Topic: User got voted into DT1 by sockpuppets - page 2. (Read 2792 times)

So starting with ignoring low rank and banned accounts

Merit received by gunhell16 from January 24, 2018 until April 05, 2019 (source)

Tue Apr 10 17:53:06 2018: 3 from hackzang12 Banned! (history) for Re: Philippines to accept eth trading @coins.ph
Tue Apr 10 17:50:43 2018: 4 from Viscera (history) for Re: Philippines to accept eth trading @coins.ph
Tue Apr 10 17:04:16 2018: 4 from Dwey Banned! (history) for Re: Philippines to accept eth trading @coins.ph
Tue Apr 10 17:02:31 2018: 6 from Dwey Banned! (history) for Re: Philippines to accept eth trading @coins.ph
Mon Apr  2 17:19:20 2018: 2 from tokeweed (Trust list) (history) for Re: A Poll on Blockchain.info on What You Use it For. The Next20 Earn 2 Merits Each!
Mon Apr  2 10:56:11 2018: 5 from martina14 (history) for Re: Philippines to accept eth trading @coins.ph
Mon Apr  2 10:19:43 2018: 5 from Cassy14 (history) for Re: Philippines to accept eth trading @coins.ph
Wed Feb 28 13:07:43 2018: 4 from coinstalker23 Banned! (history) for Re: [ANN][ICO] EARTH TOKEN - Participate in the $120 trillion natural asset market
Wed Feb 28 12:51:52 2018: 5 from Risktaker31 (history) for Re: [ANN][ICO] EARTH TOKEN - Participate in the $120 trillion natural asset market
Sun Feb 25 16:59:23 2018: 5 from lance04 Banned! (history) for Re: [ANN][ICO] EARTH TOKEN - Participate in the $120 trillion natural asset market
Sun Feb 25 16:55:51 2018: 5 from ace4549 Banned! (history) for Re: [ANN][ICO] EARTH TOKEN - Participate in the $120 trillion natural asset market
Sun Feb 25 16:03:05 2018: 10 from santino11 Banned! (history) for Re: [ANN][ICO] EARTH TOKEN - Participate in the $120 trillion natural asset market
Sun Feb 25 16:01:05 2018: 5 from kram31 (history) for Re: why hackers can get into Myetherwallet
Sun Feb 25 15:43:02 2018: 10 from cherryganda (history) for Re: Why People Can Not Believe Bitcoin
Fri Feb 23 13:19:06 2018: 1 from Gibreil (history) for Re: Cryptocurrency Exchanges!
Fri Feb 23 13:11:54 2018: 2 from Wallflower28 (history) for Re: How does a Bitcoin have any value?
Thu Feb 22 12:46:51 2018: 15 from anjho.ace (history) for Re: 🌟🌟🚀[BOUNTY][ICO]ATLANT REAL ESTATE PLATFORM[OFFICIAL CAMPAIGN]🚀🌟🌟
Thu Feb 22 12:42:13 2018: 4 from yrrehc16 Banned! (history) for Re: 🌟🌟🚀[BOUNTY][ICO]ATLANT REAL ESTATE PLATFORM[OFFICIAL CAMPAIGN]🚀🌟🌟
Thu Feb 22 12:41:34 2018: 16 from wdnj (history) for Re: 🌟🌟🚀[BOUNTY][ICO]ATLANT REAL ESTATE PLATFORM[OFFICIAL CAMPAIGN]🚀🌟🌟
Thu Feb 22 12:28:26 2018: 10 from santiPOGI (history) for Re: why hackers can get into Myetherwallet
Tue Feb 20 17:36:49 2018: 10 from n691309 Banned! (history) for Re: why hackers can get into Myetherwallet
Tue Feb 20 17:35:43 2018: 10 from santino11 Banned! (history) for Re: why hackers can get into Myetherwallet
Thu Feb 15 18:03:57 2018: 4 from cherryganda (history) for Re: do you think i should sell my coins to cut my losses?
Thu Jan 25 14:18:44 2018: 5 from ivanst776 Banned! (history) for LENDING? Why dont we turn it 180 degrees!

5 Accounts connected
 
   cherryganda    
   santiPOGI    
   wdnj    
   anjho.ace    
   martina14    


Proof:

We have a good transaction here
https://etherscan.io/address/0x8950ea1d18b383bb86b24e72c5d97a8e59c43cdc#tokentxns



And here to link the final account

https://etherscan.io/token/0xfa2632a88bd0c11535a38f98a98db8251ccbaa9e?a=0x99c24521433b2316b973009f1bbcf281f96003db



Related Addresses:

Miscellaneous:

_________________________________________	_____________________	________________________________________________	___________________
BTC	ACCOUNTlink	BTC on forum	ARCHIVE
0xc6C16064C5d5be91d06aD9a5F29dE0b898b52484	cherryganda	https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/cherryganda-1108107	http://archive.fo/vzMOM
0xCC95096A0F4BAFF51723058Abfb67E50Ecb45B37	santiPOGI	https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/santipogi-1107098	http://archive.fo/FgsZn
0xAbdC34a85485619A1E686C816C179bB6440d29d0	wdnj	https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/wdnj-412953	http://archive.fo/4WrZE
0x99c24521433b2316B973009f1BbCF281f96003dB	anjho.ace	https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/anjhoace-1197849	http://archive.fo/IHa5O
0x19657b9f9F3614D0289a1cdF52867019a8dE029C	martina14	https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/martina14-1169245	http://archive.fo/PfSek

What does it mean? They probably know each other and more likely those are full members alt for gunhell. Others account are probably alts too.
Will look more tomorrow, bed time.

So what would you have him do instead? Constantly harass everyone with him on their trust list until they remove him?

Perhaps he was fed up of artificial drama being manufactured by some users for personal gain. I can't say I blame him.

I thought it might have something to do with the realization that he was providing support to those who were promoting scams he claimed to be fighting and him not wanting to be a complete and total hypocrite while maintaining his personal relationships.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.49666702

Maybe he doesn't want the hassle that comes along with having his red tags (or green ones) carry so much weight.  It certainly can be a pain in the ass when your PM inbox blows up every day with pleas for mercy, excuses, and everything else that goes along with being a DT member.  Ultimately, we don't know why he made the request to be removed, but I don't find anything suspicious about it. 

Given how warped QS's view of things is, it doesn't surprise me he thinks there's something sinister about marlboroza not wanting to be on DT.  And no, marlboroza doesn't have to justify anything to anybody when he hasn't done anything wrong.

Yep.

Yeah but we can be sure that you're trying to make this molehill into a mountain because marlboroza posted not-so-nice things about you recently. You're giving thin-skinned narcissists a bad name. How is this even relevant to the topic of sockpuppets voting for DT1? He doesn't vote nor can be voted for.

I didn’t compare the date of the trust list to the date of his thread. There is a post not long after the thread was opened that shows he has an empty trust list.

I would presume he cleared his trust list prior to opening the thread or very shortly thereafter.

I was trying to point out that he previously had a trust list before he was blacklisted.

The suspicious part is that his actions don’t match what he is saying.

He is very much aware that his ratings show up by default but he continues to leave ratings despite saying that he doesn’t want them showing up by default.

When I first saw the thread, I didn’t think his request was genuine, but I wasn’t sure why he was making the request.

Not to mention that people who are not in DT are also allowed, encouraged even, to have trust lists.

This is quite questionable. When was this change made? Should not all DT1 users be manually reviewed and not automatically placed into the category?

Except his trust list was wiped at most 3 hours after starting the thread asking to be excluded: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.49699653. It was probably wiped before that though, since Loyce's data would have been 3 days old by that point.

How is asking to be removed from DT suspicious? If he was asking to be added to DT, you may have a point.

Because he could be sending ratings for his own benefit, or he is perfectly happy for his ratings to appear as untrusted to everyone else, you know, just the same as the thousands of forum members who leave ratings but aren't on DT or anyone else's trust list.

I think you misinterpreted the date:
Feb 12, I made some improvements to my Trust list viewer, and updated week 4. However, the data dump I used was from Saturday morning before that (Feb 9).

Marlboroza created his topic on Feb 12:
I have no reason to believe marlboroza had not emptied his trust list yet, when he created that topic.

This conflicts with the insulation that he does not want to be on DT1, nor DT2 anymore.

There is no question that he was blacklisted. The question surrounds the circumstances surrounding him getting blacklisted.
I agree, no questions regarding suspicious activity should be allowed to be asked of him. /s
Right  So you are telling me you think it is completely normal behavior for someone to *ask* to be removed from everyone's trust list, and continue sending trust ratings? These two activities conflict with eachother; there is no argument against this. 

So?

He was blacklisted. He disappeared from DT1 on the same day he made the original thread, and not when DT1 was next recalculated 3 weeks later. Therefore, theymos must have manually removed him. He is also not required, in any way shape or form, to explain his decision to anyone.

Not wanting to be part of DT has nothing to do with leaving trust ratings, otherwise no one except DT members would ever leave trust ratings.

Lauda has marlboroza on his trust list. Also, as of Feb 12, marlboroza had many people on his trust list.

I would point out that marlboroza says he asked to be blacklisted from DT1, he has not given any details regarding the circumstances as to why he asked to be blacklisted, he asked to be removed from DT publicly, however he has put very little effort into getting this done (very near to zero effort), and he still leaves trust sometimes.

Quicksy's twisting everything into a shit pretzel as usual. marlboroza is doing fine as a DT2 member, doesn't seem too frazzled by the evil DT1 members not heeding his request.

marlboroza requested theymos put him on the blacklist. Also, marlborozo doesn't have a custom trust list. Quite frankly I don't know what you think you caught a whiff of.  

There is one person on lauda trust list that theymos blacklisted from DT1. I am not sure if his DT votes were also blacklisted and it would be difficult to test, it is possible his trust list is setup so that it won’t matter.

The person claims to have requested to be blacklisted and opened a thread requesting to be removed from everyone’s trust list but there was seemingly close to zero effort put into this actually getting done.

edit: He asked for everyone to not ask any questions, but he was asked a few, but he did not answer anything meaningful.

YES
anyone that would trust lauda is very suspicious

at the very least they must be unintelligent   have poor judgement   or have a corrupt motive

no legitimate reason for trusting lauda exists

Investigations usually begin with some sort of evidence or at least a list of suspects. Do you have any?

I think lauda has sufficient trust inclusions for him to be in DT1 under current rules. There might be one or two alts on lauda's trust list (inconclusive), and there are perhaps some more inappropriate trust list relationships between lauda and others.

There are some people who also have inappropriate trust list relationships due to conflicts of interest via close business relationships, and close personal relationships, and some people seem to have popped into notoriety and into DT1 seemingly out of nowhere (and suspiciously).

I don't think that's necessary. Sooner or later these farmers will run out of merits, as opposed to being able to continue this shit indefinitely like it was prior to the merit system.