Topic: Using the trust system for personal Vendetta - page 3. (Read 1306 times)

I have to apologize? Man, LOL )
You should apologize and all those who will write nonsense to my trust. This is crazy manipulation, without waiting for the decision of the forum administration.

Same, I will respond properly tomorrow. I haven’t forgotten bro.

Interpretation of facts / I did not claim that you edited the post, I said that you added a clarification, (this implied another post). I recommend that you read this thread carefully and this one (post 1992, 1994 and 1995). After that, you should apologize, then I will consider the incident settled.

Fixed: Additions to baseless insults added after 24 hours.

best regards
icopress

A lie once again, edit was not about this phrase. And this is my personal opinion about you based on your actions on this forum. Am I entitled to that opinion of you?

I quote / you added this clarification an hour later, which does not change the essence. You allow yourself to publish groundless insults for no reason.

But we will return to this conversation later 

Dude! You're also a liar or an inattentive person Clearly highlighted in red that I meant you.

Then you should know how to deal with "feedback issues".

Appeal to the user; if it fails as in most cases see next step
Ask yourself are they on DT? If yes, appeal to whoever has them included giving providing them a DT position
If that fails then maybe the feedback is warranted.

In this case it's pretty easy, this is not what the trust system is intended for so I don't see them getting into or remaining on DT.
Correct. Images where discussed when the first wave of autobans hit the forum for plagiarism. I can't remember where it was stated but images were definitely excluded from the "plagiarism" category on forum.

---

That's concerning.

What makes you sure it is a personal vendetta?

You yourself appear to have left me a red tag after I commented on your shitty awards thread? Was that a vendetta??

I mean you have no reference for the red trust you left on my account?. The reason is less sensible than whitemanwhites and yours is entirely stupid. People have me on ignore= redtag?
Fuck off you pathetic crying plagiarist weasel.

Now crying when others point out you are guilty of using others work without their permission
Did they make those images for your use? To support something you said? How many different occasions with different images ?
I wonder if you are now editing a ton of posts??



Even so, as you enjoy using the trust system for whatever you like which has nothing to do with scamming or financially motivated wrongdoing then so can anyone else ?

Or are the rules for others and not yourself? Or rather the lack of rules.

Looking through your post history you look to be a plausible alt lauda.
Stop whining about your specific gripes with red trust and start to realize that you're guilty of worse that what you're accusing others of..

If he wants to red tag you for anything he can.
If a member can be tagged by a DT scammer for presenting evidence of their scamming then there are no rules.

It is quite simple his tag would be 1000x more credible and valid than your own.

Got your message to reply here, OP, and I will.  Give me a few hours.

I'll quote my post here:

A couple of things here:

• Red trust for plagiarism is probably unnecessary unless it involves something else that is scammy - e.g. shitbumping scams with plagiarized content. Plagiarism should be reported to moderators.
• You have more examples of plagiarism in your post history than just the ones pointed out by WhiteManWhite. Indirect references through your blog may not be enough. If a moderator can't see the reference in your post - you'll get into trouble sooner or later.