Rational people will have, if they can afford it (!), some savings they will not touch unless something big and bad happens. Does this means they'll die before spending all their money? Yes, and it's fine. Having a certain peace of mind has its costs.
You're probably right. In real life, however, it's more interesting. I have an uncle who died with much money. He was thrifty. He normally bought used clothes only. I guess he was a bit paranoid so he saved a lot for whatever extreme may come, probably health issues and costly hospital bills when he gets old. On his deathbed, ill, he told me he'll be recovering soon because he has yet to go to the Holy Land. That was apparently on his bucket list. He never made it there. He left more than $20,000 in his bank accounts.
It made me think, what if he lived to the fullest, spending all his money down to the last penny, and died penniless but satisfied? Would it have been better?
My aunty was a very hard-working woman that engaged in so many trades to ensure that she saved for her children. Due to her quest to save for my cousin, she always ate an unbalanced diet and visits quack doctors whenever she was ill. My mother will always advise her to take good care of herself but she refused to heed her advice. She died because she ensured that her savings are untouchable. A few months after her death, my cousins squandered all she had saved for them.
Such an unfortunate yet common scenario here in my country. I don't know if this has something to do with human nature or something cultural.
The same principles might apply to money. Actively spending and going broke could produce incentive and motivation to develop methods to amass more money. While rationing expenditures might produce an illusion of comfort and safety.
I appreciate your view. I love the idea.
My observation here is that this is usually the case with the people who are daily wage earners or those who are living with side hustles only. Near my place is a slum. Some of the people who live there are my friends. I noticed that they are also the people who don't think twice of spending whatever money they have. I can even go as far as saying they normally have better food on the table than those with permanent jobs. I'm even awed at their ability to disregard what you call the "illusion of comfort and safety." They're not afraid to go broke. I guess it's not a risk for them. They're living their lives day by day. Having no money simply means they need to look for some work.
I have Untouchable Savings. I keep in usdt as i believe savings should be liquid at all times. Any banks for storage are highly unreliable. Keeping Untouchable Savings in gold and the like is also unreliable.
This looks bad to me. I don't agree, and I don't encourage this. USDT is more unreliable than gold and money kept in banks.