Topic: Using the trust system for personal Vendetta (Read 1324 times)

1. You didnt debunk or even try tefute any point I made regarding icopress
2. You're a proven scammer protector.
3. Lol at no red trust from current DT. That probably means you're dirty. Which you are.

Lol at the pharmacist i can see he is still opening his moronic gob.
That non achieving retard keep talking as if his opinion has any credibility.  

I don't mind the forum-leaving drama if the member actually leaves the forum for good.  It's when you get turds like cryptohunter saying oh, fare-thee-well you crotchety cocksuckers and then return with one of more alt accounts within a month, that's what grinds my dingus.

So if WhiteManWhite is gone, that's cool...just as long as he's gone.

Oh yeah, I think the tape has been on loop for the last few years or so.  It's funny sometimes how plagiarists call attention to their own misdoings by making a stink about some other member's plagiaristic tendencies because of some personal grudge.  That's a comedy I don't mind seeing a few times.

Observers is mispelt by you.


Which is why you felt compelled to comment on it.


Likewise I am sure.


Without proof, we'll never know.


And yet I have no negative trust feedback from any DT1 or DT2.  Yet you do.  (pokes out tongue)


I'm being paid to post the posts I would have posted any way, how cool is that (especially given there is no editorial control over my posts...)


Stick and stones...


Without proof, it's only the voices in your head telling you that.


Oh come come - your rant is against me, surely you can focus on one shiny thing at a time?


I've added BBCode to your list (such as it is) given you don't seem to know how to do such things.

---

---

I'll wager BTC 0.0001 you can't make it to Legendary.

I think objective obaervers can see you're a pathetic drooling imbecile ready to suck up to anyone that will support you on DT.
Your judgement is literally meaningless. So shut up about it as if it is some piece of important and weighty data that needs to be given serious consideration. Lol

You're clearly deranged or a serious drug user.

You are one of the dumbest and least successful legends here. Still begging and spamming around on a 3rd rate sig.
What a loser. And a scammer protector.

I have clearly demonstrated that

1. Icopress uses the trust system as a tool for personal retribution
2. Icopress has given red trust for personal retribution on weaker and less appropriate evidence than he is crying he received it.
3. Icopress is a cry baby bitch who wants to be treated way better than he treats others.
4. Icopress is clearly trying to pass art off as his own that is the work of others.
5. Icopress appeared from WHERE? Never heard of this loud mouth twat attention seeker before lauda and tman started vanishing.
6. Icopress seems to be getting the nullius protection racket text wall defense treatment that lauda did.

Oh no... what should we do now? So after he tried to go over mprep and reach theymos, he got so disappointed by theymos which did not reply to him and, as a consequence for the forum itself not helping him prove that he overreacted toward icopress, he left the forum. Whata loss! From now on things will never be the same, heh? Oh well, farewell WhiteManWhite! May your life take you only on routes where you hold the absolute truth and nobody will ever dare to say you are wrong!

I don't really see that as being that big an issue - reaching out to others for help and tho obtain their opinions...

It'd be like setting up a group of people in a conglomerate ... or a guild even.

I haven't just arbitrarily taken heavy handed action, rather I've opened the discussion up further.

Thoughts anyone?

That would be an quite unpleasant move even after knowing icopress has motives of mobbing around by sending PMs to veteran members here.

Nah... forum-leaving dramas are fashionable these days. Plagiarising user red trusting others for alleged plagiarism is also a movie we've seen before I think.

I've been considering DT distrusting whitemanwhite (and in turn DT trusting icopress - despite the fact it would disadvantage me due to both of their trust/distrust lists opposite to mine) - I won't have any hesitation to do so if whitemanwhite comes back and doubles down on their actions.

What a shame ! 

That's a plot twist
This post translated:

WhiteManWhite has left the forum. Therefore, I think no vendetta and continuation of the story should be expected.
The reviews that you left for each other will remain unchanged.
In any case, whoever becomes a DT should be very careful and competent in leaving feedback.
There are many rules, and I often file complaints about plagiarism, but all decisions in any case remain with the moderators. Leaving red trusts to everyone indiscriminately is an indicator of intemperance.
And I would like to advise icopress to become independent and stop relying on “people I respect”. You very often put emphasis, underline the words "Dear users", it looks like sycophant on your part . It's time to build trust, not with personal messages, but in plain sight.

suchmoon has a long way to go...

---

---

Back to the real issue at hand. (wanky <-> hand - get it... ??   )

I'll be watching closely to see who else whitemanwhite retaliatory distrusts:

That's literally the opposite of what I said but don't let your reading disability get in the way of an opportunity to bitch some more.

Come on, you don't know VOD ? "Call Of Gang". As icopress is a pussy licker its acceptable from people with that mentality to be a coward.


This is a clear view of what's going around and how prominent users are becoming experts in pulling out plagiarism rules all over.

IcoPress is an trust and flag abuser and can't be trusted due to his biased judgements and motives of manipulating DT.

Is suchmoon insisting *all* users on the forum attribute *all* images they use and equally DT distrusting *all* users of the Forum when they don't?

Thanks for your reply, you have a good viewing angle.

But all people, it seems to me, subconsciously perceive others, through the prism of their own personality and their thinking, (and I am no exception). So I logically assumed that the reader can understand that these quoted headings are interrelated and have subordinate text. Anyway, I think the question has run its course, as the incorrect citation form has been corrected (although I'll probably go over the post history again).

As for the images, it seemed to me that everything is obvious here, given that these are fairly well-known images from different parts of the world. Not to mention that it was all posted on the "Wall Observer". And you pointed out correctly ... that I pointed out that this is a collection of images from my blog (all three parts are positioned as a single whole, and also include not only photographs of Dietmar.). And the blog is listed as the source from where these photos were mainly imported (some remained).

Sometimes suchmoon is the second most sensible poster on a thread I contribute to.
This is of course a rare instance of clear sighted appraisal by her.

I agree this is a deliberate calculated and cunning attempt to claim these pieces of art are you own and for no other reason than to gain unwarranted kudos. It's not like you were going hell for leather fighting armies of colluding scammers and using evidence someone made to support your claims and forgot to reference it on some occasions and not others and gaining a 2 000 000 000 usd equiv air drop for the entire forum. That was apparently reason for a ban lol  NOT.
Laudas sneaky grafting others words inside her own paragraphs on multiple occasions and then punishing others for way way way less intentional copy and paste is worse than icopress but you should be watched closely.
"Those that are faithful in little things " ...

You are just simply wishing to look cool posting others art hoping they will believe you're the original source.
Then complain about a red tag for that when giving out red tags for totally bogus reasons.
I have no idea where you sprung from anyway noob trash. At just the time some other trust abusing scammer plagiarist leaves.
Icopress who speaks English with the same condescending shady tones as conniving cat. Both of who's plagiarism is gladly defended by the notorious plagiarism hater ..err I mean hypocrite nullius.

Accept your red tag icopress because by your own standards you clearly deserve to have it  
Sneaky little cry baby turd.

You use the trust system for personal vendettas based on way way less ... actually nothing that would hold up to scrutiny at all.
Live by your own standards

I don't think it's bad enough for you to have a ban. However you give red tags for nothing so stop crying when you get one for being sneaky and greedy. Make your own art in future.

That's a really evasive way of saying that you went out of your way to hide the source behind a tiny number so that you could both pretend it's your content, and have plausible deniability if plagiarism is suspected.

Same thing with the images - even though it's correct that this is not plagiarism / not against the rules - saying that you took the images from your own blog (unprompted BTW) implies ownership more strongly than if you said nothing.

I don't understand why you need to do that. Your posts would have the same value if you fully attributed the source and didn't try to hide it.

Actually, I myself had missed something which I discovered just a few minutes ago, when for the first time ever, I reported a WO post to the forum moderators:


See for yourself.  Click the “Report to moderator” link on any post in the Wall Observer.  Obviously, you would see the same message if you tried to report icopress’ posts.

So, yes, there are officially “Special Wall Observer rules” in bright red letters.  (What those rules are is another matter.)