Topic: Untouchable Savings: Do you have it? - page 9. (Read 1126 times)

No because that is slavery of oneself. Slavery is dehumanising and to give yourself such a treatment is just worse of it all, why deprive yourself of what you can afford? That means you suffer or labour to make money and you also labour to eat from same money, that is bad. Money is meant to take care of our challenges whether direct financial or indirect, money is important.


It may not be intentionally. That is when you don't have financial challenges then you can save but if you do then you can't save if you barely survive with the little you earn.


Health and medical issues because it involves saving of life and that is why they say health is wealth. If you are alive then you have hope of being wealthy.

Untouched vs. untouchable, good point and important to consider! That is certainly another very important distinction you added here.

I don't have savings that are "untouchable" but on the other hand I won't just waste money on things it's not absolutely necessary to do.

Nobody can really foresee all the circumstances that could happen to you, so it helps having more money allocated for savings than what is necessary just in case the truly unexpected and horrible does happen.

Yes. I have untouched savings until I reach my goal, so I can finally touch it. I think it's important to keep this personal rule for your life, otherwise you are going to use funds which were supposed to be untouched for any banal reasons.

In the case of the person who was found dead on the desert I think it was a lack of management, although it's unlikely he/she would have survived even if the water had been drank. The difference would be to find the body with an empty bottle of water, instead of a body with a full bottle of water.

You can try to spend less all the time while the future is uncertain. But it wouldn't be right to make the money you save to be untouchable. One that you can do is sell your watch and jewelry to a pawnshop or to your rich friend as your last resort.

It's not good to hide your fiat money these days because inflation will eat up its purchasing power which in the end, you won't be able to buy anything out of it. If there is anything that you could make untouchable savings, its BTC in your private wallet.

Not only in Argentina, keeping fiat generally is not advisable just as your post generally meant.

Inflation in countries that is recently over 50% :
Iran     52.2
Ghana   54.1
Sri Lanka  54.2
Suriname   54.56
Turkey   57.68
Sudan   87.3
Argentina   94.8
Lebanon   122
Syria   139
Venezuela   156
Zimbabwe   230

Only one country with disinflation which is South Sudan, all other countries are experiencing inflation, even including the developed ones.

https://tradingeconomics.com/country-list/inflation-rate?continent=world

Bitcoin is one of the asset that people can invest on, although educating oneself is very important for not to invest at the wrong time. Bitcoin is a store if value in time like this, but not advisable sometimes. Sometimes, it is better to go for other assets. Diversifying is also good and wait for the right time to come again.

There is a huge difference between untouched savings and untouchable savings.

Rational people will have, if they can afford it (!), some savings they will not touch unless something big and bad happens. Does this means they'll die before spending all their money? Yes, and it's fine. Having a certain peace of mind has its costs.

Untouchable savings is imho stupidly risky. They have their purpose in case of people with certain addictions, but it's something that has to be treated with extreme attention. It's more advisable to allow other (trusted!) person/entity take care of those savings than lock them and make them untouchable, since if a health issue comes up, one may need that money, but may not be able to touch it.

I always have untouched savings even though I can take it and spend it whenever I want, but there are some things that I really have to prepare money for or have savings that I can't touch for other needs, this happens because I have a plan for certain situations such as the case of savings specifically for bill payments or other urgent payments that I might have to prepare in advance. Especially in the current economic conditions, I don't know when I will get money again, therefore I keep it while I have it and don't touch it, even though I have to eat potluck food for a while.

"The difference between savings and no savings is often just a few percent in..."?

A: Spending

B: Inflation



I think when it comes to untouchable savings it is also unavoidable to consider the economic environment and circumstances you are in. Argentina and Turkey had an above 80% inflation rate in October 2022 year-over-year.

The "untouchable" somehow implies that you lock it away and perhaps even refrain from managing it. I know that is my assumption about what OP wanted to express with the question, but I just wanted to point out that in certain circumstances even the untouchable savings must be managed thoroughly.

If with "untouchable" it is meant that someone earns fiat, puts it aside and strictly doesn't touch it, then those untouchable earnings might vanish over time despite any good intentions of the disciplined saver.

If with "untouchable" OP refers to a fixed amount being invested in liquid and rather safe asset classes, that makes more sense if it is to be understood as a general rule or basic principle.

When I read about an 88% inflation rate in Argentina, the bitter truth is that those who put their money aside for years with very high discipline, turned out to be the big losers anyway.

So the fact of the matter is that building wealth starts with educating yourself about financial management and not underestimate the impact you can have on your own situation by familiarizing yourself with some basic terms and rules.

The difference between savings and no savings is often just a few percent in spending. If you spend a tad more, long term you have no savings. If you spend a tad less, you'll always have something left. I like having something left.

I stumbled upon this interesting tweet days ago.


https://twitter.com/SchrodingrsBrat/status/1622320014215856128?cxt=HHwWgIC-9aPd0YMtAAAA

Many of the comments are equally interesting. They apply the idea to all kinds of things including the game Resident Evil. And then I thought perhaps this is also true in the economic aspect of life. Perhaps this aptly applies to those whose economic lives are like the desert and whose little money they have they keep tightly for the hardest of days.

When I was studying in the university far from family and relatives or even family friends, I had a difficult time. Money is extremely scarce. Early mornings are usually for hot drinks-- coffee, chocolate, milk, tea, or whatever. I realized that what made those drinks important is that they are hot. So I learned to drink only a hot cup of water which I could easily ask for free from the eatery in front of where I stayed.

Come meal time, I would also request that the serving be made in half. That's to save money. But I had the money. I always made sure I have some. Emergencies and unforeseen expenses may arise anytime. So I need to have money all the time, but I won't touch it. Ironically, it also gave me hunger, inconvenience, discomfort at times.

My story is rather uninteresting, but let me know yours. Does this idea also apply to you? You could have the money to buy a new car to replace your old and broken one but you prefer not to touch it. Do you hold yourself from spending what you have to the point of depriving yourself of what you deserve? Do you keep significant savings for occasions that might only happen in your imagination? Or at what point would you allow yourself to be drained of your last penny?