Pages:
Author

Topic: Users who spread false/fake/unhelpful information on technical board (Read 2931 times)

legendary
Activity: 2870
Merit: 7490
Crypto Swap Exchange
User: RTX-G53

Additional information (optional):
* I suspect this user using chatbot.

List of post:

Does anyone know if BTC Core will work properly if installed on Tails USB with Persistent Storage enabled? I saw that the modern versions now allow you to upgrade the Tails OS on the fly while keeping all of your Persistent Storage encrypted volume intact which is great. I remember not using this OS because you needed to wipe the data to upgrade but now it works.
If you want to use BTC Core wallet for watch-only to send transactions, will this work properly? has anyone tried?

Btw, is there a problem by sending BTC to a centralized exchange through Tor? in terms of getting the transaction blacklisted or something? I just use Tor by default for common sense privacy, but you never know nowadays.
Your question is multi-topic and technical. ails OS is a Linux distribution designed for security. Data is not saved in Tails by default. The Persistent Storage feature in Tails stores encrypted data in specific segments. In it you can keep secret information, programs and files. Bitcoin data is transacted by downloading blockchain data to the BTC Core wallet. Persistent Storage must be encrypted This is important for privacy as the private keys of Bitcoin wallets are saved on this drive. However, using BTC Core for wallet-only purposes will probably work fine, but it's not ideal for running a full Bitcoin node.Use of Tor ensures privacy in deployment. Transactions using Tor should not be a problem, but since many hackers or intruders use the Tor network, transactions originating from Tor nodes may be suspect to some exchanges. They may block your transaction or suspend your account in case of multiple suspicious transactions and unusual behavior in the exchange's system. Personal information should not be shared during transactions on exchanges using Tor. Ensure Tor's security by using a configured browser and always updating your browser.

1. 6 months necroposting.
2. Not all Linux distro designed or focused on security. Some of them have different goal or focus, such as beginner friendly or run on old computer.
3. Tails use Tor by default, so there's no point of saying "Use of Tor ensures privacy in deployment.".
4. Without sybil attack, it's not easy to find out which node or device initially broadcast a transaction. So there's no need to worry about exchange finding out certain TX initially broadcasted from node/device which use Tor connection.

Hello i am looking for Library which can handel Bitcoind (Full Node) commands and queries i dont want to use a 3rd party i will host my own server
Since you want to setup your own server to run Bitcoin Full Node, the Bitcoin Core library will be most useful. It is able to communicate independently with the blockchain and is also the official client of Bitcoin, which can perform commands and configuration. First you need to download Bitcoin Core. After setting up Bitcoin Core, you need to use RPC (Remote Procedure Call) of Bitcoin Core which can give commands and replies. You can configure your node via the bitcoin.conf file. It has to set RPC credentials and other options. Finally JSON-RPC should be used to send various commands.

1. Bitcoin Core is application/software, not library.
2. While Bitcoin Core is most popular full node software, it's not official client.
3. It doesn't answer Nrcewker question, since it seems he's looking for library in order to avoid using JSON-RPC directly.
legendary
Activity: 2870
Merit: 7490
Crypto Swap Exchange
User: ilan25

Additional information (optional):
* I suspect this user user chatbot.
* The post contain hidden SEO spam, which removed on below quoted post.

List of post:
A share rejection rate of around 1.34% (9 rejected out of 670 shares) might seem high, especially if you've heard that it should be below 1%. While it’s true that many miners aim for a rejection rate below 1%, there are several factors that can influence the number of rejected shares:

    Network Configuration: Ensure that your mining software is configured correctly. Incorrect settings can lead to rejected shares. Make sure you are using the correct pool URL and port.

        Overclocking/Underclocking: If you’re overclocking your hardware, it might cause instability, leading to rejected shares. Consider dialing back the overclocking settings to see if that reduces the rejection rate.

        Hardware Issues: Sometimes, hardware issues can lead to rejected shares. Ensure that your hardware (like your Bitaxe 401 Supra) is functioning correctly and that it is properly cooled. Overheating can cause errors during mining.

        Network Latency: High latency can lead to rejected shares, especially if your miner is not receiving updates from the pool in a timely manner. Check your internet connection and consider testing from a different location or provider to see if it affects performance.

        Mining Pool Configuration: Sometimes, the mining pool itself may have settings or issues that can cause a higher rejection rate. You might want to check the pool’s status or forums for any reported issues.

        Share Difficulty: If the pool's share difficulty is set too high for your hashrate, it might result in more rejected shares. Make sure you are aware of the pool's settings and adjust if necessary.

        Software Bugs: Occasionally, the mining software you are using might have bugs or issues leading to rejected shares. Make sure you are running the latest version of your mining software.
While a rejection rate over 1% isn't ideal, it’s also not unusual, especially in the early days of mining when you’re still tuning your setup. Keep monitoring your share rejection rate over time; if it remains high, you may want to explore some of the suggestions above further.

If the issue persists, consider reaching out to the community around solo.ckpool.org or looking for forums specifically about your mining hardware for tailored advice.

1. If wrong pool URL or port is being used, the pool would report it receive no hashrate or share instead.
2. The thread never mention overclock, so suggesting to stop overclock isn't helpful. In addition, underclock generally doesn't lead to increased share rejection rate.
3. The mentioned pool (solo ckpool) have history of accepting miner with relative low hashrate. So mentioning about pool's share difficulty isn't helpful.



User: Babayan-nawu

Additional information (optional):
* I suspect this user user chatbot.

List of post:

In my recent research i have been learning about Merkle trees in blockchain, and during my study I read that it is data encrypted design used for data identification and stored all transaction data mined on the bitcoin network safely in blockchain. I also read that it helps miners identify whether transaction have been tempered with and it remove any duplicate transaction and that it has no delay when sending data across the network. They also total and stores all set of transaction in a block and produce digital fingerprint to all these transactions and allow efficient validation from user to check if it include a transaction in a block.

It clear to me from my research that Merkle trees are crucial in blockchain, but I'd like some assistance in understanding what would happen if merkle trees didn't included in the blockchain and what difficulties arise while using them. I would appreciate any corrections you may have so I may improve my research, because learning the technical aspects of bitcoin is my top goal here.


I think many answers were given but I will like add this too,Although Merkle trees make it possible to improve the performance, security and scalability of the blockchain. Without them, blockchain would face the most serious problems leading to congestion, centralization and lower rates of adoption.

I think you need to explain further why lack of merkle trees leads to congestion, centralization and lower rates adaption. After all,
1. Merkle tree doesn't determine block size limit, which means total transaction which can fit in a block doesn't change.
2. Full nodes verify whole block, where lack of merkle tree wouldn't have such major impact on verification time.
3. Average user doesn't know or care about how Bitcoin works in details.

CMIIW.


Congestion:    Without Merkle trees:   

Increased storage requirements: Hence, the block sizes would also increase since every block would need to contain all transaction information and therefore would require more storage space.

Increased transaction verification time: Every transaction within that particular block has to be verified meaning over reliance on computational resources which will take a long time, this also might lead to the network getting congested.

Slower transaction processing speed: Due to the delay in computational time, there is a reduction in the speed and number of transactions that can be conducted in a block. Thus overall decreasing the transaction throughput.

    Centralization:     Without Merkle trees:   

Growing computational requirements,Every stage of the transaction verification processes will be very complicated and thus it will favor only big mining companies having the necessary capabilities.

Greater barriers to entry,Smaller miners and nodes may find it difficult to successfully verify transactions which might result into centralization and lesser decentralization of the network.

Greater dependence on trust nodes, People may depend on centralized services or trusted nodes more than what is desirable to end up disrupting the decentralized scope of Blockchains.

    Lower adoption rates     Without Merkle trees:   

Substandard user experience,Due to delays in transaction processing and transaction verifications, when users are engaging in these activities, they are left in so much frustration.

Very limited scalability,As a result, the throughput in number of transactions would make it impossible for blockchains to achieve widespread support

Thank you for making me elaborate it more.


1. Block already contain all transaction data.
2. Full node already verify all transaction.
3. When people talk about "congestion", usually it means there are more transaction created compared with block size, not time to verify a block which currently only takes few seconds.
4. Even without markle tree, it doesn't change transaction size or block size limit. That means it won't reduce transaction throughput or theoretical TPS (Transaction per second).
5. Almost all Bitcoin miners join mining pool these days, which mean they never perform any verification.

Yes, the integrity of the wallet can be verified.

As a security feature, if you want to check the integrity of a QT wallet.dat file without initiating a transaction all steps can help you.
>>Do not sync the wallet and unlock it.
>>Check that the balances correspond to the explorer.
>>Run bitcoin-cli verifychain in order to examine the integrity of the blockchain.
>>Use bitcoin-cli getbalance to view available balance.

If these verifications are satisfactorily passed, probably the wallet.dat file is intact and the balances are ready to be utilized.

Note: Check whether the height of the blockchain of the given wallet is equal to that of the current height of the chain so that one can be sure the wallet is up-to-date.


1. bitcoin-cli getbalance might show outdated balance if you don't let Bitcoin Core sync the wallet (a.k.a. finding relevant transaction associated with the wallet).
2. Default parameter for verifychain (at least on Bitcoin Core 28.0) doesn't verify whole blockchain.



User: btcdvl

Additional information (optional):
* Some member suspect this user use chatbot.
* On thread created by this user, other member also point other of his technical non-sense.

List of post:

but I think the secp256k1 algorithm used in bitcoin is inadequate and this is a design flaw.
How exactly it's flawed or inadequate? It's still deemed secure until now and at that time, Satoshi couldn't use Schnorr Signature due to patent.

in the old days it would have been impossible. But now any password without a timestamp can be brute forced. Algorithms like Bcrypt are stronger. You can examine the range of timestamped ciphers with public hash used in cryptography.

secp256k1 (as part of ECDSA) is used to generate public key and sign transaction/message, not handling password.
legendary
Activity: 2870
Merit: 7490
Crypto Swap Exchange
User: Henkey

Additional information (optional): -

List of post:
Hello, I don't know if this is the right place here, I hope so....

 I have a wallet that contains some bitcoin mined from march 2009 june 2009 by my brother.
Since they were worthless and he had changed his laptop he left everything there....
Now I found it and tried using it with version 0.95.

My problem  is this, it seems that no mining transaction is entered into the blockchain even though as soon as I open it (before it updates the blockchain) it tells me I have X bitcoin and shows me all the mining transactions. I preface, it has not done any transfer operation.

I am attaching one of these mining transactions hoping you can tell me something, even just an idea to recover them.

Thank's





gettransaction "ef4fbf9cbca98540ea043c1a12b906af176b2d8a50f4dddfa10632e94a1bb748"
{
"amount" : 50.00000000,
"confirmations" : 437,
"generated" : true,
"blockhash" : "000000009df7cae8906f25033e7cd53fdb4fe04b338a94dfef8e6eda18649cc2",
"blockindex" : 0,
"blocktime" : 1243187650,
"txid" : "ef4fbf9cbca98540ea043c1a12b906af176b2d8a50f4dddfa10632e94a1bb748",
"walletconflicts" : [
],
"time" : 1243187650,
"timereceived" : 1243187650,
"details" : [
{
"account" : "",
"address" : "12bp69KNGPv3o5R8q1wbZBqAxtrv3GFS5P",
"category" : "generate",
"amount" : 50.00000000
}
],
"hex" : "01000000010000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000fffff fff0c02b229010a062f503253482fffffffff0100f2052a0100000023210353534d9d8cdd7255dc 4eeac1a2e68004c75520917b775b0655f15cf073703be8ac00000000"
}


It sounds like you might be dealing with "stale" blocks or unconfirmed transactions. In the early days of Bitcoin, some mined blocks didn’t get added to the main blockchain due to the lack of network participants, which may explain why you see the mined transactions but they aren’t showing up in the blockchain now.

A possible step is to try loading the wallet using the latest Bitcoin Core version and let it fully sync with the blockchain. Make sure to back up your wallet.dat file first! If the coins were mined back in 2009 and they are part of confirmed blocks, they should appear once the blockchain syncs properly.

If you're still having issues, you might want to reach out to a Bitcoin recovery service, but be cautious and ensure you're working with a trusted party.

User @Cricktor explain why it's wrong on https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--5512858.

It sounds like the issue may be related to some formatting or symbols in your CSV file rather than the words themselves. The angle brackets ("<" and ">") and asterisks ("*") aren’t part of a valid BIP39 seed phrase, which is likely causing the checksum errors. Try removing any symbols, such as brackets or asterisks, from the seed phrases and see if that resolves the issue.

If the problem persists, the words could be in the wrong order. Since BTCRecover didn’t help reorder them, it may still be worth trying different combinations manually or using tools designed to brute-force different seed orders. Make sure the seed is exactly 24 words, as BIP39 requires a specific word count for the checksum to pass. Good luck!

1. Some information he stated already mentioned by other member on https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.64629781 and https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.64629829, where it's possible he simply rephrase those posts.
2. BTCRecover definitely have feature to perform brute-force by trying all combination of 24 words on different position.



User: rionika

Additional information (optional):
* I suspect this user use chatbot.

List of post:

What is RBF (Replace-By-Fee)?
RBF (Replace-By-Fee) is a mechanism in the bitcoin network that allows you to replace an unconfirmed transaction with a new transaction with a higher commission in order to speed up its confirmation by miners.

When is it useful to use RBF?
Confirmation delay: Sometimes bitcoin transactions can take a long time to be confirmed, especially if the commission is set too low. In this case, RBF allows you to "increase" the commission by replacing the transaction with a new one with a higher commission in order to speed up its confirmation.
Market conditions analysis: You can first send a transaction with a low commission to save money, and if the network is busy, increase the commission using RBF.
How does RBF work?
You are sending a transaction with RBF capability (this feature must be activated when sending).
If the transaction is delayed and not confirmed, you create a new transaction with the same inputs and outputs, but with a higher commission.
The new transaction replaces the old one in the mempool (pool of unconfirmed transactions), and miners will prefer to process the transaction with a higher commission.
Steps for using RBF:
1. RBF support on the wallet
In order to use RBF, your crypto wallet must support this feature. Not all wallets include RBF by default.

For example, wallets such as Electrum, Samourai Wallet, and Bitcoin Core support RBF.
When sending a transaction, you need to make sure that the "replace by commission" (RBF) function is enabled.
2. Creating a transaction with RBF
When you submit a transaction, select the RBF option. This gives you the opportunity to later replace the transaction with a new one with a higher commission, if necessary.

3. Tracking unconfirmed transactions
If you see that your transaction has been hanging unconfirmed in the mempool for too long, you can decide to replace it with a higher commission. Usually, this can be seen through a wallet or a blockchain explorer.

4. Replace the transaction
There should be an option in your wallet to replace a transaction that is no longer being confirmed. The process may vary depending on the wallet:

In Electrum, simply highlight the transaction that has not been confirmed and select the "Replace-by-Fee" or "Bump Fee" option.
Specify a new, higher commission.
5. Sending a new transaction
After setting a higher commission, resend the transaction. The new transaction will replace the old one in the mempool.

Important points:
Commissions: The higher you set the RBF fee, the faster your transaction will be confirmed by the miners.
Wallet Compatibility: Make sure that your wallet and the network to which the transaction is sent support RBF.
Unconfirmed Transaction Notifications: Many wallets can notify you if your transaction is not confirmed for a long time, which can be a signal to use RBF.
Example:
You are sending a transaction with a low commission of 5 satoshi per byte.
The transaction has not been confirmed for several hours or even days.
You use RBF to increase the commission to 50 satoshi per byte, and your transaction gets into the block quickly.
How do I learn RBF?
Practice on wallets: Start by using wallets that support RBF, such as Electrum. This will help you understand how the mechanism works.
Reading the documentation: Review the documentation on using RBF for the specific wallet or client you are using.
Video Tutorials and Guides: Find tutorial videos that explain step-by-step the process of creating and replacing transactions using RBF.

1. People behind Samourai Wallet has been seized by US government. In addition, i've checked and found out it's no longer available on Google Play and F-Droid.
2. Using term "commission" rather than "TX fee" could confuse beginner and few general reader.
3. Since the posts mention Bitcoin Core, it's worth to mention the transaction doesn't have to use RBF flag since these days full RBF is enabled by many nodes and mining pools. It means, you can replace transaction which doesn't have RBF flag.

When almost everything is digital, and you're looking to mine cryptocurrency, the "pool" you're referring to is likely a mining pool—a group of miners who combine their computational resources to increase their chances of successfully mining blocks and earning rewards.

Here are a few well-known mining pools you can consider joining:
F2Pool: One of the largest and oldest mining pools, supporting a wide variety of cryptocurrencies, including Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH), and Litecoin (LTC).

Slush Pool: The world’s first Bitcoin mining pool, offering a reliable platform for mining Bitcoin and Zcash (ZEC).

AntPool: Operated by Bitmain, a major manufacturer of mining hardware, AntPool is a large pool for Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies.

SparkPool: Known for Ethereum mining, SparkPool is popular among those looking to mine Ethereum (ETH) due to its high rewards and reliable service.

Ethermine: A major mining pool for Ethereum (ETH), it provides stable payouts and supports smaller miners.

ViaBTC: A versatile mining pool that supports mining Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH), and several other coins, offering both PPS (Pay-Per-Share) and PPLNS (Pay-Per-Last-N-Shares) payout methods.

Key Points to Consider When Choosing a Mining Pool:
Fees: Mining pools usually take a percentage of the earnings (typically around 1-3%) as a fee for running the pool.
Payout Structure: Some pools offer PPS (Pay-Per-Share), where you get paid based on the work you contribute, regardless of whether a block is found, while others use PPLNS (Pay-Per-Last-N-Shares), where you get paid based on the blocks mined.
Hashrate Distribution: It’s generally better for decentralization if you choose a pool that isn’t too dominant in the mining space, to avoid centralization risks.
Coin Support: Some pools specialize in specific coins (e.g., Bitcoin, Ethereum), while others support a variety of altcoins.
Mining in a Digital World:
As you mentioned, almost everything is digital now, and the mining process itself is digital. Mining pools are essentially platforms where participants contribute computational power to increase the chances of solving complex cryptographic puzzles and earning rewards. Joining a mining pool ensures more consistent payouts, especially for smaller miners who may not have enough individual hash power to successfully mine blocks on their own.

1. These days you can't mine ETH.
2. Slush Pool has been renamed into Braiins Pool, where https://braiins.com/pool doesn't mention supporting ZEC.
member
Activity: 378
Merit: 93
Enable v2transport=1 and mempoolfullrbf=1
User: bigmanik

Additional information: User says a config edit amplifies the security of your node when the edit actually censors valid transactions and slows down the entire network.

List of posts: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--5512388

Explanation why post is technically wrong: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--5512388
legendary
Activity: 2870
Merit: 7490
Crypto Swap Exchange
User: bigmanik

Additional information (optional):
* This user accused using chatbot/AI, https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.64592547.
* Looking at https://ninjastic.space/search?author=bigmanik, some of his technical post/thread already deleted by moderator.

List of post:

Hello there, i dont know how to mine crypto BTC with ubuntu, any ideas? Thanks  Cool

Well if you want to mine crypto with Ubuntu here's what I think you should do
Firstly you'll need:
Powerful computer
High-performance graphics card
Enough RAM
Fast internet connection

Install necessary packages with `sudo apt-get update` and `sudo apt-get install openjdk-8-jre`. Choose mining software like CGMiner, EasyMiner, or MultiMiner.

Configure with your Bitcoin wallet and join a mining pool like Slush Pool or Antpool. Run CGMiner with `cgminer --pool pool-url --user username --pass password`.


I hope this was helpful

1. You can't mine Bitcoin and obtain profit using computer.
2. I don't know why he specifically mention to install openjdk-8-jre when some software he mentioned doesn't even use Java programming language. For example, https://github.com/CGMinerGit/CGMiner shows CGMiner use C programming language.

Cool

Hello, I have some spare cash with me which I want to invest in crypto. BTC is king anyway so I will need your suggestions for best way to store it for long term - cold storage preferred for investment and also some way I can spend it without using banks while I travel abroad. Please help this noob.

Thank you

Have a nice day  Roll Eyes
 
Well firstly congrats on considering investing in bitcoin
You are welcome to the Bitcoin family 😂

Well if you are considering a long-term storage there are different forms in which they can be stored
You could use a hardware wallet like a ledger or trezor
You could use an offline storage solutions like cold card and cobo
Or paper wallets
But these are cold wallets, and since you want to be able to spend your crypto while travelling
You would have to consider hot wallets because they are much more easier to access
Which are your mobile wallets the only issue is that hot wallets are not as secure as cold wallets and are prone to being hacked
You should consider going on coindesk.com for more information they really helped me alot as a beginner

1. Cobo wallet isn't offline storage solution, according to https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=cobo.wallet&hl=en-US.
2. Suggesting Ledger is reckless, mainly due to controversial Ledger Recover feature.
legendary
Activity: 2870
Merit: 7490
Crypto Swap Exchange
User JohanM (created in 2013) posted this:
You really should not try to download the entire blockchain using a HDD, it will take literally weeks.
Do it on an SSD. After that just copy the entire thing over to your HDD. You'll save weeks.
While there are many reasons to use an SSD, this isn't correct. I did this earlier this year, and it took 11 hours and 10 minutes.
For a fast IBD, you need either a fast disk, or enough RAM (or both).

I agree, it only takes weeks if you have very slow internet connection or hardware (usually with low RAM capacity or slow CPU). But considering his past post seems to be accurate, it's probably just his unusual experience.
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
User JohanM (created in 2013) posted this:
You really should not try to download the entire blockchain using a HDD, it will take literally weeks.
Do it on an SSD. After that just copy the entire thing over to your HDD. You'll save weeks.
While there are many reasons to use an SSD, this isn't correct. I did this earlier this year, and it took 11 hours and 10 minutes.
For a fast IBD, you need either a fast disk, or enough RAM (or both).
legendary
Activity: 2870
Merit: 7490
Crypto Swap Exchange
User: Yuri Samato

Additional information (optional):
* I suspect this user use chatbot. Discussion about it can be seen on https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.64512760.
* The entire thread/reply are rather long, so please visit https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/quantum-resistant-bitcoin-address-generator-5508689 or https://ninjastic.space/topic/5508689 to see full context.

List of post:

Steps to Create a Quantum-Resistant Address

1- Install Dependencies

Use Python's hashlib for hashing. Install additional libraries with:

pip install pqcrypto

The guide mention to install "pqcrypto", but never use it on the shared code.



Full Script for Generating a Quantum-Resistant-Like Address


this script demonstrates how to generate a quantum-resistant-like address using the XMSS (eXtended Merkle Signature Scheme). It illustrates key generation and address creation with quantum-safe principles, but it does not produce a standard Bitcoin address.



import hashlib
from xmss import XMSS

--snip--

The post claim to provide full script, but xmss library isn't exist PyPi. After i asked him about it, he deflect it by saying we should find or implement XMSS library, where he also claim the code is an education example. It's not educational when it uses non-existence library.

the specific xmss library I mentioned is not available on PyPI. sorry for the confusion. I shouldve clarified that you would need to use an XMSS implementation from either a cryptographic library that supports post-quantum algorithms (like oqs-python) or implement your own. I’ll update the post to reference a more accessible option for quantum-safe key generation

3. On finding an XMSS library: The code was more of an educational example to show how you could build a quantum-resistant-like address, but I understand that it’s not practical without the right library.



Even practically, generating a quantum-resistant Bitcoin address is feasible, though it requires significant effort. Quantum resistance involves using cryptographic methods that can withstand the capabilities of quantum computers. This typically requires employing advanced algorithms like hash-based signatures (e.g., XMSS) or lattice-based cryptography, which are not yet standard in current Bitcoin implementations. Developing and integrating these methods into Bitcoin's existing infrastructure involves complex technical challenges and rigorous testing to ensure they provide the same level of security and functionality as traditional cryptographic methods

1. It's simply impossible to generate quantum-resistant Bitcoin address. All types of Bitcoin address rely on ECDSA with secp256k1 curve which isn't resistant against Quantum Computer.
2. There's no point to add add quantum-resistant Bitcoin address, when it's only have same security/functionally level with traditional cryptography.
legendary
Activity: 2870
Merit: 7490
Crypto Swap Exchange
User: NTA blog

Additional information (optional):
* This use perform hidden SEO spam, by adding the SEO spam link few days after writing post. Explanation of how it works can be seen on https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.64172888.

List of post:

If you’re aiming to get really deep into Bitcoin’s tech side, I’d suggest starting with the Bitcoin Developer Documentation—it’s pretty comprehensive. I’ve also found BitcoinTalk forums really helpful for technical discussions. For a solid book, “Mastering Bitcoin” by Andreas Antonopoulos is a goldmine. Plus, online courses on Coursera or Udemy can be a great way to get structured learning.

1. Saying "Bitcoin Developer Documentation" isn't helpful, since it's vague and google search show many different and relevant reslt.
2. There's no point of mention BitcoinTalk, when he make the reply on same forum
3. There are thousands of courses of Coursera or Udemy, where some of them may be outdated by now.

I’ve always been a bit skeptical about the energy use with PoW, so mixing in forged blocks sounds like a smart way to cut down on waste while keeping the network secure. I like how miners who stop can still contribute—feels a bit more inclusive. And faster transactions? Definitely a win in my book.

This post fail to realize that liberabit's idea wouldn't reduce electricity usage where miner just use ASIC on altcoin.



Here are few example of his hidden SEO spam,



legendary
Activity: 2870
Merit: 7490
Crypto Swap Exchange
This is different from my usual report, but still fit this thread.

Today, i noticed COBRAS[1] writing 19 posts in less than 24 hours. This user writing multiple posts in a row, with long/big pyramid quote[2]. He also have habit of creating short or vague thread on technical board, such as "looking for a scrypt of GPU EC math operation". It's also worth to mention that he was a PR manager of a shady project[3] which turned out to be scam[4]. This user also received 2 negative feedback for offering shady offer about cracking Bitcoin's cryptography[5].

Due to those reasons, i'm also leaving negative feedback.

[1] https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/cobras-2795868
[2] https://web.archive.org/web/20240823085349/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5506761.20
[3] https://web.archive.org/web/20240823085756/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5414763.0
[4] https://web.archive.org/web/20240823085640/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5500014.0
[5] https://archive.ph/UvtOx
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
I can tell right away that this one at least is AI generated.
He created that long post 6 minutes after registration, and went offline right after that. It's obvious he can't type that much in 6 minutes, and indeed, it looks like chatbot diarrhea. I'm starting to think this is a flaw of the Merit system: users spam to earn Merit, and chatbots make that very easy nowadays. It looks like they use throwaway accounts: if it works, it works. If it doesn't work, go to the next one.
Chatbot spam at this level didn't exist yet when theymos created the Merit system.
legendary
Activity: 3010
Merit: 8114
I'm creating this post as reference reporting these posts to moderator.

User: Hinnenkamp

Additional information (optional): -

List of post:

BIP49 mnemonic converter is not a widely known or standardized tool, because BIP49 (Hierarchical Deterministic Wallet Generation for Segregated Witness Addresses) focuses on the generation rules of wallet addresses, not directly on the conversion of mnemonics. However, I can provide some general information and suggestions on mnemonic conversion.
...

I can tell right away that this one at least is AI generated.

Hivemoderation: 99.9% likely to contain AI Generated Text
Sapling.ai: 99.9% Fake
Copyleaks: AI Content Detected


As for the others, it is just incorrect information: not AI and not plagiarism, unless they were translated from another language.
legendary
Activity: 2870
Merit: 7490
Crypto Swap Exchange
I'm creating this post as reference reporting these posts to moderator.

User: Hinnenkamp

Additional information (optional): -

List of post:

BIP49 mnemonic converter is not a widely known or standardized tool, because BIP49 (Hierarchical Deterministic Wallet Generation for Segregated Witness Addresses) focuses on the generation rules of wallet addresses, not directly on the conversion of mnemonics. However, I can provide some general information and suggestions on mnemonic conversion.

Basic Concepts of Mnemonics

Mnemonic is a set of words used to recover private keys and addresses in a wallet address hierarchical deterministic (HD) wallet. These words are usually randomly selected from a preset word list so that users can remember and back up more easily. The BIP39 standard defines the rules for the generation, verification, and use of mnemonics, while BIP49 expands the generation rules for segregated witness addresses on this basis.

Need for mnemonic conversion

Although BIP49 does not directly involve the conversion of mnemonics, users may need to convert mnemonics for a variety of reasons, such as:

Language conversion: convert English mnemonics to other languages ​​(such as Chinese) to make them easier to remember or avoid language barriers.
Format conversion: Convert the mnemonic to a different format (such as a sequence, binary, etc.) to improve security or meet specific needs.

Conversion method

1. Language conversion:
If you need to convert English mnemonics to Chinese, you can find or create a Chinese-English mnemonic comparison table. Then, replace the English words with the corresponding Chinese words according to the comparison table. But please note that this method may not be supported by all wallets, and you need to ensure that the converted Chinese mnemonics are still valid when restoring the wallet.

Another method is to use wallet software that supports multi-language mnemonics, which usually allow users to choose the language of the mnemonics.

2. Format conversion:
Converting mnemonics to formats such as sequence or binary is usually for improved security. This can be achieved by writing a custom script or using an existing conversion tool. But please note that this conversion needs to be able to be reversed when restoring the wallet to ensure the validity of the mnemonics.

The assumption of the existence of a BIP49 mnemonic converter

Although there is no dedicated BIP49 mnemonic converter, you can use a general mnemonic conversion tool or method to meet your needs. These tools or methods may not be designed specifically for BIP49, but they can handle the basic conversion tasks of mnemonics.

Notes

When performing mnemonic conversion, be sure to ensure the security and reliability of the conversion process. Avoid using unverified conversion tools or methods.
The converted mnemonics should be kept properly and ensure that the wallet can be restored when needed.
If you have any questions or uncertainties about mnemonic conversion, please consult a professional blockchain or cryptocurrency expert.

In summary, although there is no dedicated BIP49 mnemonic converter, you can achieve the conversion needs of mnemonics through other methods. Please be careful and ensure the security and effectiveness of the conversion process.

1. Looking at https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0049.mediawiki, BIP49 isn't about mnemonic.
2. BIP 49 talks about derivation scheme for P2WPKH-P2SH from BIP-32, not BIP 39.
3. If he actually talks about BIP 39, then using language other than English isn't good idea due to less support and testing.
4. Changing mnemonic format can be seen as security by obfuscation, but using non-stadanrd format may bring complication when restoring access to the Bitcoin.



User: Bitcoin Fan Mr. A

Additional information (optional): -

List of post:
Financial activities will drive Bitcoin to continuously advance toward the technological limits of cryptocurrencies. From a financial perspective, cryptocurrencies are destined to replace paper money as the mainstream currency due to their increasingly prominent functionalities.

Taking BTC and ETH as examples, the current Ordinals protocol has expanded Bitcoin's service capabilities with inscriptions and collectible ordinal numbers, as well as names containing words. There is immense future potential for speculation in this space.

As a result, the possibility of expanding storage fees for various sats we collect is a financial consideration worth discussing.

On the other hand, ETH's development is less concerning in terms of trading volume. ETH's functionality leans more towards replacing ballots, with potential use in various elections, including U.S. elections. This means ETH will not lack trading volume to generate transaction fees, which helps balance the relationship between ETH supply and miners.

1. Replacing fiat with cryptocurrency is far more than technical problem.
2. There's no thing such as "storage fee" on Bitcoin protocol. Those who add arbitrary data only pay transaction fee, where full node (expect pruned ones) forced to store it forever.
3. The topic talks about BTC, so mentioning ETH is somewhat off-topic. And using ETH for voting is impractical, since every voter need to own ETH and let everyone know who they're voting for.



User: programmer3666

Additional information (optional): -

List of post:
I've been out of the mining game for a while and I'm considering getting back into it. I'm looking at getting a high-end desktop computer with a single powerful GPU (https://fenn.systems/build/njord-maxx/ with i9 & 4090).

Given the advancements in mining technology and the increasing difficulty of mining, is it still feasible to mine Bitcoin in 2024 with just this setup? How does this compare to miners with multiple GPUs? Are there any significant differences in profitability or efficiency?

I will suggest you explore cryptocurrencies such as Ethereum, Ergo, and Flux since they are more GPU-friendly at this present 2024 given the fact that you are considering using a high-end desktop, if that is the case I suggest an RTX 4090 because with a powerful GPU the profit in returns will be quite encouraging. Mining has become a competitive field lately, While a high-end GPU setup will look impressive enough to admire, it is very keen to align any hardware of choice with the right cryptocurrency to maximize profitability at the end of the day.

Besides one needs to be financially buoyant to acquire most of this hardware because as the year goes by things are becoming very expensive.

1. It's impossible to mine ETH with GPU, when ETH use PoS since 2022.
2. GPU mining is on decline, where ROI will take long time. For example, compare https://whattomine.com/ (current's estimation) with https://web.archive.org/web/20210104030921/https://whattomine.com/ (estimation on early 2021).

Bitcoin Client Software and Version Number: Knots 27.1
Operating System: Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
System Hardware Specs: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-9850H CPU @ 2.60GHz   2.59 GHz
Description of Problem: Tor Win32 Service returns system error 1064
Any Related Addresses: None
Any Related Transaction IDs: None
Screenshot of the problem: https://imgur.com/a/Z34rGcl
Log Files from the Bitcoin Client: https://pastebin.com/EdQCibG3

I've followed this https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Setting_up_a_Tor_hidden_service

Tor Win32 Service is not running.

I've tried this: If you don't see any LISTENING output, it means that Tor service is not working properly and this issue may be related to Windows permissions on the folder you extracted. To fix it go to where you extracted the Tor Expert Bundle and check the top folder Properties > Security > Advanced and verify if in the Permissions tab you have SERVICE with Full Control, if not click Add, click on the link Select a Secure Entity and type SERVICE (all letters in UPPERCASE) then hit enter and select Full Control (Try to start the Tor service again in Windows Services, if it doesn't work, try adding SYSTEM and LOCAL SERVICE with Full Control on folder permissions and repeat the tests above).

Still nothing. Does it matter that the extracted torExpertBundle is in C:\ and the Bitcoin Data Directory is on a HardDrive?

The torrc file says:

Appreciate all help!



Based on the screenshot and log file presented. Try checking the torrc paths

Make sure all the supposed path are absolute path not just relative paths so it can help in avoiding issues with file locations.

Also try verifying issues with file configuration just open the torrc and make sure it is well configured for instance using this command line:

Log notice file C:\path\to\tor.log
DataDirectory C:\path\to\tor\data
ControlPort 9051
SocksPort 9050


Just make sure it is your actual directory structure.

 Or You can just reinstall the tor Service by following this process
using your CMD as Admin.

Delete the existing tor service by using this command
sc delete "Tor Win32 Service"

now try to recreate the service with the correct paths using this command

sc create "Tor Win32 Service" binPath= "\"C:\path\to\tor.exe\" --nt-service -f \"C:\path\to\torrc\""


Running tor as a local system account is also a possible option but it seems you already applied it in the initial recommendation.


1. Screenshot and log shared by @felimuno doesn't mention anything about path of torrc file.
2. Command to create the service seems to be invalid, since sc.exe on Windows 10 doesn't mention --nt-service.

Code:
PS C:\Windows\system32> sc.exe create
DESCRIPTION:
        Creates a service entry in the registry and Service Database.
USAGE:
        sc create [service name] [binPath= ] ...

OPTIONS:
NOTE: The option name includes the equal sign.
      A space is required between the equal sign and the value.
 type=
       (default = own)
 start=
       (default = demand)
 error=
       (default = normal)
 binPath=
 group=
 tag=
 depend=
 obj=
       (default = LocalSystem)
 DisplayName=
 password=
legendary
Activity: 2870
Merit: 7490
Crypto Swap Exchange
What is the punishment for any user who has been severally called out here for giving false/fake information but they are unrepentant?

Nothing much. I only expect their post may be deleted if someone report it and few members leave neutral tag/feedback.
legendary
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1081
Goodnight, o_e_l_e_o 🌹
What is the punishment for any user who has been severally called out here for giving false/fake information but they are unrepentant?
legendary
Activity: 2870
Merit: 7490
Crypto Swap Exchange
He has several scam tags against him already, and posts crap like this on the tech board:
for further processing could help with password hashing farm access, text me private
The tech boards need visible Trust feedback.

Yeah, i noticed he already several tags. Bitcoin Technical Support definitely need to show trust feedback, since it may be too late when someone report the post or moderator delete the post.

Even after pointing out he's wrong, this 2018-Newbie continues posting incorrect information:
Open the wallet.dat file with a text editor
Nonsense. It is a Berkeley/DB file, not a text file
That doesn't mean you can't open it in an editor. Takuma sato is correct: if you search for "name" you'll find addresses.
It definitely means you can not open it in a text editor

Not as bad as most post mentioned in this thread. Although it's problematic he remove part of reply which state to find "name" text among gibberish text shown by text editor.
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
He has several scam tags against him already, and posts crap like this on the tech board:
for further processing could help with password hashing farm access, text me private
The tech boards need visible Trust feedback.



Even after pointing out he's wrong, this 2018-Newbie continues posting incorrect information:
Open the wallet.dat file with a text editor
Nonsense. It is a Berkeley/DB file, not a text file
That doesn't mean you can't open it in an editor. Takuma sato is correct: if you search for "name" you'll find addresses.
It definitely means you can not open it in a text editor
legendary
Activity: 2870
Merit: 7490
Crypto Swap Exchange
User: alecfisker

Additional information (optional):
* This user previously share shady/scam website, https://archive.fo/iVWtW.
* This user suspected using chatbot, https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.64405061.

List of post:

Good evening dear forum members,
I have 2 questions regarding Full Node and Electrum Server.

1) What can the owner of a full node see when I connect to his node?

2) What can the owner of an Electrum server see when I connect to his server?

Thank you very much and best regards
it depends how he will be looking at it, and what configuration on node was maid
can post more details about why such knowledge required
main difference is that electrum custodial solution, it host your wallet and have access to wallet file
stick to full node and use electrum for smaller amounts

Another user already mention wrong things with this reply.

main difference is that electrum custodial solution, it host your wallet and have access to wallet file
Electrum has access to your wallet file? What are you saying? Please don't post about something you don't have any information about.

Electrum is a non-custodial wallet. You keys are generated locally on your own device and no one has access to your wallet. Unless your device is compromised or some one has access to it, your electrum wallet would be secure.



Sorry for the late reply.

My friend did download bitcoin core and tried to attach the wallet but he said it wasn't recognised.
 He is the only person I thought new about computers but he told me after that he didn't verify the program and I think you are meant to? Would of that effected the outcome?

I have tried opening it in notepad and it comes up as two lines of Asian looking written or something foreign. 

Is it possible that wallet.dat file and crypto_key files are a android file for like a android wallet from 2010 or some type of cryptography? It's on a SD card from my late partners HTC phone.

When I attempted to do pywallet It was so hard to learn but I really had no idea what I was doing I would just copy and paste commands into the cmd to get it to do something. And it gave me back a few lines say it was encrypted and version?
And if pywallet is a scam does that mean I would have lost it if it is a bitcoin wallet?

Is walletrecoveryservices legitimate and completely trustworthy?

Thankyou I appreciate everyone's time. 

HTC wallet file will not open on windows, have to manage it from phone, open about phone dialog and check OS version name
than use tool to dump wallet data, once dump file ready it possible to copy to windows device for further processing
could help with password hashing farm access, text me private



1. HTC is name of smartphone brand, not cryptocurrency wallet.
2. There's no direct correlation between OS version/type on the HTC phone and attempting wallet recovery.



try heat up drive and check more data copy possible, than cool down and try again, in some cases it helps to have more time for reading before failure

While i've seen few people heat certain part of computer in attempt to repair, this post forget to mention it could cause more damage instead.
legendary
Activity: 2870
Merit: 7490
Crypto Swap Exchange
User: DifDrama

Additional information (optional):
* This user sometimes make posts which doesn't make sense, where some of them got deleted. Although occasionally he also made helpful post and good question.
* This user previously accused of using chatbot, https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.62530440.

List of post:

This means the transaction is verified using a Merkle tree structure without broadcasting it to the public blockchain.

This post doesn't make sense, you don't need Merkle tree structure tree to verify transaction. Although it's worth to mention SPV wallet use Merkle tree structure to verify whether certain transaction actually included in a block.



I have 2 Internet providers,
one works OK the other one says "Your IP network is currently pending review"
everything is the same nothing is changes in the local network when it is swamped with the 2 Internet providers.

It's possible that the IP address range assigned by Internet provider B is flagged by bitnodes. io or other services due to previous activity or network behavior. This could result in your network being subject to additional scrutiny or review. If so, you need to contact Internet provider B's customer support.

Another user explain why it's bad suggestion.

If so, you need to contact Internet provider B's customer support.

This has to be one the dumbest pieces of advice I've read this year. Do you really think ISP B's customer support even know what a Bitcoin node is, let alone know about bitnodes?

Most likely the customers of this ISP have their computers infected and being used for DDoS attacks. This is the only way I think could trigger a residential ISP's addresses to be reviewed for malicious activity.



SegWit transactions enhance the security of the Bitcoin network by enforcing signature checks before any other checks.  This prevents certain types of attacks and makes the network more resistant to vulnerabilities that exploit transaction malleability. Besides, SegWit's introduction was a soft fork, meaning that it did not require a majority consensus of miners to activate.  This made the upgrade process smoother and allowed for a more gradual transition.
And here is a link for beginner to learn Segwit, hope it will be helpful.
https://blockgeeks.com/guides/what-is-segwit/



Another user made correction.

SegWit transactions enhance the security of the Bitcoin network by enforcing signature checks before any other checks.  This prevents certain types of attacks and makes the network more resistant to vulnerabilities that exploit transaction malleability. Besides, SegWit's introduction was a soft fork, meaning that it did not require a majority consensus of miners to activate.  This made the upgrade process smoother and allowed for a more gradual transition.
And here is a link for beginner to learn Segwit, hope it will be helpful.
https://blockgeeks.com/guides/what-is-segwit/
The transaction malleability wasn't due to the failure of checking for signatures, but it segregated the signature from the actual transaction itself. This prevents the signature from being modified and thus being malleable.

It was anything but smooth. It was totally unnecessary for it to be dragged on for longer than it did. Segwit's activation requires miners to signal support for it as well and it definitely required a super majority of the miners to signal support for it to be activated. In fact, most if not all soft forks work in this manner. USAF was not materialized and it was definitely not activated by user signalling. Any forks should have consensus and majority support.

List of deleted posts which quoted by other member with corrections:

It's worth noting that intentionally creating many low-fee or feeless transactions can contribute to network congestion and may be seen as spam behavior, which is generally discouraged by the Bitcoin community.  As such, it's essential to use the Bitcoin network responsibly and pay appropriate fees for your transactions based on the current network conditions.
It doesn't congest the network in any meaningful way. If you attempt to broadcast a transaction with zero fee or a fee below the dynamic lower limit set by individual node's mempool settings, then nodes will simply not relay that transaction. Repeatedly try to do this, and nodes will simply blacklist your IP and ignore you.

Attempting to create a fake transaction without paying any fees and without it ever getting confirmed is not a practical scenario on the Bitcoin blockchain.

Correct. If the input is invalid, then the transaction is invalid and it will be rejected by EVERY node on the network.

While you might be able to create such a transaction and broadcast it,

Broadcast it to whom? Bitcoin nodes will simply reject it.

the likelihood of it being confirmed is close to zero.

It is exactly zero.  Invalid transacitons can not be confirmed.

Instead, it will likely remain in the mempool (the pool of unconfirmed transactions) until it eventually gets removed by nodes after some time.

No. That is incorrect. Fake, invalid, transactions never get into the mempool in the first place.  A transaction is verified BEFORE it is accepted into the mempool.

Further more, deliberately creating invalid or fake transactions . . . -snip- . . . may be against the terms of service of some wallets and exchanges.

How would a wallet or an exchange know that you created a fake transaction? Why would they care?

If you send Bitcoin to the address derived from this invalid private key (1NLqpZnW746xjdAgnrTb56V4uZJiV4jjrU), the funds will be associated with that address.  However, since the private key is not valid, you won't be able to sign transactions to spend or transfer those funds.  In essence, the funds sent to that address would be irrecoverable.

Am I right?

That string you listed is an address, not a private key. And also, its private key is not invalid. Even if the hex number is out of range it is converted into a valid private key by using modulo, as others here have pointed out (unless the number is 0 or a multiple of n). So no. Anybody will be able to retrieve any bitcoins sent to this address.
legendary
Activity: 2870
Merit: 7490
Crypto Swap Exchange
User: obtainhigh

--snip--

I've reported all of his thread on technical board, but few of them still have "Unhandled" status. So i create this post explaining why those thread also contain false/fake/unhelpful information.


### **Top Bitcoin Mining Pools: Join the Best in 2024** ###

Explore the Leading Bitcoin Mining Pools and Enhance Your Mining Experience!



Leading Mining Pools of 2024:

1. F2Pool: F2Pool, also known as Discus Fish, is one of the earliest and most reputable mining pools, with a significant global presence. It supports a wide range of cryptocurrencies and employs a PPS+ payout scheme, offering a 3% bonus as a loyalty reward. The pool has a 2.5% fee and is known for its user-friendly interface and robust support. Learn more about F2Pool here.

2. Poolin: Poolin is celebrated for its innovation and competitive services. It offers various payout mechanisms and has a strong focus on security and reliability. With a user-friendly interface and support for multiple cryptocurrencies, Poolin is a preferred choice for many miners. Discover Poolin’s benefits here.

3. Antpool: Operated by Bitmain, Antpool is one of the most well-known mining pools. It provides stability, reliability, and supports various payout methods. Antpool’s detailed statistics help miners track performance effectively. Read about Antpool here.



Emerging Trends in Bitcoin Mining Pools:

1. Green Mining Initiatives: Environmental concerns are driving some mining pools to adopt eco-friendly practices. Pools that prioritize renewable energy sources and energy-efficient mining hardware are becoming more popular among environmentally conscious miners. More on green mining initiatives.

2. Decentralized Mining Pools: Decentralized mining pools aim to distribute control and rewards more evenly among participants, addressing concerns related to centralization. These pools offer a more democratic approach to Bitcoin mining. Details on decentralized pools.

3. Integration of Advanced Technologies: Advanced technologies like AI and Machine Learning are being integrated into mining pools to optimize operations, enhance efficiency, and increase profitability. These innovations are set to revolutionize the mining industry. Learn about technology integration here.



Choosing the Right Mining Pool:

1. Pool Hashrate: The hashrate indicates a pool’s computational power. Higher hashrates generally lead to more frequent block discoveries and consistent payouts. Consider the hashrate and how it aligns with your mining goals. Understand hashrate importance.

2. Payout Structure: Different pools use various payout structures, such as PPS, FPPS, and PPLNS. Choose one that aligns with your risk tolerance and preferences to maximize your rewards. Explore payout structures here.

3. Fees: Fees can significantly impact your overall earnings. Ensure you understand the fee structure and choose a pool with reasonable fees. Check fee structures here.



Join the Mining Pool Discussion!

We invite miners, experts, and enthusiasts to share their experiences, ask questions, and stay updated with the latest trends and innovations in Bitcoin mining pools. Your insights and discussions are highly valued!



Obtain --SNIP--


1. He doesn't mention criteria of choosing leading or top mining pools.
2. ALL link mentioned that thread are invalid, where all website show error message such as "Error 404!".
3. According to https://f2pool.io/mining/support/#fees-and-thresholds, F2Pool have fee 4% for FPPS and 2% for PPLNS. So claim on 2.5% is wrong.
4. There's no trend about decentralized Bitcoin mining pool, when P2pool and other similar pool no longer developed.

### Latest Bitcoin Mining Hardware: Top Picks and Innovations for July 2024 ###



Discover the Best Hardware for Bitcoin Mining in 2024!

Stay Ahead with Cutting-Edge Mining Equipment



Top Bitcoin Mining Hardware of 2024:

1. Bitmain Antminer S21 200T: Known for its efficiency, the Bitmain Antminer S21 200T boasts a hash rate of 200 TH/s with an energy consumption of 3500W. This miner is ideal for those looking to maximize their output with lower electricity costs, making it a popular choice for both small and large-scale mining operations. Learn more here.

2. MicroBT WhatsMiner M56S: Launched in 2023, the WhatsMiner M56S is designed for both home and industrial use. With a hash rate of 212 TH/s and a power consumption of 5550W, it offers a balanced approach to performance and efficiency. More details on WhatsMiner M56S.

3. Bitmain Antminer S19 XP Hydro: With its water-cooled system, the Antminer S19 XP Hydro is both powerful and quiet. It provides a hash rate of 255 TH/s with an energy consumption of 5304W, making it one of the most efficient miners on the market. Discover the Antminer S19 XP Hydro.



Choosing the Right Mining Hardware:

1. Evaluate Your Needs: Depending on whether you're mining at home or in an industrial setting, your hardware needs will differ. High hash rate miners like the Antminer S21 are suited for industrial use, while models like the WhatsMiner M56S offer versatility for various environments.

2. Consider Power Consumption: Efficiency is key in mining. The lower the joules per terahash (J/TH), the better. For instance, the Antminer S19 XP Hydro's efficiency at 0.021 J/GH makes it a strong contender for those looking to minimize energy costs.



Upcoming Trends in Mining Hardware:

1. Hydro Cooling Systems: As seen in models like the Antminer S19 XP Hydro, hydro cooling is becoming a preferred method to reduce noise and improve cooling efficiency. This technology is likely to be integrated into more models moving forward.

2. Enhanced Security Features: Newer mining hardware is incorporating advanced security measures to protect against theft and ensure operational integrity. Strategic partnerships and secure data centers, as seen with ECOS's mining hosting services, are setting new standards.



Join the Hardware Discussion!

We invite miners, experts, and enthusiasts to share their insights, ask questions, and stay updated with the latest hardware developments in the Bitcoin mining ecosystem. Your contributions are highly valued!



Obtain --SNIP--


1. Looking at https://www.asicminervalue.com/efficiency/sha-256, Antminer S19 XP Hydro and WhatsMiner M56S are far from most efficient SHA-256 ASIC.
2. ALL link mentioned that thread are invalid, where all website show error message such as "Error 404!".
3. Recommendation on "Choosing the Right Mining Hardware:" is harmful due to the 1st point.

Analyzing Bitcoin Mining Speculation: Trends and Insights


Current Trends in Bitcoin Mining Speculation

Exploring Market Dynamics and Predictions for Bitcoin Mining



Notable Factors Influencing Bitcoin Mining Speculation:

1. Impact of the Mt. Gox Repayments: The upcoming distribution of Bitcoin to Mt. Gox creditors is expected to introduce significant market fluctuations. Approximately 140,000 BTC will be released, potentially increasing selling pressure. However, experts predict that fewer coins will be distributed than anticipated, which might mitigate the expected market impact. Read more here.

2. Bitcoin Halving 2024 Predictions: The next Bitcoin halving event is projected to significantly influence mining profitability by reducing rewards and emphasizing transaction fees. Historical patterns suggest a pre-halving surge in prices, followed by a post-halving dip and eventual recovery. This cyclical behavior attracts both speculators and long-term investors. Learn more about Bitcoin halving.

3. Regulatory Developments: Recent regulatory updates in major economies are reshaping the Bitcoin mining landscape. Enhanced clarity and compliance requirements are fostering a more stable and transparent environment for miners, potentially impacting speculative activities. Discover the regulatory impact.



Speculative Opportunities and Risks:

1. Technological Innovations: Advances in mining hardware, such as the development of more efficient ASIC rigs, are crucial for maintaining profitability. Miners investing in cutting-edge technology are likely to gain a competitive edge, influencing speculative strategies. Read about the latest hardware developments.

2. Market Volatility: The inherent volatility of Bitcoin prices creates both opportunities and risks for miners. Understanding and predicting price movements, especially around significant events like the Mt. Gox repayments and halving, is essential for speculative success. Learn more about market volatility.



Join the Discussion on Bitcoin Mining Speculation!

We invite miners, investors, and enthusiasts to share their insights, ask questions, and stay updated with the latest trends and developments in Bitcoin mining speculation. Your contributions are highly valued!



Obtain --SNIP--


1. There's no strong correlation between Mt. Gox repayments and Bitcoin mining.
2. ALL link mentioned that thread are invalid, where all website show error message such as "Error 404!".
3. Halving already happened few months ago, so statement "The next Bitcoin halving event.." are wrong.
Pages:
Jump to: