Vod
Zepher
Lutpin
EcuaMobi
Lauda
Are all the same person. This is confirmed!
Topic: [User Generated] - Known alts of anyone - page 53. (Read 146348 times)
Accounts Connected: hollandvan, wannarahaa
Proof:
Quote from wannarahaa in a locked thread
http://archive.is/99mb7
Addresses:
From wallet [e383762417]
Miscellaneous: Users were created within 24h from each other.
Proof:
Quote from wannarahaa in a locked thread
Flashcoin wallet address or email address: [email protected]
Link to Profile: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/hollandvan-887083
Bitcointalk Rank: Member
Current number of posts: 90
Bitcoin Address to send the payment: 16eB3LQ2pC2xr9tA65c9zs1rTxE1Mkjcbv
Link to Profile: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/hollandvan-887083
Bitcointalk Rank: Member
Current number of posts: 90
Bitcoin Address to send the payment: 16eB3LQ2pC2xr9tA65c9zs1rTxE1Mkjcbv
http://archive.is/99mb7
Addresses:
From wallet [e383762417]
Code:
1KEP9KxrRKTndNjr5bWrmfbXjtKnp26br
16eB3LQ2pC2xr9tA65c9zs1rTxE1Mkjcbv
Miscellaneous: Users were created within 24h from each other.
Accounts connected: MakeMoneyBtc, BitcoinMuscle
Proof:
MakeMoneyBtc uses the address 1LDjigeEmVPSikocw7fnB4zRZ24GaYjHh5 here: https://archive.fo/EcM6N#selection-4085.12-4085.46
BitcoinMuscle uses the same address here: https://archive.fo/Nh08G#selection-3919.11-3919.45
Addresses:
Miscellaneous: Seems to want to buy more accounts.
Proof:
MakeMoneyBtc uses the address 1LDjigeEmVPSikocw7fnB4zRZ24GaYjHh5 here: https://archive.fo/EcM6N#selection-4085.12-4085.46
BitcoinMuscle uses the same address here: https://archive.fo/Nh08G#selection-3919.11-3919.45
Addresses:
Code:
1LDjigeEmVPSikocw7fnB4zRZ24GaYjHh5
Miscellaneous: Seems to want to buy more accounts.
I haven't read everything concerning quickseller / master-P (I have a life after all)
In this thread https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.17381020 http://archive.is/IWmbZ#selection-7779.0-7748.7 erikalui admits to being employed to create posts - something I wouldn't have thought of, so it'd not a stretch to suppose quickseller has a handful of staff he passes UID's to to manufacture posts, then takes them back to sell. (having boasted they'd sold 70 UID's in 2014 alone)
In this thread https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.17381020 http://archive.is/IWmbZ#selection-7779.0-7748.7 erikalui admits to being employed to create posts - something I wouldn't have thought of, so it'd not a stretch to suppose quickseller has a handful of staff he passes UID's to to manufacture posts, then takes them back to sell. (having boasted they'd sold 70 UID's in 2014 alone)
OK, so this was the reason you left a negative rating on my account? I posted on behalf of anyone was something you assumed? I did not post as a part of farming accounts while it's just like a signature campaign where you get paid to make forum posts so how does that make me a part of account farming? I own only one account on this forum and your rating on my account doesn't imply anything. I did not even make posts from my account and you say I made posts for quickseller? I used to post for CEG and on other forums and I never gave them the account details as they are owned by me.
I was cheated/scammed by CEG as he did not pay me nor others for making posts and when he paid me, he asked me to confirm the same saying he was another owned of the account. Now if I confirm the same, have I committed a crime?
I don't get what your statement implies (so it'd not a stretch to suppose quickseller has a handful of staff he passes UID's to to manufacture posts, then takes them back to sell. (having boasted they'd sold 70 UID's in 2014 alone))
I am myself against account farming and you blame me of doing so?
Accounts Connected: Catlonid, knyolku123
Proof:
Catlonid uses address : 13GaL9bgJnN31ejFa7vbVMuykJWhmDgBbU in his profile
archive ( https://web.archive.org/web/20170107082048/https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/catlonid-729508 )
and,
knyolku123 uses address: 14hY97a8BaCC7nqUmhFAxCjCyCxHvW4xdU in his profile
archive ( https://web.archive.org/web/20170107082228/https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/knyolku123-912076)
are part of wallet [ https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/140590fb58d820f1/addresses ] and also both addresses signs a transaction ( https://www.walletexplorer.com/txid/0098bb01328a21eb90783be51e3d9c0f0ebd92d03ee521c27a284f7108d41980 )
Accounts Connected: clickerz, sotoshihero
Proof:
clickerz posts address : 19XE7dfg93257MTZ9a5aUHEAm9jW8KVZAr here archive
Proof:
Catlonid uses address : 13GaL9bgJnN31ejFa7vbVMuykJWhmDgBbU in his profile
archive ( https://web.archive.org/web/20170107082048/https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/catlonid-729508 )
and,
knyolku123 uses address: 14hY97a8BaCC7nqUmhFAxCjCyCxHvW4xdU in his profile
archive ( https://web.archive.org/web/20170107082228/https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/knyolku123-912076)
Code:
13GaL9bgJnN31ejFa7vbVMuykJWhmDgBbU
14hY97a8BaCC7nqUmhFAxCjCyCxHvW4xdU
are part of wallet [ https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/140590fb58d820f1/addresses ] and also both addresses signs a transaction ( https://www.walletexplorer.com/txid/0098bb01328a21eb90783be51e3d9c0f0ebd92d03ee521c27a284f7108d41980 )
Accounts Connected: clickerz, sotoshihero
Proof:
clickerz posts address : 19XE7dfg93257MTZ9a5aUHEAm9jW8KVZAr here archive
Hello, It is still open? I am applying also for signature campaign 
Your Username: sotoshihero
Position to Apply: Jr. member
Your Current Post Count: 30
Your BTC Address: 19XE7dfg93257MTZ9a5aUHEAm9jW8KVZAr
Thank you.
Your Username: sotoshihero
Position to Apply: Jr. member
Your Current Post Count: 30
Your BTC Address: 19XE7dfg93257MTZ9a5aUHEAm9jW8KVZAr
Thank you.
Accounts connected: Mark02, Mark1003
Proof:
Mark02 uses the address 37629DkihVDK8KQQRjHAqPp9nj2WDgrGjT on their profile here: https://archive.fo/8xdmy#selection-497.0-497.34
Mark1003 uses the same address on their profile here: https://archive.fo/cHRpk#selection-493.0-493.34
Addresses:
Miscellaneous: Seems to want to buy more accounts and has exchanged trust with their own alt.
Proof:
Mark02 uses the address 37629DkihVDK8KQQRjHAqPp9nj2WDgrGjT on their profile here: https://archive.fo/8xdmy#selection-497.0-497.34
Mark1003 uses the same address on their profile here: https://archive.fo/cHRpk#selection-493.0-493.34
Addresses:
Code:
37629DkihVDK8KQQRjHAqPp9nj2WDgrGjT
Miscellaneous: Seems to want to buy more accounts and has exchanged trust with their own alt.
Accounts connected: ophyrim, evrentunca
Proof:
same address
Addresses
Proof:
done as evren tunca
1MFyHKob3MQsZ8ZELoQKTsUXtaHLyty8TY
thank you for the service
(Archive)1MFyHKob3MQsZ8ZELoQKTsUXtaHLyty8TY
thank you for the service
same address
Thank you for your service
My Steemit Account: https://steemit.com/@evren
My BTC Address: 1MFyHKob3MQsZ8ZELoQKTsUXtaHLyty8TY
(Archive)My Steemit Account: https://steemit.com/@evren
My BTC Address: 1MFyHKob3MQsZ8ZELoQKTsUXtaHLyty8TY
Addresses
Code:
1MFyHKob3MQsZ8ZELoQKTsUXtaHLyty8TY
-snip-
Second edit, see their last messages:
LeancyBTC https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/leancybtc-235825 http://archive.is/fVqUU
ElTrinita https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/eltrinita-259550 http://archive.is/FRuoC
Fair enough. I have added the the first few accounts and will review the remaining ones once again before deciding what to do.Second edit, see their last messages:
LeancyBTC https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/leancybtc-235825 http://archive.is/fVqUU
ElTrinita https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/eltrinita-259550 http://archive.is/FRuoC
I think that I have correctly added all the connections that have been listed so far (besides some that may not contain enough concrete proof). Please double-check and PM me if something is missing.
in their name; they are:
all registering in a tight 26 day period in February 2014.
I don't think including those as alts is the proper thing to do here. Having that link on their profile is circumstantial evidence at best, and it looks to me like those are their personal referral links. I could be wrong as I am not getting anywhere close to that website. LeancyInvest seems to fit the criteria though.Code:
Offline LeancyBTC Member 2014-02-02 121
Offline xperia Brand new 2014-02-14 0
Offline MMOForever LEANCY Newbie 2014-02-15 5
Offline traffik Leancy Jr. Member 2014-02-19 38
Offline LeancyInvest Member 2014-02-21 80
Offline ElTrinita Bitcoin Investment - 150% Yield / 5% Daily Interest Member 2014-02-28 184
all registering in a tight 26 day period in February 2014.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=mlist;sa=search select all five boxes and then search, nothing personal as it's there for all to read.
| Name: LeancyBTC Posts: 121 Activity: 70 Position: Member Date Registered: 02 February 2014, 13:11:55 Last Active: 25 December 2016, 17:59:35 Last actual active: 25 March 2014, 14:22:14 | Name: ElTrinita Posts: 184 Activity: 70 Position: Member Date Registered: 28 February 2014, 05:37:27 Last Active: 22 December 2016, 01:31:00 last regular post 01 April 2014, 17:14:25 Next post 19 December 2016, 20:37:34 |
registered 26 days apart, last active less then three days apart... (even though one was last actual active nearly three years ago)
*edit* have I mentioned how much I hate tables?
Second edit, see their last messages:
LeancyBTC https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/leancybtc-235825 http://archive.is/fVqUU
ElTrinita https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/eltrinita-259550 http://archive.is/FRuoC
Message archived for future reference: http://archive.is/4zbVQ#selection-1631.59-1630.1
as long as Timelord2067 and Shorena ... what exactly?
I would like to confess that Quickseller is indeed my alt, as long as Timelord2069 and Shorena.
Thanks.
believe i found some connected accs, will post tomorrow.
Thanks.
believe i found some connected accs, will post tomorrow.
as long as Timelord2067 and Shorena ... what exactly?
I would like to request that you remove your negative trust as it was a joke...
Do people seriously get that uptight? And autocorrect changed "as well as" to as long as.
Twice in one day four minutes apart: http://archive.is/PZIY3#selection-3181.0-3213.7 Oh dear... what part of Australia are you in then? (Choose your answer very carefully)
I like making
I would prefer not to reveal my exact location publically, but I will PM you.
in their name; they are:
all registering in a tight 26 day period in February 2014.
I don't think including those as alts is the proper thing to do here. Having that link on their profile is circumstantial evidence at best, and it looks to me like those are their personal referral links. I could be wrong as I am not getting anywhere close to that website. LeancyInvest seems to fit the criteria though. Code:
Offline LeancyBTC Member 2014-02-02 121
Offline xperia Brand new 2014-02-14 0
Offline MMOForever LEANCY Newbie 2014-02-15 5
Offline traffik Leancy Jr. Member 2014-02-19 38
Offline LeancyInvest Member 2014-02-21 80
Offline ElTrinita Bitcoin Investment - 150% Yield / 5% Daily Interest Member 2014-02-28 184
all registering in a tight 26 day period in February 2014.
Message archived for future reference: http://archive.is/4zbVQ#selection-1631.59-1630.1
as long as Timelord2067 and Shorena ... what exactly?
I would like to confess that Quickseller is indeed my alt, as long as Timelord2069 and Shorena.
Thanks.
believe i found some connected accs, will post tomorrow.
Thanks.
believe i found some connected accs, will post tomorrow.
as long as Timelord2067 and Shorena ... what exactly?
I would like to request that you remove your negative trust as it was a joke...
Do people seriously get that uptight? And autocorrect changed "as well as" to as long as.
Twice in one day four minutes apart: http://archive.is/PZIY3#selection-3181.0-3213.7 Oh dear... what part of Australia are you in then? (Choose your answer very carefully)
As shorena said, it doesn't make economic sense to scam/spam with a purchased account because that would mean loosing the money you just spent on buying said account. Doing this would more or less be throwing money away.
Quickseller often invokes this sort of rationale
-snip-
Alright, lets get the fallacies out. This is a personal attack, which does nothing to devalue the arguement at hand.
The argument "pay X for account, must scam >=X to ROI => account trades make scams less likely to be profitable" was introduced by Salty IIRC.
-people are irrational-
Yes, like these ratings. "account was traded => new owner will scam/spam" is not rational. Neither is "trades account && traded accounts result in scams => account trader is scammer". We can agree that a new owner may scam or spam and try to find evidence of the likelyhood.
-snip-
Another trick quickseller employs is for s/he and one of their alts to engage in conversation backing each-others assertions about a point...
-snip-
Another trick quickseller employs is for s/he and one of their alts to engage in conversation backing each-others assertions about a point...
-snip-
Which is a useless tactic if you argue with arguments and not against or for the person.
Accounts Connected:
fivejonnyfive, LeancyBTC, LeancyInvest, Bit-Gods -2: -1 / +0, johnathan32,
and
LeancyBTC, xperia, MMOForever, traffik, LeancyInvest, ElTrinita
Proof:
In this locked thread: Loan required https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1091250.0;all http://archive.is/APtfr
Bit-Gods -2: -1 / +0 asks for a loan and is asked to sign a message using the wallet address 179Jji311wMyKuM6fVF8BR4CyssNb8kpht that was used in a previous thread:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.6925148 (Locked thread)
The thread Giving away more then 0.01 for investment https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/giving-away-more-then-001-for-investment-478962 http://archive.is/VDv4Y is a thinly veiled Ponzi run by LeancyInvest u=255301
LavaWave then sends more money to the Ponzi: http://archive.is/VDv4Y#selection-24473.0-24491.7
but as we see in the tX
1Lt33qBQEqCwroW2YgonF7zRWHTYcAmvFs and 1LvCJ77BbtPUzLTjQ1EAPN42gHeLP7WKfD send to
1CF9wMh61PYAT9JVaNT9Jz2JwQ9xAgXhLC 0.1 BTC 1K5j1AYemriEriDyBePg9bQLtqwBHZJ2Er 0.02879856 BTC and 146DaifSyWj45Pa8v4hXHXNK7DDTc2azDB 0.02139612 BTC
So, even if LavaWave is told to send funds to a new Wallet Address via PM, those three warrant a looking at:
1CF9wMh61PYAT9JVaNT9Jz2JwQ9xAgXhLC is part of Wallet [6d7f155769] https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/6d7f155769f3afef/addresses with just two Wallet Addresses:
their funds get sent to Wallet Leancy.com https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/Leancy.com with just the one wallet address
http://archive.is/6hdi7#selection-3397.0-3427.32
and one post later: http://archive.is/6hdi7#selection-3587.0-3619.76
1K5j1AYemriEriDyBePg9bQLtqwBHZJ2Er is part of Wallet [000001e522] while
146DaifSyWj45Pa8v4hXHXNK7DDTc2azDB and 1GhFsXaHKfMErReBhc81kESYCYJt2ewRTR are both part of Wallet [77aaad0495]
Miscellaneous:
there are six UID's registered at BCT with the term
in their name; they are:
all registering in a tight 26 day period in February 2014.
fivejonnyfive, LeancyBTC, LeancyInvest, Bit-Gods -2: -1 / +0, johnathan32,
and
LeancyBTC, xperia, MMOForever, traffik, LeancyInvest, ElTrinita
Proof:
In this locked thread: Loan required https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1091250.0;all http://archive.is/APtfr
Bit-Gods -2: -1 / +0 asks for a loan and is asked to sign a message using the wallet address 179Jji311wMyKuM6fVF8BR4CyssNb8kpht that was used in a previous thread:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.6925148 (Locked thread)
Registered
Username: LavaWave
127ziW1QtrefoMBoPeCf2WaZet4iyWe3Cg
Thank you!
RECEIVED!
Username: LavaWave
127ziW1QtrefoMBoPeCf2WaZet4iyWe3Cg
Thank you!
RECEIVED!
The thread Giving away more then 0.01 for investment https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/giving-away-more-then-001-for-investment-478962 http://archive.is/VDv4Y is a thinly veiled Ponzi run by LeancyInvest u=255301
LavaWave then sends more money to the Ponzi: http://archive.is/VDv4Y#selection-24473.0-24491.7
Username: LavaWave
I invested .10 BTC
https://blockchain.info/tx/38aaaf592ae825a7b034eca8e01305370f942b789d6b1b0b27a2a86f14f1ea4c
Please send my .02 BTC to 1MdQ8KN88ndJCfpeHpWdwcrKpLMcsX18C6
Thanks!
I invested .10 BTC
https://blockchain.info/tx/38aaaf592ae825a7b034eca8e01305370f942b789d6b1b0b27a2a86f14f1ea4c
Please send my .02 BTC to 1MdQ8KN88ndJCfpeHpWdwcrKpLMcsX18C6
Thanks!
but as we see in the tX
1Lt33qBQEqCwroW2YgonF7zRWHTYcAmvFs and 1LvCJ77BbtPUzLTjQ1EAPN42gHeLP7WKfD send to
1CF9wMh61PYAT9JVaNT9Jz2JwQ9xAgXhLC 0.1 BTC 1K5j1AYemriEriDyBePg9bQLtqwBHZJ2Er 0.02879856 BTC and 146DaifSyWj45Pa8v4hXHXNK7DDTc2azDB 0.02139612 BTC
So, even if LavaWave is told to send funds to a new Wallet Address via PM, those three warrant a looking at:
1CF9wMh61PYAT9JVaNT9Jz2JwQ9xAgXhLC is part of Wallet [6d7f155769] https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/6d7f155769f3afef/addresses with just two Wallet Addresses:
Code:
1CF9wMh61PYAT9JVaNT9Jz2JwQ9xAgXhLC 0. 1 287301
1PLJc76xTQmKAcJMQwF6dnUNWJWPkTJgb5 0. 1 287301
their funds get sent to Wallet Leancy.com https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/Leancy.com with just the one wallet address
Code:
145SmDToAhtfcBQhNxfeM8hnS6CBeiRukY 0.0001 6901 335165
http://archive.is/6hdi7#selection-3397.0-3427.32
All Bitcoin transactions (deposits/withdrawals) are now enabled. Leancy is processing all pending Bitcoin withdrawals as well.
https://blockchain.info/address/145SmDToAhtfcBQhNxfeM8hnS6CBeiRukY
Look at all those outbound tx's
https://blockchain.info/address/145SmDToAhtfcBQhNxfeM8hnS6CBeiRukY
Look at all those outbound tx's
and one post later: http://archive.is/6hdi7#selection-3587.0-3619.76
BITCOIN PAYMENTS HAVE RESUMED.
https://blockchain.info/address/145SmDToAhtfcBQhNxfeM8hnS6CBeiRukY
I apologize for caps lock, however I feel it is justified in this instance.
https://blockchain.info/address/145SmDToAhtfcBQhNxfeM8hnS6CBeiRukY
I apologize for caps lock, however I feel it is justified in this instance.
- LeancyBTC and LeancyInvest running Ponzi's connected via Wallet Address transfer
- Bit-Gods -2: -1 / +0 runs a thinly vield Ponzi that LavaWave collects from then deposits funds into.
- Bit-Gods -2: -1 / +0 is connected to johnathan32 via a slip up in the account used to reply to a message
- and then we have fivejonnyfive echoing the words LeancyBTC has just used and mere posts earlier on the same page is reassuring punters that everything is alright. http://archive.is/6hdi7#selection-2791.0-2845.90Thanks a lot btcmania, now we all have to read through those poor-excuse of a meme. lol
Update: One of the admin has informed me Bitcoin transactions should be working within the hour.
https://blockchain.info/tx/c2a01b425254660297fbdd483567ecd1d45ca8604f3827e03aa1545b557ef945
Seems to me they're actually pulling funds from their reserve account to cover the Bitcoin backlog. That's really good news for all of us.
It looks like they must have moved coins into cold storage yesterday, presumably to secure them while their server was moving around.
This all seems like good news. The more news that comes out, the better everything looks.
1K5j1AYemriEriDyBePg9bQLtqwBHZJ2Er is part of Wallet [000001e522] while
146DaifSyWj45Pa8v4hXHXNK7DDTc2azDB and 1GhFsXaHKfMErReBhc81kESYCYJt2ewRTR are both part of Wallet [77aaad0495]
Miscellaneous:
there are six UID's registered at BCT with the term
Code:
Leancy
in their name; they are:
Code:
Offline LeancyBTC Member 2014-02-02 121
Offline xperia Brand new 2014-02-14 0
Offline MMOForever LEANCY Newbie 2014-02-15 5
Offline traffik Leancy Jr. Member 2014-02-19 38
Offline LeancyInvest Member 2014-02-21 80
Offline ElTrinita Bitcoin Investment - 150% Yield / 5% Daily Interest Member 2014-02-28 184
all registering in a tight 26 day period in February 2014.
Message archived for future reference: http://archive.is/4zbVQ#selection-1631.59-1630.1
as long as Timelord2067 and Shorena ... what exactly?
I would like to confess that Quickseller is indeed my alt, as long as Timelord2069 and Shorena.
Thanks.
believe i found some connected accs, will post tomorrow.
Thanks.
believe i found some connected accs, will post tomorrow.
as long as Timelord2067 and Shorena ... what exactly?
I would like to request that you remove your negative trust as it was a joke...
Do people seriously get that uptight? And autocorrect changed "as well as" to as long as.
Accounts Connected:
Nothing else to go on, except the Skype name:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/lava-trader-476037 http://archive.is/B9rpf
In lava-trader's "website" is the url soldi-italia.tk a search for is inconclusive as it nets multiple users with the word soldier in their UID name.
1QAAdQcikmCHgUXpN4qKp5BBSHJehUXxkR hasn't been seen on the network.
Nothing else to go on, except the Skype name:
Code:
Name: ctzulu u=76044 http://archive.is/txbIr
Posts: 0
Activity: 0
Position: Brand new
Date Registered: 24 December 2012, 22:46:02
Last Active: 25 December 2012, 01:22:05
Code:
Name: lava-trader u=476037 http://archive.is/Xlaaz
Posts: 2
Activity: 2
Position: Newbie
Date Registered: 12 March 2015, 20:14:09
Last Active: 12 March 2015, 22:18:10
Skype: ctzulu
Bitcoin address: 1QAAdQcikmCHgUXpN4qKp5BBSHJehUXxkR
Gender: Male
Age: 38
Location: basel
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/lava-trader-476037 http://archive.is/B9rpf
In lava-trader's "website" is the url soldi-italia.tk a search for
Code:
soldi
1QAAdQcikmCHgUXpN4qKp5BBSHJehUXxkR hasn't been seen on the network.
You know...i dont like witch-hunting as well and sometimes i dont have the mental strenght to follow Timelord's investigation as he clearly is being way more anal than me (hey i have a life too...), but sometimes i wonder if your account is a bought account too because trust me: "young members" like me in this forum are having an hard time to believe you were a DT long time ago...
~Gun
~Gun
The quickseller UID was set up by someone with a, shall we say a Disposition specifically to give the allusion of selling accounts, some of which would then go on to scam. Together with their "patron" TomatoCage and other Alts, they would then give negative trust to these "sold" alts.
Any genuinely sold Alts can also get tagged and no one would be the wiser.
Over in this thread https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/what-happened-with-xetsr-1616969 I've now realised why quickseller is unconcerned why xetsr has gone missing owing hundreds of dollars, as with TomatoCage, quickseller relys on their patronage for their trust rating being at the level it is by relying on two UID's that are effectively missing in action.
Should either return and their new comments trip them up, all three's trust ratings will be trashed.
I haven't had time to check the PGP key signing is that previously listed, however, I'm surprised no one investigating Alts has ever commented on this uncanny short list of PGP keys that quickseller is on.
Another trick quickseller employs is for s/he and one of their alts to engage in conversation backing each-others assertions about a point...
Code:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
My QS account has not been sold. Not that this fact has anything to do with your argument.
QS
Jan 5, 2017
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: oPenGP 6.0 on iOS
iQEVAwUBWG5nJlMt0pDwvrUWAQghNwf/dnocGGRvtl9t7sAprG4Sz5za/Lmas9GM
Sq4PHP1p46McNw8etK9c1xsqBAjtr2LDEVPtH83XFWKWUn7auPrZtkxApAcJqiO2
6cT/+Cl3PIgTD7B1ngnxKExHXsQCUhIHYKkpcdsSnm+2hA3uP7mIw/8AsanIJMx3
OwLU3TUCYe18sNNE3hv5LDR8Qs8wc2mvwWV5X7EB+E+2C2pnhp3mAfpMowlMzOY0
xsKhcbN2QuZSrk+a/f7CYZE6G0dl4qTun7QcaMOjExkbZhRLDQqffnShaadA8gcx
0Uv7x7CEkGjLzixmi/jwnK6gdQPkZEgMLne6ZntIwo+g040DZx7QTQ==
=i6KL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
If you can appreciate what I am getting at.
Congrats to 'Quickseller' for achieving Legendary status! Awesome work.
Even ❝TomatoCage❞ can't tell what Alt they are posting from any more...
Message archived for future reference: http://archive.is/4zbVQ#selection-1631.59-1630.1
as long as Timelord2067 and Shorena ... what exactly?
I would like to confess that Quickseller is indeed my alt, as long as Timelord2069 and Shorena.
Thanks.
believe i found some connected accs, will post tomorrow.
Thanks.
believe i found some connected accs, will post tomorrow.
as long as Timelord2067 and Shorena ... what exactly?
If it becomes a common practice to give a negative rating on known sold accounts
It is exactly what happened by that time (points to KWH, Shield and all DT that have decided to neg sold/bought accounts) but you still are likeit doesn't make economic sense to scam/spam with a purchased account
oh...the bait again...someone warned me, I guess.Lol. I find it very ironic that someone who is clearly engaged in at the very least the purchase of accounts (and most likely the sale of accounts as well) is arguing against trading of accounts.
You are going to have to cite evidence if you want this statement to be credible.please don't provide evidence of this
As shorena said, it doesn't make economic sense to scam/spam with a purchased account because that would mean loosing the money you just spent on buying said account. Doing this would more or less be throwing money away.
You must have changed your mind very quickly:
If it becomes a common practice to give a negative rating on known sold accounts, then the value of such accounts will decline because buyers will need to factor in the risk that their newly purchased account will receive a negative rating (and along with it, lose all/most of it's value) for no real reason. This will cause two things to happen:
1) When accounts are sold, the new buyers will have a greater incentive to try to scam because they know there is a chance it will receive negative trust eventually anyway, so they have less ways to make their initial investment back.
2) Owners of accounts (the original owners) will have greater incentives to try to scam because the EV of a scam attempt verses trying to sell their account would be greater because of the low prices their account would now be worth, when compared to the potential payout of scamming.
1) When accounts are sold, the new buyers will have a greater incentive to try to scam because they know there is a chance it will receive negative trust eventually anyway, so they have less ways to make their initial investment back.
2) Owners of accounts (the original owners) will have greater incentives to try to scam because the EV of a scam attempt verses trying to sell their account would be greater because of the low prices their account would now be worth, when compared to the potential payout of scamming.
Lol. I find it very ironic that someone who is clearly engaged in at the very least the purchase of accounts (and most likely the sale of accounts as well) is arguing against trading of accounts.
You are going to have to cite evidence if you want this statement to be credible.Jump to: