Pages:
Author

Topic: User got voted into DT1 by sockpuppets (Read 2807 times)

legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
February 13, 2022, 03:55:19 AM
#74
@Timelord2067: I've taken your question to DefaultTrust changes.
legendary
Activity: 3696
Merit: 2219
💲🏎️💨🚓
February 13, 2022, 01:14:56 AM
#73
You could not have known that I excluded them, since I don't generally announce it.
Any chance you can share the full DT1-voting blacklist (for my DT1-election: Rank up pipeline)?

So far, I have these confirmed userIDs on "my" DT1-voting blacklist:

This user BIBInaX_Maksim_SOSI seems to have been banned/nuked AND all of their DT trust both received and given has been removed.

Was this a one off, or, could those on that list also be removed in the same way?




twiki might be another one to watch having woken up to remove their entire DT trust list this last week https://loyce.club/trust/2022-02-12_Sat_05.19h/2460637.html
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
February 12, 2022, 01:44:23 PM
#72
Until this moment, I didn't know that the trust list should only contain users with reviews.
It literally tells you when you edit your trust settings:
Quote
List the users who you trust to have good trust ratings and good trust lists
legendary
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1257
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
February 12, 2022, 01:40:53 PM
#71

Quote
Now I understand better how the trust system works.
Allow me to disagree: In the past week, you've added 8 more users who never left any feedback to your Trust list. That's not how you should build a proper Trust list. Luckily, your DT1 strength is (-5) already, so it doesn't matter to the Trust system. I'd much rather see Trust lists based on the right criteria. If you haven't read it yet: LoyceV's Beginners guide to correct use of the Trust system.
Can you explain why you've included 8 users who haven't left any feedback? "Being friends" shouldn't be the answer.

I'm also curious why you went from including to excluding icopress from your Trust list. His judgement was spot-on!
Until this moment, I didn't know that the trust list should only contain users with reviews.

icopress is on my no-trust list for the same reason that these members are there:
Balthazar
KTChampions
tvplus006
witcher_sense
madnessteat
lovesmayfamilis
FontSeli
zasad@
Goran_

I don't trust them
I consider them a group of people who illegally seized power in the Russian DT1

If you want, this is my "political program". And it is for this reason that users voted for me.
...
 I wonder what the reasons were for so many users to include you on their Trust list.
...
There is a conflict of interest. And it's too much for me to translate. But if you insist, then I will try.
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
February 12, 2022, 05:00:33 AM
#70
You could not have known that I excluded them, since I don't generally announce it.
Any chance you can share the full DT1-voting blacklist (for my DT1-election: Rank up pipeline)?

So far, I have these confirmed userIDs on "my" DT1-voting blacklist:
Code:
1231252
1231268
1236860
1236879
1236944
1237123
1237158
1240198
1240832
1240853
1240872
1240919
1247193
1247203
1247213
1247231
1260451
1260476
1289915
1290532
1290714
1311608
1311624
1311649
1311664
1311700
1311716
1311740
1311776
1311798
1311852
1311924
1312215
1312669
1312682
1312730
1312750
1312835
1312864
1325612
1325624
1325633
1325651
1325665
1325681
1325699
1325707
1575704
1575750
1586404
1586457
1586551
1586585
1586656
1609508
1658865
2061631
1037701
335282
1048813
1123319
(the last 4 added just now)



Latest data:
I recently started studying how the trust system works. Mostly after being included in the dt1 list.
If you didn't know how the Trust system works, you shouldn't have been voted into DT1 in the first place. Since you've only left feedback twice, I wonder what the reasons were for so many users to include you on their Trust list.

Quote
Thank you for your trust.
I don't think theymos' post nor your DT1-inclusion has anything to do with theymos trusting you.

Quote
Now I understand better how the trust system works.
Allow me to disagree: In the past week, you've added 8 more users who never left any feedback to your Trust list. That's not how you should build a proper Trust list. Luckily, your DT1 strength is (-5) already, so it doesn't matter to the Trust system. I'd much rather see Trust lists based on the right criteria. If you haven't read it yet: LoyceV's Beginners guide to correct use of the Trust system.
Can you explain why you've included 8 users who haven't left any feedback? "Being friends" shouldn't be the answer.

I'm also curious why you went from including to excluding icopress from your Trust list. His judgement was spot-on!
legendary
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1257
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
February 12, 2022, 04:18:13 AM
#69
theymos, thank you for making it clear. I recently started studying how the trust system works. Mostly after being included in the dt1 list. It was a surprise to me. Thank you for your trust. First of all, because people began to demand it from me. Sorry for my mistakes. Now I have deleted inactive, banned, and multiaccount users. I will continue to try not to include there those who conduct any malicious activity on the forum. Now I understand better how the trust system works. After this discussion. starting with this post (Russian).
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.59167566
edit  I hope the discussion that has arisen has drawn attention to the trust system in the Russian local, and more users will start using it
In fact, I think that a two-party "political system", if I may say so, has begun to form in the Russian local
sorry for my googlish


legendary
Activity: 3696
Merit: 2219
💲🏎️💨🚓
February 11, 2022, 09:23:36 PM
#68
Might want to check out fzkto trust feedback page https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1094839;dt

SaracenRomero213    2019-12-15        Top altcoin analyst with extensive experience. Follow him and get a lot of useful information.
SaracenRomero213    2019-12-15        He is a very professional cryptanalyst. Reading 3meek, I get a lot of useful information. He is a very helpful member of the Russian crypto community.




2014-08-13, 11:31:19 Date Registered:    SaracenRomero213 (Inactive)

2017-08-04, 11:58:41 Date Registered:    fzkto
2017-08-10, 04:37:56 Date Registered:    F1ak
2017-08-31, 07:34:44 Date Registered:    debext (Inactive)

2017-10-07, 18:14:02 Date Registered:    3meek

2021-05-06, 06:04:21 Last Active:    debext (Inactive)

2021-09-01, 04:36:10 Last Active:    SaracenRomero213 (Inactive)

2022-01-03, 04:07:56 Last Active:    F1ak
administrator
Activity: 5222
Merit: 13032
February 11, 2022, 06:16:21 PM
#67
Request to exclude 4 related accounts from the DT selection process.

Thank you for mentioning this potential abuse, but I previously already excluded those users from the DT calculation; they are not the cause of The0ldl_lser being included. (You could not have known that I excluded them, since I don't generally announce it.) At the time of the last DT reconstitution, The0ldl_lser was included in this way:

Big requirement:Small requirement:(Other "voters" may have been possible; these were the ones the system semi-randomly chose to satisfy the criteria.)

In this case I already excluded these users, but it is helpful if people point out potential abuse in the DT reconstitution process, since I don't spend all that much time on it, and I could easily miss things.
legendary
Activity: 1456
Merit: 5874
light_warrior ... 🕯️
February 11, 2022, 03:04:23 PM
#66
The above statement doesn't seem correct: Even without those 4 accounts voting for him, The0ldl_lser has enough inclusions to join the DT1-election.

Your evidence is in Ru, so I can't easily review it. But even if those 4 accounts aren't the reason The0ldl_lser reach DT1, if they're alts they shouldn't give any user more than one vote.
I know about the criteria, the problem is that until week 158 he was not eligible to participate in the elections [the moment when 5 alt accounts intervened].

I have nothing against this guy, I'm just for the fact that the 4 mentioned accounts would be blacklisted.

By the way, Google translator should translate normally (I checked).

Quote
The0ldl_lser's judgement is Trusted by:
1. peloso (Trust: +2 / =3 / -4) (186 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. NEW naska21 (Trust: +0 / =0 / -4) (135 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. Vadi2323 (Trust: +1 / =3 / -0) (187 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. popachubby (Trust: neutral) (10 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
5. NEW xenon131 (Trust: +0 / =0 / -2) (DT1! (0) 1141 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
6. NEW Captain-Cryptory (Trust: +0 / =0 / -3) (753 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
7. F1ak (Trust: neutral) (241 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
8. NEW Smartprofit (Trust: neutral) (613 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
9. NEW soliton (Trust: +0 / =0 / -3) (583 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
10. MoxnatyShmel (Trust: +1 / =0 / -1) (DT1 (-1) 374 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
11. stoos (Trust: +1 / =0 / -1) (181 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
12. DabLjat (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (70 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
13. Ya_Gor32 (Trust: neutral) (2 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
14. twiki (Trust: neutral) (24 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
15. NEW airfinex (Trust: neutral) (54 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
16. Xforsrtrit (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
17. Gangster-Hamster (Trust: neutral) (456 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
18. koks and marihuanna (Trust: +0 / =1 / -1) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
19. ssss57ssss2ss (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
20. RUtrolls (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
21. BIBInaX_Maksim_SOSI (Trust: +0 / =0 / -1) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
February 11, 2022, 02:34:05 PM
#65
LoyceV, I hope you don't mind if I refrain from creating a new thread  Tongue
I don't mind Smiley

Quote
Manipulation of the trust system [thanks to these voices, The0ldl_lser became DT1 for the first time this month]
The above statement doesn't seem correct: Even without those 4 accounts voting for him, The0ldl_lser has enough inclusions to join the DT1-election.

Your evidence is in Russian, so I can't easily review it. But even if those 4 accounts aren't the reason The0ldl_lser reach DT1, if they're alts they shouldn't give any user more than one vote.
legendary
Activity: 1456
Merit: 5874
light_warrior ... 🕯️
February 11, 2022, 02:06:23 PM
#64
LoyceV, I hope you don't mind if I refrain from creating a new thread  Tongue

Unlike the previous policy, I will not generally be trying to cultivate a good list; that will be left to the DT1 members themselves. However, I reserve the right to remove you and blacklist you from future selection if you engage in egregious and obvious abuse, or if multiple known alt accounts could be selected.

Request to exclude 4 related accounts from the DT selection process.

  • Irrefutable evidence linking these accounts

Merited by witcher_sense (4), madnessteat (4), A-Bolt (1), imhoneer (1), tvplus006 (1), lovesmayfamilis (1), zasad@ (1)

  • Confession

Thank you, I have long wanted to leave the forum, I do not need it and only took my time. [...]

  • Manipulation of the trust system [thanks to these voices, The0ldl_lser became DT1 for the first time this month]

Quote
Trust list for: The0ldl_lser (Trust: neutral) (DT1 (-4) 410 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

The0ldl_lser's judgement is Trusted by:
1. peloso (Trust: +2 / =3 / -5) (186 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. naska21 (Trust: +0 / =0 / -4) (135 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. Vadi2323 (Trust: +1 / =2 / -0) (187 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. popachubby (Trust: neutral) (10 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
5. xenon131 (Trust: +0 / =0 / -2) (1141 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
6. Captain-Cryptory (Trust: +0 / =0 / -3) (753 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
7. F1ak (Trust: neutral) (241 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
8. Smartprofit (Trust: neutral) (623 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
9. soliton (Trust: +0 / =0 / -3) (583 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
10. MoxnatyShmel (Trust: +1 / =0 / -1) (DT1 (-1) 374 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
11. stoos (Trust: +1 / =0 / -1) (197 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
12. DabLjat (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (70 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
13. Ya_Gor32 (Trust: neutral) (2 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
14. twiki (Trust: neutral) (24 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
15. airfinex (Trust: neutral) (54 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
16. Xforsrtrit (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
17. NEW Excimer (Trust: #  +0 / =2 / -7) (64 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
18. Gangster-Hamster (Trust: neutral) (456 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
19. koks and marihuanna (Trust: +0 / =1 / -1) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
20. ssss57ssss2ss (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
21. RUtrolls (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
22. BIBInaX_Maksim_SOSI (Trust: +0 / =0 / -1) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

Soon after the exposure, all the mentioned accounts began to distance themselves from each other (example 157/158 week).

Quote
Captain-Cryptory's judgement is Trusted by:
1. Removed naska21 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -4) (135 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
1. Removed xenon131 (Trust: +0 / =0 / -2) (DT1! (0) 1140 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
1. Removed soliton (Trust: +0 / =0 / -3) (583 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. XEOP$ (Trust: neutral) (171 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. The0ldl_lser (Trust: neutral) (386 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
legendary
Activity: 3696
Merit: 2219
💲🏎️💨🚓
August 24, 2019, 07:10:47 AM
#63
I see no particular evidence of Bazinga442 being an alt, but the other six five (edit: zin-zang may not be part of this circle) are all the same person. They will be blacklisted from the DT selection system in the future. Haven't decided whether this abuse warrants a forum ban.

How did they get 10 merit? (I don't have time to look into this right now.)

10 merit is difficult enough IMO. I don't want it to be too difficult. Any other suggestions? We could just keep an eye on it and respond reactively to cases like this.


Edit:

After some investigation, this is a circle of 58 accounts, most of which have 10+ merit. IDs:
2061631

(snip)

They're all now excluded from the DT selection process, so if the goal was to manipulate DT, someone blew ~580 sMerit in order to ultimately fail doing so.

My trust list today looks like this:

i have gained enough,im done with bitcointalk  Grin ~ 78k in one year is a good shit ~ bountyhunter hahaha..its not me but i know him

xolxol is probably part of this coven of merit farmers given their UID is a few ahead of this user u=2061631 (by twelve minutes) that is on the theymos list:

Code:
Name: burakike u=2061631
Posts: 8
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
Position: Newbie
Date Registered: 24 April 2018, 16:11:21
Last Active: 22 February 2019, 10:01:15

Code:
Name: xolxol
Posts: 173
Activity: 173
Merit: 4
Position: Jr. Member
Date Registered: 24 April 2018, 15:58:55
Last Active: 23 August 2019, 06:07:55



I would wager zin-zang is probably part of this group also as they last posted three weeks before the others, all are created in January 2018 and last post in February 2019:

Code:
Name: Zin-Zang
Posts: 860
Activity: 364
Merit: 11
Position: Member
Date Registered: 31 January 2018, 07:48:53
Last Active: 03 February 2019, 00:43:03

Code:
Name: chickinini
Posts: 19
Activity: 19
Merit: 11
Position: Newbie
Date Registered: 04 January 2018, 02:42:37
Last Active: 21 February 2019, 22:40:26

Name: cryptorgasm
Posts: 13
Activity: 13
Merit: 4
Position: Newbie
Date Registered: 04 January 2018, 02:49:11
Last Active: 21 February 2019, 22:40:42

Name: Pablojob
Posts: 18
Activity: 18
Merit: 10
Position: Newbie
Date Registered: 05 January 2018, 11:04:40
Last Active: 21 February 2019, 23:16:09

Name: PiningGarcia
Posts: 15
Activity: 15
Merit: 10
Position: Newbie
Date Registered: 05 January 2018, 11:15:43
Last Active: 22 February 2019, 00:42:32

Name: PingGermoco
Posts: 17
Activity: 17
Merit: 10
Position: Newbie
Date Registered: 05 January 2018, 11:19:11
Last Active: 22 February 2019, 01:03:47

Name: cryptopov
Posts: 19
Activity: 19
Merit: 4
Position: Newbie
Date Registered: 07 January 2018, 09:25:52
Last Active: 22 February 2019, 10:20:42

Name: poypototoy
Posts: 14
Activity: 14
Merit: 10
Position: Newbie
Date Registered: 11 January 2018, 11:22:45
Last Active: 22 February 2019, 14:50:29



ito-marketing and gwsukabokepjepang are probably part of this cluster too given they were created 24 hours (almost to the minute) apart:

Code:
Name: ito-marketing
Posts: 7
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
Position: Newbie
Date Registered: 28 January 2019, 00:29:43
Last Active: 18 June 2019, 03:20:13

Code:
Name: gwsukabokepjepang
Posts: 68
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
Position: Newbie
Date Registered: 29 January 2019, 00:15:35
Last Active: 07 April 2019, 15:44:57
copper member
Activity: 2996
Merit: 2374
April 13, 2019, 12:32:33 PM
#62
As of immidiately prior to him being blacklisted from DT1, he was voting for others in his trust list to be on DT1.
And then he stopped voting and removed himself from DT1 at the same time. If he had removed himself from DT1 and continued to vote for others, you may have a point, but he didn't so you don't.
If he was forced out of DT1, he would presumably be unable to vote via his trust list as well. Removing his trust list would only remove the possibility of someone not showing up on DT1 when they should have if his trust list votes were to count, and would reduce the chances of anyone asking any questions with substance.

It also looks like he does not like being questioned very much. What he posted is also not proof of anything, it does not show context, especially if there was communications before his alleged message he sent asking to be blacklisted from DT1.
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
April 12, 2019, 07:44:28 AM
#61
How is this even relevant to the topic of sockpuppets voting for DT1? He doesn't vote nor can be voted for.
I don't think you are this blind and are playing dumb.

As of immidiately prior to him being blacklisted from DT1, he was voting for others in his trust list to be on DT1.

So? Relevance to the topic at hand? Are you gonna bring up every one of the ~4000 users who are voting or have voted for DT1?

Based on the below two facts, I believe marlboroza was forced off DT1, and was forced into making a public attempt of getting removed from DT2:

Holy shit, this is stupid even by your standards. You know that theymos is unlikely to comment on the reason for blacklisting this so you're just making shit up.
legendary
Activity: 3010
Merit: 8114
April 12, 2019, 04:47:57 AM
#60

Its just funny to me that gunhell16 achieved exactly enough merit to rank up to Sr Member and hasn't earned 1 more since.

I suppose this isn't exactly "bounty cheating" because there's no way to prove for sure that they are all the same person, yet it is highly suspicious that all the bounty tokens appear to be funneling to the same ETH address.

In any case, good work, and in the future we'll be on the lookout for lude Filipino profile names, lol.
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
April 12, 2019, 04:15:49 AM
#59
Unless anyone is constantly scraping the DT1 list (doubtful)
I like it Cheesy
Starting now, I'm scraping https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;dtview every hour. If/when I get a VPS I'll publish everything, until then, send me a PM if you have a specific request.
legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 18748
April 12, 2019, 04:04:41 AM
#58
As of immidiately prior to him being blacklisted from DT1, he was voting for others in his trust list to be on DT1.
And then he stopped voting and removed himself from DT1 at the same time. If he had removed himself from DT1 and continued to vote for others, you may have a point, but he didn't so you don't.

Based on the below two facts, I believe marlboroza was forced off DT1
Unless anyone is constantly scraping the DT1 list (doubtful), there is no way to prove that without theymos.

I also wonder why you would be so keen to invent this nonsense drama to derail the thread away from the issue of sockpuppets voting for DT1 members. Roll Eyes
copper member
Activity: 2996
Merit: 2374
April 12, 2019, 03:14:02 AM
#57
I don't think marlboroza, what I believe amounts to pretending to want to get off DT2 is suspicious on its own, but he was in fact blacklisted from being on DT1, and was removed from DT1 immidiately.

This is a fact? Maybe I missed something, but could you provide your source?
He has been blacklisted from DT1, see below:

I'm surprised you dropped out instantly, does that mean you can drop from DT1 the moment you don't have 10 users on your trust list anymore?
I don't know, probably not, probably on voting day. Blacklisted on request Smiley
You can see he was immidiately removed from DT1:
@theymos



You used to be DT1. I'm surprised you dropped out instantly, does that mean you can drop from DT1 the moment you don't have 10 users on your trust list anymore?
Is this the intended behavior of the system?
I posted why I believe marlboroza is pretending to want to be removed in the post you quoted.

What's far more likely is he was just sick of the petty drama of DT politics and wants to take a breather from it.
It is possible he does not want to participate in DT drama. He opened a thread asking to be removed from DT2 on Feb 11, and within 10 days, by my count, he had left an additional 50 ratings, and in the ~month since he opened his thread, he has left more than 120 ratings.

The above happened when he was very well aware that he is still in DT2.

Based on the above facts, I don't find it to be a reasonable conclusion that he was trying to get removed due to the DT drama.
legendary
Activity: 3010
Merit: 8114
April 12, 2019, 01:57:00 AM
#56
I don't think marlboroza, what I believe amounts to pretending to want to get off DT2 is suspicious on its own, but he was in fact blacklisted from being on DT1, and was removed from DT1 immidiately.

This is a fact? Maybe I missed something, but could you provide your source?

It is not normal behavior for someone to not honor this type of request if they believe it is legitimate. It appears those who still have marlboroza do not believe he is making a serious request, and marlboroza has not done anything to correct this, assuming he actually wants off everyone's trust lists (as discussed above, I do not believe this). A good first step to trying to get someone to remove you from their trust list would include sending a personal message asking to be removed from their trust list, and to follow up if they do not comply.

What's far more likely is he was just sick of the petty drama of DT politics and wants to take a breather from it.
copper member
Activity: 2996
Merit: 2374
April 12, 2019, 01:48:20 AM
#55
How is this even relevant to the topic of sockpuppets voting for DT1? He doesn't vote nor can be voted for.
I don't think you are this blind and are playing dumb.

As of immidiately prior to him being blacklisted from DT1, he was voting for others in his trust list to be on DT1.

So you are telling me you think it is completely normal behavior for someone to *ask* to be removed from everyone's trust list, and continue sending trust ratings? These two activities conflict with eachother; there is no argument against this. 
Maybe he doesn't want the hassle that comes along with having his red tags (or green ones) carry so much weight.  It certainly can be a pain in the ass when your PM inbox blows up every day with pleas for mercy, excuses, and everything else that goes along with being a DT member.  Ultimately, we don't know why he made the request to be removed, but I don't find anything suspicious about it. 
The thing is that he does not appear to actually want to be off DT. He has gained a more solid footing into DT2 than he was before he opened his thread. He appears to have put in a "show" effort into "trying" to get removed from DT2, and is not serious about getting removed.

I don't think marlboroza, what I believe amounts to pretending to want to get off DT2 is suspicious on its own, but he was in fact blacklisted from being on DT1, and was removed from DT1 immidiately.

Based on the below two facts, I believe marlboroza was forced off DT1, and was forced into making a public attempt of getting removed from DT2:
  • Was actually blacklisted from DT1
  • Appears to be pretending to want to get off DT2



The suspicious part is that his actions don’t match what he is saying.
So what would you have him do instead? Constantly harass everyone with him on their trust list until they remove him?
It is not normal behavior for someone to not honor this type of request if they believe it is legitimate. It appears those who still have marlboroza do not believe he is making a serious request, and marlboroza has not done anything to correct this, assuming he actually wants off everyone's trust lists (as discussed above, I do not believe this). A good first step to trying to get someone to remove you from their trust list would include sending a personal message asking to be removed from their trust list, and to follow up if they do not comply.
Pages:
Jump to: