What other shitcoins market's do does not pertain to VNL. Your correlation theory doesn't compute. Use the Dash chart as a perfect example to understand your flaws.
Thank you for your support.
I'd disagree with that. As far as I've seen most crypto performs similar on the market. Coins with superior tech usually stand out by three things:
- higher volume
- not getting abandoned and delisted from exchanges
- possible pumps long after the first big pump (usually smaller)
Otherwise their charts look pretty much the same. And Dash you mentioned is a perfect example: they have the same speculative pump-and-dump rollercoaster as most crypto does, only it had happened twice already.
I disagree because you come without facts (links to prove your theory). On the other hand VNL is only 10 months old. Come back in a year and see.
Thank you for your support.
So as you do. Do you want a link to every single altcoin chart? Or a link to Dash chart? Or a link to VNL chart?
To be clear I'm not preaching against VNL here. I'm just saying that altcoin market has its own ways.
That's because, with few exceptions, most other altcoins only offer gimmicks. The sole purpose of their creation was to make the creator, or those who paid the creator, money.
John is trying to build VNL into a scalable, decentralized currency that won't have to centralize in the future. Again, Bitcoin will most likely have to centralize over the next few decades for a variety of reasons.
Also, Dash hit almost $70 million when the vast majority of Dash coins that were mined, were instamined. That means with 22 million total coins, Dash had launched for 6 months and had a future valuation of $350 million. Dash obviously had to crash hard at some point.
I guess VNL was pumped to $1.5 million, but even at $1.5 million, VNL still deserved to be worth more than the vast majority of coins that had a higher market cap. It's just that not enough people realize what VNL is offering yet.
