should be worried of not being able to fpga mine, not discuss your member wars.

heartastack

hero member

Activity: 714

Merit: 500

Quote from: bitl0ck on August 31, 2015, 01:20:30 AM

Great move by john-connor, buying all stock from ztex ( 1.15y) leaving users out of fpga mining.

Also i never spoke but he kept like 100 or 200k when the coin was only cpu minable ( locked thread on bitcointalk, possibly for no new users at that stage ) .

Go suck Smooth's cock

bitl0ck

sr. member

Activity: 240

Merit: 250

Great move by john-connor, buying all stock from ztex ( 1.15y) leaving users out of fpga mining.

Also i never spoke but he kept like 100 or 200k when the coin was only cpu minable ( locked thread on bitcointalk, possibly for no new users at that stage ) .

STEALTHMODE

sr. member

Activity: 329

Merit: 250

No TX Fees #JustRaiBlocks

Quote from: EmilioMann on August 30, 2015, 06:43:14 PM

Quote from: STEALTHMODE on August 30, 2015, 05:09:23 PM

LOL
Pretty cool

Thanks Guys

Always Loved Magic the gathering. Saw the documentury rise and rise of bitcoin and saw that Mt Gox means Magic the gathering online exchange.

Any news about vanilla?

EmilioMann

legendary

Activity: 2184

Merit: 1028

#mitandopelomundo

Quote from: STEALTHMODE on August 30, 2015, 05:09:23 PM

LOL
Pretty cool

etoque

legendary

Activity: 1988

Merit: 1000

Quote from: STEALTHMODE on August 30, 2015, 05:09:23 PM

lol

Vanilla worth definitively more than 200k Wink

But it was an humble price still

STEALTHMODE

sr. member

Activity: 329

Merit: 250

No TX Fees #JustRaiBlocks

losk22

legendary

Activity: 1354

Merit: 1000

Quote from: traumschiff on August 30, 2015, 03:59:02 PM

Quote from: losk22 on August 30, 2015, 03:41:22 PM

Everything is going well, but no one helped me with POS and not working. And the wallet is not on all the computers. John should pay their attention to the problem of windows on wallet will be difficult to gain the trust of new supporters of the coin.

Nothing wrong with POS, you need to have your wallet unlocked. There was never anyone who couldn't stake sooner or later.

The more coins and incoming transactions (smaller increments) you have the faster you will stake. If you only own a few hundred or 1-5k you can wait for days/weeks for your first stake to arrive. Same goes for the case if for ex. you have 2k and you did a 2k transaction to a new wallet (withdraw from the exchange) instead of doing it as: 1x 1000 10x 100. Thats all we can help with, the windows wallet works and stakes perfectly for everyone. Well I will try transferred from Exchange 1000 coins.

pokeytex

legendary

Activity: 1504

Merit: 1002

Quote from: losk22 on August 30, 2015, 03:41:22 PM

Everything is going well, but no one helped me with POS and not working. And the wallet is not on all the computers. John should pay their attention to the problem of windows on wallet will be difficult to gain the trust of new supporters of the coin.

My wallet runs perfect on Windows 8.1 for months now!

traumschiff

legendary

Activity: 1498

Merit: 1001

180 BPM

Quote from: losk22 on August 30, 2015, 03:41:22 PM

Everything is going well, but no one helped me with POS and not working. And the wallet is not on all the computers. John should pay their attention to the problem of windows on wallet will be difficult to gain the trust of new supporters of the coin.

Nothing wrong with POS, you need to have your wallet unlocked. There was never anyone who couldn't stake sooner or later.

The more coins and incoming transactions (smaller increments) you have the faster you will stake. If you only own a few hundred or 1-5k you can wait for days/weeks for your first stake to arrive. Same goes for the case if for ex. you have 2k and you did a 2k transaction to a new wallet (withdraw from the exchange) instead of doing it as: 1x 1000 10x 100. Thats all we can help with, the windows wallet works and stakes perfectly for everyone.

losk22

legendary

Activity: 1354

Merit: 1000

Everything is going well, but no one helped me with POS and not working. And the wallet is not on all the computers. John should pay their attention to the problem of windows on wallet will be difficult to gain the trust of new supporters of the coin.

traumschiff

legendary

Activity: 1498

Merit: 1001

180 BPM

John started an official Wiki for Vanillacoin, you can reach it from the "Resource" tab on the official website or directly with the following link:

http://vanillacoin.net/wiki/

BadAss.Sx

legendary

Activity: 1526

Merit: 1002

Bulletproof VPS/VPN/Email @ BadAss.Sx

I don't care what people say....specially not what they say on BCT. I'm also in the IT business and people or colleagues are always competing to each other for their own benefit. I don't know who John Connor is and to be honest, i don't give a shit. What i like is that he is going to be the black sheep of the crypto world with his ideas. The Donald Trump of BCT. And that means one thing....or you like him, or you hate him...that's it.....and i love it!!

traumschiff

legendary

Activity: 1498

Merit: 1001

180 BPM

Quote from: Blazin8888 on August 30, 2015, 10:36:48 AM

LMAO this coin was 10 cents a few days ago. RIP VNL

Quality BTT comment right there.

Show me another project with a single developer and similar activity: https://github.com/john-connor

Current price doesn't matter and it is still up by huge % compared to past months.

Blazin8888

hero member

Activity: 672

Merit: 500

LMAO this coin was 10 cents a few days ago. RIP VNL

fmz89

legendary

Activity: 1764

Merit: 1002

VNL is gone Cheesy

nextgencoin

legendary

Activity: 1106

Merit: 1000

I would add to that, speed and security and hopefully fully anonymous will never get old. Most new coins are based on some gimmick that while impressive most likely won't be used. When all those coins are forgotten VNL will still be fast, secure and anonymous. Its is deceptively simple and not earth shattering but when it comes to making payments no one wants to wait, take on risk and have everyone know what they are doing. These are things that like I said don't get old....ever.

pseudonymdude

legendary

Activity: 896

Merit: 1000

Quote from: Za1n on August 29, 2015, 04:03:16 PM

Quote from: bitcoin carpenter on August 29, 2015, 11:28:34 AM

Been reading the debate about zero time and doublespending...

My conclusion for the time being is that zero time allows instant transfers whenever there isn't a malcious attack.

And although it has not been peer reviewed to stop double spending, it at least has been reviewed by poloniex enough to make it as secure as bitcoin with taking onlyone confirmation before deposit is clear.

So it takes less than 10 minutes per block and allows100 transactions/sec, while under a double spend attack ie never, and is istantaneous the rest of the time.

Correct me if I'm wrong but this is pretty Frick in sweet isn't it?
Probably even a game changer.

Disclaimer, I own a few btc's worth of vnl, but I own more xmr and btc than I do VNL.

So does that mean Poloniex now accepts deposits using zerotime, or is there still a 1 confirmation hold time? I think the 1 confirmation was already pretty fast, so I do not know if this would even make much of a difference transferring to/from exchanges.

Where I could see zerotime being more useful would be in retail establishments, buying a bagel and coffee for instance, the proprietor could confirm in near real-time the transaction is valid. Of course, most places that accept Bitcoin already use Bitpay or something similar, and they transfer the already low risk to a third party, so even in this scenario I am not sure how useful this is in the real world. It sounds cool and all, but I am struggling to find the real value here.

Again, consider the following scenario:

Your balance has run out and you need to get funds to miningrigrentals because a coin that you feel like you need to mine just launched.

Let's say miningrigrentals accepts both X and BTC.

X confirms in seconds. BTC confirms in an average of 10 minutes but sometimes takes hours.

Do you choose to use X or BTC?

Two of the most important aspects of a payment system are security and speed. A number of people posting in this thread don't seem to understand how big of a deal Zerotime is. Now, I understand that you don't yet have third-party confirmation of how secure Zerotime is, but assuming it's secure, it is a fundamental improvement over the way Bitcoin's network works.

bitcoin carpenter

legendary

Activity: 1582

Merit: 1001

Quote from: nextgencoin on August 29, 2015, 06:38:01 PM

Quote from: Za1n on August 29, 2015, 04:03:16 PM

Quote from: bitcoin carpenter on August 29, 2015, 11:28:34 AM

Been reading the debate about zero time and doublespending...

My conclusion for the time being is that zero time allows instant transfers whenever there isn't a malcious attack.

And although it has not been peer reviewed to stop double spending, it at least has been reviewed by poloniex enough to make it as secure as bitcoin with taking onlyone confirmation before deposit is clear.

So it takes less than 10 minutes per block and allows100 transactions/sec, while under a double spend attack ie never, and is istantaneous the rest of the time.

Correct me if I'm wrong but this is pretty Frick in sweet isn't it?
Probably even a game changer.

Disclaimer, I own a few btc's worth of vnl, but I own more xmr and btc than I do VNL.

So does that mean Poloniex now accepts deposits using zerotime, or is there still a 1 confirmation hold time? I think the 1 confirmation was already pretty fast, so I do not know if this would even make much of a difference transferring to/from exchanges.

Where I could see zerotime being more useful would be in retail establishments, buying a bagel and coffee for instance, the proprietor could confirm in near real-time the transaction is valid. Of course, most places that accept Bitcoin already use Bitpay or something similar, and they transfer the already low risk to a third party, so even in this scenario I am not sure how useful this is in the real world. It sounds cool and all, but I am struggling to find the real value here.

Polinex still is waiting for 1 confirmation....maybe as people start to trust Zerotime they can remove it but exchanges won't want to rush to do that I imagine due to their focus on tight security.

I disagree about the third party instant processing of third parties like Bitpay.......I haven't used them but assuming they are almost like using some kind of PayPal for BTC I would say there is a world of difference even if the user experience feels the same. Many people might not care but the difference between centralised and decentralised is everything. Especially if the centralised option goes through the banking system.....kind of misses the point of cryptocurency IMO.

+

Topic: [UNOFFICIAL] [VNL] Vanillacoin 0.4.1 | Instant ▱ Incentivized ▱ Innovative - page 114. (Read 433405 times)