^^^ You have read the documents? You have determined that they are top secret and classified? Or are you only listening to hearsay?
Why is your determination greater than the President of the United States, Donald Trump, who declassified these documents his last day in office?
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.62425530If you read the documents, and you think they should remain classified, aren't you the real criminal by your own admittance, by voluntarily reading documents that you say are classified? Or show us your top secret clearance.
But if you didn't read them, why are you simply believing a bunch of blabbermouths who say they were or should be classified over what the President said and did... declassification?
No, I cannot read them, they are Top Secret and I do not have clearance and I have not participated in parties at Mar-a-Lago, which is the other way of having direct access to these.
That's the point. You still think that they are classified, so you won't read them even if you have access to them... right? Or would you read them?
I guess we will have to wait for the answer to these things. Neither of us, nor the major media, has the ability to adjudicate this.
“As president, I could have declassified, but now I can’t,” Trump says, according to the transcript.
No, Trump cannot declassify just like that:
That is simply rhetoric. It's like if you were in and out of your house all yesterday. Then, this morning you locked yourself out. Then you said, " As owner of the house, I could have gotten in all day yesterday, but now I can't get in."
President's don't simply do things that they can't. Trump checked into all the details before he declassified the docs, to make sure he was allowed.
Hearsay, until we get down to the nitty-gritty. Did the experts check into all the reasoning why Trump declassified?... if they even said this? Other experts, including Clinton's attorney in the case Clinton won, said that Trump had every right... Clinton Case VINDICATES Trump! -
https://www.freedomsphoenix.com/News/345301-2023-06-13-clinton-case-vindicates-trump.htm.
No, my sources of information are an order of magnitude better than yours. That can be checked across your post history easily.
Finally note that I say, subject to verdict. Innocent until proven guilty. Unfortunately, it is more likely that Trump did everything he is accused of than the FBI and the doj being in cahoots on a super-conspiracy that would require the involvement of hundreds of people.
As you said. Your sources don't mean anything, because innocent until proven guilty. However, because US law is by contract more than it is by Constitution or 'black letter law', Trump could lose. But the real point is, guilty or innocent, Trump is being pressured politically by the Biden administration to keep him out of the Presidency in 2024.
How do we know? Because the tiny amounts of something that Trump might have done illegally or immorally are nothing compared with the 'big bad' Biden is doing out in the open all the time. The Dems behind Biden have found the Trump-needle in the Biden haystack, and that is all they are focusing on, and trying to keep us focused on.
Former federal prosecutor finds numerous problems with indictment documents against Trump
https://www.naturalnews.com/2023-06-19-former-federal-prosecutor-half-dozen-problems-indictment-docs-against-trump.htmlA former assistant U.S. attorney has looked at the 37-count indictment against former President Donald Trump and has concluded that the case is essentially political in nature and should never stand up in a real court of law.
Trump was charged last week in connection with his handling of classified documents. He appeared in a federal court in Miami on Tuesday and pleaded not guilty to all of them. In comments since, Trump has said that, under provisions of the Presidential Records Act, he and he alone, as president, had the authority to declassified documents at will and declare them non-presidential records.
Now, Will Scharf, writing in The Federalist, laid out six problems he sees with the indictment.
“Interplay” between the Presidential Records Act and the Espionage ActSection 793(e) of the Espionage Act, which Trump has been charged under, “requires the government to prove that the defendant knew he had National Defense Information (NDI) in his possession, knew there was a government official entitled to receive the information, and then willfully failed to deliver it to that official,” Scharf wrote.
“This is a very high set of mens rea bars to jump in any circumstance. Proving a defendant’s intent and knowledge can often be tough. But it’s even tougher here because of the Presidential Records Act,” he said, adding:
The Presidential Records Act sets up a system where the president designates all records that he creates either as presidential or personal records (44 U.S.C. § 2203(b)). A former president is supposed to turn over his presidential records to the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), and he has the right to keep his personal records.
Brighteon.TV
Based on the documents I’ve read and his actions I’ve read about, I believe Trump viewed his “boxes” as his personal records under the PRA.
National Defense info and classification...
